# data[].attributes.body
- UNDERSTANDING -

# data[].attributes.headline
 1. I think he was King Richard III of The House of York, a Plantegenet . He was the last monarch and the last English king to die in battle. Out of Selfishness to become king, it is said that he murdered his two young nephews in the Tower of London; a much hated person.

# data[].attributes.subject
 1. I think he was King Richard III of The House of York, a Plantegenet . He was the last monarch and the last English king to die in battle. Out of Selfishness to become king, it is said that he murdered his two young nephews in the Tower of London; a much hated person.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1. An English king descended from Plantagenet who was the last monarch of the House of York and the last English king to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1. An English king descended from Plantagenet who was the last monarch of the House of York and the last English king to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.headline
  Q1) An English king Richard III of The House of York, a Plantegenet .

# data[].attributes.subject
  Q1) An English king Richard III of The House of York, a Plantegenet .

# data[].attributes.headline
1. He was an English King, Richard III of The House of York, a Plantagenet, and he was the last monarch to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. He was an English King, Richard III of The House of York, a Plantagenet, and he was the last monarch to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in but when Edward IV died in April 1483 Richard did escort his nephew Edward V to the Tower of London where he was joined by his little brother and the two of them have never appeared again. It was rumoured that Richard murder them so he could be the king thus, Shakespeare's version  could be true.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in but when Edward IV died in April 1483 Richard did escort his nephew Edward V to the Tower of London where he was joined by his little brother and the two of them have never appeared again. It was rumoured that Richard murder them so he could be the king thus, Shakespeare's version  could be true.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain from him in his play, and people believed it.

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain from him in his play, and people believed it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3. The skeleton has been examined and scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3. The skeleton has been examined and scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis. 

# data[].attributes.headline
3. The skeleton was examined and scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis. 

# data[].attributes.subject
3. The skeleton was examined and scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis. 

# data[].attributes.headline
4. Because it belongs to a king that was accused of murdering his nephews.

# data[].attributes.subject
4. Because it belongs to a king that was accused of murdering his nephews.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q4. It is extremely important to study the skeleton thoroughly in order to ensure that the identity of the skeleton is King Richard III as it could possibly be someone else who is also descended from the Plantagenet and rigorous research process will give a more trustworthy result. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Q4. It is extremely important to study the skeleton thoroughly in order to ensure that the identity of the skeleton is King Richard III as it could possibly be someone else who is also descended from the Plantagenet and rigorous research process will give a more trustworthy result. 

# data[].attributes.headline
 Q2) Shakespeare created a hideous , horrible villain that people actually believe in . But as far as i know ,when Edward IV died in april 1483 (a hundred years before Shakespeare's play) Richard did escort his nephew .

# data[].attributes.subject
 Q2) Shakespeare created a hideous , horrible villain that people actually believe in . But as far as i know ,when Edward IV died in april 1483 (a hundred years before Shakespeare's play) Richard did escort his nephew .

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3) The skeleton was examined and scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3) The skeleton was examined and scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.headline
5. To look back in the case of his nephews death.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. To look back in the case of his nephews death.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q5. In my opinion, the historians need to look at the historical sources again because it is precise that the two princes have never appeared again after Richard III escorted them to the Tower of London; however, there are no proves that he actually murdered them and the Shakespeare's version was created a hundred years after this event happened.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q5. In my opinion, the historians need to look at the historical sources again because it is precise that the two princes have never appeared again after Richard III escorted them to the Tower of London; however, there are no proves that he actually murdered them and the Shakespeare's version was created a hundred years after this event happened.

# data[].attributes.headline
1.An english King Richard III, of The House of York,a Plantegenet.

# data[].attributes.subject
1.An english King Richard III, of The House of York,a Plantegenet.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Richard III, who was a Plantagenet, was known as the last monarch of the House of York and the Last English king to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Richard III, who was a Plantagenet, was known as the last monarch of the House of York and the Last English king to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.headline
 Q4) Because it is important to study the skeleton thoroughly in order to ensure that the identity of the skeleton is King Richard III .

# data[].attributes.subject
 Q4) Because it is important to study the skeleton thoroughly in order to ensure that the identity of the skeleton is King Richard III .

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1) An english King Richard III of the house of york, ' a Plantegenet'. He was the last monarch and last one to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1) An english King Richard III of the house of york, ' a Plantegenet'. He was the last monarch and last one to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1. a) Monarch - the ruler of the country. b) Reins of power - control of the country. c) Rumours - tittle-tattle. d) Portrayed - made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1. a) Monarch - the ruler of the country. b) Reins of power - control of the country. c) Rumours - tittle-tattle. d) Portrayed - made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in. It has also been rumoured that Richard III had massacred them in order for him to be king. 

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in. It has also been rumoured that Richard III had massacred them in order for him to be king. 

# data[].attributes.headline
2.Shakespeare created a hideous,horrible villain that people actually believe it.

# data[].attributes.subject
2.Shakespeare created a hideous,horrible villain that people actually believe it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2. Because they want to be more specific while writing down the news and the words in the word cloud are more appropriate and suitable for the title.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2. Because they want to be more specific while writing down the news and the words in the word cloud are more appropriate and suitable for the title.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2) Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2) Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in. 

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Monarch - the ruler of the country.        Reins of power - control of the country.     Rumours - tittle-tattle.      Portrayed - made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Monarch - the ruler of the country.        Reins of power - control of the country.     Rumours - tittle-tattle.      Portrayed - made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
4. Without thorough inspection of the skeletons found and its identity, it may lead to miscalculations and perhaps what they thought could've been the skeleton of a late person, could have been someone else, and their indication would turn out to be wrong. 

# data[].attributes.subject
4. Without thorough inspection of the skeletons found and its identity, it may lead to miscalculations and perhaps what they thought could've been the skeleton of a late person, could have been someone else, and their indication would turn out to be wrong. 

# data[].attributes.headline
3.The skeleton have proved by DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.subject
3.The skeleton have proved by DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.headline
5. In my opinion, it is crucial for the historians to look at historical sources to identify whether or not it is true that the rumour of Richard III murdering his young nephew to (as interpreted) be king was, in fact, true. 

# data[].attributes.subject
5. In my opinion, it is crucial for the historians to look at historical sources to identify whether or not it is true that the rumour of Richard III murdering his young nephew to (as interpreted) be king was, in fact, true. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Q4) It is so important to study the skeleton thoroughly in order to ensure that the identity of the Skeleton is King Richard III.  

# data[].attributes.subject
Q4) It is so important to study the skeleton thoroughly in order to ensure that the identity of the Skeleton is King Richard III.  

# data[].attributes.headline
Q5) In my opinion, I think the histories must need to look at the historical sources again to know whether that speculation of Richard III is true or not. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Q5) In my opinion, I think the histories must need to look at the historical sources again to know whether that speculation of Richard III is true or not. 

# data[].attributes.headline
1. a) Monarch - The ruler of the country. / b) Reins of power - Control of the country. / c) Rumours - Tittle-tattle. / d) Portrayed - Made out to be. 

# data[].attributes.subject
1. a) Monarch - The ruler of the country. / b) Reins of power - Control of the country. / c) Rumours - Tittle-tattle. / d) Portrayed - Made out to be. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1) a. Monarch- the ruler of the country. b) Reins of the power - control of the country. c) Rumours - tittle-tattle. d) Portrayed- made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1) a. Monarch- the ruler of the country. b) Reins of the power - control of the country. c) Rumours - tittle-tattle. d) Portrayed- made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
4.It is important to study the skeleton order to ensure that the identity of this skeleton is King Richard.

# data[].attributes.subject
4.It is important to study the skeleton order to ensure that the identity of this skeleton is King Richard.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q5) Historians must reconsider the historical sources because, to be precise, the two princes did not reappear after Richard III took them to the Tower of London, and there is no evidence that they killed them in the sky and Shakespeare's version was created a hundred years after the event .

# data[].attributes.subject
Q5) Historians must reconsider the historical sources because, to be precise, the two princes did not reappear after Richard III took them to the Tower of London, and there is no evidence that they killed them in the sky and Shakespeare's version was created a hundred years after the event .

# data[].attributes.headline
2. It makes it more interesting and engaging. Because he is giving information about something that happened in the past.

# data[].attributes.subject
2. It makes it more interesting and engaging. Because he is giving information about something that happened in the past.

# data[].attributes.headline
2.Because blogs are more straight to the point or general rather than expressive and advanced in words. 

# data[].attributes.subject
2.Because blogs are more straight to the point or general rather than expressive and advanced in words. 

# data[].attributes.body
(not sure of this answer though)

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1) (a) Monarch : the ruler of the country. (b) Reins of power : control of the country. (c) Rumours : tittle-tattle. (d) Portrayed : made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1) (a) Monarch : the ruler of the country. (b) Reins of power : control of the country. (c) Rumours : tittle-tattle. (d) Portrayed : made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2) The details should be right before start writing the news or blog and the words in the word clouds are more sensible for the blog.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2) The details should be right before start writing the news or blog and the words in the word clouds are more sensible for the blog.

# data[].attributes.headline
5.In my opinion,the historians need to look at the historical sources because it is accurate that the two princes have never appeared again after Richard III took them to the Tower of London so there is no proves that he actually kill them so we dont know whether its true or not.

# data[].attributes.subject
5.In my opinion,the historians need to look at the historical sources because it is accurate that the two princes have never appeared again after Richard III took them to the Tower of London so there is no proves that he actually kill them so we dont know whether its true or not.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2) Because they want to be more challenging while blogging the news.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2) Because they want to be more challenging while blogging the news.

# data[].attributes.headline
1(a)Monarch:the ruler of the country.(b)Reins of power:control of the country.(c)Rumors:tittle-tattle.(d)Portrayed:made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
1(a)Monarch:the ruler of the country.(b)Reins of power:control of the country.(c)Rumors:tittle-tattle.(d)Portrayed:made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
2.To make it more suitable for the blog.

# data[].attributes.subject
2.To make it more suitable for the blog.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. It indicates that Shakespeare's hideous perception of Richard III might be of truth. The study proves that the skeleton is of a "17th- generation Plantagenet descendant," which the writer supports, by saying "As far as I know, when Edward IV died in... Richard did escort his nephew... it was rumored they'd been murdered by Richard so he could be king". This means that Shakespeare must have been right. 

# data[].attributes.subject
2. It indicates that Shakespeare's hideous perception of Richard III might be of truth. The study proves that the skeleton is of a "17th- generation Plantagenet descendant," which the writer supports, by saying "As far as I know, when Edward IV died in... Richard did escort his nephew... it was rumored they'd been murdered by Richard so he could be king". This means that Shakespeare must have been right. 

# data[].attributes.body
understanding questions

# data[].attributes.headline
3. It was identified through DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. It was identified through DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.headline
4. (I'm not sure) Maybe it is because if the skeleton is proven to have been from a longer or nearer time, the perception made by Shakespeare about Richard III could be wrong. This would eventually lead to a look back on history once again to see what might have happened to the two princes and fact-check different sources. There might be other issues to look into as well.

# data[].attributes.subject
4. (I'm not sure) Maybe it is because if the skeleton is proven to have been from a longer or nearer time, the perception made by Shakespeare about Richard III could be wrong. This would eventually lead to a look back on history once again to see what might have happened to the two princes and fact-check different sources. There might be other issues to look into as well.

# data[].attributes.headline
5. To confirm whether their discoveries are true. Looking back at history, their findings can either be supported or proven wrong. That's how they know Richard III was definitely a Plantagenet descendant. Science and history are linked in this case, and equally support one another.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. To confirm whether their discoveries are true. Looking back at history, their findings can either be supported or proven wrong. That's how they know Richard III was definitely a Plantagenet descendant. Science and history are linked in this case, and equally support one another.

# data[].attributes.body
He was an English king. He is a Plantagenet, was the last monarch of the house of York and the last English kind to die in battle

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Monarch --> The ruler of the country | Reins of power --> Control of the country | Rumours --> Tittle-tattle | Portrayed --> Made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Monarch --> The ruler of the country | Reins of power --> Control of the country | Rumours --> Tittle-tattle | Portrayed --> Made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Because they are the most suitable and generally don't have many synonyms.

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Because they are the most suitable and generally don't have many synonyms.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Remember that Plantagenet who was said to have killed his nephews just to be king? That vile man's skeleton was found in a carpark in Leicestershire, London. Yes! King Richard III, much hated by people including Shakespeare himself, has been found in the place he deserves. With a slightly curved spine, the skeleton was taken to be examined by scientists in a DNA analysis, and found to have been that of a 17th-generation Plantagenet descendant. Diligent and precise studies seem to support Shakespeare's perception of this man as was shown in one of his plays.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Remember that Plantagenet who was said to have killed his nephews just to be king? That vile man's skeleton was found in a carpark in Leicestershire, London. Yes! King Richard III, much hated by people including Shakespeare himself, has been found in the place he deserves. With a slightly curved spine, the skeleton was taken to be examined by scientists in a DNA analysis, and found to have been that of a 17th-generation Plantagenet descendant. Diligent and precise studies seem to support Shakespeare's perception of this man as was shown in one of his plays.

# data[].attributes.body
I apologize for either making it too long or with facts that are not enough.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. The remains of Richard III, the last English king killed in battle, were found under a car park in Leicestershire, England. He was a hated man because it is said that he killed his brothers, nephews, and any person to become king. Shakespeare also did a play creating a hideous, horrible villain from him in his play, which people believed. 

# data[].attributes.subject
3. The remains of Richard III, the last English king killed in battle, were found under a car park in Leicestershire, England. He was a hated man because it is said that he killed his brothers, nephews, and any person to become king. Shakespeare also did a play creating a hideous, horrible villain from him in his play, which people believed. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2) What does the discovery prove about how Shakespeare portrayed the king?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2) What does the discovery prove about how Shakespeare portrayed the king?

# data[].attributes.body
In the play Richard III, Shakespeare created hideous, horrible villain of Richard III that people actually believe in. But when Edward IV died in April 1483, which was a hundred years before Shakespeare's play, Richard did escort his nephew Edward V to the tower of London,where he joined by his little brother, and the young prince never appear again. At the time, it was rumored they had been murdered by Richard so he could be the King. So Shakespeare's version could be true.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3) How has modern science been used to identify the skeleton found in Leicester?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3) How has modern science been used to identify the skeleton found in Leicester?

# data[].attributes.body
The skeletons, has been examined and scientist have proved its identity through DNA analysis.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q4) The archaeologist Richard Buckley said the bones had been subjected to a rigorous study. Why do you think it was so important to study skeleton?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q4) The archaeologist Richard Buckley said the bones had been subjected to a rigorous study. Why do you think it was so important to study skeleton?

# data[].attributes.body
They have to study the skeletons so that they could identify the skeletons belongs to whom, also to make sure that this skeleton belongs to Richard III and not someone else.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q5) Why, in your opinion, do historians need to look at historical sources again in this case?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q5) Why, in your opinion, do historians need to look at historical sources again in this case?

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, yes historians need to look at historical sources again, because they might have missed some information and also to see weather it is true or false that king Richard III murdered the two young prince, so he could be the king.

# data[].attributes.body
Word builder

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1) Match the words and expressions from the word cloud with their meanings.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1) Match the words and expressions from the word cloud with their meanings.

# data[].attributes.body
a. Monarch--- the ruler of the country.                                      b. Reins of power--- control of the country.                                c. Rumors--- tittle-tattle.                                                              d. Portrayed--- made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2) Why do you think the people who wrote the news about the discovery of the king's skeleton used the words in the word cloud and not the other words and expressions?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2) Why do you think the people who wrote the news about the discovery of the king's skeleton used the words in the word cloud and not the other words and expressions?

# data[].attributes.body
The words in the word cloud are more suitable for the blog and the readers. (I am not sure of the answer)

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Remains of what may have been speculated as King Richard III, the last monarch of the House of York and last English king, had been found under a car park in Leicestershire, England. After several DNA testing and analysis, it has been proven that it indeed was the 17th generation Plantagenet descendant, who reined over England, many consider a menace . The most asked question of one of the most well-known rumour that still remains unresolved to this day would be of the truth to whether the said Plantagenet had massacred his young nephew (12-year-old Edward V) in the Tower of London. Though, there indeed is an interpretation through one of his plays -Richard III- of said dreadful incident by the infamous writer, William Shakespeare, where it has been noted that Richard III (who was perceived as a horrible villain in Shakespeare’s play) had murdered his young nephew, from his greed to be king after the late King Edward IV had passed away - Many believe that this version of the story could possibly be true.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Remains of what may have been speculated as King Richard III, the last monarch of the House of York and last English king, had been found under a car park in Leicestershire, England. After several DNA testing and analysis, it has been proven that it indeed was the 17th generation Plantagenet descendant, who reined over England, many consider a menace . The most asked question of one of the most well-known rumour that still remains unresolved to this day would be of the truth to whether the said Plantagenet had massacred his young nephew (12-year-old Edward V) in the Tower of London. Though, there indeed is an interpretation through one of his plays -Richard III- of said dreadful incident by the infamous writer, William Shakespeare, where it has been noted that Richard III (who was perceived as a horrible villain in Shakespeare’s play) had murdered his young nephew, from his greed to be king after the late King Edward IV had passed away - Many believe that this version of the story could possibly be true.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Richard II, a Plantagenet, was the last monarch of the House of York, and the last English king to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Richard II, a Plantagenet, was the last monarch of the House of York, and the last English king to die in battle.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain that people actually believe in. This proved that Richard really murder his young nephews in the Tower of London.

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Shakespeare created a hideous, horrible villain that people actually believe in. This proved that Richard really murder his young nephews in the Tower of London.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis of a 17th-generation Plantagenet descendent.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Scientists have proved its identity through DNA analysis of a 17th-generation Plantagenet descendent.

# data[].attributes.headline
4. Because it can better verify the identity of the owner of the bone

# data[].attributes.subject
4. Because it can better verify the identity of the owner of the bone

# data[].attributes.headline
5. In my opinion, it is important for historians to review the source of history, because it can verify whether the rumor that Richard  II murdered his nephew is true.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. In my opinion, it is important for historians to review the source of history, because it can verify whether the rumor that Richard  II murdered his nephew is true.

# data[].attributes.headline
1- Monarch: the ruler of the country.  Reins of power: control of the country.  Rumors: tittle-tattle.  Portrayed: made out to be.

# data[].attributes.subject
1- Monarch: the ruler of the country.  Reins of power: control of the country.  Rumors: tittle-tattle.  Portrayed: made out to be.

# data[].attributes.headline
2- Perhaps these words are more suitable for this blog than other words and expression s; or these words are more advanced.

# data[].attributes.subject
2- Perhaps these words are more suitable for this blog than other words and expression s; or these words are more advanced.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Scientists have determined that the skeleton discovered beneath a parking lot in Leicestershire, England, belongs to Richard II, a Plantagenet ruler, thanks to DNA research of the 17th generation of Plantagenet descendants (he was the last monarch of the House of York and the last English king to be killed in battle). But one mystery has lingered: did Richard truly murder his infant nephew in the Tower of London? The majority of people are familiar with the king thanks to Shakespeare's famous Richard III. Shakespeare developed a villain in this play who was often regarded as absolutely evil. When Edward IV died in April 1483 (a hundred years before Shakespeare's play), Richard escorted his 12-year-old nephew, Edward V, to the Tower of London (along by his brother), where the two young princes were never seen again. There were suspicions at the time that Richard had them killed in order to become king. As a result, Shakespeare's version could be correct.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Scientists have determined that the skeleton discovered beneath a parking lot in Leicestershire, England, belongs to Richard II, a Plantagenet ruler, thanks to DNA research of the 17th generation of Plantagenet descendants (he was the last monarch of the House of York and the last English king to be killed in battle). But one mystery has lingered: did Richard truly murder his infant nephew in the Tower of London? The majority of people are familiar with the king thanks to Shakespeare's famous Richard III. Shakespeare developed a villain in this play who was often regarded as absolutely evil. When Edward IV died in April 1483 (a hundred years before Shakespeare's play), Richard escorted his 12-year-old nephew, Edward V, to the Tower of London (along by his brother), where the two young princes were never seen again. There were suspicions at the time that Richard had them killed in order to become king. As a result, Shakespeare's version could be correct.