# data[].attributes.body
The process of repuposing emergent technologies for other than their intended use.

Using what is familiar and inviting a new relationship to everyday behaviors.

# data[].attributes.headline
"a staged rehearsal of possible cyborg realties"

# data[].attributes.subject
"a staged rehearsal of possible cyborg realties"

# data[].attributes.body
The way we use technology is a microcosm of how we approach our broader reality. We are using this relationship to practice new realities.

# data[].attributes.body
Cayden Mak

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Electric Lit relies on contributions from our readers to help make literature more exciting, relevant, and inclusive. Please support our work by becoming a member today, or making a one-time donation here.

.

I know a lot of hackers, the kinds of people who can and do pull apart everything and anything, reassembling things into something new and useful. While most of them work in electronics, and I dabble too, I think I'm part of hacker practice in a different way. My writing and work is based upon hacking my complex set of social identities - compiled into a single identity that we might call cyborg identity.

We are all cyborgs in a Harawayan sense. We are amalgamations of complicated histories of violence, socialization, and the internalization of the oppression that surrounds us. In her 1989 "Cyborg Manifesto", Donna Haraway writes about the ways in which feminism has failed women of color and women in the Global South. She neglects to mention the group which has been failed most violently by feminism, transgender people. Feminism has a nasty history of erasing transgender people: denying the humanity and womanhood of trans women, fetishizing and degendering trans men, and rejecting legitimacy of all people who queer gender. This is a topic for another essay entirely - what matters for our purposes is that Haraway is not trying to squeeze all non-men into a certain framework. She is trying to pull apart the tangle of identity.

The interesting thing about Haraway's exclusion of transgender identities from her discussion of cyborgs is that we are perfect examples of cyborg praxis. By that I mean, we have bodies mediated in complex, meaningful ways by technology which, in many cases must be separated into component parts (and we are often examined as medical curiosities and rarely treated as holistic people); we have a preoccupation with the technologies of writing and language; and regardless of the complex gender identity we claim for ourselves, we represent an embodied experience of dissonance, language-play, Deleuzian multiplicity, and mediation. Trans people are living rejections of a dualism that separates the mind from the body: by virtue of our trans-ness, we refuse that there is any division at all.

The best explanation we can often offer to cis people about our justification for our "deviant" behavior and our need for medical care is that our minds don't match our bodies. But that's crazy talk. Of course one's mind matches one's body. They are inseparable. When we consider that we think as much with our bodies as we do with our minds - that our bodies are what draw lines between what is known and what is possible - it seems ridiculous to say that there is a separation. (Which is to say nothing of the philosophical untenability of dualism.) When we consider that queer identities are not explicable via genetics, or neuroscience, or sociology, or psychology alone, we must recognize that the roots of identity are deep and complex, too complex for the disjointed work of "experts."

This lack of a separation is most boldly exemplified in experimental self care and medical care. I have been this kind of a hacker for the past six or seven years. For me, hacking started with so-called "cross-dressing." A suit and tie, the layers of binding which hide the body underneath. The adoption of an androgynous name - first as a nickname, then as a legal fact. The negotiations of doctors and gatekeepers. Testosterone therapy. Confusing people on the street, in shops, restaurants, and positions of authority. When I went to get my New York State driver license, the DMV officials argued amongst themselves if my driver license should carry an F for female, or an M for male.

These interventions are all enabled by technology - weaving, sewing, medicine, language, writing, synthetic materials, the automobile. The transgender experience is deeply mediated, as is the experience of all. But what sets the mediation of transgender selves apart is the intentional use of technology to change our being-in-the-world, and the lack of obvious alternatives. We appropriate the technology of our oppressors - we hack not just our selves but our society; we hack not just our society but our oppression.

In the Manifesto, Haraway explains that "Writing is pre-eminently the technology of cyborgs, etched surfaces of the late twentieth century. Cyborg politics is the struggle for language and the struggle against perfect communication, against the one code that translates all meaning perfectly, the central dogma of phallogocentrism." And, no, there is no perfect way to speak about transgender identities. Because my trans-ness is a fusion of human, animal and machine, something profound and profane, I cannot describe accurately what it is I am, what it is I am doing. It's what's so difficult when we have conversations about the rights of transgender people: the lack of clear parallel makes us an easy Other, and the best intentions often become the most dangerous hurdles.

I exist outside the totalities that society expects me to conform to. I do this with intension, with a Harawayan sense of irony. I am playing with the bits I'm supposed to have and the bits I'm not, but can get. This play is deadly serious. My very motion through social space is a challenge, a subversion of heterosexual (and even homosexual) desires. Because I am not a man. I am not a woman. (But what are you, you might ask?) There are not words to describe what I am, so I must invent them. They come piecemeal from a variety of traditions and languages, from a fragmentary consciousness of a fragmented body.

"The cyborg is a kind of dissassembled and reassembled, postmodern collective and personal self," says Haraway. To take apart the gender that has been imposed upon you, to make alterations to it, remove constituent parts which are unsuitable and add new ones entirely, this what it is to be transgender. It's not that I am learning to be a man. I am unlearning - not to achieve some essential state of nature, but to become singular. And so the self becomes art and artifact, the product of intellectual effort, medicine, pageantry, inspiration, and nonbinary logic.

There will be no return to nature. The state of nature is an anachronism, for not only is it impossible for us to renounce our technological augmentation, by embracing it we acknowledge the state of nature as a tool of oppression. To live a cyborg is to liberate oneself from this onerous fantasy. There is no state of nature. There is no original sin. There are people, traces and pieces, littered all over the world.

At the end of the day, we're all complicated creatures. We ought not settle for the status quo. We have every right as cyborgs to demand more, to move forward joyously demanding no less than justice for all. We gain nothing by pretending at simplicity, at circumscribing categories onto ourselves, and denying that our whole selves are cultural and artistic artifacts. We stand to reclaim our autonomy by hacking our bodies, our society, and our oppressions.

- Cayden Mak is a Buffalo-based cyborg, educator, game designer, and theorist.
Photo Credit: Shasti O'Leary Soudant

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cyborg Theory, Cyborg Practice - Electric Literature

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
I know a lot of hackers, the kinds of people who can and do pull apart everything and anything, reassembling things into something new and useful. While most of them work in electronics, and I dabble too, I think I'm part of hacker practice in a different way.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Deleuze’s Body Without Organs Explained to Children

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Deleuze’s Body Without Organs Explained to Children — The Turnip Truck(s)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Philosopher Gilles Deleuze would say that not one organ actually produces anything, all productions are collectively produced by the entire body, and actually, by more than the body but a complex of bodies and environments. 

# data[].attributes.body
“Deleuze would say that not one organ actually produces anything, all productions are collectively produced by the entire body, and actually, by more than the body but a complex of bodies and environments.”

# data[].attributes.body
"I do not merely create my digital image and it does not merely represent me, as we are not in a linear relationship." (EG Thesis pg. 9)

# data[].attributes.body
René Descartes: DUALISM (binary) "I THINK, THEREFORE, I AM."
White dude, google it.

🧠PROBLEMATIC PRIVILEGING OF MIND OVER BODY.
Discounts the body's intelligence and ability to process and ENTIRE CULTURES who do not value the TOP-DOWN epistemology of Western ideals. Allows bodies to be treated as OBJECTS.

OBJECTS can be commodified. Abused. Exploited.

"I FEEL, therefore I am?"

EMBODIMENT THEORY

An embodiment perspective argues for the inextricable nature of identity and the body, one that can envision a body “beyond the binary of materiality or representation – the body not as an object but as an event.”
(EG Research Paper pg. 3)

Merleau-Ponty and SO MANY OTHERS

"...learning to internally listen to one’s bodily signals and body language, to recognize and understand one’s needs and emotions as a means to feel alive in one’s body and one’s relationship to others and society, is argued as necessary for well-being and control, or, in our case, for coherence."
(EG Research Paper  pg. 4)

"Social media removes us from our corporeality, reinforcing the notion of a mind/body binary. Embodiment theory demonstrates the vital role of the body in attaining and maintaining a healthy, productive relationship to self and others in order to function in society. An identity lacking corporeality is already at risk for coherence, and without bodily involvement on social media, identity becomes an object which can be commodified."
(EG Research Paper  pg. 6)

# data[].attributes.body
We can think of the “organism” as our identity and an “organ” as a signifier of identity we believe to be immutable. Gender, for example. Removing the organ from the organism frees us of subjectification that has been socially constructed on us. (EG Thesis pg. 9)

Deleuze + Guattari speak of ASSEMBLAGES ... which the cyborg might call HYBRIDS.

“The enemy is not what constitutes us (organs) but what has been put upon our organism or the structures and constructs that constitute our form. If you “go no farther than the organs... you stay locked into the organism, or into a stratum that blocks the flows and anchors us in this, our world.”  (Deleuze + Guatarri, BwO)

# data[].attributes.body
Identity is fluid and constructed through reiterative actions and performances adhering to accepted societal and cultural standards.

"Many fields and disciplines of study have shifted from a definition of identity as a fixed,

static, or predetermined state toward a more fluid interpretation that sees identity as something that one “does” or performs."
(EG Research Paper  pg. 6)

JUDITH BUTLER Performativity

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Judith Butler: Your Behavior Creates Your Gender | Big Think

# data[].attributes.body
1960:
cybernetic + organism = CYBORG

"...leaving man free to explore, to create, to think, and to feel.”

# data[].attributes.body
•cybernetic organism

• a hybrid of machine and organism.
• a creature of lived social reality (present)
• creature of fiction (future)

"It is important to understand that for Haraway, these four descriptions of the cyborg (cybernetic, hybrid, of the present, of the future) are not discrete, but rather co-determinate. For instance, Haraway argues that in philosophical terms, there is no real space between "lived social reality" and "fiction", because one category is constantly defining and refining the other."  (Teresa Senft)

# data[].attributes.headline
a HYBRID creature with FLUID boundaries (EG's definition)

# data[].attributes.subject
a HYBRID creature with FLUID boundaries (EG's definition)

# data[].attributes.body
"I’d like to consider how the cyborg blurs the boundary between the physical and the virtual, interiority and the external, between layers of signifiers and identification. I wish to apply the notion of the cyborg to encompass these deep internal spaces of (a more fluid) identity."
(EG Thesis pg 8)

# data[].attributes.body
"I have been concerned with how technological somnambulism, or blindly following technological trends, translates to giving up our power in larger societal issues. What if these technological habits are keeping us isolated in myopic bubbles, embedded in the constant present tense and vying for attention, and keeping us from looking widely and critically at our own actions the their potential effects on others?" (EG thesis pg. 7)

# data[].attributes.headline
Haraway's cyborg takes “pleasure in the confusion of boundaries and for the responsibility in their construction.”

# data[].attributes.subject
Haraway's cyborg takes “pleasure in the confusion of boundaries and for the responsibility in their construction.”

# data[].attributes.body
Are we taking full advantage of the confusion of the border between the real and virtual? Are we taking enough responsibility in its construction, or are we blindly following technological trends? At the level of identity, how do we responsibly begin to dismantle former borders of signification and subjectification? To imagine new ways of defining ourselves and thus, defining and relating to others? (EG Thesis pg. 9)

# data[].attributes.body
adrienne maree brown + Jonathan Van Ness touch on this concept --  (54:30) -- by talking about boundaries in a different way. That we don't dissolve our borders and become so porous that we are carrying OTHER PEOPLE'S burdens. INTERdependence is finding how we are RIGHT RELATION with everyone/thing else but not completely LEANING ON or SUPPORTING someone/thing else.

INTERdependency can help us think about dismantling out INTERNAL borders because borders keep us in a state of COdependence or INdependence - neither of which are fluid or understanding our RELATION to one another / the earth / the universe and.. and.. and..

# data[].attributes.body
"What we are at the small scale we are at the large scale."
- amb

# data[].attributes.body
If we can't imagine beyond or find the courage to confront the systems of supremacy in something as (seemingly) innocuous as social media, we are very likely unable to confront injustices at the larger scale. We must PRACTICE at the small level what we wish to change at the larger level.

# data[].attributes.body
Imagining BEYOND the DOMINANT reality.

The clinging to internal boundaries of identity limits our imagination and creates a binary sense of self; a black-or-white, this-or-that understanding of who we are or can become. Here, I argue for expanding our understanding of distinctness so that we might imagine a future ontology not of “this or “that” as we can already articulate, but one we haven’t yet conceived.
(EG Thesis pg. 8-9)

# data[].attributes.body
“Queerness is not yet here. Queerness is an ideality”.

# data[].attributes.body
We must address white supremacy at the level of our bodies.