# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the future projected economic growth, and that the GDP will eventually decrease. All countries have their limits, and all resources will eventually become scarce. Dan Airely is right in saying that we need economic growth, but not for everyone. He supports this through the real measurement of finiacial divisions vs the expected amount of concentrated money each economic class holds. Since a country's resources are scarce, productivity eventually leads to the decrease in available resources.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Dan. It is inevitable, due to limited resources across the globe, that nations will face scarcity as more and more of their population become specialized in various labors and labor forces. It is indeed true that the United States is stuck in stagnation, although on the surface our GDP per capita is significantly higher than that of other nations, and this stagnation is due to immense amounts of debt that no matter the economic intentionality put behind attempts to reduce the debt, our nation will never truly be able to experience growth. While our capitalist practices is a large portion of our maximized GDP, newly developing nations on the rise, such as Mexico, have heightening GDP's due to the extreme gap in where they once were economically to where they stand currently: growing and expanding; compared to the US, who, already at the top, will only fall due to a lack of spark to exponentialize our GDP and economic status. I also agree that economic growth should not be for everyone, because there would be no balance of economic power and resources. With everyone having the ability to buy resources, immense scarcity would result leaving the entire globe in a rut!

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because it is inevitable that resources will one day run out. A country only has so much of its limited resources until they are all utilized in production. Also, the more economic growth a country experiences, more resources are being used, thus resulting in further scarcity in resources. Although I was surprised to learn, Dan Ariely is right to say that economic growth is to be expected, but that it is not wanted for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because we are constantly depleting the natural resources on Earth. Developed countries will be affected the most because natural resources are not unlimited so growth will diminish and stagnate when they're gone. We want to have growth but we don't it to be equal for everyone. However, we don't growth to be too heavily centered for one group of people.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the future projected economic growth. We have expectations for everyone to experience economic growth, but economic growth for everyone isn't practical. This is due to scarcity of resources. The US will continue to experience economic growth until the resources used are depleted. If everyone had equal economic growth, then the quality of goods would decrease as a result.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that with the projected economic growth, the US has its limits with how much longer we can go using limited energy sources, it's just a matter of time until it becomes true. I also agree with Dan on how we want economic growth, but not for everyone (although it should be) simply due to how limited resources are and how much more quickly we'd run out of them because of scarcity. Economic growth means lots of resources and it'll soon become a competition for them between the fastest growing countries like China and India.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because resources are limited on Earth. Growth will continue until resources run out. The United States use their resources abundantly while other countries have used resources more efficiently. Dan Ariely shows that the population doesn't want economic equality for everyone because then there would be no competition between people. Competition and scarcity motive people to work and make a living. If everyone was equal in the economy, then the quality of goods would go down and poverty would increase.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth. Resources are limited and the USA relies on natural resources tremendously but we don't use our own resources. If the economy for the United States goes down it will eventually come back up when middle eastern countries can't supply oil or energy anymore. But for now China and India are both increasing the education of their workers and job opportunities therefor their economies are booming.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth. Developed nations are bound to stagnate and decrease in terms of their share of the global economy. An aging population with low birth rates will result in a smaller labor force within these developed nations, capping the economic growth and development which can occur within these nation's borders. Though nations that experience an influx of immigration such as the United States, will be less effected, others will experience decreasing GDP per capita and growth. The beginnings of this trend are currently being witnessed in Japan and Scandinavian countries and will only expand to other developed nations. On the other hand, countries with growing and already large populations such as China and India will grow economically substantially as individual consumption and domestic innovation occur.Though the quantity of nonrenewable resources such as oil and coal will eventually be depleted, technology and innovation can yield alternatives which can be used to continue the progression of growth in these nations. While economic growth will genrally increase the individual well being of individuals, especially in developing nations, the wealth gap will likely expand significantly due to the inherent selfish nature of capitalism.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth. Every country has its limits. As others nations economically progress, resources will move towards depletion. Competition between each country will increase and global debt will grow as a great issue. Also, it is not surprising that the United States is unable to develop further due to the fact that they have not utilized their resources like developing countries have learned to do.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that with the future of the economy will grow for developing countries. We rely heavily on natural resources and we only have a limited amount. Because of this our GDP will decline while others will grow such as China and India.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because the United States had limited resources and over time the nations around the world will have a change in their economic growth. This will cause some countries such as the US and Australia to have a lower economic growth over time. I agree with Dan that we would like to have economic growth, but not everyone can because of scarcity of resources. As the economy grows, more resources are used. However resources are limited and there is a scarcity of resources in the economy. Once the nation reaches its capacity of resource use the economy can not continue to grow

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected economic growth because the use of resources, and the debt owed that causes a decrease in the share in the global economy.Additionally, with the aspect of scarcity, the economy will fall as e US uses resources inefficiently . Dan Ariely is correct in that we do want economic growth but not distributed evenly among society. OuOur perspective is slightly obscured in the fact that equality is not equally given but to those who are more accessible to wealth. Economic growth relates to scarcity because the economy is based off of the availability of goods and services , and their marketing.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the projected outlook of our economy. Specific counties like China overtime will cause our countries GDP to decrease over time. Competition between countries around the world will increase causing our GDP to gradually decrease. The United States has used their resources to it’s fullest. This will cause issues in the future as developing countries are beginning to use their resources more efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the future projected economic growth is possible as resources are limited in the United States. Scarcity hinders economic growth in the long run, and with the US rapidly using its resources, other countries such as China have utilized its resources properly, giving them the opportunity to surpass our economic standing in the future. I also agree with Dan Arely as individuals want growth and success for themselves; however, they don’t want it for everyone as it will take away from their personal gains. As a country, we say we want growth for everyone, but if everyone was prosperous, that would take away from the United States and where we stand on a global scale.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, and the US will eventually reach its limit on natural resources and then will be faced with the problem of scarcity.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Dan that economic growth shouldn't be for everyone. Growth is good, but resources on Earth are limited. If everyone grows exponentially, it'll only be a matter of time before we run out of resources, and countries begin to crash.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because as we use up more of our resources more of the less developed countries will have new technologies to use their resources to its full capacity. Also as China and Indias labor force continues to increase in skilled workers because of their population growth yet our population of skilled workers isnt growing as rapidly as other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected future economic growth because there is only a limited amount of resources on Earth and as other nations experience economic growth, there will be less resources for the US economy to grow.

# data[].attributes.body
The future projected economic growth is definitely agreeable because more people are struggling to go up to the higher standard of living, but amount of wealth people can have is limited. Also, because the economic growth has been so rapid, people did not have many chances to take care of the minorities in the society. Poor people get poorer and rich people get richer. Even with the scarcity of resources, only rich class has the privilege to enjoy it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected growth because the US has developed to the extent that its available resources have been utilized while developing countries have not yet had the opportunity to do the same, which will drastically increase their economic growth while the US (among other developed countries) has already developed their resources enough. It was surprising that everyone wanted around the same things in terms of economic wealth because you would think that those who are richer would want wealth more concentrated towards their economic class versus others.

# data[].attributes.body
Due to scarcity (limited amount of resources), economic growth is limited to the amount of resources each country is able to obtain. Because the population of India and China are rapidly increasing, their skilled labor force i on the rise as well. Therefore, i agree with the economic projection. The US already has experienced drastic economic growth through the yeads and can be considered at it's peak. Countries with lower economic productivity but are gaining resources will result in a much more significant growth than countries with already developed economy. Realistically, you wouldn't want other countries to grow as well so that your own can progress

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the projected future of the economic growth. As resources are slowly being depleted, the economic competition between countries will continue to rise, making global debt even bigger. In this sense, economic growth means relates to scarcity. Economic equality is not ideal because competition would be stagnant between people different economic levels. There would be a lack of motivation to move up, and our economy would plummet even more.

# data[].attributes.body
Economic growth does have its limits, which will cause economies to stagnate,  so countries will jave to learn to work with a limited economies and resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the predicted future economic growth as there are limits that have been ignored and has caused the continual rise of debt as we continue to borrow what little scarcity we have left. Other countries such as China or India have an predicted projected growth due to the increase in population growth that will increase the labor force but may be to only a certain limite as our resources are being depleted and gradually decreasing.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected economic growth. With all of the growth that has occurred in the United States, more resources are being used. As the resources are depleted, the country is not able to maintain the economy. Also, I agree with Dan with the fact that  citizens want the economy to continue to grow and develop, but they do not want it to be equal between everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because of scarcity. Nonrenewable resources are limited in the United States, and if other countries use their resources wisely, they can positively impact their economies. Although we may not want growth for other countries, it would be beneficial for the import of resources, but it could create more competition between countries.

# data[].attributes.body
The projected economic growth is very probable and logical in my opinion. That data took a lot of things into account, and countries like Indian and China are developing rapidly and putting their people to work. OECD countries are running out of human capital and motivation for competition, so I fully believe that will happen.

It would be naive to want compete economic equality becuase it would result in a stagnant economy. No one would have any ambition I move up if everyone has the same amount of wealth. With the upper class having a bit more, it would create motivation for middle and lower class workers to strive toward, and as a result it would create economic growth.

The longer we put off using sustainable resources and the longer we continue selfish economic practices, the worse our problem gets, and scarcity will drive us to behaving like animals. What worked for our parents won’t work for us, and it’s time to make drastic changes.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the projected economic growth and I agree that economic growth will slow down and level out in the coming years. With the projected calculations , all of the worlds economies are taken into account and as the economies of developing countries increase, the worlds powerful courties will produce less of the worlds produce. As the countries continue to use up resources, the competition between countries will increase which leads to the scarcity of this unrenewable resources. I think that Dan is right that people want to economy to grow, but they do not want to economy to be equal between people of differing economic situations.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because economic growth has been slowing down for the more advanced countries in recent years. I also agree agree with Dan because if everyone grows then there’s less resources for more developed countries that are slowing in their economic growth. Economic growth relates to scarcity because as more resources are used by growing countries, the more scarce resources would become.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that, although the economic growth of the United States will slow down, it will not be as drastic as the video predicted. I feel that the superiority of the technology in the US will allow the country to produce new inventions at a rate other countries cannot.
All people wish to have a higher pay, and wish that others will have a high standard of living, but you move more towards a socialist economy which in turn results in less production within an economy.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the future projected economic growth, our resources are nonreuseable. Humans all throughout are decapitating the world. We've
reached the top and I agree that the economy won't have further growth. It's true that people and countries desire wealth but with resources being sacred, it will be difficult.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because resources are limited. China and India have growing populations and will likely experience economic growth within the next thirty years. I agree with Dan's statement because everybody desires wealth and equality.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the future projected growth. The United States relies too much on it's natural resources and does very little to maintain growth within it's economy. Eventually this decrease will lead to scarcity with the U.S, and perhaps even a need to import more than it already does. However developing countries such as China and India are utilizing their labor force by increasing education and job opportunities which ultimately allows them to create greater output than the U.S. The people of the world however, as Dan Andy said, don't necessarily want growth for everyone. This mindset explains the desire for people to raise their own standard of living at the expense of others, and a basic understanding that the top percent should have more wealth and the bottom percent should have less wealth.

# data[].attributes.body
Economic growth = scarcity ? With every country trying to be its best more and more production is necessary. Without even realizing it reasources vanish . I agree there is a limit to our economic growth we can't wait till it's too late finish our reasources how I also know what won't happen in 10or 20 years we have enough to last us many more years to come but we can't be leaving future generations to deal with our mistakes .

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Dan Ariely and the idea of future projected economic growth where many countries try to increase their GDP per year. However due to scarcity and resource depletion, this is not the case because the rate of resource depletion is higher than economic growth so GDP decrease and no economic growth can oocur. Economic growth is not necessarily designed for everyone because due to the unlimited wants and limited resources, increasing growth may not continue making a barrier. This is because resources continue to plummet which can lead to an economic crisis in a country creating a recession and finally a depression.

# data[].attributes.body
The future economic growth will decrease for the US because there is real GDP growth unlike the other countries like India and China are going to grow in the future. This is probably because India and China are developing new things constantly.
If everyone had economic growth then would there really be growth at all because who would people base the growth off of. We have  Unlimited wants but limited resources. The natural resources the world has is decreasing exponenially and it's not being restored. With less and less resources economic growth is harder to achieve.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth. As time goes by, our GDP will go down because we trade with other major economic countries like China. The price of goods decreases the more we trade with China, but the amount of natural resources used stays the same leading to a limited supply of them. This will lead to a decrease in production.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Ariely and his opinions on future Economic growth. He is correct stating that that we would like economic growth. However, we would not want other countries to progress in their economic growth because competition with those countries and the United States would grow. The U.S. economic growth will decrease in time, and scarcity will rise due to the constant need for goods and services.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I do agree with future projected economic growth I believe that Dan Ariely is correct about further economic growth in the future. Knowing that the U.S. Is a developed country, everything has been done to grow the country as much as possible . Economic growth is become more and more obvious as recessions occur. As countries with undeveloped economies grow, highly developed countries will further decline in the future. Although the U.S. Woo have further population growth, that won't really have an impact on the overall growth of the U.S.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the projected growth. As a developed country nearly everything that has been done to grow the country as much as possible. With an undeveloped country nearly every instance of growth causes growth because up to that point not much has been done. As far as Dan's presentation, I agree we don't want wealth equality for everyone. This is because true equality is unobtainable. There will always be some one on top. A person is smart but people are stupid there are some who simpally can't handle wealth at all.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with Dan  Ariely; although everyone would like to have an economic growth, it should not be for all due to its limits done by scarcity.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with Dan Ariely. Economic growth is a concept we would like for our countries but not necessarily for other countries. Sure we would like people in more rural areas to have more opportunities but deep inside we want to stay at the top to be a leading nation. There is sufficient evidence of countries like China who's economy is greatly improving at a fast rate but what people don't know is how it was achieved. We're in a zone we're we want to be the best and produce the best without realizing it takes up reasources and that there should be a limit to how much a country does.

# data[].attributes.body
I unfortunately have to agree with Dan. We are rapidly depleting our resources, and if everyone continues to rapidly grow, then there wont be resources for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree that growth is something that everyone wants without having the ability to reach, due to the increasing number of debt and limits to resources. I also agree with the predicted growth rate, as the United States will continue to have a population growth causing really no change to the overall growth, resulting in almost really no change or growth, as all of the other politicians promise us

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the assertion that economic growth is bound to stagnate. Economic growth can be thought of as a resource itself. Not every country or socioeconomic class can grow at the same rate, just as a resource can not be used by every country, company, etc. at the same rate without its depletion because of scarcity. In the same way, economic growth on a global scale is bound to plateau and eventually decrease as the capacity for economic growth on a global scale decreases. Despite our desire for fast, astronomical growth around the world, or even in a certain country, that kind of growth quickly hits the impassible ceiling that scarcity represents.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Dan Ariely that with economic growth is needed but not necessarily wanted for everyone. With society it’s desired to have the wealth become distributed but with different wealth groups of society it will be split up very differently. As time goes on most countries are depleting all their resources and soon will be faced with economic challenges and will change the way of distribution of wealth and change the availability of resources for most countries as well.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree,  economic growth cannot go forever due to the limited resources we have

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, there is overwhelming evidence that human consumption in its infinite expansion cannot be contained by our world or even our own better senses. Regardless of what we say people will always take from others and exploit to their own content.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Dan Ariely. Eventually over the future years other countries will become more delveloped such as China and India and eventually will be in competition with the United States. The U.S. will eventually stop growing and decline due to scarcity and the fact that we do not have unlimited resources. Even though the U.S. would like to advance and grow it is not possible for any country to continue to grow. It is bound to slow down and decrease.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with Dan Ariely because the population's stagnating growth and limited by amount of resources would fit the projected outcome. For most people, economic growth is seen as beneficial, but it also implies that more resources are needed to keep that up. Scarcity is unlimited wants but limited resources, so if economic growth continues, obstacles with continuing growth will be met as resources begin to grow more and more scarce. This would make economic growth hard to continue for the home country and everyone else.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't believe that economic growth in developed countries will necessarily stagnate like he suggests in the video. Over time, countries with economic expansion will eventually take over today's powerhouses but I don't believe the U.S will be totally overmatched and stop growing and innovating its economy.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that growth will come back but not in a timely fashion, and I say this because we have learned that there is a  cycle that has been going on for ages that has yet to cease. It will come back eventually for some in some time, but not near. Our wealth of resources will eventually end, but for the time being, we are ok. They will end regardless though, and the growth will all together end, but it is of no concern for now.

# data[].attributes.body
Dan Ariely is correct in his thinking and I agree that other countries should grow. Expecally rising countries. They have the biggest opportunity and the most motivation to make an impact on this world. However, there are very limited resources in the world which will slow down growth exponentially and we need more innovation to counteract this.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that there will be future economic growth. Based on the videos we can see that the countries that are towards the bottom will eventually make there way to the top. Those are the countries where we get most of our goods from so they will prosper from us buying goods from them. For example, India and China's GDP is a lot lower than the USA's but eventually they will rise to the top.  I agree with Dan because we all want economic growth but not for everyone. We only have so many resources which we all want to ourselves. So each country is trying to better themselves and get to the top.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with future economic growth. Dan Ariely is right about us wanting it to grow but not wanting it for everyone in that we want to see the class we're personally in receive most growth, but if we didn't know what class we would be In we would obviously want it to be much more equal. Economic growth is based on scarcity because the economy can only grow with enough resources. If resources are depleted then that leads to borrowing which to debt which in the long run does not help the economy and so on and so forth

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I agree with the future of economic growth and Dan Ariely because its true that we want economic growth,but not for everyone because it will throw the economy off balance.Scarcity is related to economic growth because economic growth is very limited, which is the equivalent of Scarcity.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree with the projected economic growth from the video "Who Killed Economic Growth" because it suggests that because resources are being depleted, humans cannot sustain the same kind of growth achieved in the Industrial Revolution. However, I believe that humans are capable of finding new solutions to problems, and a lack of resources will not prevent the US or the world economies from growing. Additionally, I agree that we generally want economic growth, but we don't necessarily want it for everyone. Complete economic equality would be socialism, which wouldn't be an effective economic system. Global economic growth seems desirable, but it would also mean that other nations would catch up to the level of economic prosperity in the United States, which means we wouldn't be as powerful on a global scale.

# data[].attributes.body
I do ageee with the projected economic growth in the coming years. Dan is also right in that growth cant be given freely to all, because we have limited resources. That would also throw the balance off the economy as some people will transfur jobs and such. The limited resources will cause major countries that are dependant on large amounts of energy to slow down economically as the rural life style of undeveloped countries continues to grow slowly.

# data[].attributes.body
I completely agree with Dan Ariely & the futures project growth. The economic growth is booming but it not desired because of scarcity.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with the futures projected growth.
Dan Ariely is right that wealth equality's desirability changes as we look at different factors, but growth was not desired for everyone.
The biggest problem with economic growth is scarcity since many don't consider what resources are available when they are so focused on continuing economic growth.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Dan Ariely on future projected economic growth. The GDP will decrease as time goes by due to the fact that we trade with major economic countries like China. Since we trade a lot with them, the manufactured goods would decrease too. The usage of more natural resources leads to the extinction of these resources. As we approach the future, productivity will slow down due to the continuous loss of resources

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the economy of these emerging countries are starting to rise. Places like China and India with large booming populations are beginning to experience an increase in economic growth. They are better educating their workers, as well as manufacturing products to many different countries. In my opinion Dan Ariely is correct in his opinion about us wanting growth, and wanting wealth to be concentrated in a certain percentage of the population. The idea of capitalism promotes this wealth, and I think that is why many people didn't have a more socialist outlook in the survey

# data[].attributes.body
There is not enough room left for growth in many developed countries but Dan is right. We want growth but not for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what Dan says about future projected growth. Growth is wanted, but not necessarily for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
The expectations and projected growth is desired most everyone in economic society. The distribution of wealth equality is wanted differently by each wealth group of society. Long term growth will be met with obstacles as most countries are depleting their resources, and productivity correlates to the availability, and quantity of resources.

# data[].attributes.body
The projections of growth are likely true because production and aid are being funneled out of developed countries to developing countries. Globalization ideals has led people to forget that they are in competition with everyone else, so we are strengthening our rivals. Dan's finidibgs are probably true for the average person; growth & wealth are desired by everyone, and capitalism promotes more wealth at the top, but I higher functioning society will have more than 30% of wealth at the top.

# data[].attributes.body
I really enjoyed the ideas that Dan talked about. I agree with his idea about how we want growth, but I don't think we want growth for everyone. I agree with the future projected growth. Every country isn't going to continue to grow. I think we will see other countries grow that aren't expected to grow. We are using all of the natural resources to grow, and one day those resources are going to run out. Productivity will slow when these resources run out.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected growth because the world's leading countries now can not always stay at the top. I also agree with Dan because perfect equality doesn't make sense because there needs to be leaders. Economic growth has a limit because there are limited resources on Earth. Scarcity limits economic growth.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected Economic growth that the GDP will eventually decrease. Since China and India are major economic powers, the more we trade with other countries, the number of manufactured goods will decrease as well. Dan Airely is correct in saying that we want growth but not for everyone. He proves this through the actual measurement of finiacial divisions versus the expected amount of concentrated money each economic class holds. Since a country'/ resources are scarce, productivity eventually leads to the decrease in available resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Dan Ariley.  Dan is right that he believes we want growth, but we don't want it for everyone. He proved his point with the chart of the predicted wealth of the lower 20%. There was an obvious knowledge gap between what we think our current lower 20% have compared to the actual number. The more a country grows the more it depletes their natural resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree that there is really no economic growth left for developed countries. I do believe Dan is right in that we want economic growth but not for everyone because we are selfish. Economic growth is limited because of scarcity and that's why economic growth is so hard for developed countries like the US and China while it is easy for undeveloped countries like those in Africa to further develop.

# data[].attributes.body
The Tedx talk was interesting because Ariely was openly advocating for better wealth equality, but he opposed socialism. He started suggesting that many other things such as social welfare and our development as a nation are derived from wealth and spread of that wealth. Ariely's model was very similar to the fascist ideas of Mussolini. Though he did not exactly say the government should be involved in the spread of wealth, this was a focus of fascism. Everyone works to better the state and "people" of that state and everyone would be somewhat equal because there would simply be no poor people. This is why I do not agree with his ideas because despite fascism sounding good it forces people to do things they may not want to do. Naturally there are lazy people and driven people. If someone is going to be lazy, it's hard to change them. This is their decision and it's not society's responsibility to make them better. Therefore Ariely is wrong in his shared wealth projection. The future projections are correct. China and India's economy are export based and focused on employing better and more workers to provide for consuming countries such as the United States. They will soon surpass and possibly put us into a dependency on them. Looking fifty years ahead they will surpass us, but leading up to that point we have to consider nationalistic ideals. Will Western nations regain that idea of superiority and innovation that drove us to build the current world. Eventually, we might get tired of depending on China or India and might do something drastic. This is why the future predictions need to be highly considered in our growth as a world economy. Economic growth requires resources to fuel it, But there's limited resources. As China and India grow and produce more and more, there will be less and less resources. This could lead to wars between colossal powers, so we must look into better usage of our resources. The pollutants are a huge backlash to this as well. As economies grow more waste is produced and we have limited place for it to go. More physical objects could go to outer space but air pollution can't be dispersed like that. China already produces more air pollution in one year than the US does in ten. And as they grow it'll only get worse. This is how economics and scarcity relate.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected growth of the US because of its stagnating population growth and limited resources. I think Dan is right because people have expectations for growth but don't actually know the reality or the implications of that growth. If economic growth continues, eventually resources that spurred that growth will deplete themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Dan is right and that the future projected economic growth is realistic. We don't want it for everyone which I thought was very surprising. The shift of economic growth to less developed is undeniable.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with the future projected economic growth because countries with the most productive economies can not become more productive due to the given, limited resources. Because resources are scarce, some countries can not become anymore productive. It wouldn’t be possible for every country to have growth, and it wouldn’t be desirable either. In order to make room for other countries to grow, some countries must decline.

# data[].attributes.body
I loved Dan's perspective. I think it not only applies to economics but also life. It can shape a lot of positive change in our society. I agreed with the future projected video. I definitely think we're gonna see some new world players and as developing countries become more stable they will step up in economics. This may relate back to Dan's theory with equal distribution of wealth. I disagree with the last video. I think there are always ways to grow. I agree it shouldn't be our focus, but as our economy falls and rises, we can continue to grow and fix our economy.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because the more we trade with other countries, the number of manufactured goods will soon decrease. I think that Daniel Ariely is right because when we do want growth and are in favor of growth it is more of an appearance thing than a method of helping others.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree that the economies of developed countries are stagnating and eventually decline due to the limits of our resources. This is becoming more evident as recessions occur.. there are limits to our resources. As economies of undeveloped countries occur, the economies of developed countries will stagnate and eventually decline. There is only so much economic capacity for growth and itwill displace other countries. For us, the growth of developing

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the future projected economic growth. I believe that dan Ariely is correct thinking that we would like growth but not for everyone. He would prove this through the knowledge gap of the how much of the world's wealth people have and what they actually have. It was assumed that the poorest people had about 3 % of the world's wealth when in reality they only had about a tenth of a percent. People that have wealth would like everyone to prosper as well but are not willing to give up their wealth. With economic growth, there is a limit. The world only has so many resources meaning that continuous growth cannot go on forever. This is basically the idea of scarcity.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the projected economic growth for the future; without a high work ethic and production rate within the United States I believe that its GDP will decrease. India and China are quickly emerging as economic powers, and much of the US's success rests in these foreign countries. They have the resources and drive to see economic growth. I think that Dan Ariely's ideas of our desire for equality are right; there is a gap between what is true, what we think is true, and what we want to be true. Countries don't want everyone to grow economically because it would limit their own abilities and development.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the future projected economic growth because a country like China should see an increase since it is innovative and has motivated workers. The USA should have a decrease over time because we are not as innovative. Even though we have billion dollar ideas like IPhones, we still use countries such as China to do our labor. I believe that Dan Airely is correct with his ideal because it would be difficult to have growth for everyone. The world’s economy is not perfect, so not everyone could have growth. Everyone could see growth over time, but the growth would not be equal. With the idea of scarcity, econoimc growth is difficult which was seen with the recession in 2009. Scarcity is also around, but the government tends to ignore it until it’s too late like with natural resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because the countries today leading the charts eventually will fall in economic activity due to the decreasing amount of manufactoring. Dan Ariely is right because people don't want others to be greater than them, so this means that we approve growth but not for the better of others. If the economy grows, more items are needed to continue the growth. Since there is scarcity there is only so much items available to us that we can't continue growing without it.