# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with the Leandro v. State decision because it is in support of all students needs. The decision assists students with backgrounds that are not compatible with the other students around them. This decision allows for different students to have their best shot at reaching a successful life in their future.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I agree with the ruling of Leandro v. State. I think it is unfair that students were given different educations based on where they lived because I think it is important for all students to receive a proper education. It is important for all schools to have adequate funding to provide their students with the tools they need to learn at the same level as other students.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I agree with the ruling of the Leandro vs. State case because of what a big step it is towards equity in education. I believe that there were major differences in the education quality throughout the state and that should not be. All students in the state of North Carolina should be given equal opportunity with equitable equipment and help to ensure they succeed.

# data[].attributes.body
I fully agree with the Leandro v. State decision. I believe it is imperative for all students to receive an equal education, and equal funding is an easy way to meet the requirement. It is unfair for districts within the same state to have such a vast difference in education quality. It is the job of the state to allocate the taxes collected appropriately. All students residing in the same state should be presented with equal opportunities, as it is not up to them to decide their upbringing.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I agree with the ruling of Leandro v. State. Students' education should not be based on where they live or the wealth of their family. It is critical for all schools to have the same technology as each other and findings.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the Leandro V. State ruling. It's important that all students have the same access to education no matter there economic standing.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, I do fully agree with the Leandro V. State decision. I believe that all students should have to the same opportunity to success in life, their education should not be based off how much money they have or where they live. schools with less funding lose more opportunities for their students.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I do agree with the ruling of the court case. One thing that I really liked about this reading was at the end when it mentions the end image of the student becoming a functioning adult.I liked how the list was very specific. However, I do feel that it needs to be updated. One thing that wasn’t mentioned on the list that I think would be very beneficial would be for the student to have an in depth knowledge of technology literacy. Technology is being more and more involved with our daily lives, so I think that it is important for us to create adults who have the skills to use it efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
I completely agree with the Leandro vs. State decision. Coming from a very low-income community myself, I understand the challenges faced when proper funding is missing from certain areas and the strain it can bring to members of the community. Every child, regardless of socio-economic background, deserves a sound, basic education.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I strongly agree with the Leonardo v. State court decisions. I believe that every student should have an equal opportunity to succeed in life no matter where they are located. I think that this case served justice for all low-income districts. I personally went to school in a low income area and I understand the struggles that these school districts can face.  It seemed like we were always the last county to get smart boards, commuters and chrome books. Earlier in my education my parents were shocked to see that I was learning things with the exact same materials they were.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with the supreme court ruling if this case. It is unfair for students in higher poverty areas to receive a lesser education than students that simply live in a wealthier part of town. It is essential for all students to receive the same education no matter where they live or how much their family's income is.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the Leandro v. State ruling. Every student should have the chance to gain a sufficient education. Not only that, they should also have the opportunity to gain an education that will prepare them for university if they so choose to attend one. However, I feel as if the court decision should have placed a larger responsibility on the state to uphold these promises of a sufficient education. There are still public schools today that are severely underfunded and don't provide the same curricular activities or classes that highly funded schools do.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with Leandro v. State because every school should have access to the same quality of education.

# data[].attributes.body
I definitely agree with the decision in this case. First, I agree that "that neither school districts nor counties have any constitutional right to equal funding" due to the fact that each state has a different student population with different needs and their local economies all differ; ensuring each state got equal funding is nearly impossible AND I don't see funding as the make or break contributor to an adequate education. Additionally, O agree that students/children have the constitutional right to a sound basic education; without it our society would be full of uneducated citizens. I don't dislike uneducated people, but to allow that to become a larger portion of the population is reckless and endangers the immediate society/community as it adds more "mouths to feed" that don't contribute to the betterment of the community due to their lack of skill/knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes- I agree with the Leandro vs. State decision. As we learned in Chapter 8, students who happen to lie in certain district zones, receive different educations. Some states spend up to 15,000$ annually on the average students, while others spend 6,000$. I agree with the decision because it aimed to equalize funding for all schools, despite location or taxation rates.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I do believe the decision, mainly because it is a more fair way for all schools. Like mentioned in the text it is stated multiple times that family and personal wealth should not affect a child's education. I feel that all schools should be as equal as to education to give all students the same amount of opportunities and level the playing field for all.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I do agree with the decision that was made in the Leandro v. State. Every student should have a right to equal schooling no matter what situation they are going through. Students should have a chance to move on with their lives instead of being stuck in their current situation.