# data[].attributes.body
It can be very old and hard to read

# data[].attributes.body
It talks about how they experienced it and gives most of the information

# data[].attributes.body
A primary source can be more bias like a diary

# data[].attributes.body
It has exactly what the whole experience felt like, or looked like.

# data[].attributes.body
you can hear from the actual person

# data[].attributes.body
It is an actual witness from that day/event that provides actual facts and details.

# data[].attributes.body
The advantage to a primary source is that the author of the article or whatever experienced the event, where as secondary sources might leave out some details because of a mistake in the source.

# data[].attributes.body
The advantage of primary sources is that it was experienced first-hand.

# data[].attributes.body
It's more reliable because the person who wrote it had a firsthand account.

# data[].attributes.body
you can know the life of te person

# data[].attributes.body
Secondary sources is what the author takes from the story so it could be bias

# data[].attributes.body
It is told from the person that experienced the event.

# data[].attributes.body
more biased

# data[].attributes.body
very hard to read sometimes

# data[].attributes.body
Primary sources are more detailed because they are usually First- hand accounts and the people usually tell the truth and don't tweek or modify the truth

# data[].attributes.body
It can be old time story.

# data[].attributes.body
because you can actually hear what is happening instead of hearing a lie

# data[].attributes.body
First hand counts, gives information, get to know what people wrote in the 1900s

# data[].attributes.body
it could be old or hard to read

# data[].attributes.body
Its writen by the real person who saw it so it easier for the reader to understand

# data[].attributes.body
A pro to a primary source is that you will have more info

# data[].attributes.body
It can be hard to understand what they are saying because it is old

# data[].attributes.body
Could be worn down so it's more difficult to read

# data[].attributes.body
The advantages of primary sources are that they are written in a firsthand account. That means that you can hear what actually happened and what it felt like.

# data[].attributes.body
It can be a lot of first person information

# data[].attributes.body
it came from someone not there, only have details from drawing,pictures, and what people said.

# data[].attributes.body
it's more in the situation so it's more acret

# data[].attributes.body
there are a lot more secondary sources than primary

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe it doesnt have all the facts because maybe the person missed something and found out later.

# data[].attributes.body
The person who wrote the secondary source could have gotten miss information on the topic while researching it

# data[].attributes.body
A disadvantage could be different opinions or view on the situation. Like the author might have seen the event a certain way, but someone else saw it differently.

# data[].attributes.body
it can be easier to read

# data[].attributes.body
One advantage of a primary source is that you can understand something from a person that experienced what happened. It can also help get to know how others feel about a subject when they experienced it.

# data[].attributes.body
Its a firsthand account of that time

# data[].attributes.body
Could be hard to read or to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
It is a lot more easier to find secondary sources and its mostly new the secondary source

# data[].attributes.body
Secondary sources are easier to read.

# data[].attributes.body
it isnt from the actual person

# data[].attributes.body
it might be in a different language or its broken and has a missing piece of the story

# data[].attributes.body
It doesnt give most of the information like if someone felt it

# data[].attributes.body
Hard to read maybe not so exact maybe with not so exact details and false facts.

# data[].attributes.body
it can be destroyed sometimes and then is hard to read

# data[].attributes.body
I can be old or super hard to read, it might be falling apart, it could have words you don't understand.

# data[].attributes.body
they know what actually happened during that event

# data[].attributes.body
It could be hard to decipher and you may need an experts help.

# data[].attributes.body
they are not as readable as a secondary source.

# data[].attributes.body
sculptures can be worn down by mist and can't see all the details

# data[].attributes.body
A primary source is good because we can read it from their point of view and tell us if it was good or bad and say some things that no one knew about.

# data[].attributes.body
It can be easier to read

# data[].attributes.body
It could be old and might be hard to read. Ancient people had a different language and alphabet. They could have used different letters and words that we don't understand.

# data[].attributes.body
since there is less info you might use things that are easier to find like news papers

# data[].attributes.body
It was an actual person or artifact that was at the event and could be more trustworthy than a secondary source.

# data[].attributes.body
They have all the facts and they are based off of primary sources and they are translated into our language so they are made easier to read

# data[].attributes.body
understanding it is easier

# data[].attributes.body
It can be an a different language or ript

# data[].attributes.body
A disadvantage would be, the writer might not have all the information connected to the event. They haven't understood the feeling of what happened, because they didn't experience the event

# data[].attributes.body
it will definitely be easier to read

# data[].attributes.body
Its older so it might be riped or some holes in it that can have some information that people might need

# data[].attributes.body
Secondary sources are easier to read.

# data[].attributes.body
One disadvantages of a primary source is that it could only be an opinion from another person's perspective. It can also be hard to read or be in a different language.

# data[].attributes.body
There are more secondary than primary, it can give info what happend in a timeline.

# data[].attributes.body
The person writing the secondary source might have misresearched the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Secondary sources may have wrong information and it does not really capture the moment.

# data[].attributes.body
You can find more secondary sources because there wasn't a lot of people that experienced the event.

# data[].attributes.body
They might be written in a different language that you don't know that makes it harder to understand

# data[].attributes.body
Ancient peoples handwriting might have been hard to understand. Also, they might have written it in a different language that we don't know.

# data[].attributes.body
much more common than primary

# data[].attributes.body
The disadvantage of primary sources is that they can be very hard to read.

# data[].attributes.body
they could have misinformation

# data[].attributes.body
It could be ripped or old and might be hard to read or if its a painting or piece of pottery may also be hard to put back together.

# data[].attributes.body
You can reread stuff

# data[].attributes.body
Secondary sources could have wrong info because the person that made it could of made in 2011 but it talks about 1900s so he or she was not there in that time.

# data[].attributes.body
this advantage is bad because it is torn apart and you can't find the peace

# data[].attributes.body
when writing people might guess what hapend when there is no info on the topic

# data[].attributes.body
They might be biased or have misinformation or are missing some crutial details.

# data[].attributes.body
you get misinformation
and cant understand some languages