# data[].attributes.headline
Should our S.S. textbooks be rewritten? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Should our S.S. textbooks be rewritten? 

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because they are outdated and they don't have enough info on Homo Naledi. They also don't have  enough information on the confirmation of the 4,000,000 year old Australopithicine.
------
Maiya

# data[].attributes.body
this is Really important to our understanding of early humans, heavily due to the fact that they buried their dead (and aside from homo Naledi Its modern events chapter isn't that modern)

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because there are new thing happening everyday. More bones are being found.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hould our social studies textbooks be rewritten Yes they should.

# data[].attributes.subject
Hould our social studies textbooks be rewritten Yes they should.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes they should because they would have more recent information and they wouldn't be as fragile.

# data[].attributes.body
Because people found more useful information about the early people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think yes because our book has much more important things than bones and stuff if we were learning about digging bones and stuff we might as well have to books two bring to class

-Ra'Niya :)

# data[].attributes.body
Yes our text books should be re-written because we wouldnt have known about the homo Naledi if there were no information online .I think that every year they should switch the S.S books.-Mani

# data[].attributes.body
yes our text book are missing a lot of historical events and the new kind of human ancestor

# data[].attributes.body
They should because our books that we have know do not have all of the information that we need about social studies.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they should update the book because they keep finding great new things.

# data[].attributes.body
more and more bones are beings found each day they could sill have the other stuff

# data[].attributes.headline
I say yes, because nobody would ever know that Homo nadeli was found, besides the news. But our textbooks are probably years old. They should be rewrittenj

# data[].attributes.subject
I say yes, because nobody would ever know that Homo nadeli was found, besides the news. But our textbooks are probably years old. They should be rewrittenj

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because there are a lot of information we need and some of it is not in the book

# data[].attributes.body
i chose yes because we wouldnt have known about homo naledi if it wasnt found

# data[].attributes.body
I say they should update it. People should know what humans used to think about our ancestors, but they should also know what we've recently found. I just hope they update it.

# data[].attributes.body
If it is not rewritten then people might never here about it, and it is a GREAT find.

# data[].attributes.headline
No because they where written in the past so the have the origianl facts

# data[].attributes.subject
No because they where written in the past so the have the origianl facts

# data[].attributes.body
I say yes because  the book, is old, and Homo naledi is new so that means it would not be in the book

# data[].attributes.body
Cause we can learn more about this new hom

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think they should be rewritten.  They should just be expanded. They should have someone add on to the book and add all of the resent discoveries.  Like the 4,000,000 year old  Australopithecine, if they do not add that big discovery in then barely anyone is going to know about it, and that would be sad.
---
Nina Christopherson😀

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
See all the wonderful things Leah Odle has made