# data[].attributes.headline
Schumann’s (1978) Acculturation Model, for example, was an attempt to explain how social as well as psychological distance from the target-language community affected learners’ access to and acqui- sition of the target language. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Schumann’s (1978) Acculturation Model, for example, was an attempt to explain how social as well as psychological distance from the target-language community affected learners’ access to and acqui- sition of the target language. 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We and our partners use cookies to personalize your experience, to show you ads based on your interests, and for measurement and analytics purposes. By using our website and our services, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
#9_Estágios de aquisição da língua inglesa

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Listen to this episode from Bilíngue em pauta on Spotify. Bilíngue em pauta - o seu podcast sobre Educação Bilíngue! O tema central deste episódio gira em torno dos estágios de aquisição da língua inglesa. Você sabia que há uma grande diferença entre aprender e adquirir uma segunda língua?

# data[].attributes.headline
 Poststructuralist theories (e.g. Bourdieu, 1986) and social theories such as Community of Practice Theory (Lave & Wenger, 1991) provided the constructs and tools for re-thinking SLA as a primarily social phenomenon.

# data[].attributes.subject
 Poststructuralist theories (e.g. Bourdieu, 1986) and social theories such as Community of Practice Theory (Lave & Wenger, 1991) provided the constructs and tools for re-thinking SLA as a primarily social phenomenon.

# data[].attributes.body
Subject

# data[].attributes.headline
In SLA (Block, 2003) and the claims that L2 acquisition cannot be explained in purely cognitive terms, that learners are complex social beings, and that L2 acquisition is best understood by studying how individual learners both respond to and shape their social context.

# data[].attributes.subject
In SLA (Block, 2003) and the claims that L2 acquisition cannot be explained in purely cognitive terms, that learners are complex social beings, and that L2 acquisition is best understood by studying how individual learners both respond to and shape their social context.

# data[].attributes.headline
Information-processing the- ories are premised on an input-output view of learning and what Lantolf (1996) called the ‘computa- tional model’. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Information-processing the- ories are premised on an input-output view of learning and what Lantolf (1996) called the ‘computa- tional model’. 

# data[].attributes.headline
This represents a coming together of Complexity Theory (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008) and Dynamic Systems Theory (de Bot, Lowie, & Verspoor, 2007).

# data[].attributes.subject
This represents a coming together of Complexity Theory (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008) and Dynamic Systems Theory (de Bot, Lowie, & Verspoor, 2007).

# data[].attributes.headline
The three types of input discussed by Ellis (1986).

# data[].attributes.subject
The three types of input discussed by Ellis (1986).

# data[].attributes.body
The behaviorismo, is treated in terms of stimuli and fedback.
The nativist, minimizes the role of the input and explains language development primarily in terms of the learner's internal processing mechanisms.
The interactionist see language development as the result both of input factors and of innate mechanisms.

# data[].attributes.body
Researchs by Professor Ellis show phases for acquisition in L2 trougth of his studying completed empirical. The collaboration for SLA is very important,  a form of the learner acquire an second language.

The acquisition of language for way interaction is process what result of factors divers, as social ambient, motivation, home comunication which contribuete for internalization  the words for L2 learner and his interlocutor.

In us context, the language of the classroom come grown, but depend the type of language and method used by the teacher your interactions whit students.

# data[].attributes.body
The nativist view  is dynamic for language acquisition, second empirical research was built up which investigated how mothers talked to their children (e.g Snow and Fergusin 1977;Waterson and Snow 1978). This interaction between mother and his children determined the nature of the input, a verbal interaction and comunication that internalize a specific linguistic. Is importante than the child comprehends what is said to him with sgnals or speech used in conversations. This form of language learning in Brazil will be process some difficult to applicc in public school, because social question, the parentes in the most do not speak a L2 at home and in general, has not interaction with him about a foreigner language.