# data[].attributes.body
In this short film, when the man choose what type of person he wanted to sleep with we can see just how sad our future looks like, with a click of a button you design the ideal person to sleep with. I believe that is the ultimate concern, which is what our future holds for us, you go online and you choose who you sleep with instead of going out there and getting to know the person; losing a face to face communication. The man wants satisfaction but at the same time someone to talk to, he feels lonely. He is so desperate to not to be alone that he gets on his knees for her not to leave meanwhile she has no heart, she just wants to do her job and get paid and leave. The woman has no kind of emotions left inside of her. From a psychological point of view, it is clear he lacks social interaction from Maslow's hierarchy of needs. He doesn't have anyone to talk to and cannot even get a hooker to talk to him.

# data[].attributes.body
Ultimate concern

He wants something more than just a good time. He wants to romance her. She has no emotion. She just wants to satisfy his sexual desire but he doesn't want to say he is satisfied because he wants to keep her. He is so desperate for love that he hired a "prostitute" for love.

Psychologists sexuality.

He claimed she did this everyday and asked what it was like and she said they "smell" different. I believe she expressed it that way because I feel like she is saying they don't want her to stay. They just want to be satisfied and then push her to the curb. It is a possibility that she once was like him too. She probably once wanted love and since she was shunned by all the people she tried to love she turned cold. Now she shuns him. It may or not be true but at the end she also did say I'll leave the door open. She could've possibly said it as a means that she was leaving and obviously not closing the door or it could possibly mean that she might leave the door open to the thought of "loving" him. She is kind of like Freud and he is kind of like Lewis.

Sexual code - dos or don'ts

Do's

He believes that by making her a dinner and trying to dance with her he is opening up a window for her to love him. He thinks that by trying to romance her he will win her over. He doesn't realize that he is trying to romance a prostitute. He even begs her to stay because there is nothing for him there. Her job is to satisfy him and nothing further, so she says there is nothing there for her either.

She is incapable of loving him because this is her job. She tries to satisfy him and leaves. She thinks it's perfectly normal to sleep around with multiple men. She feels that sex is just about satisfying him. No love, no feelings, no happiness.

Don'ts

He believes that she should stay with him. He doesn't want her to leave him. He picked out his "perfect woman" but doesn't fail to realize that he ordered her for a specific task. He basically asked for her to shut him out.

She doesn't understand what he is trying to do. She was hired to satisfy him and leave. She knows nothing more than to do what she was hired to do. When he begs her to stay she has no emotion. Even when he dances with her she doesn't even move her feet. She is incapable of showing affection to the guy. She doesn't know how.

# data[].attributes.body
The women in the video has a mindset just like Freud. She only cares about her pleasure and her satisfaction after they are done having sex. The attitude that the women has is similar to Freud’s as well because she left so sudden which clearly shows that there was no meaning to sex. When leaving the women seemed like she was happy and satisfied with the sex but the guy apparently didn’t want her to leave. He wanted more than that. The man had a mindset more like Lewis, he wanted to actually connect to her and talk to her. It was more than just Genital contact for him he wanted more from her but she couldn’t provide that. The ultimate concern is that there is no interaction or communication between the two. They had sex and that was the end of it. That’s a major problem because how can sex be enjoyed when there isn’t an emotional connection.

# data[].attributes.body
After reviewing the short film, it is clear to see that ultimate concern of the 23rd century couple was self-satisfaction. The satisfaction of pleasuring (woman), and the notion of being pleasured (man). The absence of communication, sensuality, and connection destroyed the essence of sex/love.

# data[].attributes.body
The ultimate concern of this culture is to be satisfied sexually. This video allows the male to pick out exactly what he wants in a female. If she is dressed how he likes than he must be pleasured. This turns out to be wrong. In this hook up culture, he realizes something is missing. He tries to form a connection by eating and dancing with his guest, but she can't do these things because it is not in protocol. The man is visually upset by this. Moreover, when the intercourse is over, he is still upset. It is obvious that he did not get pleasure from this encounter because he yearns for more. This demonstrates how there needs to be an emotional connection in relationships to ensure happiness. This culture is similar to Freuds view on sex. He states that sex is the only way to achieve happiness. This contradicts Freud's view because there was no happiness in this encounter. What the male wanted was social interaction which relates to Lewis. Lewis encouraged sex, but did not think it was the key to happiness. He emphasized social interactions and a deep connection can lead to happiness. There needs to be both in a relationship.

# data[].attributes.body
Like Frued, the female character lacked love, or the compassion to love or be loved. There was no need for social interaction because love wasn't the important matter. The only satisfaction that is needed is sex. This video proves that sexual entities are not all that we need! Pertaining to mallows pyramid, the male character had the physical, he had good shelter etc. but he, because of the society he is in, can not progress to the ascending level. It seems as though no intimacy is allowed. That strong feeling towards another person not in the sexual genital sense though. Even with sex, the male character still wasn't happy! which is what Frued states. It's all just temporary pleasure, which the female upholds so as to not allow the interaction to go beyond that! Love is not the necessity, sex is, in this society of case

# data[].attributes.body
The ultimate concern of this culture is to be satisfied strictly sexually. The sexual code in a culture like this is to not focus on human connection, that the only way to obtain satisfaction is through casual sex. The code is to remain detached from the other person, don't let them get close to you or get to know them on a personal level. Ultimately I find a society that follows this code unsuccessful. As you can see in the film even though the man is choosing specific characteristics in the beginning of what the girl must have, he is still craving a deeper connection than just the sexual encounter. So this society may be successful short term and fulfill sexual desires of both parties. However, ultimately it will result in a lifeless society, where there are no connections and there is a sense of emptiness within everyone. There are no thoughts, just the motions of what is expected of the specific sex in the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
The movie shows what the society would be if people were to hookup only. The ultimate concern about this society is that people can not love since the people they are dealing with are there only to sexually satisfy them. Clearly the guy wanted to get to know the girl but she was only there to do her job which was to satisfy his sexual desire. Sex is not everything and getting to know the person you are interacting with gives a deeper and higher meaning to sex. In the video clearly the guy was not totally satisfy since he was left alone by the woman who was only there to do her job.

# data[].attributes.body
Watching this video for a second time after reviewing Freud and Lewis there are like characteristics. In the beginning when she tells could you please at the dinner table he wanted her to eat something put something in her mouth and bite . This relates to Freud oral stage and how the mouth has to do with sexual pleasure. Once she ate they went into the bedroom. They had asexual the lady did her job and she was ready to go but the guy wanted more. He didn't want her to leave because I think he felt that sex was more than just sex but meaningful like Lewis believed. He wants more he doesn't just want a hit it and quit it as culture does today but he desire more, love, passion and sense of being. In the end the ultimate concern I think that sex means so much more than what is perceived. Also that everyone has a different definition of sex. If we look at sex and male vs female what usually occurs is women catch feeling and men can do what they have to do and go. But this video was the opposite she didn't care and he wanted more. Overall we can't change how anyone feels about sex but I think that no matter what
until you find the satisfaction beyond the sexual desires and find true love he/she will forever will be searching.

# data[].attributes.body
when watching this video for the second time and analyzing it with different methods learned today . You realize a certain disconnect from the female , but also an uneasiness by the male to continue with this activity with out forming a connection , he had a certain want for something more , but eventually realizing what she was and the sex code that was implied and began to give her commands . The ultimate concern in this culture is simply to continue achieving pleasure once someone is pleased thats that and nothing else can be done . The sex code implies that the connection in this era is non existent sex is sex and thats all it is , if i were to look at this in a psychologists view i would reference it to freud comparing it to the thought that sex is just instinct once you are completely satisfied in all sexual stages than there is nothing left , no more progression.

# data[].attributes.body
This video was an extremely interesting video. While watching this video it made me think about things that take place in the real world today. For example, some women only can offer sex to men and that’s a huge problem. In the video the guy asked her to dance with him. When she got up to dance you can tell that she wasn’t into dancing and she couldn’t dance because her feet wasn’t moving at all. The man was kind of shock because at first he didn’t just want sex from her. He wanted it to be something romantic which is why he asked her to dance. When the man told her to open her legs, that was easy for her to do. This video kind of portrayed women as people who only can offer one thing. Something so precious to offer. When they were done having sex the guy didn’t want the women to leave but she seemed so in a rush. He explained to her that he wasn’t like those other people that she have sex with, but still in the end she wanted to leave. He wanted more than just sex from her he wanted to just talk. The man was so shocked at the reaction he got from the women because he didn’t want her to leave. This isn’t an example of love. He wanted to love her, he didn’t just want sex from her. It was more that he wanted, but she was so use to men leaving her after sex so she left before he could. This is an extremely interesting video, people only know how to offer up sex but love is deeper than that.

# data[].attributes.body
The movie was interesting but at the end the woman seemed to not want anything to do with the man. She was only interested in sex. In a relationship it needs to be more than that or the two individuals will not able to evolve

# data[].attributes.body
The 23rd century society looks like a society developed or imagined by Freud: Autonomy, intimacy as a commodity.

# data[].attributes.headline
Eddwin Gregg                            After viewing the short film, the portrayal of the 23rd Century lacked sensuality, and intimacy. The female came to handle her duty, which was satisfy the man. The male demonstrated that he want the action of intimacy, but not the involvement of sensuality. He says, "Turn off lights. Take off clothes. Open your legs." As if the female is an object. Once he noticed that she was equally emotionless, he felt the need to discover that affection and comfort. The physicality of their intercourse was inadequate causing the male to mentally connect with his partner. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Eddwin Gregg                            After viewing the short film, the portrayal of the 23rd Century lacked sensuality, and intimacy. The female came to handle her duty, which was satisfy the man. The male demonstrated that he want the action of intimacy, but not the involvement of sensuality. He says, "Turn off lights. Take off clothes. Open your legs." As if the female is an object. Once he noticed that she was equally emotionless, he felt the need to discover that affection and comfort. The physicality of their intercourse was inadequate causing the male to mentally connect with his partner. 

# data[].attributes.body
The man in the short film was searching for a deeper connection with another human through means of sex but

# data[].attributes.body
He was interested in more than just sex with her and she clearly wanted nothing to do with him. All she wanted to know was if she satisfied his sexual desire. It really caught my eye because Society views females as the far more sensitive in relationships. That was not the case here. The roles were definitely reversed here.

# data[].attributes.body
He wanted more than just sex. Lewis mentioned that there are more lasting sources of happiness other than the desire for sex.

Watching the film a second time made me realize that the ultimate concern of this culture is to satisfy each others sexual needs. In the beginning of the film, the guy was choosing all the qualities he wanted in a woman from a board that said "all that is human." He choose to have a good evening, a woman with high heels and white stockings. But this is not all that is human, there is much more to a person than just that. The woman thinks more like Freud, she believes that the one purpose in life is to be satisfy through sex. And the man  thinks more like Lewis, who believes that the desire of sex is one of many "God-given" pleasures, there are more sources of happiness. Sources that are much more fullfilling and long lasting.

# data[].attributes.body
The video had undertones. The man asked for someone in a white dress and shoes. Was he expecting someone pure? The ultimate concern was the video showed two sides of a human:  a  male who was longing for human interaction, and a woman who was very automated, almost existing to only satisfy a sexual need. The man was clearly looking for a normal interaction, he made dinner, he played a song and he asked her to dance. Sensing the woman's non-reaction, he became automated himself and both had sex. As the woman prepared to leave, the man was almost begging for her to stay.  The two are a product of two cultures.  There is a clear divide between what is expected (protocol) and how people should live. Life is not all about sex. It is about sharing the journey with someone you care about, learning about each other, and falling in love with each other.

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between the two individuals is just a physical connection, nothing more. The man was seeking for love, but not love as in sex. He wanted something more than that. It was the lady’s job to just have sex and leave making sure he was “satisfied.” The man, at first, is trying to show his love by having a meal and then a dance, while on the other hand she’s just there for sex.

# data[].attributes.body
The video was very deep , it demonstrated I think the perception of how lust isn't love and how humans need to be stimulated mentally and emotionally as well as physically. Love and lust not being exactly the same .

# data[].attributes.body
It is clear that there was no connection between the two and the man wants someone to love him so badly that he tries to seek this through sex. He lowers his dignity and kneels to stranger seeking attention because he feels dead inside and lonely.

# data[].attributes.body
The video showed that love and lust are different

# data[].attributes.body
The individuals seem withdrawn. There's no connection between the two. It's just sex! The film was uncomfortable to watch in a way. Because of the simple fact that there was no real intimacy. I never understood, in reality, how people could partake in sexual activities without feeling any connection. From the female characters side it was strictly sexual, in her world it was just that. But for the male character, though he wanted more than just the physical, he was looking in the wrong place for it!

# data[].attributes.body
In love there has to be more than sex or you will not be fulfilled. There needs to be an emotional connection, which Lewis emphasized. Freud stated that the greatest form of happiness is through sexual pleasure, but the man in this film was not happy.

# data[].attributes.body
The film represents a depiction of what all humans desire from life and each other. The man in the film was clearly lacking intimacy in his life and was desperate to find it. This explains why it seems he hired a prostitute in hopes of achieving some sort of intimacy. Relating it to the reading, this movie solidifies Lewis' views and rejects what Freud thought about the role of sexuality.

# data[].attributes.body
They guy in the video seems out of this world like he was here but not really here physically. There was a disconnect to the world he was present but abscent. That woman asked him if he was satisfied and he responded that it was a loaded question. She did what she had to do and felt no connection while he didn't want to let her go after the sex..... I guess sex was just sex for her while he maybe felt a connection after.

# data[].attributes.body
Their contact was intentionally physical only but it seemed the guy craved something deeper. Satisfaction and contentment is more than just sexual gratification; there was a clear lack of connection and intimacy that made it awkward.

Watching the Second Time:
The ultimate concern is to "satisfy" in no other way but sexually. The code is that you have intercourse and then leave right after, like an every day task. The video mentions protocol so that everything seems very mechanical, superficial and not deep at all. In the beginning, the guy even picks out the traits he wants in the woman that would be coming over. There is no substance, only bodily pleasure. You can see the lack of interaction on just a conversational level really affects the man in a negative way. This societal view on hook-up culture shows clearly that a deeper understanding or a deeper relationship with another person is needed to be content and to feel more fulfilled.

# data[].attributes.body
The two individuals seemed very corrupted by "protocols" where the male was trying to brake said protocols and the female abided by them. I think that the film showed the level of intimacy in some instances where there it is dwindling and there is no more human connection. No more feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
As you view the short film, participate in a conversation regarding sexuality in light of our readings. Remember the guidelines: at least three posts, comments or questions should advance the discussion, the tone and words should be respectful of people's dignity and viewpoint. The outcome is understanding and being understood