# data[].attributes.headline
Leadership challenge (Team prep. time - 15 min., presentation - 5 min.)

# data[].attributes.subject
Leadership challenge (Team prep. time - 15 min., presentation - 5 min.)

# data[].attributes.body
Sample of a hypothetical scenario in session 1.

As a district president role

Situation: Many students in your district struggle with transportation to school. Some live far away and have no school bus service, while others face unsafe conditions when walking or biking. As the district president, how would you solve the issue of safe and accessible transportation for all students?

Possible debate angles:

Should the government provide free school buses for all students, or should families be responsible for transportation?

Should the district invest in better sidewalks and bike lanes to encourage walking and cycling?

# data[].attributes.headline
Solution 1. Government-Funded School Bus System:

# data[].attributes.subject
Solution 1. Government-Funded School Bus System:

# data[].attributes.body
Provide free or subsidized school buses to all students, ensuring safe and reliable transportation, especially for those in remote areas.

Reduce traffic congestion and pollution by minimizing individual car drop-offs.

# data[].attributes.headline
Improved Infrastructure for Walking and Cycling:

# data[].attributes.subject
Improved Infrastructure for Walking and Cycling:

# data[].attributes.body
Build and maintain well-lit sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and protected bike lanes to promote safe commuting.

Implement a school-led walking or biking program with adult supervision for added security.

# data[].attributes.headline
Solution 3. Public-Private Partnership for Transport:

# data[].attributes.subject
Solution 3. Public-Private Partnership for Transport:

# data[].attributes.body
Collaborate with local transportation companies to offer discounted student passes for public buses and trains.

Introduce school ride-sharing programs to encourage carpooling among parents and guardians.

# data[].attributes.headline
TOPIC 1: Should influencers (KOL- Key Opinion Leaders) be held legally responsible for advice they give online?

# data[].attributes.subject
TOPIC 1: Should influencers (KOL- Key Opinion Leaders) be held legally responsible for advice they give online?

# data[].attributes.body
INTRODUCTION - FIONA

AFFIRMATIVE:

1. Famous people should be responsible like professionals. Influencers have huge audiences and their advice can directly impact people's lives, affect their health and mental health

Example: .........................................................

2. HAI

Misinformation- influencers have a lot of power, some influencers promote fake news, unverified medical advice, or dangerous trends. Fact: The "Tide Pod Challenge" encouraged by viral content led to hundreds of poisoning cases among teenagers.

3. ANGELA

Famous people should be good role models -They Influence Young Minds

Many children and teenagers look up to celebrities and try to copy their behavior.

MAX

Closing - Famous people, especially influencers, have a powerful impact on society—their words and actions reach millions, shaping opinions, choices, and behaviors. Because of this influence, they should be held to the same level of responsibility as professionals. Whether it’s sharing advice that affects health (#1), spreading misinformation (#2), or setting an example for young people (#3), their role comes with real responsibility. Being famous isn’t just about popularity—it’s about being aware of the influence you have and using it wisely.

NEGATIVE:

1. FIONA Freedom of Speech

Influencers Aren’t Experts

They are not legally qualified like doctors or financial advisors.

It is the audience’s responsibility to verify information before acting on it.

Example ................................................................

2. HAI

Influencers Cannot Control People's Actions -

While influencers have a strong impact on their followers, they cannot directly control how people act. Their role is to share opinions, advice, and experiences, but ultimately, it is up to individuals to make their own choices.

Example ...............................................................

3. Holding influencers legally responsible could violate free speech and limit creativity.

People should have personal responsibility for the choices they make.

Example ...............................................................

Ex:

1.Hằng Du Mục

2.Yona cươn

3...

# data[].attributes.headline
TOPIC 2: Is AI making young people too dependent on technology?

# data[].attributes.subject
TOPIC 2: Is AI making young people too dependent on technology?

# data[].attributes.body
AFFIRMATIVE: Yes, AI is making young people too dependent on technology

Speaker 1 - FIONA

INTRODUCTION: AFFIRMATIVE

​In today's digital world, artificial intelligence (AI) is a big part of young people's lives, helping them learn, chat, and make choices. But, there's a worry that using AI too much might make them depend too much on technology for some reasons. The 1st reason is:

AI reduces Critical Thinking – AI tools like ChatGPT or search engines provide instant answers, making it less likely for young people to analyze information critically. Students may rely on AI instead of fully understanding the subject.

Example: ............................................................

Speaker 2 - HAI

AI evolves lazyness

Example: ............................................................

Speaker 3 - ANGELA

AI decreases Patience - people become impatient when they need some ideas, they don't want to use critical thinking, they can not focus on long-term learning. They are just procrastinating their time - when you chill, and do not do anything till the deadline, and you know AI will do everything for you

Example - .............................................................................

Closing AFFIRMATIVE - MAX

AI has made life easier, but its overuse is creating a generation that struggles with critical thinking, creativity, and patience. Instead of analyzing problems, young people often depend on instant answers. AI also limits our ability to think independently and develop new ideas, as it reduces personal creativity. Additionally, the habit of getting quick solutions weakens patience. If we don’t find a balance, AI may do more harm than good in shaping the minds of the future.

NEGATIVE: No, AI is just a tool, not a dependency

Speaker 1 - FIONA

INTRODUCTION NEGATIVE:

We think that AI AI is just a tool, not a dependency for some reasons. Reason 1 is that it supports Personalized Learning - it can adapt any information for your needs and create your own individual learning styles, you just need to use it wisely. It will make learning more engaging and accessible for students of all levels.

Example - if a person doesn't know how to start to learn English AI can create a plan, find resourses and give you tips what to do first.

Speaker 2 - HAI

It helps to learn at home, when you don't understand in a class - ....................

Example: ............................................................

Speaker 3 - ANGELA

AI prepares for the Future – The modern world relies on AI, and learning how to use it effectively is a necessary skill rather than a dependency.

Example: Many companies now use AI in fields like healthcare, marketing, finance, and even art. For instance, doctors use AI to help analyze X-rays more quickly and accurately, and marketers use AI to study customer behavior. If students learn how to use AI tools now—like data analysis programs or content generators—they’ll be better prepared for future jobs that rely on these technologies.

Closing NEGATIVE - MAX

AI is not making young people too dependent—it’s actually helping them grow smarter and more prepared. It offers personalized learning that matches each student’s needs and pace, and it’s especially helpful when someone doesn’t understand something in class and wants to learn again at home. Most importantly, learning to use AI now is a smart step toward getting ready for the future, where technology will be part of almost every job. When used wisely, AI is not a problem—it’s a powerful partner in education.

# data[].attributes.headline
TOPIC 3: Is success solely defined by societal standards such as wealth and status?

# data[].attributes.subject
TOPIC 3: Is success solely defined by societal standards such as wealth and status?

# data[].attributes.body
useful idiom - "people from all walks of life" (People of many different ethnicities and socioeconomic classes.)

INTRODUCTION: In today’s world, success is mostly judged by money, job position, and social status. People who earn a high salary, live in big houses, and have powerful jobs are seen as successful. From a young age, society teaches us to work hard for financial security and recognition.

AFFIRMATIVE: FIONA

Social Media makes people believe that successful people are those with lots of money, fame, or power. Movies, ads, influencers often shapes how people, especially young ones, define success.

Example 1: ..............................................................

HAI Public Recognition and Respect

Example 2: A politician who reaches a high-ranking position, such as a president or prime minister, is seen as successful because they have status and influence.

Rebuttal: Holding a powerful position doesn’t always mean success. Some politicians face immense criticism, scandals, or corruption, leading to dissatisfaction and even disgrace. A local activist making a real impact in their community might be more successful in terms of meaningful contribution.

ANGELA

Visible Achievements Matter – Expensive cars, big houses, and luxury lifestyles are widely seen as signs of success. These are material things that society values and rewards.

INTRODUCTION: NEGATIVE

Success is NOT just money and social status. While society often measures success by wealth, job titles, and fame, true success can also come from happiness, personal growth, and meaningful relationships. Many people who are not rich or famous still feel fulfilled because they follow their passions, help others, or achieve personal goals. If success were only about wealth, then teachers, artists, and volunteers—who make a big difference in the world—would not be considered successful. But in reality, success is different for everyone and is not just about what society values.

NEGATIVE:

Success is not only about wealth and status; it is subjective and personal. FIONA

Example 1: A teacher who dedicates their life to educating students and finds fulfillment in shaping young minds may see themselves as successful, even without great wealth.

Rebuttal: While fulfillment is important, financial security also matters. A teacher may feel successful, but if they struggle to pay bills, their success could be limited in practical terms. A mix of personal satisfaction and financial stability might be an ideal balance.

Example 2: A person who prioritizes work-life balance, spending quality time with their family, and maintaining happiness is successful in their own way, regardless of financial status.

Rebuttal: While happiness is crucial, some people might argue that professional achievements also contribute to success. If someone chooses only personal happiness but struggles to provide for their family, society may not view them as entirely successful.

Example 3: An artist who follows their passion and creates meaningful work, even if they are not rich or famous, can feel accomplished and successful in their field.

Rebuttal: Passion is important, but financial stability can’t be ignored. If an artist can’t sell their work and struggles to survive, their success might be questioned. True success could be when passion meets sustainability.

# data[].attributes.headline
TOPIC 4: Should gender-specific roles and expectations be abolished in society?

# data[].attributes.subject
TOPIC 4: Should gender-specific roles and expectations be abolished in society?

# data[].attributes.body
Abolish - eliminate, liquidate, cancel, remove, wipe out

INTRODUCTION - Gender roles limit individual freedom and don't give us equal opportunities. When society expects people to act in a certain way based on their gender, it restricts their ability to get true passions, interests, and careers. These roles often lead to harmful stereotypes and discrimination.

AFFIRMATIVE: Gender-Specific Roles and Expectations SHOULD Be Abolished

Speaker 1-Fiona

1. Gender Roles Limit Individual Freedom

Assigning roles based on gender restricts people’s choices and forces them into societal pressure expectations.

People should be free to choose careers, interests, and lifestyles without being pressured by traditional roles.

It limit the male and female's

dreams,opinions,hobbies

Ex: My cousin's family limit her study and job,she just does the housework and can not have a real career.

🔄 Rebuttal: Gender roles are not always restrictive—some people find comfort in traditional roles, and eliminating them entirely could ignore personal preferences rather than promote freedom.

2. Gender roles perpetuate workplace discrimination.

Stereotypes about “male” and “female” jobs contribute to wage gaps and fewer opportunities for certain genders.

If gender roles were abolished, people would be judged on skills and qualifications, not gender.

🔄 Rebuttal: Even in societies with fewer gender expectations, career choices still differ—many women still choose caregiving roles, and many men choose physical labor. The problem is not just societal pressure but also natural preference.

SPEAKER 3 ANGELA

3. Gender Roles limit our Self-expression

Encouraging boys to be tough and girls to be weak can limit emotional growth and self-expression. If people can not express themselves, they can even become mentally and phisically sick, according to the scientists limiting self-expression affects our health badly.

🔄 Rebuttal: Some gender expectations exist for biological reasons—such as maternity leave for women. Instead of abolishing roles entirely, society can adapt them to be fairer rather than removing them altogether.

Stereotypes about “male” and “female” jobs contribute to wage gaps and fewer opportunities for certain genders.

If gender roles were abolished, people would be judged on skills and qualifications, not gender.

🔄 Rebuttal: Even in societies with fewer gender expectations, career choices still differ—many women still choose caregiving roles, and many men choose physical labor. The problem is not just societal pressure but also natural preference.

4 Gender Roles Are Outdated in a Modern Society

Historically, roles were based on physical labor and survival needs, but modern technology and social progress have made many traditional roles unnecessary.

Abolishing gender roles would allow people to thrive based on talent and interest rather than outdated norms.

🔄 Rebuttal: While society has evolved, many people still value gender roles for cultural and personal reasons. Abolishing them entirely might be unrealistic or unnecessary—modifying them could be a better approach.

NEGATIVE: Gender-Specific Roles and Expectations Should NOT Be Abolished

INTRODUCTION. FIONA

Gender roles and expectations have been create societal structures, reflecting natural differences between men and women. These roles have been a shape of our though,opinon,...

1. Gender Roles Provide Stability and Structure

Traditional roles help organize families and societies, creating clear expectations for responsibilities.

Many cultures value gender roles as part of their identity and heritage,

2. HAI

Gender Roles Reflect Natural Differences

Men and women have biological and psychological differences that influence their roles in society.

Gender roles are not always imposed—many emerge naturally based on strengths and preferences.

🔄 Rebuttal: While biology plays a role, it does not justify forcing specific roles on individuals. Many differences between men and women are cultural rather than natural, meaning they can be changed.

SPEAKER 3 ANGELA.

Some People Prefer Traditional Gender Roles

Many men and women actively choose traditional roles because they match their strengths and interests.

Abolishing gender roles might invalidate the choices of those who embrace them.