# data[].attributes.headline
Gruppe 6 - Læst og giver den max gaaaaas                         (Piotr, Nicolas, Luna, Hele)

# data[].attributes.subject
Gruppe 6 - Læst og giver den max gaaaaas                         (Piotr, Nicolas, Luna, Hele)

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation of the text:
Marilyn Manson

Band, metallic rock

Scary looks

The poster-boy of fear

Criticising religion, society in his music

The text

Begs the question: “Who is to blame for the Columbine shooting?” - media

Focusses on the ‘biased’ media coverage of tragic events

Murder equals entertainment

Media blames idols for teens’ mistakes and wrongdoings

How to use our freedom

Children are growing up with media - bad for them

He just has an opinion (and present it in a rebelish way) - is that a bad thing?

He advocates diversity amongst teens

Theme:

Media's effect on people's minds

School shootings

Who’s to blame?  (TV or Music) - Icon’s effect

Religion

3-line-summary:

Analysis - see Analysis of non-faction, from Angles:

Genre: An opinion piece - an editorial (his view on a subject of current interest)

Subject: Violence and guns in USA

Sender: Marilyn Manson

Receiver: The American population

Medium: This text is a one-way communication in which he brings forward his opinion

Context: He’s trying to “save his own ass” - The columbine shooting is not his fault, it’s medias

Rhetorical purpose - Why is it written?: To make people be critical for what they read and to persuade

In his arguments, he mainly uses pathos and a bit of logos

Ethos - by giving us confidence in him, because he knows a lot about former murderers

His headline is great, because it’s exactly what the whole text is about - (Columbine : Whose fault is it?)

Structure/composistion:

Style and language:

Informal language - he’s using words and expressions as (“Out of the blue”, bullshit, OK, “finger-pointing”) and so on

But he also use a lot of formal words, which make him sound clever, but not too clever, to be understood from teens - he’s not an unreachable authority

References : Jezus, Murderers,

Discussion and parallel texts:

# data[].attributes.body
Det er meget godt

# data[].attributes.headline
Gruppe 1(Emma, Camilia S, Lena & Frederik)

# data[].attributes.subject
Gruppe 1(Emma, Camilia S, Lena & Frederik)

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation of the text:
May 28 1999. A month after Columbine
By Marilyn Manson
Titel: Columbine: Whose fault it it?
Article  - Persuade & Entertain.
Theme: Guns, violence, media.
Summary: The text is about, persuading us to feel and have the same meaning about shootings as Marilyn Manson.
Analysis: Article/Non fiction. Opinion piece.
Structure:
Style, Language:
* Pathos; because he tries to make us feel bad & sorry about gun violence.
* Logos: He use logos to back up his opinions.
* Columbine: Whose Fault Is It?

Discussion:

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation of the text:
Marilyn Manson
Band, metallic rock
Scary looks
The poster-boy of fear
Criticising religion, society in his music
The text
Begs the question: “Who is to blame for the Columbine shooting?” - media
Focusses on the ‘biased’ media coverage of tragic events
Murder equals entertainment
Media blames idols for teens’ mistakes and wrongdoings
How to use our freedom
Children are growing up with media - bad for them
He just has an opinion (and present it in a rebelish way) - is that a bad thing? 
He advocates diversity amongst teens


Theme:
Media's effect on people's minds
School shootings
Who’s to blame?  (TV or Music) - Icon’s effect
Religion



3-line-summary:



Analysis - see Analysis of non-faction, from Angles:
Genre: An opinion piece - an editorial (his view on a subject of current interest)
Subject: Violence and guns in USA 
Sender: Marilyn Manson
Receiver: The American population 
Medium: This text is a one-way communication in which he brings forward his opinion
Context: He’s trying to “save his own ass” - The columbine shooting is not his fault, it’s medias
Rhetorical purpose - Why is it written?: To make people be critical for what they read and to persuade
In his arguments, he mainly uses pathos and a bit of logos
Ethos - by giving us confidence in him, because he knows a lot about former murderers
His headline is great, because it’s exactly what the whole text is about - (Columbine : Whose fault is it?)


Structure/composistion:

Style and language:
Informal language - he’s using words and expressions as (“Out of the blue”, bullshit, OK, “finger-pointing”) and so on
But he also use a lot of formal words, which make him sound clever, but not too clever, to be understood from teens - he’s not an unreachable authority
References : Jezus, Murderers, 

Discussion and parallel texts:

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation of the text:
May 28 1999. A month after Columbine
By Marilyn Manson
Titel: Columbine: Whose fault it it?
Article  - Persuade & Entertain. 
Theme: Guns, violence, media. 
Summary: The text is about, persuading us to feel and have the same meaning about shootings as Marilyn Manson. 
Analysis: Article/Non fiction. Opinion piece. 
Structure: 
Style, Language: 
* Pathos; because he tries to make us feel bad & sorry about gun violence.
* Logos: He use logos to back up his opinions.  
* Etos: Based on the keys word we got last time, his crediblity, isn't good. People will probly compare him with the problem, and mabye say that he caust the problem by his looks and music.
Discussion: 

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation:
- Columbine: Whose fault is it?
- Marilyn Manson
- May 28, 1999
Theme:
- Shootings
- Media
- Culture
"It is sad to think that the first few people on earth needed no books, movies, games or music to inspire cold-blooded murder."
Summary:

Analysis:
-The genre is an article
- interview

Structure/composition:

Style and language:
American - english
informal

¨¨

Discussion:

Parallel Texts: