# data[].attributes.body
An article that talks about Shakespeare possibly plagiarizing some of his plays.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Books News

Dennis McCarthy, a self-taught Shakespeare scholar, at his home in North Hampton, N.H. Credit... Cody O'Loughlin for The New York Times

For years scholars have debated what inspired William Shakespeare's writings. Now, with the help of software typically used by professors to nab cheating students, two writers have discovered an unpublished manuscript they believe the Bard of Avon consulted to write "King Lear," "Macbeth," "Richard III," "Henry V" and seven other plays.

The news has caused Shakespeareans to sit up and take notice.

"If it proves to be what they say it is, it is a once-in-a-generation - or several generations - find," said Michael Witmore, director of the Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington.

The findings were made by Dennis McCarthy and June Schlueter, who describe them in a book to be published next week by the academic press D. S. Brewer and the British Library. The authors are not suggesting that Shakespeare plagiarized but rather that he read and was inspired by a manuscript titled "A Brief Discourse of Rebellion and Rebels," written in the late 1500s by George North, a minor figure in the court of Queen Elizabeth, who served as an ambassador to Sweden.

Image

The second page of the George North manuscript, showing the passage that Shakespeare used to write the opening soliloquy in "Richard III."

"It's a source that he keeps coming back to," said Mr. McCarthy, a self-taught Shakespeare scholar, during a recent interview at his home in North Hampton, N.H. "It affects the language, it shapes the scenes and it, to a certain extent, really even influences the philosophy of the plays."

Credit... Patricia Wall/The New York Times

In reviewing the book before it was published, David Bevington, professor emeritus in the humanities at the University of Chicago and editor of "The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (7th Edition)," called it "a revelation" for the sheer number of correlations with the plays, eclipsed only by the chronicles of Holinshed and Hall and Plutarch's "Lives."

Martin Meisel, professor of dramatic literature emeritus at Columbia University, said in another review that the book is "impressively argued." He added that there is no question the manuscript "must have been somewhere in the background mix of Shakespeare's mental landscape" while writing the plays.

Mr. McCarthy used decidedly modern techniques to marshal his evidence, employing WCopyfind, an open-source plagiarism software, which picked out common words and phrases in the manuscript and the plays.

In the dedication to his manuscript, for example, North urges those who might see themselves as ugly to strive to be inwardly beautiful, to defy nature. He uses a succession of words to make the argument, including "proportion," "glass," "feature," "fair," "deformed," "world," "shadow" and "nature." In the opening soliloquy of Richard III ("Now is the winter of our discontent ...") the hunchbacked tyrant uses the same words in virtually the same order to come to the opposite conclusion: that since he is outwardly ugly, he will act the villain he appears to be.

"People don't realize how rare these words actually are," Mr. McCarthy said. "And he keeps hitting word after word. It's like a lottery ticket. It's easy to get one number out of six, but not to get every number."

Scholars have used computer-assisted techniques in the humanities for several decades. Most of that scholarship, however, uses function words such as articles and prepositions to create a "digital signature" that can be used to identify a writer as author or co-author of another work, rather than using comparatively rare words to locate a source.

Mr. McCarthy was inspired to use plagiarism software by the work of Sir Brian Vickers, who used similar techniques in 2009 to identify Shakespeare as a co-author of the play "Edward III." While the book has been received favorably, the statistical techniques used have not yet been subjected to a rigorous review by other scholars in the digital humanities field.

Those techniques may only be the "icing on the cake," said Mr. Witmore, who briefly examined an advance copy. "At its core, this remains a literary argument, not a statistical one." The book contends that Shakespeare not only uses the same words as North, but often uses them in scenes about similar themes, and even the same historical characters. In another passage, North uses six terms for dogs, from the noble mastiff to the lowly cur and "trundle-tail," to argue that just as dogs exist in a natural hierarchy, so do humans. Shakespeare uses essentially the same list of dogs to make similar points in "King Lear" and "Macbeth."

To make sure North and Shakespeare weren't using common sources, Mr. McCarthy ran phrases through the database Early English Books Online, which contains 17 million pages from nearly every work published in English between 1473 and 1700. He found that almost no other works contained the same words in passages of the same length. Some words are especially rare; "trundle-tail" appears in only one other work before 1623.

In the past, some scholars have identified sources for Shakespeare from a few unique words. In 1977, for example, Kenneth Muir made the case that Shakespeare used a particular translation of a book of Latin stories for "The Merchant of Venice" based on the word "insculpt." In recent years, however, it's become rare to identify new sources for Shakespeare. "The field has been picked over so carefully," Mr. Bevington said.

Mr. McCarthy is an unlikely literary scholar. Originally from Amherst, N.Y., he studied computer science and theater at the University at Buffalo, but never graduated. He began writing for magazines and newspapers and published a book in 2009, titled "Here Be Dragons," about the geographical underpinnings of evolution.

That interest led him to wonder if literary ideas could propagate the same way, and starting in 2006 he began to explore the sources of Shakespeare. Mr. McCarthy focused on Thomas North, a translator of Plutarch's "Lives," whom Shakespeare relied on heavily for his dramas.

In April 2011, Mr. McCarthy brought some of his findings to Ms. Schlueter, professor emerita of English at Lafayette College in Pennsylvania and a founding editor of Shakespeare Bulletin, a scholarly journal. She admired his diligence and natural affinity for scholarly research. "Dennis is the Steve Jobs of the Shakespeare community," Ms. Schlueter said, referring to the self-taught Apple founder.

Mr. McCarthy, 53, works behind three computer monitors on the dining room table of his home. Supported financially by his wife, a biotechnology executive, he spends 12 hours a day or more at his computer.

Mr. McCarthy found a reference to the manuscript by George North, a likely cousin of Thomas, online in a 1927 auction catalog, which noted it would be "extremely interesting" to compare certain passages with Shakespeare. He and Ms. Schlueter scoured libraries and archives for a year before enlisting the help of a manuscript detective, who studies rare documents and traced it to the British Library, which had purchased it in 1933. (The manuscript was filed under an obscure shelf mark, which made finding it difficult.)

In 1576, North was living at Kirtling Hall near Cambridge, England, the estate of Baron Roger North. It was here, Mr. McCarthy says, that he wrote his manuscript, at the same time Thomas North was there possibly working on his translation of Plutarch.

The manuscript is a diatribe against rebels, arguing that all rebellions against a monarch are unjust and doomed to fail. While Shakespeare had a more ambiguous position on rebellion, Mr. McCarthy said he clearly mined North's treatise for themes and characters.

One of the most compelling is Jack Cade, who led a failed popular rebellion against Henry VI in 1450. Shakespeare describes Cade's final days in "Henry VI, Part 2," in which he says he was starving and eating grass, before he was finally caught and dragged through the street by his heels, his body left to be eaten by crows. Scholars have long thought that Shakespeare invented these details, but all of them are present in a passage from North's "Discourse" in which he inveighs against Cade and two other famous rebels. Mr. McCarthy and Ms. Schlueter argue that Shakespeare used those details to make Cade into a composite of the three.

While Cade is a minor character, Mr. McCarthy also argues that North's "Discourse" may have inspired one of Shakespeare's most iconic characters, the Fool in "King Lear." He points to the memorable passage in which the Fool and Lear are lost in a storm, and the Fool recites a prophecy that he attributes to Merlin.

A page from the George North manuscript that starts the poem about Jack Cade. The last stanza lists terms for dogs, which Shakespeare used in "King Lear" and "Macbeth."

Scholars have long puzzled over the recitation, which doesn't seem to match any known prophecy of Merlin's. In their book, however, Mr. McCarthy and Ms. Schlueter claim the passage was inspired by a version of Merlin's prophecy that North includes in his "Discourse" to present a dystopian view of the world "turned up side down." Mr. McCarthy and Ms. Schlueter argue such lines may have inspired themes in "King Lear" and even the character of the Fool.

While agreeing the passage influenced the scene in "King Lear," Mr. Bevington cautioned against an overly expansive reading, noting such themes were in the air in contemporaneous works, including Erasmus's "In Praise of Folly." Whatever its influence, Mr. Witmore said, the find suggests that while scholars may have exhausted print sources, there may be other unpublished manuscripts that inspired the Bard that remain to be discovered.

For his part, Mr. McCarthy is already planning future volumes based on his electronic techniques, hoping to present more discoveries that shed light on how Shakespeare wrote his plays.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Plagiarism Software Unveils a New Source for 11 of Shakespeare's Plays (Published 2018)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Books News For years scholars have debated what inspired William Shakespeare's writings. Now, with the help of software typically used by professors to nab cheating students, two writers have discovered an unpublished manuscript they believe the Bard of Avon consulted to write "King Lear," "Macbeth," "Richard III," "Henry V" and seven other plays.

# data[].attributes.body
Marlowe and Shakespeare Credits

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe Has Officially Been Credited as Co-Author of 3 Shakespeare Plays

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Oxford University Press will soon publish a new critical edition of Shakespeare’s completed works, The New Oxford Shakespeare, which will feature Christopher Marlowe as the Bard’s co-writer on three Henry VI plays.

# data[].attributes.body
Marlowe was a bad boy!?!? Thia article explains how he was often in trouble with the authorities.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe (baptized Feb. 26, 1564, Canterbury, Kent, Eng.-died May 30, 1593, Deptford, near London) was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse.

Early years

Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first schooling, but on Jan. 14, 1579, he entered the King's School, Canterbury, as a scholar. A year later he went to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Obtaining his bachelor of arts degree in 1584, he continued in residence at Cambridge-which may imply that he was intending to take Anglican orders. In 1587, however, the university hesitated about granting him the master's degree; its doubts (arising from his frequent absences from the university) were apparently set at rest when the Privy Council sent a letter declaring that he had been employed "on matters touching the benefit of his country"-apparently in Elizabeth I's secret service.

Last years and literary career.

After 1587 Marlowe was in London, writing for the theatres, occasionally getting into trouble with the authorities because of his violent and disreputable behaviour, and probably also engaging himself from time to time in government service. Marlowe won a dangerous reputation for "atheism," but this could, in Elizabeth I's time, indicate merely unorthodox religious opinions. In Robert Greene's deathbed tract, Greenes groats-worth of witte, Marlowe is referred to as a "famous gracer of Tragedians" and is reproved for having said, like Greene himself, "There is no god" and for having studied "pestilent Machiuilian pollicie." There is further evidence of his unorthodoxy, notably in the denunciation of him written by the spy Richard Baines and in the letter of Thomas Kyd to the lord keeper in 1593 after Marlowe's death. Kyd alleged that certain papers "denying the deity of Jesus Christ" that were found in his room belonged to Marlowe, who had shared the room two years before. Both Baines and Kyd suggested on Marlowe's part atheism in the stricter sense and a persistent delight in blasphemy. Whatever the case may be, on May 18, 1593, the Privy Council issued an order for Marlowe's arrest; two days later the poet was ordered to give daily attendance on their lordships "until he shall be licensed to the contrary." On May 30, however, Marlowe was killed by Ingram Frizer, in the dubious company of Nicholas Skeres and Robert Poley, at a lodging house in Deptford, where they had spent most of the day and where, it was alleged, a fight broke out between them over the bill.

In a playwriting career that spanned little more than six years, Marlowe's achievements were diverse and splendid. Perhaps before leaving Cambridge he had already written Tamburlaine the Great (in two parts, both performed by the end of 1587; published 1590). Almost certainly during his later Cambridge years, Marlowe had translated Ovid's Amores ( The Loves) and the first book of Lucan's Pharsalia from the Latin. About this time he also wrote the play Dido, Queen of Carthage (published in 1594 as the joint work of Marlowe and Thomas Nashe). With the production of Tamburlaine he received recognition and acclaim, and playwriting became his major concern in the few years that lay ahead. Both parts of Tamburlaine were published anonymously in 1590, and the publisher omitted certain passages that he found incongruous with the play's serious concern with history; even so, the extant Tamburlaine text can be regarded as substantially Marlowe's. No other of his plays or poems or translations was published during his life. His unfinished but splendid poem Hero and Leander -which is almost certainly the finest nondramatic Elizabethan poem apart from those produced by Edmund Spenser-appeared in 1598.

There is argument among scholars concerning the order in which the plays subsequent to Tamburlaine were written. It is not uncommonly held that Faustus quickly followed Tamburlaine and that then Marlowe turned to a more neutral, more "social" kind of writing in Edward II and The Massacre at Paris. His last play may have been The Jew of Malta, in which he signally broke new ground. It is known that Tamburlaine, Faustus, and The Jew of Malta were performed by the Admiral's Men, a company whose outstanding actor was Edward Alleyn, who most certainly played Tamburlaine, Faustus, and Barabas the Jew.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe | English Playwright & Poet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse. Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first

# data[].attributes.body
Christopher Marlowe was accused of using blasphemous words in his writings which were alleged as depicting atheism.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe was baptized on February 26, 1564, in Canterbury, Kent, England. He was a prominent figure during the Elizabeth era as a playwright, translator, and poet. He was a significant influence and inspiration to William Shakespeare who was also born in 1564. Shakespeare succeeded him as the Elizabethan playwright shortly after his sudden death.

He was arrested on May 18, 1593, on allegations of blasphemy and was tried before the court on May 20 the same year. He was to attend the court hearings until his case was proved otherwise, but he never lived to participate in the proceedings as he met his end ten days later. Ingram Frizer stabbed him to death on May 30, 1593, in Deptford, Kent.

Early Life

Christopher Marlowe was baptized on February 26, 1564, and was the son of John Marlowe and Catherine. His actual date of birth is not in records but is supposed to be few days before his baptism.

He wasborn in Canterbury, Kent, England and went to The King's School in his early teens. He later attended Corpus Christi College, Cambridge on a scholarship and graduated in 1584 with aBachelor of Arts degree.

In 1587 after completing his master's studies he was denied his Master of Arts degree. This was due to a rumor that he wanted to enroll at the English College, Rheims in preparation for his priesthood ordination. He was later granted his degree with intervention from the Privy Council who praised him for his excellent services to the Queen.

Career

In 1587 Christopher Marlowe started writing plays for theatre performances while in London and also served in the government. 'Dido, Queen of Carthage' is believed to be the first play that he wrote which was published in 1594.

His first play to be performed in London in 1587 was titled 'Tamburlaine the Great' which was published in 1590. The play depicted the character Timur who rose from a mere shepherd to become a mighty warlord. This play was considered to be among his first English plays written in plain verses and performed on a regular stage.

Although scholars have differed in the order by which the subsequent plays were written, what stands out is their ideal manner in which they were written and the themes they portray. It is believed that 'Doctor Faustus' followed 'Tamburlaine' then 'Edward the Second' until the last one 'The Jew of Malta.' However, Marlowe's society gave their chronology as 'The Jew of Malta' followed by 'Doctor Faustus,' 'Edward the Second' and lastly 'The Massacre at Paris.' All the four plays were written between 1589 and 1592.

His Plays

'The Jew of Malta' originally known as 'The Famous Tragedy of the Rich Jew of Malta' talks about a rich Jew in the Island of Malta known as Barabas whose wealth was taken by the government. In his attempts to recover his wealth from the rulers he ends up being killed by the Maltese Soldiers. The play highlights different themes including religious conflict, intrigue, and revenge.

The play inspired Shakespeare's work 'The Merchant of Venice' with Shylock depicting the character of Barabas. 'The Jew of Malta' in essence became one of his four last works with a portrayal of controversial themes.

'Edward the Second' depicts a weak and powerless King Edward II of England who is beguiled and overcome by his baron and the queen. 'The Massacre at Paris' is another work bearing controversial themes. It portrays the massacre of thousands of Protestants by the Catholic elites and French notables.

It highlights the events that prevailed on the fateful day known as Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 1572. The last play titled 'Doctor Faustus' well known as 'The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus.' The play depicts a man signing a deal with the devil by selling his soul to get power and knowledge in return. He is instead warned by a good Angel and proves himself as unable to repentwhich leads to his tragic end.

Controversy and Arrest

Christopher Marlowe was accused of using blasphemous words in his writings which were alleged as depicting atheism. He was arrested and brought before the court in 1593 on accounts of heresies and atheism which were vile offenses.

However, the court was unable to determine whether he was liable for punishment or not. The court released him but was expected to appear before the council on a daily basis. It was not long before he was stabbed to death ten days later by Ingram Frizer. He died on May 30, 1593, at the young age of twenty-nine in Deptford, Kent, England.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe Biography, Life, Interesting Facts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe was baptized on February 26, 1564, in Canterbury, Kent, England. He was a prominent figure during the Elizabeth era as a playwright, translator, and poet. He was a significant influence and inspiration to William Shakespeare who was also born in 1564. Shakespeare succeeded him as the Elizabethan playwright shortly after his sudden death.

# data[].attributes.body
This article explains commonalities between Shakespeare and Marlowe due to common speculations that people had about them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Controversy of Shakespeare and Marlowe - Utah Shakespeare Festival

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Speculation continually follows William Shakespeare, especially since we know so little about him. Only a few certain facts are known, and even fewer documents survive. But Shakespeare isn't the only playwright during his time period to be surrounded by speculation. His contemporary, Christopher Mar

# data[].attributes.body
Need a site full of links for shakespeare tragedies? You've come to the right post http://www.bardweb.net/plays/

# data[].attributes.body
Talks about who Marlowe is

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe (baptized Feb. 26, 1564, Canterbury, Kent, Eng.-died May 30, 1593, Deptford, near London) was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse.

Early years

Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first schooling, but on Jan. 14, 1579, he entered the King's School, Canterbury, as a scholar. A year later he went to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Obtaining his bachelor of arts degree in 1584, he continued in residence at Cambridge-which may imply that he was intending to take Anglican orders. In 1587, however, the university hesitated about granting him the master's degree; its doubts (arising from his frequent absences from the university) were apparently set at rest when the Privy Council sent a letter declaring that he had been employed "on matters touching the benefit of his country"-apparently in Elizabeth I's secret service.

Last years and literary career.

After 1587 Marlowe was in London, writing for the theatres, occasionally getting into trouble with the authorities because of his violent and disreputable behaviour, and probably also engaging himself from time to time in government service. Marlowe won a dangerous reputation for "atheism," but this could, in Elizabeth I's time, indicate merely unorthodox religious opinions. In Robert Greene's deathbed tract, Greenes groats-worth of witte, Marlowe is referred to as a "famous gracer of Tragedians" and is reproved for having said, like Greene himself, "There is no god" and for having studied "pestilent Machiuilian pollicie." There is further evidence of his unorthodoxy, notably in the denunciation of him written by the spy Richard Baines and in the letter of Thomas Kyd to the lord keeper in 1593 after Marlowe's death. Kyd alleged that certain papers "denying the deity of Jesus Christ" that were found in his room belonged to Marlowe, who had shared the room two years before. Both Baines and Kyd suggested on Marlowe's part atheism in the stricter sense and a persistent delight in blasphemy. Whatever the case may be, on May 18, 1593, the Privy Council issued an order for Marlowe's arrest; two days later the poet was ordered to give daily attendance on their lordships "until he shall be licensed to the contrary." On May 30, however, Marlowe was killed by Ingram Frizer, in the dubious company of Nicholas Skeres and Robert Poley, at a lodging house in Deptford, where they had spent most of the day and where, it was alleged, a fight broke out between them over the bill.

In a playwriting career that spanned little more than six years, Marlowe's achievements were diverse and splendid. Perhaps before leaving Cambridge he had already written Tamburlaine the Great (in two parts, both performed by the end of 1587; published 1590). Almost certainly during his later Cambridge years, Marlowe had translated Ovid's Amores ( The Loves) and the first book of Lucan's Pharsalia from the Latin. About this time he also wrote the play Dido, Queen of Carthage (published in 1594 as the joint work of Marlowe and Thomas Nashe). With the production of Tamburlaine he received recognition and acclaim, and playwriting became his major concern in the few years that lay ahead. Both parts of Tamburlaine were published anonymously in 1590, and the publisher omitted certain passages that he found incongruous with the play's serious concern with history; even so, the extant Tamburlaine text can be regarded as substantially Marlowe's. No other of his plays or poems or translations was published during his life. His unfinished but splendid poem Hero and Leander -which is almost certainly the finest nondramatic Elizabethan poem apart from those produced by Edmund Spenser-appeared in 1598.

There is argument among scholars concerning the order in which the plays subsequent to Tamburlaine were written. It is not uncommonly held that Faustus quickly followed Tamburlaine and that then Marlowe turned to a more neutral, more "social" kind of writing in Edward II and The Massacre at Paris. His last play may have been The Jew of Malta, in which he signally broke new ground. It is known that Tamburlaine, Faustus, and The Jew of Malta were performed by the Admiral's Men, a company whose outstanding actor was Edward Alleyn, who most certainly played Tamburlaine, Faustus, and Barabas the Jew.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe | English Playwright & Poet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse. Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first

# data[].attributes.body
Article that talked about the death of Christopher Marlowe.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Playwright Christopher Marlowe, 29, is killed in a brawl over a bar tab on this day.

Marlowe, born two months before William Shakespeare, was the son of a Canterbury shoemaker. A bright student, he won scholarships to prestigious schools and earned his B.A. from Cambridge in 1584. He was nearly denied his master's degree in 1587, until advisers to Queen Elizabeth intervened, recommending he receive the degree, referring obliquely to his services for the state. Marlowe's activities as a spy for Queen Elizabeth were later documented by historians.

While still in school, Marlowe wrote his play Tamburlaine the Great, about a 14th century shepherd who became an emperor. The blank verse drama caught on with the public, and Marlowe wrote five more plays before his death in 1593, including The Jew of Malta and Dr. Faustus. He also published a translation of Ovid's Elegies.

In May of 1593, Marlowe's former roommate, playwright Thomas Kyd, was arrested and tortured for treason. He told authorities that "heretical" papers found in his room belonged to Marlowe, who was subsequently arrested. While out on bail, Marlowe became involved in a fight over a tavern bill and was stabbed to death.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Playwright Christopher Marlowe killed in tavern brawl

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Playwright Christopher Marlowe, 29, is killed in a brawl over a bar tab on this day. Marlowe, born two months before William Shakespeare, was the son of a Canterbury shoemaker. A bright student, he won scholarships to prestigious schools and earned his B.A. from Cambridge in 1584.

# data[].attributes.body
An introduction to Modern Tragedy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble stature and the transcendent realm of tragedy. One could, in short, measure oneself against the larger, universal background of what constitutes tragedy, as rendered by an Aeschylus and a Sophocles in, respectively, an Agamemnon or an Oedipus. A certain greatness, immensity, and exceptionality surrounded the tragic dimension, even as tragedy connoted something greater than immediate life, from which, of course, it emerged and the reality of which it reflected to a heightened, ultimate degree.

An epic poem like Homer's Iliad is fraught with tragic meaning and destiny, its heroes immense, even overwhelming in their tragic circumstances and predicament-in their fatedness ( moira). Their tragic qualities help to place their tragic experience on the highest level of moral significance. The tragedy of Achilles, like his shield, depicts what is astonishing and enormous in consequence, trans-human and superhuman. His suffering, no less than his weakness and sin ( hamartia), overshadows everything else in the epic tragedy of the Iliad. His demise, unalterable, dramatizes tragic lessons in wisdom and insight for those who discern the spectacle of his glory and destruction. A monumental essence radiates in his every act and gesture, in his heroic praxis and doxai. In association with Achilles, what is terribly human attains its highest measure of worth.

The line of descent and connection from Achilles to Agamemnon to Oedipus to Antigone to Medea is one that discloses a kind of spiritual angst, at once terrifying and redeeming. In these tragic figures and in the dilemma of each hero's agon, we recognize the deeper parts of our extended selves in the undulant process of purification and expiation. In their pathos we perceive our own-and we take note of the redemptive context of reverence. Their tragedy helps us to understand our limits, our limitations. Such tragedy, at once humane and humanizing, helps us to encounter and also to measure our humanity. It enables us to perceive, even if from a distance, what is called, in Hellenic contexts, a "vision of the agathon " as a dimension of a "divine paradigm," and always against the background of those "unwritten laws" that Sophocles describes in Antigone:

"The immortal unwritten laws of Heaven,
they were not born today nor yesterday;
They die not; and none knoweth whence they sprang."

Ancient tragedy, it can be said, has its ground of being in these "laws," these first and last principles, the arche and telos of all human experience and meaning. This is tragedy of transcendence, as it were, with its informing metaphysic in relation to human nothingness ("I count your life as equal to zero," the Chorus cries in Oedipus Rex) and also, in the end, to the suffering which also brings a cleansing self-recognition-a kind of grace at the edge of redemption in the country of the spirit: "Submit, you fool. Submit. In agony learn wisdom," as Aeschylus declares in Prometheus. Ancient tragedy is, thus, the experience of transformation (not "transfiguration" in the later Christian sense), enacted in the contexts of what Goethe terms the "divine worth of tones and tears." That, too, Greek tragedy has, in its unique way, a religious center, even, that is, a spiritual essence, is an incontrovertible fact. For the Greek tragedians, as teachers of virtues, were deeply involved with religious questions-ultimate questions revolving around man's worth and destiny-with some super-human power ( theos), and with man's fate. "The Greeks of the sixth and fifth centuries," writes Werner Jaeger in Paideia (1939-1944), "had long been brooding on the great religious problem: why does God send suffering into the life of man?"

The Greek tragedians, hence, stressed the eternal fact that man must not forget his unconscious and yet transcendent ties to the unwritten laws and his need for reverence ( eusebeia) for the unknown, the mysterious. Their tragedies, in effect, provided a dramatic interpretation of life, both moral and spiritual in principle. And these tragedies, more specifically, focused on some heroic figure-some superior being-in whom some fateful problem was to be enacted, particularly the great religious problem of suffering and sin, of punishment and expiation. "Behind all suffering," G. Lowes Dickinson writes in The Greek View of Life (1896), "behind sin and crime, must lie a redeeming magnanimity." A Greek tragedy, by becoming a "moving sculpture" and "a sleep of music," also was to become a study of Man ( anthropos), finally transporting the audience to a world of higher reality and permanence from the material world of terror and flux.

Clearly, ancient tragedy contains a humanistic orientation: that is, a fervent and consummate preoccupation with the nature of man, his predicament and his fate. Man, in short, is the center, though that center has its added metaphysical dimension, its added center, in the universe (in the cosmos), so that to concentrate solely on the first center to the neglect of the second center breeds arrogance, insolence, impiety, overweening pride- hubris. Aeschylus's Agamemnon depicts precisely this centeredness of the self and images its destructive process when he walks on the purple carpets reserved only for the Gods and thus courts punishment and doom itself. He glorifies what Simone Weil calls "the empire of might" (in all of its consequences) as it collides with the "justice of Zeus," and with the "law of measure" ("nothing in excess," to recall the Greek warning).

Greek tragedy also becomes a drama of discrimination, seeking as it does to present itself as a mode of explaining the world-the human condition-and knowing it. In Sophocles this form of tragedy-of tragic discrimination-affirms man's greatness in the face of cruel adversity; affirms man's heroic capacity within the scope of a heroism of dignity, which constitutes, for the ancients, true humility and final redemption. Sophocles, in this respect, is a tragic poet of order, reverence, proportion, above all, of sophrosyne, the supreme Hellenic virtue.

Attic tragedy records the disorder of eros and the yearning for order; it records, in effect, the constant collision between gravity and grace, between disequilibrium and equilibrium, between nothingness and being, between courage and nihilism. Tragedy, of its very nature, must bear "the burden of vision" for eternity itself. It should not go unnoticed that ancient and modern tragedy do have a connecting link in Euripides, the perturbing Greek dramatist who, as Jaeger was to observe, "discovered the soul in a new sense-who revealed the troubled world of man's emotions and passions."

Unlike Aeschylus and Sophocles, Euripides confronted the cold, hard face of reality as he saw it; showed fierce understanding of what he saw; and fiercely condemned those conditions that he exposed. Indeed, Euripides has been described as a dramatist who had a "modern mind," the first of the moderns; Aristophanes, in fact, charged that Euripides taught the Athenians to "think, see, understand, suspect, question everything," and no words better prophesy the "modern temper" than these.

That, too, Euripides belonged essentially to a destructive analytical spirit, that he took things rebelliously, that he reflected an age of movement and transition, that he echoed the sophistic spirit, that all truth is relative-it is this sophism that Plato equated with intellectual and moral anarchy: these aspects of his thought and dramatic achievement anticipate the modern age and what Thomas Hardy specifies as "the ache of modernism." In Euripides we have a prophetic glimpse of the crisis of modernism in the destructive forms of disorder, discontinuity, disinheritance: of a modern world that is "a broken center," when as Rilke declares, "the world...passed out of the hands of God into the hands of men."

Walter Pater cogently summarizes our modernity when he writes: "Modern thought is distinguished from ancient by its cultivation of the 'relative spirit' in place of the 'absolute."' This modernity, pervasive and irreversible, spells the "doom of orthodox sophrosyne," which signifies the law of measure. The Russian poet F. I. Tiutshev (1803-1873) registers the modern predicament when he writes in his poem "The Abyss":

Behold man, without home,
orphaned, alone, impotent,
facing the dark abyss; ...
And in this strange mysterious night
he sees and knows a Fatal heritage.

The "fatal heritage" that Tiutshev speaks of in his poem is also that which Matthew Arnold, in his poem "The Scholar Gypsy," associates with "this strange disease of modern life/ With its sick hurry, its divided aims." William Butler Yeats, in "The Second Coming" (1919), also underlines the ravages and the desperation of such a heritage of fatal consequences in modern life: "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;/ Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world."

In his book The End of the Modern World (1956) Romano Guardini declares that "Man has no place-absolutely no place-in the universe," words that embody not only the essence of modernity but also its tragic essences that culminate in the modern waste land that T.S. Eliot renders. The sustaining and redeeming principles of conservation and correction espoused by Edmund Burke, as well as the disciplines of continuity intimately connected with these, have been superseded, or contravened, by what the philosopher Michael Polanyi calls a "positivistic empiricism," or as he further observes: "...[the] idea of unlimited progress, intensified to perfectionism, has combined with our sharpened skepticism to produce the perilous state of the modern mind."

Human meaning, then, is "reduced to the condition of things," reduced, in effect, to a concern with "the idea of man...[as an] administrative number," without a past and without memory, when, as Samuel Beckett declares, "it is not for man to act, but to be acted upon: man can only despair of hope, can only not wait or wait." Spiritual inertia, which results from this process of cruel reductionism in a pluralist society, leads to a malaise that afflicts human existence and that adopts, for example, the belief that, in Simone Weil's words, "matter is a machine for manufacturing good."

Such a belief plunges modern man deeper into Plato's "Cave of Illusion" and renounces the redemption that resides in humility, perhaps the highest spiritual quality to be found in the "tragic sense of life": "Without humility, all the virtues are finite," Simone Weil further states. "Only humility makes them infinite." Indeed, humility is the omega-point of a metaphysics of tragedy-of tragic meaning, experience, destiny. It is a paradigm of tragedy, which if it is scorned or repudiated leads precisely to the annihilation of the tragic spirit that makes tragedy non-tragic in modern life; in short, transforms tragedy into paradox, which thrusts one "beyond tragedy," that also signalizes "the death of tragedy."

Nicola Chiaromonte, the late Italian social critic (1905-1972), is much to the point when he writes concerning the nihilism and violated principles shaping and finally destroying human meaning in modern civilization:

"The sickness of our times is egomania. It renders the individual radically impious and makes him ignore everything that does not serve his immediate objectives (which never extended beyond the limits of his own lifetime), thereby denying all that is ineffable, secret, and arcane in the world-the 'divine' inherent in all things and in every impulse of the spirit."

Impiety, that which for Virgil constituted an ultimate discordance found in furor impius, is a major part of the disorientation in modern life that breaks and diminishes the patience and magnanimity that inhere redemptively in genuine tragic experience as it depicts the search for order of the soul. "No-more'' and "Not-yet," Heidegger's "double Not," now make the tragic sense a "senseless fatality"; the so-called modern hero is just "anybody," just another "sleep-walker'' in "kosmos Kafka," for whom "eternity is replaced by endlessness" and who bleakly gives us news, as Kafka would have it, of "the abandoned world" in which he lives.

In the modern age, which one critic terms "an age of bad faith" commencing with August 1914, when the Great War broke out, tragic vision and experience undergo a radical change-a devaluative pulverizing process in which what for the ancients is noble, elevated, and heroic now becomes trivial, minimal, and common. A modern victim's tragedy lacks stature or grandeur, and is often one that underlines a victim's grotesqueness, meaninglessness, rootlessness, his absurdity, his non-being. In the modern world in which the idea of transcendence has neither place nor meaning tragedy itself is a victim of what Eric Voegelin calls "existential deformation."

If in ancient tragedy a tragic hero is shrouded in a world of mystery, possesses a noumenal quality of human worth, has a standard of character in an ascending pattern of development and meaning, in modern tragedy a tragic figure is identified by demystification and by dehumanization, by lostness and rootlessness. His world, in a sense, has no universal frontiers and is reduced in its physical and spiritual horizons; that is, it is a localized, non-ontological, non-organic world in which man himself is reduced, or neutralized, or denatured; a disinherited, displaced person, as it were, and, indeed, a non-person consigned to a "cancer ward," or exiled, forever, to a Siberian gulag, the modern forms of tragic fate in "the heart of darkness." These are our conditions of modern tragedy, or better our pseudonyms of tragedy.

In the ancient world tragedy contained and was nourished by the "religious sense," that is to say, by the elements of piety and humility, by an intuitive veneration of "the idea of the holy," of the sacred logos as opposed to the profane impulse, by an intuitive pull towards the transcendent as opposed to the present and the nominal. Sophocles's Oedipus at Colonus is perhaps the most vivid illustration of the religious sense and of the religious acceptation in a tragic context. Oedipus, now an exile and wanderer, recognizes his moira -''In suffering I was born." "The sap of earth dries up," he confesses almost abjectly.

"Flesh dies, and while faith withers falsehood blooms.
The spirit is not constant from friend to friend, from city to city;
it changes, soon or late."

His end, in a scene that is perhaps grander than any in Greek tragedy, we view the aged and blind Oedipus disappearing into a sacred grove-"And the place is holy." Oedipus now encounters the " mysterium tremendum ":

...suddenly a Voice called him, a terrifying voice at which all trembled and hair stood on end. A god was calling to him. "Oedipus! Oedipus!" it cried, again and again. "It is time: you stay too long." He heard the summons, and knew that it was from God.

Oedipus passes from the human world to the divine-to "holy ground." His end, his disappearance into the divine unknown, into the divine otherness, emphasizes the religious sense as it conjoins with the tragic sense, each deepening and enhancing the other in relation to the huge cosmic mystery, wondrous in its breadth and depth.

This religious sense, in its Hellenic constituents, should not be forcibly amalgamated or confused with the religious sense in its Christian contexts. Oedipus's tragic passion and fate, whatever their religious feeling and pull, must be differentiated from the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The religious dimension of Greek tragedy revolves around moral struggle, but it is obviously removed from the Christian vision of redemption. Greek tragic heroes are finite beings even in their religious nobility, whereas a Christian tragic hero (as in the fiction of a Dostoevsky) is a creature of freedom, sin, guilt, and salvation.

Greek tragedy venerates the transcendent, in its awe and sanctity, but it is teleological in its experiential qualities of pity and terror. The eschatological character of the Christian religious sense must not be ignored-that subsuming religious sense that has its ultimates in the coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the Last Judgment. Both Greek tragedy and modern tragedy are anchored in time, in chronos-in measured time that has a beginning and ending; that has boundaries at once temporal and spatial. For the Christian, on the other hand, all tragedy ends in grace, attains its finality, its telos, in ultimate time, in kairos, in that time, to kairo ekino: in divine time that is timeless and that fuses beginnings and endings, endings and beginnings.

For the Christian, tragedy ends not in the heroic suffering of the Greeks or in the perverse skepticism of the moderns, but in Revelation. "For those who have faith to trust in the revelation that is the Christ," Preston T. Roberts, Jr., writes in a masterful essay, "A Christian Theory of Dramatic Tragedy," "evil, sin, the devil, death-in short all that is cursed, wretched, and miserable about this life-becomes redeemable in principle and redeemed at certain points and moments in fact."

Modern tragedy, having increasingly repudiated the religious sense that radiated in and even renewed ancient tragedy by endowing it with a metaphysical yearning, registers the nothingness, the "nameless, ultimate fear, a horror of the completely negative," that Dr. F.R. Leavis perceives in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land (1922):

After the torchlight red on sweaty faces
After the frosty silence in the garden
After the agony in stony places
The shouting and the crying
Prison and palace and reverberation
Of thunder of spring over distant mountains
He who was living is now dead
We who were living are now dying
With a little patience.

It can be said that modern tragedy is the tragedy of experiencing "the agony in stony places" and yet learning nothing from this tragic experience: or of hearing the " ou-boum" ("utterly dull") which, in E. M. Forster's novel A Passage to India (1924), merely states, now and forever, in this world and in all worlds, "Everything exists, nothing has value." Forster's words evoke the import of tragedy in the modern world even as they severely constrict the boundaries of tragic vision. This constriction signals not only the crisis of modernity but also the tragedy of modernity as we live and experience it in the "antagonist world."
Reprinted with the gracious permission of Modern Age (Fall 1997).
The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics-we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble

# data[].attributes.body
a quick overview of who Christopher Marlowe was and what happened throughout his life

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
If you want to know the famous poet, translator and playwright for England, you have to check Facts about Christopher Marlowe. Marlowe lived in 1564 until 1593. He was born in Canterbury, Kent, England. His mother was Catherine, while his father was John Marlowe. On 26th February 1564, he was baptized at St George's Church. Check other interesting facts about Christopher Marlowe below:

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 1: the education

Marlowe was educated at The King's School in Canterbury. Then he went to Cambridge to study at Corpus Christi College after he earned a scholarship from the university. In 1584, he got Bachelor of Arts degree

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 2: the nickname

The nickname of Christopher Marlowe is Kit Marlowe. The exact birthday of Marlowe is not known until today.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 3: Elizabethan era

During the Elizabethan era, Marlowe was recognized as a notable poet, translator and playwright. He was also considered as the notable tragedian in that era.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 4: the characteristics of Marlowe's plays

If you check the plays of Marlowe, most of them were created using the overreaching protagonist and black verse.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 5: an arrest

On 18 May 1593, there was a warrant for his arrest. The main reason for his arrest was not known. The people believed that it had something to do with the allegation of blasphemy.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 6: to the court

He was captured and brought to the court on 20 May 1593. It was scheduled for him to be questioned by the Privy Council. However, there was no record that he met the council.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 7: death of Marlowe

Marlowe died after Ingram Frizer stabbed him 10 days later. The people can only speculate whether the death was related to the arrest or not.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 8: Dido, Queen of Carthage

It is believed that the first drama that Marlowe wrote is Dido, Queen of Carthage. Children of the Chapel was a company of boy actors who made the performance of this drama in 1587 until 1593. In 1594, the first play was published. Find facts about Chris Ofili here.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 9: the sexuality

Marlowe was subject of controversy. The people sometimes describe him as a homosexual.

Facts about Christopher Marlowe 10: the plays

There are various plays made Marlowe. Those include The Massacre at Paris, Edward II, Doctor Faustus, Doctor Faustus and Tamburlaine. Get facts about Christopher Bruce here.

Do you have any comment on facts about Christopher Marlowe?

tags: Christopher Marlowe, Facts about Christopher Marlowe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
If you want to know the famous poet, translator and playwright for England, you have to check Facts about Christopher Marlowe. Marlowe lived in 1564 until 1593. He was born in Canterbury, Kent, England. His mother was Catherine, while his father was John Marlowe. On 26th February 1564, he was baptized at St George's Church.

# data[].attributes.body
Here's a more professional source with a more concise description of tragedy in modern times. The graphic design is kind of garbage though :(

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Understanding Dramatic Tragedy

Dr. John W. Hodgson
(close this browser window to return to the start page)

Tragedy: the word evokes connotations of sadness, death, and irony. Contemporary American culture overuses the word; every occasion for grief becomes, in the lexicon of the evening news, "a tragedy." We have misused the word so completely and so often that most Americans have no idea what it really means.

In literature, a tragedy is a plot in which the protagonist, because of some inherent flaw in his/her character, dies. Thus Hamlet is a tragedy. Julius Caesar is a tragedy. Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy. (The destruction of the World Trade Center is an outrage, and is sad, but it is not a tragedy no matter how often CNN says that it is.) In each of these plays the protagonist is either a great man or a man of great promise; instead of fulfilling his potential, however, each one succumbs to his tragic flaw and ultimately dies. Caesar's flaw is ambition, Hamlet's is the inability to take action, and Romeo's is his tendency to love too much.

It might seem, from this highly simplified definition, that character and resolution are the keys to a tragedy. But tragedy also implies a central action, a crisis which tests that flawed part of the protagonist's character. In Julius Caesar, the test comes when Marc Antony presents Caesar with the crown. Hamlet's test comes in the chapel, after witnessing his uncle's reaction to the play. Mercutio's death tests Romeo. In all three cases the protagonists are found wanting: Caesar accepts the crown after refusing it twice; Hamlet sheaths his sword instead of executing Claudius; Romeo murders Tybalt in a vengeful rage. Without the test, the flaw might never surface.

In the Poetics, Aristotle wrote that the purpose of Tragedy is to evoke a wonder born of pity and fear, the result of which is cathartic. As audience members we should sympathize with the protagonist, possibly recognizing in him/her our own human weaknesses. This quality of seeing ourselves, wholly or in part, in a fictional character is called identification; without this sort of identification, we cannot achieve what Samuel Taylor Coleridge* called "a willing suspension of disbelief" necessary to enjoy the work of fiction, whether it be on stage or in a book. Because tragedy is built around an internal conflict of character, identification with the protagonist is crucial to success. If we cannot understand Romeo's naïve, unsophisticated notion of love, for example, what poignancy does his death have?

* Biographia Literaria, Chapter 14--thanks to Steven Storer for correcting my error here.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Understanding Dramatic Tragedy Dr. John W. Hodgson (close this browser window to return to the start page) Tragedy: the word evokes connotations of sadness, death, and irony. Contemporary American culture overuses the word; every occasion for grief becomes, in the lexicon of the evening news, "a tragedy."

# data[].attributes.body
This is an article about how the play Doctor Faustus influenced other pieces of literature.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus at four hundred.

Christopher Marlowe's The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus premiered in 1594. Nearly forty years later, people were still talking about those earliest performances. The Puritan pamphleteer and ideologue William Prynne, in his massive 1633 antitheatrical tome Histriomastix, recounted diabolical legends surrounding this most infernal of plays. The spectators and actors "prophanely playing" in that first production, he reported, had a "visible apparition of the Devill on the Stage." The good Puritan-soon to be imprisoned in the Tower of London, where he would have his ears cropped for having implied that the queen was a whore-assures us that though he was not himself familiar with such theatrical dens of iniquity, he can confirm the event's veracity as "the truth of which I have heard from many now alive, who well remember it."

Similarly, a monograph by someone identified only as "G.J.R" recounts that during a performance of the scene where Dr. Faustus begins his conjurations, there suddenly "was one devil too many amongst them." It seems that the hocus pocus nonsense magic of Marlowe's immense Latin learning had accidentally triggered an actual occult transaction, pulling one of Lucifer's servants from hell into our own realm. On that stage in Exeter-there among conjuring circles, chanted invocations, and the adjuring of God's love-the extras playing stock devils with caked-on red makeup and fake horns strapped to their heads found themselves with the chance to meet the real thing. G.J.R. informs us that "after a little pause... every man hastened to be first out of doors." The actors ("contrary to their custom," he duly informs us) spent the night in "reading and in prayer," making sure to get "out of the town the next morning."

But even that is no match for the premiere of the play, at the Rose Theatre in Southwark (which today lay underneath a parking garage) among taverns, brothels, and bear-baiting pits, when some in the audience claimed that they spied Mephistopheles's master himself among the crowd, having availed himself of the opportunity to travel up to Earth and to see how accurately his old friend Kit Marlowe had presented him. No word on the review.

These claims are in keeping with a longstanding sense of the medieval in Dr. Faustus, with its cursed (goat-skin?) grimoires and its personified Sins, with devils and angels on shoulders tempting its main character, and demons dancing on stage. Dr. Faustus, after all, parrots the genre of the medieval morality play. Even so, Marlowe's text is in some ways one of our first modern plays-and its title character is our first modern man. Strung as he is between faith and doubt, insignificance and omnipotence, sin and salvation, and particularly between freedom and fate. Dr. Faustus is a creature, and in part a creator, of our world. (What could be a more Faustian bargain than ours, in which we gain immense technological power under the perennial threat of complete ecological collapse?) In his skepticism and arrogance, his total dependence and painful doubt, Faustus is our contemporary: an imperfect man with the power to sell the world. Whiffs of sulfur are not just on those stages in Exeter and Southwark where Marlowe dreamed of the modern world. They were also in the mustard gas factories of World War I; the desert plains at Alamogordo, New Mexico, where Oppenheimer detonated his grand experiment; and on the disappearing Arctic ice caps. I hear echoes of Dr. Faustus's screams of damnation time and again over the last century: for "this is hell, nor am I out of it."

*

Dr. Faustus has conjured a lot of extra devils over the years. Evidence of those hoofprints of Satan, and of the infernal contract he offered to that poor necromancer, skitter across the pages of history and literature. There are, of course, the literary treatments-Goethe, Stephen Vincent Benét's "The Devil and Daniel Webster," Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita, Thomas Mann's Doktor Faustus, even the baseball musical Damn Yankees. But real Faustian bargains are just as plentiful. Think of the German Faustbuchs of the mid-sixteenth century, which Marlowe mined for his source material. Or of Urbain Grandier, the Satanic French priest of the seventeenth-century, who made a devilish pact and held monastic orgies. Then there's the Scotsman Thomas Weir, who professed to be a loyal and solemn Covenanter, but strolled the winding cobblestoned streets of Edinburgh with Satan. Jonathan Moulton, the "Yankee Faust" of Revolutionary New Hampshire, was said to have sold his soul to the devil in exchange for two bootfuls of gold coins every month; to trick the devil, Moulton removed the soles of his boots and put them over a hole in the floor, so his basement filled with gold. (The devil burned down his house in revenge.) And, of course, there's the dusty crossroads of Highway 61 and 49 in Clarksdale, Mississippi, where the bluesman Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil sometime around 1931.

Musicians in particular seem to have a bit of the Faustian about them, something mysterious in their alchemy of melody and rhythm. The Italian violinists Giuseppe Tartini and Niccolò Paganini, and the French composer Phillipe Mussard, all from the eighteenth century, supposedly saw their names on contracts with the devil. Some have suggested that the minor-keyed "Gloomy Sunday"-the notorious "Hungarian suicide song" written by Rezső Seress around the same time Johnson went down to the crossroads-has some of the heat of hell in it, too. If Dr. Faustus is the first modern man, it's because he is the first of a modern type: the artist. The bohemian archetype has long been understood as a devilish one. Where once the individual was but a conduit for God, with Faustus he began to serve a different master, either his own consciousness or, well, Satan. Or maybe those are really the same thing. Dr. Faustus during the witching hour, with his leatherbound tomes and his scrying mirrors, scribbling furiously on vellum and divinating with the sacred geometry, wasn't a mad scientist: he was the artist. He was Marlowe himself.

*

If Dr. Faustus is one of the first modern men, then his creator, in his ambiguities, contradictions, and secrets, is right there with him. Marlowe was of the supposed "School of Night": he met with Walter Raleigh and the astrologer John Dee in graveyards to summon their own extra devils. He may have shared a bed with his colleague Thomas Kyd, and he declared, according to the renegade priest Richard Baines, "that all they that love not tobacco and boys are fools." A supposed nonbeliever, Marlowe also said that Moses "was but a juggler" and that "Christ was a bastard and his mother dishonest" (this, again, per Baines). A possible agent of Sir Francis Walshingham's fearsome Privy Council, Marlowe performed god knows what manner of subterfuge and espionage on the continent, and he may have been assassinated for it. Certainly he was accused of nailing a threat to the door of one of London's Dutch-Protestant "Stranger Churches," written in perfect iambic pentameter and signed "Tamburlaine" (another act for which he may have been killed). Marlowe, who perhaps once saw the face of the Devil, and was "tormented with ten thousand hells / In being deprived of everlasting bliss." He was, finally, stabbed to death through the eye in a Deptford tavern over a bill-at least that was the official story.

Just as there are mysteries with Marlowe, there are mysteries with the text of his masterpiece. There's a quarto "Text A" printed in 1604, a decade after his murder, and a longer, funnier "Text B," published four hundred years ago as of 2016. Its 676 new lines include a bevy of dark, comic interludes. One difference between the two texts is crucial. It hinges on the question of whether Faustus can or will repent-a massive theological difference. Text A has it, "Never too late, if Faustus can repent;" Text B says "Faustus will repent." The former implies that Faustus's agency may be constrained by some larger force, while the word will grants the doctor the ability to choose his own course. "Can" has a connotation of helplessness; "will" preserves the possibility that the individual is still free, that he may choose damnation instead of having it thrust upon him. Does Dr. Faustus admit that he's powerless? The debates then concerned predestination; just as the medieval schoolmen had their Fortuna, today we have neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, base and superstructure, determinism, fatalism, and the teleology of history. The problem remains same as it ever was, whether Faustus "can" or "will" repent-because the fact is that he's damned either way. In the contemporary world, since it was born four centuries ago, we've always found ourselves in Dr. Faustus's study, and it's always a half hour before midnight. The tragedy isn't about whether or not salvation is possible, but whether we can even try.

Ed Simon is a Ph.D. candidate in English at Lehigh University. His writing has appeared online at The Atlantic, Salon, The Millions, Lit Hub, The Revealer, Killing the Buddha, Berfrois, The Public Domain Review, and Nautilus. Follow him on Twitter @WithEdSimon.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe's "Doctor Faustus" at 400

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus at four hundred . Christopher Marlowe's The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus premiered in 1594. Nearly forty years later, people were still talking about those earliest performances. The Puritan pamphleteer and ideologue William Prynne, in his massive 1633 antitheatrical tome Histriomastix, recounted diabolical legends surrounding this most infernal of plays.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyzes the history and modern studies in Shakespearean tragedy and its philosophical approach.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An introduction to Shakespearean tragedy | The British Library

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By using this site, you agree we can set and use cookies. For more details of these cookies and how to disable them, see our cookie policy. An introduction to Shakespearean tragedy Despite their dazzling diversity, the tragedies of Shakespeare gain their enduring power from a shared dramatic vision, argues Kiernan Ryan.

# data[].attributes.body
This article explains that Doctor Faustus sold his soul to make a point.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
[Written while the author was a freshman atText copyright ©1999-2010 John Larson. All Rights Reserved.Site copyright ©1996-2010

John Larson

The University of Oregon, and should be read
with understanding of the same. —JL]

Doctor Faustus - Selling His Soul to Make a Point
_________________________________________________

Published by Luminarium through express written permission.

In Dr. Faustus, Christopher Marlowe has vividly drawn up the character of an intelligent, learned man tragically seduced by the lure of power greater than he was mortally meant to have. The character of Dr. Faustus is, in conception, an ideal of humanism, but Marlowe has taken him and shown him to be damned nonetheless, thus satirizing the ideals of Renaissance Humanism.

M. H. Abram's A Glossary of Literary Terms defines Renaissance Humanism, stating that some of the key concepts of the philosophy centered around "the dignity and central position of human beings in the universe" as reasoning creatures, as well as downplaying the "animal' passions" of the individual. The mode of the thought also "stressed the need for a rounded development of and individual's diverse powers... as opposed to merely technical or specialized training." Finally, all of this was synthesized into and perhaps defined by their tendency to minimize the prevalent Christian ideal of innate corruption and withdrawal from the present, flawed world in anticipation of heaven. (p. 83)

The character of Faustus is reasoning and very aware of the moral (or immoral) status of what he is undertaking. His opening speech is devoted to working out logically why he is willing to sacrifice both the road to honest knowledge and his soul in favor of more power. (I, 1-63) He exhibits, in his search for power, anything but animal passion; he indeed exhibits a chilling logic as he talks himself out of the possible delights of heaven. Not only is he intelligent, he also demonstrates a broad base of learning, another quality admired and upheld by humanists.

In several sections of the play, Faustus goes into beautifully vivid descriptions of the wonders he will accomplish with his power. (I, 78-97; III, 104-111) This seems an ironic parody of what Philip Sydney (a well-known humanist) described in his Defense of Poesy as the poet's prerogative of describing a reality better than that which may actually be attained. Faustus is rarely more humanist than when he describes what he will do with his hell-bought power.

Marlowe's attack on humanism is subtle. He demonstrates an admirable complexity of narration as he weaves these grand-seeming gestures of the power of the individual in with the essential damnation that walks hand-in-hand with man. There is little or nothing which Faustus does which is not unto itself humanistic. His downfall is woven into the fact that he is and will always be human thus, flawed. Marlowe creates a character who is intelligent, broad-based in his education, logical, and poetic... and still damned. Despite his humanism, he is unequivocally corrupt, a quality which Renaissance Humanism as a philosophy tended to gloss over.

When Faustus achieves his power, he time and again fails to take advantage of it for any but the silliest operations. From the viewing of the Seven Deadly Sins (V, 277-322) to enchanting an offensive knight with horns (X, 52-80), the man's professed intentions of greatness are shown for the hopeless dreams they really are they contain neither truth nor purpose, in the end, despite what Sydney stated.

Marlowe points out again and again in conversation with the wise (if evil) demons and devils the nature of hell. He states it quite simply that "All places be hell that is not heaven." (V, 125) Of earth, Mephastophilis asserts that "this is hell, nor am I out of it." (III, 76) Both these spite the humanistic love of the world, or as Abram's Glossary puts it:

...[Renaissance humanists] tended to emphasize the values achievable by human beings in this world, and to minimize the earlier Christian emphasis on innate corruption and on the ideals of asceticism and of withdrawal from this world in a preoccupation with the world hereafter. (p. 83)

Christopher Marlowe was not a Humanist, as evidenced by how clearly the tragedy that was Dr. Faustus exemplified the downfall of a humanist and reinforced themes which conflicted with the basic tenets presented by Renaissance Humanism. If this reading is to be believed, the man was in fact violently and intelligently opposed to it. It is difficult to imagine a more effective and thorough attack on the mentality and methodology of the humanist than Dr. Faustus.

Anniina Jokinen. All Rights Reserved.
Created by Anniina Jokinen on February 10, 2003. Last updated on June 5, 2010.

to Essays on Christopher Marlowe

The Tudors

King Henry VII
Elizabeth of York

King Henry VIII
Queen Catherine of Aragon
Queen Anne Boleyn
Queen Jane Seymour
Queen Anne of Cleves
Queen Catherine Howard
Queen Katherine Parr

King Edward VI
Lady Jane Grey
Queen Mary I
Queen Elizabeth I

Renaissance English Writers
Bishop John Fisher
William Tyndale
Sir Thomas More
John Heywood
Thomas Sackville
Nicholas Udall
John Skelton
Sir Thomas Wyatt
Henry Howard
Hugh Latimer
Thomas Cranmer
Roger Ascham
Sir Thomas Hoby
John Foxe
George Gascoigne
John Lyly
Thomas Nashe
Sir Philip Sidney
Edmund Spenser
Richard Hooker
Robert Southwell
Robert Greene
George Peele
Thomas Kyd
Edward de Vere
Christopher Marlowe
Anthony Munday
Sir Walter Ralegh
Thomas Hariot
Thomas Campion
Mary Sidney Herbert
Sir John Davies
Samuel Daniel
Michael Drayton
Fulke Greville
Emilia Lanyer
William Shakespeare

Persons of Interest
Visit Encyclopedia

Historical Events
Field of the Cloth of Gold, 1520
Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536
The Babington Plot, 1586
The Spanish Armada, 1588

Elizabethan Theatre
See section
English Renaissance Drama

Images of London:
London in the time of Henry VII. MS. Roy. 16 F. ii.
London, 1510, the earliest view in print
Map of England from Saxton's Descriptio Angliae, 1579
Location Map of Elizabethan London
Plan of the Bankside, Southwark, in Shakespeare's time
Detail of Norden's Map of the Bankside, 1593
Bull and Bear Baiting Rings from the Agas Map (1569-1590, pub. 1631)
Sketch of the Swan Theatre, c. 1596
Westminster in the Seventeenth Century, by Hollar
Visscher's Panoramic View of London, 1616. COLOR

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Larson. "Doctor Faustus" - Selling His Soul to Make a Point.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Written while the author was a freshman atText copyright ©1999-2010 John Larson. All Rights Reserved.Site copyright ©1996-2010 John Larson The University of Oregon, and should be read with understanding of the same. -JL] Doctor Faustus - Selling His Soul to Make a Point _________________________________________________ Published by Luminarium through express written permission.

# data[].attributes.body
This article talks about the general biography of Christopher Marlowe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe

Born: 6-Feb- 1564
Birthplace: Canterbury, England
Died: 30-May- 1593
Location of death: London, England
Cause of death: Murder
Remains: Buried, St. Nicholas Churchyard, Deptford, London, England

Gender: Male
Religion: Atheist
Race or Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Gay
Occupation: Playwright

Nationality: England
Executive summary: Doctor Faustus

English dramatist, the father of English tragedy and the first practitioner of English dramatic blank verse, the eldest son of a shoemaker at Canterbury, was born in that city on the 6th of February 1564. He was christened at St. George's Church, Canterbury, on the 26th of February, 1563/4, some two months before William Shakespeare's baptism at Stratford-on-Avon. His father, John Marlowe, is said to have been the grandson of John Morley or Marlowe, a substantial tanner of Canterbury. The father, who survived by a dozen years or so his illustrious son, married on the 22nd of May 1561 Catherine, daughter of Christopher Arthur, at one time rector of St. Peter's, Canterbury, who had been ejected by Queen Mary as a married minister. The dramatist received the rudiments of his education at the King's School, Canterbury, which he entered at Michaelmas 1578, and where he had as his fellow-pupils Richard Boyle, afterwards known as the great Earl of Cork, and Will Lyly, the brother of the dramatist John Lyly. Stephen Gosson entered the same school a little before, and William Harvey, the famous physician, a little after Marlowe. He went to Cambridge as one of Archbishop Parker's scholars from the King's School, and matriculated at Benet (Corpus Christi) College, on the 17th of March 1571, taking his B.A. degree in 1584, and that of M.A. three or four years later.

Francis Kett, the mystic, burnt in 1589 for heresy, was a fellow and tutor of his college, and may have had some share in developing Marlowe's opinions in religious matters. Marlowe's classical acquirements were of a kind which was then extremely common, being based for the most part upon a minute acquaintance with Roman mythology, as revealed in Ovid's Metamorphoses. His spirited translation of Ovid's Amores (printed 1596), which was at any rate commenced at Cambridge, does not seem to point to any very intimate acquaintance with the grammar and syntax of the Latin tongue. Before 1587 he seems to have quitted Cambridge for London, where he attached himself to the Lord Admiral's Company of Players, under the leadership of the famed actor Edward Alleyn, and almost at once began writing for the stage. Of Marlowe's career in London, apart from his four great theatrical successes, we know hardly anything; but he evidently knew Thomas Kyd, who shared his unorthodox opinions. Thomas Nashe criticized his verse, Robert Greene affected to shudder at his atheism; Gabriel Harvey maligned his memory. On the other hand Marlowe was intimate with the Walsinghams of Scadbury, Chiselhurst, kinsmen of Sir Francis Walsingham; he was also the personal friend of Sir Walter Raleigh, and perhaps of the poetical earl of Oxford, with both of whom, and with such men as Walter Warner and Robert Hughes the mathematicians, Thomas Harriott the notable astronomer, and Matthew Royden, the dramatist is said to have met in free converse. Either this free converse or the licentious character of some of the young dramatist's tirades seems to have sown a suspicion among the strait-laced that his morals left everything to be desired. It is probable enough that this attitude of reprobation drove a man of so exalted a disposition as Marlowe into a more insurgent attitude than he would have otherwise adopted. He seems at any rate to have been associated with what was denounced as Sir Walter Raleigh's school of atheism, and to have dallied with opinions which were then regarded as putting a man outside the pale of civilized humanity. As the result of some depositions made by Thomas Kyd under the influence of torture, the Privy Council were upon the eve of investigating some serious charges against Marlowe when his career was abruptly and somewhat scandalously terminated. The order had already been issued for his arrest, when he was slain in a quarrel by a man variously named (Archer and Ingram) at Deptford, at the end of May 1593, and he was buried on the 1st of June in the churchyard of St. Nicholas at Deptford. The following September Gabriel Harvey referred to him as "dead of the plague." The disgraceful particulars attached to the tragedy of Marlowe in the popular mind would not seem to have appeared until four years later (1597) when Thomas Beard, the Puritan author of The Theatre of God's Judgements, used the death of this playmaker and atheist as one of his warning examples of the vengeance of God. Upon the embellishments of this story, such as that of Francis Meres the critic, in 1598, that Marlowe came to be "stabbed to death by a bawdy servingman, a rival of his in his lewde love", or that of William Vaughan in the Golden Grove of 1600, in which the unfortunate poet's dagger is thrust into his own eye in prevention of his felonious assault upon an innocent man, his guest, it is impossible now to pronounce. We really do not know the circumstances of Marlowe's death. The probability is he was killed in a brawl, and his atheism must be interpreted not according to the ex parte accusation of one Richard Baines, a professional informer (among the Privy Council records), but as a species of rationalistic antinomianism, dialectic in character, and closely related to the deflection from conventional orthodoxy for which Kett was burnt at Norwich in 1589. A few months before the end of his life there is reason to believe that he transferred his services from the Lord Admiral's to Lord Strange's Company, and may have thus been brought into communication with Shakespeare, who in such plays as Richard II and Richard III owed not a little to the influence of his romantic predecessor.

Marlowe's career as a dramatist lies between the years 1587 and 1593, and the four great plays to which reference has been made were Tamburlaine the Great, an heroic epic in dramatic form divided into two parts of five acts each (1587, printed in 1590); Dr. Faustus (1588, entered at Stationers' Hall 1601); The Famous Tragedy of the Rich Jew of Malta (dating perhaps from 1589, acted in 1592, printed in 1633); and Edward the Second (printed 1594). The very first words of Tamburlaine sound the trumpet note of attack in the older order of things dramatic:

From jigging veins of riming mother wits
And such conceits as clownage keeps in pay
We'll lead you to the stately tent of war,
Where you shall hear the Scythian Tamburlaine
Threatening the world with high astounding terms
And scourging kingdoms with his conquering sword.

It leapt with a bound to a place beside Kyd's Spanish Tragedy, and few plays have been more imitated by rivals (Greene's Alphonsus of Aragon, George Peele's Battle of Alcazar, Selimus, Scanderbeg) or more keenly satirized by the jealousy and prejudice of out-distanced competitors.

The majestic and exquisite excellence of various lines and passages in Marlowe's first play must be admitted to relieve, if it cannot be allowed to redeem, the stormy monotony of Titanic truculence which blusters like a simoom through the noisy course of its ten fierce acts. With many and heavy faults, there is something of genuine greatness in Tamburlaine the Great; and for two grave reasons it must always be remembered with distinction and mentioned with honor. It is the first poem ever written in English blank verse, as distinguished from mere rhymeless decasyllabics; and it contains one of the noblest passages, perhaps indeed the noblest, in the literature of the world, ever written by one of the greatest masters of poetry in loving praise of the glorious delights and sublime submission to the everlasting limits of his art. In its highest and most distinctive qualities, in unfaltering and infallible command of the right note of music and the proper tone of color for the finest touches of poetic execution, no poet of the most elaborate modern school, working at ease upon every consummate resource of luxurious learning and leisurely refinement, has ever excelled the best and most representative work of a man who had literally no models before him and probably or evidently was often if not always compelled to write against time for his living.

The just and generous judgment passed by Goethe on the Faustus of his English predecessor in tragic treatment of the same subject is somewhat more than sufficient to counterbalance the slighting or the sneering references to that magnificent poem which might have been expected from the ignorance of Lord Byron or the incompetence of Hallam. And the particular note of merit observed, the special point of the praise conferred, by the great German poet should be no less sufficient to dispose of the vulgar misconception yet lingering among sciolists and pretenders to criticism, which regards a writer than whom no man was ever born with a finer or a stronger instinct for perfection of excellence in execution as a mere noble savage of letters, a rough self-taught sketcher or scribbler of crude and rude genius, whose unhewn blocks of verse had in them some veins of rare enough metal to be quarried and polished by Shakespeare. What most impressed the author of Faust in the work of Marlowe was a quality the want of which in the author of Manfred is proof enough to consign his best work to the second or third class at most. "How greatly it is all planned!" the first requisite of all great work, and one of which the highest genius possible to a greatly gifted barbarian could by no possibility understand the nature or conceive the existence. That Goethe "had thought of translating it" is perhaps hardly less precious a tribute to its greatness than the fact that it has been actually and admirably translated by the matchless translator of Shakespeare -- the son of Victor Hugo; whose labor of love may thus be said to have made another point in common, and forged as it were another link of union, between Shakespeare and the young master of Shakespeare's youth. Of all great poems in dramatic form it is perhaps the most remarkable for absolute singleness of aim and simplicity of construction; yet is it wholly free from all possible imputation of monotony or aridity. Tamburlaine is monotonous in the general roll and flow of its stately and sonorous verse through a noisy wilderness of perpetual bluster and slaughter; but the unity of tone and purpose in Doctor Faustus is not unrelieved by change of manner and variety of incident. The comic scenes, written evidently with as little of labor as of relish, are for the most part scarcely more than transcripts, thrown into the form of dialogue, from a popular prose History of Dr. Faustus, and therefore should be set down as little to the discredit as to the credit of the poet. Few masterpieces of any age in any language can stand beside this tragic poem -- it has hardly the structure of a play -- for the qualities of terror and splendor, for intensity of purpose and sublimity of note. In the vision of Helen, for example, the intense perception of loveliness gives actual sublimity to the sweetness and radiance of mere beauty in the passionate and spontaneous selection of words the most choice and perfect; and in like manner the sublimity of simplicity in Marlowe's conception and expression of the agonies endured by Faustus under the immediate imminence of his doom gives the highest note of beauty, the quality of absolute fitness and propriety, to the sheer straightforwardness of speech in which his agonizing horror finds vent ever more and more terrible from the first to the last equally beautiful and fearful verse of that tremendous monologue which has no parallel in all the range of tragedy.

It is now a commonplace of criticism to observe and regret the decline of power and interest after the opening acts of The Jew of Malta. This decline is undeniable, though even the latter part of the play (the text of which is very corrupt) is not wanting in rough energy; but the first two acts would be sufficient foundation for the durable fame of a dramatic poet. In the blank verse of John Milton alone -- who perhaps was hardly less indebted than Shakespeare was before him to Marlowe as the first English master of word-music in its grander forms -- has the glory or the melody of passages in the opening soliloquy of Barabbas been possibly surpassed. The figure of the hero before it degenerates into caricature is as finely touched as the poetic execution is excellent; and the rude and rapid sketches of the minor characters show at least some vigor and vivacity of touch.

In Edward the Second the interest rises and the execution improves as visibly and as greatly with the course of the advancing story as they decline in The Jew of Malta. The scene of the king's deposition at Kenilworth is almost as much finer in tragic effect and poetic quality as it is shorter and less elaborate than the corresponding scene in Shakespeare's King Richard II. The terror of the death scene undoubtedly rises into horror; but this horror is with skilful simplicity of treatment preserved from passing into disgust. In pure poetry, in sublime and splendid imagination, this tragedy is excelled by Doctor Faustus; in dramatic power and positive impression of natural effect it is certainly the masterpiece of Marlowe. It was almost inevitable, in the hands of any poet but Shakespeare, that none of the characters represented should be capable of securing or even exciting any finer sympathy or more serious interest than attends on the mere evolution of successive events or the mere display of emotions (except always in the great scene of the deposition) rather animal than spiritual in their expression of rage or tenderness or suffering. The exact balance of mutual effect, the final note of scenic harmony, between ideal conception and realistic execution is not yet struck with perfect accuracy of touch and security of hand; but on this point also Marlowe has here come nearer by many degrees to Shakespeare than any of his other predecessors have ever come near to Marlowe.

Of The Massacre at Paris (acted in 1593, printed around 1600) it is impossible to judge fairly from the garbled fragment of its genuine text which is all that has come down to us. To Mr. Collier, among numberless other obligations, we owe the discovery of a noble passage excised in the piratical edition which gives us the only version extant of this unlucky play, and which, it must be allowed, contains nothing of quite equal value. This is obviously an occasional and polemical work, and being as it is overcharged with the anti-Catholic passion of the time has a typical quality which gives it some empirical significance and interest. That antipapal ardor is indeed the only note of unity in a rough and ragged chronicle which shambles and stumbles onward from the death of Queen Jeanne of Navarre to the murder of the last Valois. It is possible to conjecture, what it would be fruitless to affirm, that it gave a hint in the next century to Nathaniel Lee for his far superior and really admirable tragedy on the same subject, issued ninety-seven years after the death of Marlowe.

In the tragedy of Dido Queen of Carthage (completed by Thomas Nashe, produced and printed 1594), a servile fidelity to the text of Virgil's narrative has naturally resulted in the failure which might have been expected from an attempt at once to transcribe what is essentially inimitable and to reproduce it under the hopelessly alien conditions of dramatic adaptation. The one really noble passage in a generally feeble and incomposite piece of work is, however, uninspired by the unattainable model to which the dramatists have been only too obsequious in their subservience. It is as nearly certain as anything can be which depends chiefly upon cumulative and collateral evidence that the better part of what is best in the serious scenes of King Henry VI is mainly the work of Marlowe. That he is at any rate the principal author of the second and third plays passing under that name among the works of Shakespeare, but first and imperfectly printed as The Contention between the two Famous Houses of York and Lancaster, can hardly be now a matter of debate among competent judges. The crucial difficulty of criticism in this matter is to determine, if indeed we should not rather say to conjecture, the authorship of the humorous scenes in prose, showing as they generally do a power of comparatively high and pure comic realism to which nothing in the acknowledged works of any pre-Shakespearian dramatist is even remotely comparable. Yet, especially in the original text of these scenes as they stand unpurified by the ultimate revision of Shakespeare or his editors, there are tones and touches which recall rather the clownish horseplay and homely ribaldry of his predecessors than anything in the lighter interludes of his very earliest plays. We find the same sort of thing which we find in their writings, only better done than they usually do it, rather than such work as Shakespeare's a little worse done than usual. And even in the final text of the tragic or metrical scenes the highest note struck is always, with one magnificent and unquestionable exception, rather in the key of Marlowe at his best than of Shakespeare while yet in great measure his disciple.

A Taming of a Shrew, the play of which Shakespeare's comedy was founded, has been attributed, without good reason, to Marlowe. The passages in the play borrowed from Marlowe's works provide an argument against, rather than for his authorship; while the humorous character of the play is not in keeping with his other work. He may have had a share in The Troublesome Raigne of King John (1591), and Fleay conjectured that the plays Edward III. and Richard III usually included in editions of Shakespeare are at least based on plays by Marlowe. Lust's Dominion, printed in 1657, was incorrectly ascribed to him, and a play no longer extant, The True History of George Scanderbage, was assumed by Fleay on the authority of an obscure passage of Gabriel Harvey to be his work. The Maiden's Holiday, assigned to Day and Marlowe, was destroyed by Warburton's cook. Day was considerably Marlowe's junior, and collaboration between the two is not probable.

Had every copy of Marlowe's boyish version or perversion of Ovid's Elegies (P. Ovidii Nasonis Amorum compressed into three books) deservedly perished in the flames to which it was judicially condemned by the sentence of a brace of prelates, it is possible that an occasional bookworm, it is certain that no poetical student, would have deplored its destruction, if its demerits could in that case have been imagined. His translation of the first book of Lucan alternately rises above the original and falls short of it, often inferior to the Latin in point and weight of expressive rhetoric, now and then brightened by a clearer note of poetry and lifted into a higher mood of verse. Its terseness, vigor and purity of style would in any case have been praiseworthy, but are nothing less than admirable, if not wonderful, when we consider how close the translator has on the whole (in spite of occasional slips into inaccuracy) kept himself to the most rigid limit of literal representation, phrase by phrase and often line by line. The really startling force and felicity of occasional verses are worthier of remark than the inevitable stiffness and heaviness of others, when the technical difficulty of such a task is duly taken into account.

One of the most faultless lyrics and one of the loveliest fragments in the whole range of descriptive and fanciful poetry would have secured a place for Marlowe among the memorable men of his epoch, even if his plays had perished with himself. His Passionate Shepherd remains ever since unrivalled in its way a way of pure fancy and radiant melody without break or lapse. The untitled fragment, on the other hand, has been very closely rivalled, perhaps very happily imitated, but only by the greatest lyric poet of England -- by Shelley alone. Marlowe's poem of Hero and Leander (entered at Stationers' Hall in September 1593; completed and brought out by George Chapman, who divided Marlowe's work into two sestiads and added four of his own, 1598), closing with the sunrise which closes the night of the lovers' union, stands alone in its age, and far ahead of the work of any possible competitor between the death of Spenser and the dawn of Milton. In clear mastery of narrative and presentation, in melodious ease and simplicity of strength, it is not less pre-eminent than in the adorable beauty and impeccable perfection of separate lines or passages. It is doubtful whether the heroic couplet has ever been more finely handled.

The place and the value of Christopher Marlowe as a leader among English poets it would be almost impossible for historical criticism to overestimate. To none of them all, perhaps, have so many of the greatest among them been so deeply and so directly indebted. Nor was ever any great writer's influence upon his fellows more utterly and unmixedly an influence for good. He first, and he alone, guided Shakespeare into the right way of work; his music, in which there is no echo of any man's before him, found its own echo in the more prolonged but hardly more exalted harmony of Milton's. He is the greatest discoverer, the most daring and inspired pioneer, in all our poetic literature. Before him there was neither genuine blank verse nor a genuine tragedy in our language. After his arrival the way was prepared, the paths were made straight, for Shakespeare.

Father: John Marlowe (shoemaker)
Mother: Katherine Arthur

High School: King's School, Canterbury (1578-)
University: BA, Benet College, Cambridge University (1584)
University: MA, Benet College, Cambridge University (1587)

Murder arrested 18-Sep-1589, charges dropped
Treason indicted 18-Mar-1593
Heresy indicted 18-Mar-1593
Stabbed

Do you know something we don't?
Submit a correction or make a comment about this profile

Copyright ©2019 Soylent Communications

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe Born: 6-Feb- 1564 Birthplace: Canterbury, England Died: 30-May- 1593 Location of death: London, England Cause of death: Murder Remains: Buried, St.

# data[].attributes.body
The author of Shakespearean Tragedy, Claire McEACHERN suggests that that there is no such thing as Shakespearean Tragedy. She believes instead that Shakespeare tried to formulate a tragedy.

# data[].attributes.body
Talks about what characteristics the main character has in Modern Tragedy

# data[].attributes.body
Found a source on Christopher Marlowe's biography

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Synopsis

Born in Canterbury, England, in 1564. While Christopher Marlowe's literary career lasted less than six years, and his life only 29 years, his achievements, most notably the play The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus, ensured his lasting legacy.

Early Years

Christopher Marlowe was born in Canterbury around February 26, 1564 (this was the day on which he was baptized). He went to King's School and was awarded a scholarship that enabled him to study at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, from late 1580 until 1587.

Marlowe earned his bachelor of arts degree in 1584, but in 1587 the university hesitated in granting him his master's degree. Its doubts (perhaps arising from his frequent absences, or speculation that he had converted to Roman Catholicism and would soon attend college elsewhere) were set to rest, or at least dismissed, when the Privy Council sent a letter declaring that he was now working "on matters touching the benefit of his country," and he was awarded his master's degree on schedule.

Marlowe as a Secret Agent?

The nature of Marlowe's service to England was not specified by the council, but the letter sent to Cambridge has provoked abundant speculation, notably the theory that Marlowe had become a secret agent working for Sir Francis Walsingham's intelligence service. No direct evidence supports this theory, but the council's letter clearly suggests that Marlowe was serving the government in some secret capacity.

Surviving Cambridge records from the period show that Marlowe had several lengthy absences from the university, much longer than allowed by the school's regulations. And extant dining room accounts indicate that he spent lavishly on food and drink while there, greater amounts than he could have afforded on his known scholarship income. Both of these could point to a secondary source of income, such as secret government work.

But with scant hard evidence and rampant speculation, the mystery surrounding Marlowe's service to the queen is likely to remain active. Spy or not, after attaining his master's degree, Marlowe moved to London and took up writing full-time.

Early Writing Career

After 1587, Christopher Marlowe was in London, writing for the theater and probably also engaging himself occasionally in government service. What is thought to be his first play, Dido, Queen of Carthage, was not published until 1594, but it is generally thought to have been written while he was still a student at Cambridge. According to records, the play was performed by the Children of the Chapel, a company of boy actors, between 1587 and 1593.

Marlowe's second play was the two-part Tamburlaine the Great (c. 1587; published 1590). This was Marlowe's first play to be performed on the regular stage in London and is among the first English plays in blank verse. It is considered the beginning of the mature phase of the Elizabethan theater and was the last of Marlowe's plays to be published before his untimely death.

There is disagreement among Marlowe scholars regarding the order in which the plays subsequent to Tamburlaine were written.

Some contend that Doctor Faustus quickly followed Tamburlaine, and that Marlowe then turned to writing Edward the Second, The Massacre at Paris, and finally The Jew of Malta. According to the Marlowe Society's chronology, the order was thus: The Jew of Malta, Doctor Faustus, Edward the Second and The Massacre at Paris, with Doctor Faustus being performed first (1604) and The Jew of Malta last (1633).

What is not disputed is that he wrote only these four plays after Tamburlaine, from c. 1589 to 1592, and that they cemented his legacy and proved vastly influential.

The Plays
The Jew of Malta
The Jew of Malta (fully The Famous Tragedy of the Rich Jew of Malta), with a prologue delivered by a character representing Machiavelli, depicts the Jew Barabas, the richest man on all the island of Malta. His wealth is seized, however, and he fights the government to regain it until his death at the hands of Maltese soldiers.

The play swirls with religious conflict, intrigue and revenge, and is considered to have been a major influence on Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The title character, Barabas, is seen as the main inspiration for Shakespeare's Shylock character in Merchant. The play is also considered the first (successful) black comedy, or tragicomedy.

Barabas is a complex character who has provoked mixed reactions in audiences, and there has been extensive debate about the play's portrayal of Jews (as with Shakespeare's Merchant). Filled with unseemly characters, the play also ridicules oversexed Christian monks and nuns, and portrays a pair of greedy friars vying for Barabas' wealth. The Jew of Malta in this way is a fine example of what Marlowe's final four works are in part known for: controversial themes.
Edward the Second
The historical Edward the Second (fully The Troublesome Reign and Lamentable Death of Edward the Second, King of England, with the Tragical Fall of Proud Mortimer) is a play about the deposition of England's King Edward II by his barons and the queen, all of whom resent the undue influence the king's men have over his policies.

Edward the Second is a tragedy featuring a weak and flawed monarch, and it paved the way for Shakespeare's more mature histories, such as Richard II, Henry IV and Henry V.

It is the only Marlowe plays whose text can be reliably said to represent the author's manuscript, as all of Marlowe's other plays were heavily edited or simply transcribed from performances, and the original texts were lost to the ages.
The Massacre at Paris
The Massacre at Paris is a short and lurid work, the only extant text of which was likely a reconstruction from memory, or "reported text," of the original performance. Because of its origin, the play is approximately half the length of Edward the Second, The Jew of Malta and each part of Tamburlaine, and comprises mostly bloody action with little depth of characterization or quality verse. For these reasons, the play has been the most neglected of Marlowe's oeuvre.

Massacre portrays the events of the Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 1572, in which French royalty and Catholic nobles instigated the murder and execution of thousands of protestant Huguenots. In London, agitators seized on its theme to advocate the murders of refugees, an event that the play eerily warns the queen of in its last scene. Interestingly, the warning comes from a character referred to as "English Agent," a character who has been thought to be Marlowe himself, representing his work with the queen's secret service.
Doctor Faustus
Marlowe's most famous play is The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus, but, as is the case with most of his plays, it has survived only in a corrupt form, and when Marlowe actually wrote it has been a topic of debate.

Based on the German Faustbuch, Doctor Faustus is acknowledged as the first dramatized version of the Faust legend, in which a man sells his soul to the devil in exchange for knowledge and power. While versions of story began appearing as early as the 4th century, Marlowe deviates significantly by having his hero unable to repent and have his contract annulled at the end of the play. He is warned to do so throughout by yet another Marlowe variation of the retelling--a Good Angel--but Faustus ignores the angel's advice continually.

In the end, Faustus finally seems to repent for his deeds, but it is either too late or just simply irrelevant, as Mephistopheles collects his soul, and it is clear that Faustus exits to hell with him.

Arrest and Death

The constant rumors of Christopher Marlowe's atheism finally caught up with him on Sunday May 20, 1593, and he was arrested for just that "crime." Atheism, or heresy, was a serious offense, for which the penalty was burning at the stake. Despite the gravity of the charge, however, he was not jailed or tortured but was released on the condition that he report daily to an officer of the court.

On May 30, however, Marlowe was killed by Ingram Frizer. Frizer was with Nicholas Skeres and Robert Poley, and all three men were tied to one or other of the Walsinghams--either Sir Francis Walsingham (the man who evidently recruited Marlowe himself into secret service on behalf of the queen) or a relative also in the spy business. Allegedly, after spending the day together with Marlowe in a lodging house, a fight broke out between Marlowe and Frizer over the bill, and Marlowe was stabbed in the forehead and killed.

Conspiracy theories have abounded since, with Marlowe's atheism and alleged spy activities at the heart of the murder plots, but the real reason for Marlowe's death is still debated.

What is not debated is Marlowe's literary importance, as he is Shakespeare's most important predecessor and is second only to Shakespeare himself in the realm of Elizabethan tragic drama.

Related Videos

Fact Check

We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn't look right, contact us!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Born in Canterbury, England, in 1564. While Christopher Marlowe's literary career lasted less than six years, and his life only 29 years, his achievements, most notably the play The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus, ensured his lasting legacy. Christopher Marlowe was born in Canterbury around February 26, 1564 (this was the day on which he was baptized).

# data[].attributes.body
This Article explains modern tragedy and examples of it http://bookbuilder.cast.org/view_print.php?book=42569

# data[].attributes.body
This article is abut how the play Doctor Fau

# data[].attributes.body
this site give a biography on Marlowe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe (baptized Feb. 26, 1564, Canterbury, Kent, Eng.-died May 30, 1593, Deptford, near London) was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse.

Early years

Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first schooling, but on Jan. 14, 1579, he entered the King's School, Canterbury, as a scholar. A year later he went to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Obtaining his bachelor of arts degree in 1584, he continued in residence at Cambridge-which may imply that he was intending to take Anglican orders. In 1587, however, the university hesitated about granting him the master's degree; its doubts (arising from his frequent absences from the university) were apparently set at rest when the Privy Council sent a letter declaring that he had been employed "on matters touching the benefit of his country"-apparently in Elizabeth I's secret service.

Last years and literary career.

After 1587 Marlowe was in London, writing for the theatres, occasionally getting into trouble with the authorities because of his violent and disreputable behaviour, and probably also engaging himself from time to time in government service. Marlowe won a dangerous reputation for "atheism," but this could, in Elizabeth I's time, indicate merely unorthodox religious opinions. In Robert Greene's deathbed tract, Greenes groats-worth of witte, Marlowe is referred to as a "famous gracer of Tragedians" and is reproved for having said, like Greene himself, "There is no god" and for having studied "pestilent Machiuilian pollicie." There is further evidence of his unorthodoxy, notably in the denunciation of him written by the spy Richard Baines and in the letter of Thomas Kyd to the lord keeper in 1593 after Marlowe's death. Kyd alleged that certain papers "denying the deity of Jesus Christ" that were found in his room belonged to Marlowe, who had shared the room two years before. Both Baines and Kyd suggested on Marlowe's part atheism in the stricter sense and a persistent delight in blasphemy. Whatever the case may be, on May 18, 1593, the Privy Council issued an order for Marlowe's arrest; two days later the poet was ordered to give daily attendance on their lordships "until he shall be licensed to the contrary." On May 30, however, Marlowe was killed by Ingram Frizer, in the dubious company of Nicholas Skeres and Robert Poley, at a lodging house in Deptford, where they had spent most of the day and where, it was alleged, a fight broke out between them over the bill.

In a playwriting career that spanned little more than six years, Marlowe's achievements were diverse and splendid. Perhaps before leaving Cambridge he had already written Tamburlaine the Great (in two parts, both performed by the end of 1587; published 1590). Almost certainly during his later Cambridge years, Marlowe had translated Ovid's Amores ( The Loves) and the first book of Lucan's Pharsalia from the Latin. About this time he also wrote the play Dido, Queen of Carthage (published in 1594 as the joint work of Marlowe and Thomas Nashe). With the production of Tamburlaine he received recognition and acclaim, and playwriting became his major concern in the few years that lay ahead. Both parts of Tamburlaine were published anonymously in 1590, and the publisher omitted certain passages that he found incongruous with the play's serious concern with history; even so, the extant Tamburlaine text can be regarded as substantially Marlowe's. No other of his plays or poems or translations was published during his life. His unfinished but splendid poem Hero and Leander -which is almost certainly the finest nondramatic Elizabethan poem apart from those produced by Edmund Spenser-appeared in 1598.

There is argument among scholars concerning the order in which the plays subsequent to Tamburlaine were written. It is not uncommonly held that Faustus quickly followed Tamburlaine and that then Marlowe turned to a more neutral, more "social" kind of writing in Edward II and The Massacre at Paris. His last play may have been The Jew of Malta, in which he signally broke new ground. It is known that Tamburlaine, Faustus, and The Jew of Malta were performed by the Admiral's Men, a company whose outstanding actor was Edward Alleyn, who most certainly played Tamburlaine, Faustus, and Barabas the Jew.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe | English Playwright & Poet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse. Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first

# data[].attributes.body
A tiny
article on early modern tragedies and performances.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Tiffany Stern

Tiffany Stern is the Beaverbrook and Bouverie Fellow and Tutor in English Literature at University College, Oxford. Her monographs are Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Clarendon Press, 2000), and Making Shakespeare (Routledge, 2004); with Simon Palfrey she co-authored Shakespeare in Parts (Oxford University Press, 2007). She has edited the anonymous King Leir (Nick Hern with Globe Education, 2002) and Sheridan's The Rivals (A. & C. Black, 2004), and is editing George Farquhar's Recruiting Officer, Brome's Jovial Crew, and Shakespeare's Merry Wives. She is a general editor of the New Mermaids play series, and is on the editorial board of the journals Shakespeare, Shakespeare Bulletin, Shakespeare Yearbook, and Review of English Studies. Her current project is to complete a monograph, The Fragmented Play-text in Shakespearean England.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Early Modern Tragedy and Performance - Oxford Handbooks

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When early modern plays were staged with black curtains, 'tragedy' began the moment the audience entered a playhouse. 'Tragedy', then, did not always need to be part of a play's content: it could be a look, an atmosphere, a theatrical mood. This chapter explores 'tragedy' as a kind of performance as well as a kind of drama.

# data[].attributes.body
Explains and defines Shakespearean tragedy compares it to modern

# data[].attributes.body
Another Shakespearian tragedy that I think of is when Romeo and Juliet die and we have that feeling of unsettlement.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Romeo thinks Juliet is death and he goes to the church garden where the Capulet's vault is.

There Romeo sees Paris and they start to fight. It is Romeo who kills Paris.

Paris: Oh, I'm dying! If you want to be kind, open the vault. Put my body next to Juliet's. (He dies.)

Romeo: Yes, I will. Who is this young man? (looking at him in surprise) It's Mercutio's relative, the noble Paris! What did my servant tell me on the way here? Didn't he say that Paris wanted to marry Juliet? Or did I dream that? Or am I going crazy? (taking Paris's hand) Oh give me your hand - you, a man as unlucky as I am. I'll put you in a fine grave. (He opens the vault and sees Juliet's body.) Here lies Juliet. She's so lovely. She fills this dark vault with light. ( he places Paris's body in the vault, then goes to Juliet.) Oh, my love, my wife! There's still some colour in your lovely face. ( He sees Tybalt's body in the vault.) Ah, Tybalt, are you lying there in your bloody clothes? I was the one who killed you. Now I'm going to kill myself. Forgive me, cousin! Ah, dear Juliet, why are you still so lovely? Eyes, look at Juliet for the last time! (putting his arms round her) Arms, hold her for the last time! (kissing her) And mouth, kiss her for the last time. Now, it's time for me to kill myself. (he takes out the bottle of poison. It(s very quick. (He kisses Juliets hand.) So, with a kiss, I die. (He falls to the ground and dies.)

The Friar comes in the vault and Juliet begins to move and waking up.

Juliet: Oh, dear Friar! Where's Romeo? I'm in the right place. But where's my Romeo?

Friar (afraid): I hear a noise. Lady, come away from this place of death. Everything had gone wrong. Your husband lied death an Paris too. Don't stay to ask questions. The guards are coming. (trying to pull Juliet with him) Come away, dear Juliet. I'm afraid to stay here.

Juliet (pushing him away): Go then! I'm not going to leave this place. (The Friar goes out. Juliet sees Romeo's body on the ground. She falls on him and finds the bottle in his hand.) What's this bottle in my true love's hand? (She smells it.) Poison! So that's how he died. Oh, my Romeo, haven't you left any for me? I'll kiss your mouth. Perhaps there's still some poison on it. Then I can taste it and join you in death. (She kisses him.) Your mouth is still warm!

The guards are coming into the vault.

Juliet: Do I hear a noise? Then I'll be quick. (She sees Romeo's knife and picks it up.) Oh, friendly knife! My body will be your final resting-place. (She pushes the knife into her body and falls dead.)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Romeo thinks Juliet is death and he goes to the church garden where the Capulet's vault is. There Romeo sees Paris and they start to fight. It is Romeo who kills Paris. Paris: Oh, I'm dying! If you want to be kind, open the vault. Put my body next to Juliet's.

# data[].attributes.body
Dr. Faustus Discussion points http://www.luminarium.org/renlit/larsonmarlowe.htm

# data[].attributes.body
This article explains how Doctor Faustus was originally preformed with fireworks during the play and how controversial that was in that time period.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
by Jessica Butturff
April 2012

In the sixteenth century, England transitioned back and forth between Catholicism and Protestantism. During the Reformation, Protestants were especially critical of what Robert Scribner calls the "magical" elements of the Catholic faith, elements which were removed from Protestant services (475). However, at the same time that Protestantism, which deemphasized magic, was beginning to take hold in England, Elizabethan audiences were watching plays that featured religious figures and magic (Scribner 475). Christopher Marlowe's highly controversial use of the "magical" element of fireworks onstage in Doctor Faustus allowed him to explore religious tensions of his time period and to encourage his audience to question the world around them.

Doctor Faustus is about a scholar who has mastered all of the subjects available, is bored, and decides to involve himself in magic. Although at first he hesitates to delve into the taboo subject of the dark arts and devilry, he overcomes those hesitations and decides to do a spell, which summons the demon Mephastophilis. When Mephastophilis appears, Faustus orders him to be his servant; however, Mephastophilis is already serving Lucifer. This rejection inspires Faustus to form a contract with Lucifer saying that Mephastophilis will be his servant on earth for twenty-five years in exchange for Faustus' soul after that time is up. Throughout the play, Faustus suffers a series of religious crises in that he is unable to decide whether or not to continue practicing magic or turn back to God. However, each crisis ends with a reaffirmation of his commitment to Lucifer and the use of magic to further degrade religious beliefs and figures: Faustus mocks religious ceremonies, attacks the Pope and friars, and marvels at the seven deadly sins. At the close of the play, when Faustus's time on earth is over, he tries to repent and ask for God's forgiveness; however, he is too late and is taken by demons into Hell.

In order to make the dramatic scenes of the play come to life on stage, Marlowe emphasized the use of stage magic and in particular fireworks. As Professor Tonya Howe explains, staging a play that involves pyrotechnics is a very difficult feat to accomplish safely and with a sense of control, especially in the Renaissance when this technology was just emerging. Howe argues that the fireworks themselves were probably the most dangerous element in the entire staging of the play because they were lit in a flammable playhouse, carried on stage by the players, and thrown at other characters. Lit fireworks could have caused a potentially horrifying outcome in that the players could have been injured or the wooden playhouse could have caught fire. Howe notes that for the scenes that require only loud sounds with minimal sparking, such as when Lucifer and Mephastophilis appear, firecrackers were used instead of fireworks. She explains that there were also small explosives called squibs, which added more theatricality to the production than the firecrackers because the audience could both see and hear the squibs, as opposed to the firecrackers, which were only audible. According to Howe, the scene in which squibs were used in the play is when Mephastophilis throws them onto the backs of two characters, Robin and Vintner, after they call Mephastophilis to their service (Marlowe 3.2.1011-1012).

In addition to being literally dangerous, onstage fireworks were also figuratively dangerous. The use of illusory magic to conjure the devil and set off fireworks onstage would have been at odds with the audience's religious beliefs. In his introduction to Doctor Faustus, David Wootton argues that "[b]y bringing Mephastophilis and Lucifer onto the stage (and frightening the audience with their firecrackers), Marlowe shows that even the devil may be an illusion" (xx). Moreover, both Catholicism and Protestantism regarded certain acts in the Bible as miracles, not magic. However, as Wootton notes, it is almost "impossible to distinguish reality from illusion" and between "magic (and miracles)" in Marlowe's play (xx). If an actor could perform magic tricks involving biblical characters onstage, how would the audience know that the miracles told in the Bible were not simply magic tricks?

By incorporating magic into the staging of Doctor Faustus, Marlowe was forcing the audience to reexamine the validity of religious ceremonies as well. One incident in which fireworks are involved in a religious ceremony occurs when Faustus asks Mephastophilis to bring him a wife and Mephastophilis returns "with a devil dressed like a woman, with fireworks" (Marlowe 2.1.597). Upon seeing her, Faustus exclaims "A plague on her for a hot whore!" (2.1.597). This is an example of irreverence within the play. Marriage is a religious sacrament, and it is sacrilegious that Mephastophilis brings a devil rather than a woman to marry Faustus and that she is carrying fireworks, one of the ultimate symbols of magic. For people living in this period of religious tension, an image of a devil carrying fireworks into a religious ceremony could generate an anxiety that might resonate on many levels.

The repeated incidences of fireworks in Doctor Faustus also suggest that magicians are more powerful than religious figures. This superiority is shown when Faustus and Mephastophilis "beat the friars and fling fireworks among them" when they go to Rome to torment the Pope (3.1.928-929). In this scene the audience sees the head of the Catholic Church and his friars being defiled by magicians right before their eyes. Howe points out that by portraying acts of magic that involved church figures, like the Pope and friars, Marlowe was illustrating the similarities between the theatricality of the stage and the theatricality of religion. Peter Thomson refers to the process of blurring between the lines of a real person and his fictional representation on the Renaissance stage as "personation," which Thomson defines as "the making concrete of something so intangible as an invented personality" (186). Thomson explains that as people in power began to be represented on the stage, actors created a double-sided deceit that forced the audience to doubt their leaders' authority. For an audience to see a king being represented onstage would underscore the theatricality of this office in reality (Thomson 187). In Marlowe's case, his play asks the audience to consider whether or not priests and other church leaders are merely performers.

Marlowe went to dangerous lengths to put magic into his play in order to make his point about the illusory nature of religious beliefs. Marlowe's fireworks were not only a way to entertain his audience but also to encourage them to question their beliefs as the Protestant religion continued to shift away from the "magic" of Catholicism.

Works Cited

Howe, Tonya. "Christopher Marlowe and Doctor Faustus." Marymount University, Arlington, VA. 23 Jan. 2011. Lecture.

Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2005. Print.

Scribner, Robert W. "The Reformation, Popular Magic, and the 'Disenchantment of the World.'" Journal of Interdisciplinary History 33:3 (1993): 475-494. JSTOR. 15 April 2011. Web.

Thomson, Peter. "English Renaissance and Restoration Theater." The Oxford Illustrated History of Theater. Ed. John Russell Brown. 1995. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 173-219. Print.

Wootton, David. "Introduction." Doctor Faustus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2005. vi-xxiii. Print.

previous article next article table of contents

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Fireworks of Doctor Faustus: Theatrical Magic and Religious Tension in Christopher Marlowe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
by Jessica Butturff April 2012 In the sixteenth century, England transitioned back and forth between Catholicism and Protestantism. During the Reformation, Protestants were especially critical of what Robert Scribner calls the "magical" elements of the Catholic faith, elements which were removed from Protestant services (475).

# data[].attributes.body
Marlowe employs Renaissance values, unlike a Greek tragedy, does not focus on kings and heroes, but Faustus who is born to humble parents.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
[ Full Title:] Initially, "The Tragicall History of D. Faustus". Later, "The Tragicall History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus".

[ Title Page:] Initially, "The/ Tragicall History of D. Faustus./ As it hath bene Acted by the Right/ Honorable the Earle of Nottingham his seruants./ Written by Ch. Marl./ London./ Printed by V. S. for Thomas Bushell. 1604." Later, "The Tragicall History/ of the Life and Death/ of Doctor Faustus./ Written by Ch. Marl./ (Vignette. )/ London,/ Printed for John Wright, and are to be sold at his shop/ with-out Newgate,/ at the signe of the/ Bible, 1616."

[ Commonly Known As:] Doctor Faustus or Dr. Faustus.

[ Playwright:] Christopher Marlowe.

[ Type of Writing:] Play.

[ Genre:] Tragedy.

[ Language:] English.

[ Publisher:] Undecided. Possibly the theatrical entrepreneur Philip Henslowe.

[ Publication Year:] 1604 (A text); 1616 (B text).

[ Publication Size:] Quarto. [Note. The size of a book is generally measured by the height against the width of a leaf, or sometimes the height and width of its cover. A series of terms is commonly used by libraries and publishers for the general sizes, ranging from "folio" (the largest, height x width = 15 x 12 inches), to "quarto" (smaller, height x width = 12 x 9-1/2 inches) and "octavo" (still smaller, height x width = 9 x 6 inches)].

[ Versions:] Two versions, commonly known as the A-Text (quartos of 1604, 1609) and the B-Text (quartos of 1616, 1619, 1620, 1624, 1631). A quarto of 1663, containing additions and alterations, is largely discarded by critics and is generally ignored. (Note. This book follows "The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus" by Christopher Marlowe, from the quarto of 1604, edited by the Rev. Alexander Dyce.)

[ Place of Writing:] England.

[ Time of Writing:] Although no absolute evidence for the exact date has as yet been discovered, it may be assigned to the years 1588-9. Some scholars are inclined to the belief that the play existed only in manuscript, and had not been produced before the 1594 performance; while others maintain that though there are no references to performances during the years 1589-94, it is impossible to believe in its neglect for so long a period. Generally, it may be stated as late 1580s-early 1590s.

[ Time of the Setting:] Late 1580s-early 1590s.

[ Place of the Setting:] Europe in general. Germany and Italy in particular.

[ Source of the Plot:] In 1587 there was printed at Frankfort-on-the-Main, by Johann Spiess, the first edition of the famous 'Historia von D. Johann Fausten, dent weitbeschreityen Zauberer und Schwartzkunstler; (i.e. 'the history of Dr. Johann Faust, the widely noised conjuror and master of the Black Art'); the book was twice reprinted in the same year, and three editions were issued in 1589. Marlowe evidently founded his tragedy on an English translation of the 'History,' made in all probability in the year 1588 or early in 1589; however, no entry of it is to be found in the Stationers' Register. Scholars agree that Marlowe's play was founded upon the English version and not upon the German original. The earliest extant translation in English is of P. F. Gent as "The Historie of the damnable life and deserved death of Dr. John Faustus" bearing the date 1592.

[ Protagonist:] Doctor Faustus.

[ Outer Conflict:] Faustus selling his soul to Lucifer in exchange for twenty-four years of almost unlimited power, with Mephistophilis serving him, for the fulfillment of his desires, whims and fancies.

[ Inner Conflict:] The mental conflict arising from indecisiveness, regarding whether to repent and seek God's mercy or to honor his pact with Lucifer.

[ Storyteller or Narrator:] The Chorus provides the background information and hints at future action, intermittently between scenes. The monologues of the actors besides revealing their thoughts, also help in moving the story forward. Few aside comments by the actors to the audience do likewise.

[ Tone of the Play:] Tragic and grandiose. Low comedy interspersed.

[ Tense of the Play:] Chorus alternates between past and present tenses.

[ Major Themes in the Play:] Hubris or excessive Pride. Battle between Good and Evil. Conflict between Medieval and Renaissance values. Sin, Redemption, and Damnation. Power and Corruption. Indecisiveness or Divided Will.

[ Symbols in the Play:] Blood plays multiple symbolic roles. Rejection of different branches of knowledge. Good Angel and Evil Angel.

[ Rising Action:] Faustus studying necromancy, his conjuring up Mephistophilis and subsequent conversations.

[ Climax:] Faustus promising his soul to Lucifer, with a pact sealed in his own blood.

[ Falling Action:] Faustus trying to gratify his false sense of power, by conjuring magic for different rulers of the world.

[ Structure:] The text of Marlowe's Doctor Faustus (quarto of 1604) is completely without the punctuation of act division or scene enumeration. (Note. In this book, the play is presented as having a five-act structure along with scene enumeration, for easy understanding.)

[ Greek Tragedy Conventions:] According to Aristotle's Poetics (1449), a tragedy focuses on a great person experiencing a reversal of fortune. This reversal can be from bad to good or from good to bad. According to Aristotle, the serious tone of the tragedy, was better supported by a reversal of good to bad. The protagonist in a Greek tragedy was expected to experience a reversal of fortune and a downfall, usually due to his reach for a lofty goal being thwarted by his own hubris (excessive pride). A typical ancient Greek tragedy like the tragedies of Aeschylus, Euripides and Sophocles, follows five sections, namely, Prologue, Parodos, Episodes, Stasimon, and Exodus. Marlowe does not follow any specific structural divisions. However, apparently, he employs a one-actor Chorus to present a Prologue. By making the Chorus appear intermittently between scenes, Parodos is attempted. Most of the plot takes place as different Episodes. The Stasimon is enacted by the Chorus commenting upon the Episode to the audience. The Exodus would be the Chorus' epilogue, where the moral of the tragedy is stated. In this play, the one-actor Chorus neither employs Kommos (an exchange between the Chorus and actors to describe episodes) nor does it chant or sing. The convention of not depicting any violence onstage is followed, as Faustus is carried away off-stage by devils to dismember his soul from his body. Marlowe employs Renaissance values and thus, unlike Greek tragedies, does not focus on kings or war heroes, but on Faustus who is born to humble parents. Here, Marlowe departs from the classical tragic convention, by stressing that a common-born scholar, can also be given equal importance as any king or warrior; thereby making his story worthy of being told. However, unlike a morality play hero, Faustus as the protagonist, is in the typical classical tragic mould of a person, who is trying to over-achieve and falling due to a catastrophically ill-advised decision, primarily due to his own excessive pride (hubris). This typical classical tragic mould was employed to evoke pity and fear, for necessary emotional cleansing (catharsis). Artistotle in Poetics (1449, pp. 24-28) writes, "Tragedy is, therefore, an imitation (mimēsis) of a noble and complete action [...] which through compassion and fear produces purification of the passions." The three Aristotelian unities of drama, namely, the unities of time, place and action are not followed by Marlowe, in this play.

[ Comic Synthesis:] The comedy is of a low variety. The comic figures comment satirically on the main action. The serious main plot collapses into the comic underplot. The comic subplots provide a parodic effect of the main plot and "the gradual descent of the main plot into it." The comic subplots act as a "foil" to the main plot or as "comic relief". By mingling the tragic and the comic, ignoring the Aristotelian unities, and shrinking to cramping dimensions, Marlowe creates an illusion of an immense stage, which encompassed heaven, earth and hell. The comic subplots may reduce the main plot to absurdity, but it also serves a function in highlighting the main action. The comic scenes clarify the perception of moral values, by being simultaneously nonsensical and profound, comic and didactic. The comedy of futility is highlighted by the clownish scenes, since parody is its own excuse for being, when its target is the heroic attitude. The comic scenes contrast the ironic fate of a hero, who in striving to be a god, becomes less than a man. In Faustus' vain rebellion, there is comedy, and in his fall from grace, there is irrevocable tragedy.

[ Theological Implications:] The theological implications of Doctor Faustus have been the subject of considerable debate. Among the most complicated points of contention is whether the play supports or challenges, the Calvinist doctrine of absolute predestination. John Calvin (French: Jean Calvin, born Jehan Cauvin: 10 July 1509 - 27 May 1564) in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (1559), Chapter 21, section 5, states, "By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death." According to Calvin, predestination meant that God, acting of his own free will, elects some people to be saved and others to be damned - thus, the individual has no control over his own ultimate fate. This doctrine was the source of great controversy because it was seen by the so-called anti-Calvinists to limit man's free will in regard to faith and salvation, and to present a dilemma in terms of theodicy. The doctrine of predestination remained the source of vigorous and, at times, heated debate between Calvinist scholars, such as William Whitaker and William Perkins, and anti-Calvinists, such as William Barrett and Peter Baro. Ultimately, the theology of Marlowe and the text of Doctor Faustus remain far too ambiguous, for any kind of conclusive theological interpretation.

REFERENCE:

1. Jani, R. (pp.1-4, 2013). Doctor Faustus [Annotated]. CreateSpace: USA.

~0~

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Few Facts of "Doctor Faustus" by Christopher Marlowe Edited by Rajen Jani

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Full Title:] Initially, "The Tragicall History of D. Faustus". Later, "The Tragicall History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus". [ Title Page:] Initially, "The/ Tragicall History of D. Faustus./ As it hath bene Acted by the Right/ Honorable the Earle of Nottingham his seruants./ Written by Ch.

# data[].attributes.body
talks about themes of Faustus and also talks about what type of play this is. Also includes a summarized version of the play.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers.

# data[].attributes.body
This article compadres and contrasts between a modern tragedy and a shakespearean tragedy :D

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The word "tragedy" traditionally refers to a genre of serious, dramatic work in which a heroic individual meets with or causes terrible and awe-inspiring events. We can broadly distinguish classical tragedy, a dramatic form that directly developed from these rituals and was performed in ancient Greece, and modern tragedy, a dramatic form written and performed today.

The Origins of Tragedy

Tragedy has its roots in the Bacchanalia, religious rituals to the god Dionysus held in ancient Greece. Scholars believe that the earliest forms of these rituals may have been fertility feasts featuring dancers to celebrate the new harvest. Over time, other elements were added: a speaker, then dialogue between the speaker and the dancers. The playwright Aeschylus is often credited as the first to add a second speaker, and thereby create the form of tragedy.

Classical Tragedy

In his "Poetics," Aristotle identifies the elements of classical tragedy, based primarily on the work of the playwrights Aeschylus, Euripides and Sophocles. Classical tragedy is the imitation of a single action, in which a hero of high status falls from fortune to misfortune. The fall must occur because of a "tragic flaw," or some error or shortcoming in an otherwise good protagonist, and not by vice or depravity. The purpose of tragedy, in Aristotle's view, is to provoke pity and terror in the audience, leading to a catharsis, or cleansing of these emotions.

From Classical to Modern Tragedy

Between classical and modern tragedy, we find the medieval and Renaissance forms of tragedy. Medieval tragedy mostly took the form of narratives, rather than plays, and focused on the fall of great men caused, not by a tragic flaw, but instead the spinning of fortune's wheel. Renaissance tragedy took its inspiration from classical tragedy, while changing the form in important ways, by including subplots, comic relief and expanding the possibilities for the tragic hero. Christopher Marlowe's "Edward II," who is driven by vice which causes his downfall, could not have featured as a protagonist in classical tragedy.

Modern Tragedy

Whereas in classical tragedy, the protagonist is of noble or prestigious standing, modern tragedy is more likely to focus on the "common man." A modern audience is expected to relate to, rather than look up to, the protagonist; and while the classical tragic hero's death is an event to be collectively mourned onstage, the modern tragic hero often dies unrecognized as a hero. The modern tragedy is also more likely to focus on society, rather than fate or fortune, as that which oppresses the hero. However, the modern tragedy retains a highly solemn tone and focus on matters of grave and ultimate importance, features common to tragedy throughout its history.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Difference Between a Classical & a Modern Tragedy in Literature

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The word "tragedy" traditionally refers to a genre of serious, dramatic work in which a heroic individual meets with or causes terrible and awe-inspiring events. We can broadly distinguish classical tragedy, a dramatic form that directly developed from these rituals and was performed in ancient Greece, and modern ...

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about Christopher Marlowe's life.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The achievement of Christopher Marlowe, poet and dramatist, was enormous—surpassed only by that of his exact contemporary, William Shakespeare. A few months the elder, Marlowe was usually the leader, although Shakespeare was able to bring his art to a higher perfection. Most dramatic poets of the…

# data[].attributes.body
Biography of Christopher Marlowe.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Elizabethan poet, playwright, and translator Christopher Marlowe was baptized on February 26, 1564 in Canterbury, England.

# data[].attributes.body
Talks about tragedy was different in ancient times . Next to how it is now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble stature and the transcendent realm of tragedy. One could, in short, measure oneself against the larger, universal background of what constitutes tragedy, as rendered by an Aeschylus and a Sophocles in, respectively, an Agamemnon or an Oedipus. A certain greatness, immensity, and exceptionality surrounded the tragic dimension, even as tragedy connoted something greater than immediate life, from which, of course, it emerged and the reality of which it reflected to a heightened, ultimate degree.

An epic poem like Homer's Iliad is fraught with tragic meaning and destiny, its heroes immense, even overwhelming in their tragic circumstances and predicament-in their fatedness ( moira). Their tragic qualities help to place their tragic experience on the highest level of moral significance. The tragedy of Achilles, like his shield, depicts what is astonishing and enormous in consequence, trans-human and superhuman. His suffering, no less than his weakness and sin ( hamartia), overshadows everything else in the epic tragedy of the Iliad. His demise, unalterable, dramatizes tragic lessons in wisdom and insight for those who discern the spectacle of his glory and destruction. A monumental essence radiates in his every act and gesture, in his heroic praxis and doxai. In association with Achilles, what is terribly human attains its highest measure of worth.

The line of descent and connection from Achilles to Agamemnon to Oedipus to Antigone to Medea is one that discloses a kind of spiritual angst, at once terrifying and redeeming. In these tragic figures and in the dilemma of each hero's agon, we recognize the deeper parts of our extended selves in the undulant process of purification and expiation. In their pathos we perceive our own-and we take note of the redemptive context of reverence. Their tragedy helps us to understand our limits, our limitations. Such tragedy, at once humane and humanizing, helps us to encounter and also to measure our humanity. It enables us to perceive, even if from a distance, what is called, in Hellenic contexts, a "vision of the agathon " as a dimension of a "divine paradigm," and always against the background of those "unwritten laws" that Sophocles describes in Antigone:

"The immortal unwritten laws of Heaven,
they were not born today nor yesterday;
They die not; and none knoweth whence they sprang."

Ancient tragedy, it can be said, has its ground of being in these "laws," these first and last principles, the arche and telos of all human experience and meaning. This is tragedy of transcendence, as it were, with its informing metaphysic in relation to human nothingness ("I count your life as equal to zero," the Chorus cries in Oedipus Rex) and also, in the end, to the suffering which also brings a cleansing self-recognition-a kind of grace at the edge of redemption in the country of the spirit: "Submit, you fool. Submit. In agony learn wisdom," as Aeschylus declares in Prometheus. Ancient tragedy is, thus, the experience of transformation (not "transfiguration" in the later Christian sense), enacted in the contexts of what Goethe terms the "divine worth of tones and tears." That, too, Greek tragedy has, in its unique way, a religious center, even, that is, a spiritual essence, is an incontrovertible fact. For the Greek tragedians, as teachers of virtues, were deeply involved with religious questions-ultimate questions revolving around man's worth and destiny-with some super-human power ( theos), and with man's fate. "The Greeks of the sixth and fifth centuries," writes Werner Jaeger in Paideia (1939-1944), "had long been brooding on the great religious problem: why does God send suffering into the life of man?"

The Greek tragedians, hence, stressed the eternal fact that man must not forget his unconscious and yet transcendent ties to the unwritten laws and his need for reverence ( eusebeia) for the unknown, the mysterious. Their tragedies, in effect, provided a dramatic interpretation of life, both moral and spiritual in principle. And these tragedies, more specifically, focused on some heroic figure-some superior being-in whom some fateful problem was to be enacted, particularly the great religious problem of suffering and sin, of punishment and expiation. "Behind all suffering," G. Lowes Dickinson writes in The Greek View of Life (1896), "behind sin and crime, must lie a redeeming magnanimity." A Greek tragedy, by becoming a "moving sculpture" and "a sleep of music," also was to become a study of Man ( anthropos), finally transporting the audience to a world of higher reality and permanence from the material world of terror and flux.

Clearly, ancient tragedy contains a humanistic orientation: that is, a fervent and consummate preoccupation with the nature of man, his predicament and his fate. Man, in short, is the center, though that center has its added metaphysical dimension, its added center, in the universe (in the cosmos), so that to concentrate solely on the first center to the neglect of the second center breeds arrogance, insolence, impiety, overweening pride- hubris. Aeschylus's Agamemnon depicts precisely this centeredness of the self and images its destructive process when he walks on the purple carpets reserved only for the Gods and thus courts punishment and doom itself. He glorifies what Simone Weil calls "the empire of might" (in all of its consequences) as it collides with the "justice of Zeus," and with the "law of measure" ("nothing in excess," to recall the Greek warning).

Greek tragedy also becomes a drama of discrimination, seeking as it does to present itself as a mode of explaining the world-the human condition-and knowing it. In Sophocles this form of tragedy-of tragic discrimination-affirms man's greatness in the face of cruel adversity; affirms man's heroic capacity within the scope of a heroism of dignity, which constitutes, for the ancients, true humility and final redemption. Sophocles, in this respect, is a tragic poet of order, reverence, proportion, above all, of sophrosyne, the supreme Hellenic virtue.

Attic tragedy records the disorder of eros and the yearning for order; it records, in effect, the constant collision between gravity and grace, between disequilibrium and equilibrium, between nothingness and being, between courage and nihilism. Tragedy, of its very nature, must bear "the burden of vision" for eternity itself. It should not go unnoticed that ancient and modern tragedy do have a connecting link in Euripides, the perturbing Greek dramatist who, as Jaeger was to observe, "discovered the soul in a new sense-who revealed the troubled world of man's emotions and passions."

Unlike Aeschylus and Sophocles, Euripides confronted the cold, hard face of reality as he saw it; showed fierce understanding of what he saw; and fiercely condemned those conditions that he exposed. Indeed, Euripides has been described as a dramatist who had a "modern mind," the first of the moderns; Aristophanes, in fact, charged that Euripides taught the Athenians to "think, see, understand, suspect, question everything," and no words better prophesy the "modern temper" than these.

That, too, Euripides belonged essentially to a destructive analytical spirit, that he took things rebelliously, that he reflected an age of movement and transition, that he echoed the sophistic spirit, that all truth is relative-it is this sophism that Plato equated with intellectual and moral anarchy: these aspects of his thought and dramatic achievement anticipate the modern age and what Thomas Hardy specifies as "the ache of modernism." In Euripides we have a prophetic glimpse of the crisis of modernism in the destructive forms of disorder, discontinuity, disinheritance: of a modern world that is "a broken center," when as Rilke declares, "the world...passed out of the hands of God into the hands of men."

Walter Pater cogently summarizes our modernity when he writes: "Modern thought is distinguished from ancient by its cultivation of the 'relative spirit' in place of the 'absolute."' This modernity, pervasive and irreversible, spells the "doom of orthodox sophrosyne," which signifies the law of measure. The Russian poet F. I. Tiutshev (1803-1873) registers the modern predicament when he writes in his poem "The Abyss":

Behold man, without home,
orphaned, alone, impotent,
facing the dark abyss; ...
And in this strange mysterious night
he sees and knows a Fatal heritage.

The "fatal heritage" that Tiutshev speaks of in his poem is also that which Matthew Arnold, in his poem "The Scholar Gypsy," associates with "this strange disease of modern life/ With its sick hurry, its divided aims." William Butler Yeats, in "The Second Coming" (1919), also underlines the ravages and the desperation of such a heritage of fatal consequences in modern life: "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;/ Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world."

In his book The End of the Modern World (1956) Romano Guardini declares that "Man has no place-absolutely no place-in the universe," words that embody not only the essence of modernity but also its tragic essences that culminate in the modern waste land that T.S. Eliot renders. The sustaining and redeeming principles of conservation and correction espoused by Edmund Burke, as well as the disciplines of continuity intimately connected with these, have been superseded, or contravened, by what the philosopher Michael Polanyi calls a "positivistic empiricism," or as he further observes: "...[the] idea of unlimited progress, intensified to perfectionism, has combined with our sharpened skepticism to produce the perilous state of the modern mind."

Human meaning, then, is "reduced to the condition of things," reduced, in effect, to a concern with "the idea of man...[as an] administrative number," without a past and without memory, when, as Samuel Beckett declares, "it is not for man to act, but to be acted upon: man can only despair of hope, can only not wait or wait." Spiritual inertia, which results from this process of cruel reductionism in a pluralist society, leads to a malaise that afflicts human existence and that adopts, for example, the belief that, in Simone Weil's words, "matter is a machine for manufacturing good."

Such a belief plunges modern man deeper into Plato's "Cave of Illusion" and renounces the redemption that resides in humility, perhaps the highest spiritual quality to be found in the "tragic sense of life": "Without humility, all the virtues are finite," Simone Weil further states. "Only humility makes them infinite." Indeed, humility is the omega-point of a metaphysics of tragedy-of tragic meaning, experience, destiny. It is a paradigm of tragedy, which if it is scorned or repudiated leads precisely to the annihilation of the tragic spirit that makes tragedy non-tragic in modern life; in short, transforms tragedy into paradox, which thrusts one "beyond tragedy," that also signalizes "the death of tragedy."

Nicola Chiaromonte, the late Italian social critic (1905-1972), is much to the point when he writes concerning the nihilism and violated principles shaping and finally destroying human meaning in modern civilization:

"The sickness of our times is egomania. It renders the individual radically impious and makes him ignore everything that does not serve his immediate objectives (which never extended beyond the limits of his own lifetime), thereby denying all that is ineffable, secret, and arcane in the world-the 'divine' inherent in all things and in every impulse of the spirit."

Impiety, that which for Virgil constituted an ultimate discordance found in furor impius, is a major part of the disorientation in modern life that breaks and diminishes the patience and magnanimity that inhere redemptively in genuine tragic experience as it depicts the search for order of the soul. "No-more'' and "Not-yet," Heidegger's "double Not," now make the tragic sense a "senseless fatality"; the so-called modern hero is just "anybody," just another "sleep-walker'' in "kosmos Kafka," for whom "eternity is replaced by endlessness" and who bleakly gives us news, as Kafka would have it, of "the abandoned world" in which he lives.

In the modern age, which one critic terms "an age of bad faith" commencing with August 1914, when the Great War broke out, tragic vision and experience undergo a radical change-a devaluative pulverizing process in which what for the ancients is noble, elevated, and heroic now becomes trivial, minimal, and common. A modern victim's tragedy lacks stature or grandeur, and is often one that underlines a victim's grotesqueness, meaninglessness, rootlessness, his absurdity, his non-being. In the modern world in which the idea of transcendence has neither place nor meaning tragedy itself is a victim of what Eric Voegelin calls "existential deformation."

If in ancient tragedy a tragic hero is shrouded in a world of mystery, possesses a noumenal quality of human worth, has a standard of character in an ascending pattern of development and meaning, in modern tragedy a tragic figure is identified by demystification and by dehumanization, by lostness and rootlessness. His world, in a sense, has no universal frontiers and is reduced in its physical and spiritual horizons; that is, it is a localized, non-ontological, non-organic world in which man himself is reduced, or neutralized, or denatured; a disinherited, displaced person, as it were, and, indeed, a non-person consigned to a "cancer ward," or exiled, forever, to a Siberian gulag, the modern forms of tragic fate in "the heart of darkness." These are our conditions of modern tragedy, or better our pseudonyms of tragedy.

In the ancient world tragedy contained and was nourished by the "religious sense," that is to say, by the elements of piety and humility, by an intuitive veneration of "the idea of the holy," of the sacred logos as opposed to the profane impulse, by an intuitive pull towards the transcendent as opposed to the present and the nominal. Sophocles's Oedipus at Colonus is perhaps the most vivid illustration of the religious sense and of the religious acceptation in a tragic context. Oedipus, now an exile and wanderer, recognizes his moira -''In suffering I was born." "The sap of earth dries up," he confesses almost abjectly.

"Flesh dies, and while faith withers falsehood blooms.
The spirit is not constant from friend to friend, from city to city;
it changes, soon or late."

His end, in a scene that is perhaps grander than any in Greek tragedy, we view the aged and blind Oedipus disappearing into a sacred grove-"And the place is holy." Oedipus now encounters the " mysterium tremendum ":

...suddenly a Voice called him, a terrifying voice at which all trembled and hair stood on end. A god was calling to him. "Oedipus! Oedipus!" it cried, again and again. "It is time: you stay too long." He heard the summons, and knew that it was from God.

Oedipus passes from the human world to the divine-to "holy ground." His end, his disappearance into the divine unknown, into the divine otherness, emphasizes the religious sense as it conjoins with the tragic sense, each deepening and enhancing the other in relation to the huge cosmic mystery, wondrous in its breadth and depth.

This religious sense, in its Hellenic constituents, should not be forcibly amalgamated or confused with the religious sense in its Christian contexts. Oedipus's tragic passion and fate, whatever their religious feeling and pull, must be differentiated from the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The religious dimension of Greek tragedy revolves around moral struggle, but it is obviously removed from the Christian vision of redemption. Greek tragic heroes are finite beings even in their religious nobility, whereas a Christian tragic hero (as in the fiction of a Dostoevsky) is a creature of freedom, sin, guilt, and salvation.

Greek tragedy venerates the transcendent, in its awe and sanctity, but it is teleological in its experiential qualities of pity and terror. The eschatological character of the Christian religious sense must not be ignored-that subsuming religious sense that has its ultimates in the coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the Last Judgment. Both Greek tragedy and modern tragedy are anchored in time, in chronos-in measured time that has a beginning and ending; that has boundaries at once temporal and spatial. For the Christian, on the other hand, all tragedy ends in grace, attains its finality, its telos, in ultimate time, in kairos, in that time, to kairo ekino: in divine time that is timeless and that fuses beginnings and endings, endings and beginnings.

For the Christian, tragedy ends not in the heroic suffering of the Greeks or in the perverse skepticism of the moderns, but in Revelation. "For those who have faith to trust in the revelation that is the Christ," Preston T. Roberts, Jr., writes in a masterful essay, "A Christian Theory of Dramatic Tragedy," "evil, sin, the devil, death-in short all that is cursed, wretched, and miserable about this life-becomes redeemable in principle and redeemed at certain points and moments in fact."

Modern tragedy, having increasingly repudiated the religious sense that radiated in and even renewed ancient tragedy by endowing it with a metaphysical yearning, registers the nothingness, the "nameless, ultimate fear, a horror of the completely negative," that Dr. F.R. Leavis perceives in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land (1922):

After the torchlight red on sweaty faces
After the frosty silence in the garden
After the agony in stony places
The shouting and the crying
Prison and palace and reverberation
Of thunder of spring over distant mountains
He who was living is now dead
We who were living are now dying
With a little patience.

It can be said that modern tragedy is the tragedy of experiencing "the agony in stony places" and yet learning nothing from this tragic experience: or of hearing the " ou-boum" ("utterly dull") which, in E. M. Forster's novel A Passage to India (1924), merely states, now and forever, in this world and in all worlds, "Everything exists, nothing has value." Forster's words evoke the import of tragedy in the modern world even as they severely constrict the boundaries of tragic vision. This constriction signals not only the crisis of modernity but also the tragedy of modernity as we live and experience it in the "antagonist world."
Reprinted with the gracious permission of Modern Age (Fall 1997).
The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics-we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble

# data[].attributes.body
A section in this reading compares Shakespearean tragedy and Elizabethan Tragedy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The classic discussion of Greek tragedy is Aristotle's Poetics. He defines tragedy as "the imitation of an action that is serious and also as having magnitude, complete in itself." He continues, "Tragedy is a form of drama exciting the emotions of pity and fear. Its action should be single and complete, presenting a reversal of fortune, involving persons renowned and of superior attainments,and it should be written in poetry embellished with every kind of artistic expression." The writer presents "incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to interpet its catharsis of such of such emotions" (by catharsis, Aristotle means a purging or sweeping away of the pity and fear aroused by the tragic action).

The basic difference Aristotle draws between tragedy and other genres, such as comedy and the epic, is the "tragic pleasure of pity and fear" the audience feel watching a tragedy. In order for the tragic hero to arouse these feelings in the audience, he cannot be either all good or all evil but must be someone the audience can identify with; however, if he is superior in some way(s), the tragic pleasure is intensified. His disastrous end results from a mistaken action, which in turn arises from a tragic flaw or from a tragic error in judgment. Often the tragic flaw is hubris, an excessive pride that causes the hero to ignore a divine warning or to break a moral law. It has been suggested that because the tragic hero's suffering is greater than his offense, the audience feels pity; because the audience members perceive that they could behave similarly, they feel pity. Click here for excerpts from Aristotle's Poetics.
The medieval tagedy is a prose or poetic narrative, not a drama. Tragedy was perceived as a reversal of fortune, a fall from a high position. This view of tragedy derives from the Medieval concept of fortune, which was personified as Dame Fortune, a blindfolded woman who turned a wheel at whim; men were stationed at various places on the wheel--the top of the wheel represented the best fortune, being under the wheel the worst fortune. However, the wheel could turn suddenly and the man on top could suddenly be under the wheel, without warning. A distinctly English form of tragedy begins with the Elizabethans. The translation of Seneca and the reading of Aristotle's Poetics were major influences. Many critics and playwrights, such as Ben Jonson, insisted on observing the classical unities of action, time and place (the action should be one whole and take place in one day and in one place). However, it was romantic tragedy, which Shakespeare wrote inRichard II, Macbeth, Hamlet, and King Lear, which prevailed. Romantic tragedy disregarded the unities (as in the use of subplots), mixed tragedy and comedy, and emphasized action, spectacle, and--increasingly--sensation. Shakespeare violated the the unities in these ways and also in mixing poetry and prose and using the device of a play-within-a-play, as inHamlet. The Elizabethans and their Jacobean successsors acted on stage the violence that the Greek dramatists reported. The Elizabethan and later the Jacobean playwright had a diverse audience to please, ranging from Queen Elizabeth and King James I and their courtiers to the lowest classes.
Christopher Marlowe's tragedies showed the resources of the English language with his magnificent blank verse, as in the Tragedy of Dr. Faustus, and the powerful effects that could be achieved by focusing on a towering protagonist, as in Tamburlaine. In Elizabethan tragedy, the individual leads to violence and conflict. A distinctly non-Aristotelian form of tragedy developed during this period was the tragicomedy. In a tragicomedy, the action and subject matter seem to require a tragic ending, but it is avoided by a reversal which leads to a happy ending; sometimes the tragicomedy alternates serious and comic actions throughout the play. Because it blends tragedy and comedy, the tragicomedy is sometimes referred to as a "mixed" kind.
The problem play or play of ideas usually has a tragic ending. The driving force behind the play is the exploration of some social problem, like alcoholism or prostitution; the characters are used as examples of the general problem. Frequently the playwright views the problem and its solution in a way that defies or rejects the conventional view; not surprisingly, some problem plays have aroused anger and controversy in audiences and critics. Henrik Ibsen, who helped to revive tragedy from its artistic decline in the nineteenth century, wrote problem plays. A Doll's House, for example, shows the exploitation and denigration of middle class women by society and in marriage. The tragedy frequently springs from the individual's conflict with the laws, values, traditions, and representatives of society.
Adapted from A Guide to the Study of Literature: A Companion Text for Core Studies 6, Landmarks of Literature, ©English Department, Brooklyn College.

Shakespeare's Theatre ||Shakespeare Page || The Tragic Vision || Syllabus
Guide to the Study of Literature ||Core Studies 6 Page || Melani Home Page

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The classic discussion of Greek tragedy is Aristotle's Poetics. He defines tragedy as "the imitation of an action that is serious and also as having magnitude, complete in itself." He continues, "Tragedy is a form of drama exciting the emotions of pity and fear.

# data[].attributes.body
Biography of the works and pieces of Christopher Marlowe, which also touches on his well-known plays such as Doctor Faustus, Edward the Second, etc.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Synopsis

Born in Canterbury, England, in 1564. While Christopher Marlowe's literary career lasted less than six years, and his life only 29 years, his achievements, most notably the play The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus, ensured his lasting legacy.

Early Years

Christopher Marlowe was born in Canterbury around February 26, 1564 (this was the day on which he was baptized). He went to King's School and was awarded a scholarship that enabled him to study at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, from late 1580 until 1587.

Marlowe earned his bachelor of arts degree in 1584, but in 1587 the university hesitated in granting him his master's degree. Its doubts (perhaps arising from his frequent absences, or speculation that he had converted to Roman Catholicism and would soon attend college elsewhere) were set to rest, or at least dismissed, when the Privy Council sent a letter declaring that he was now working "on matters touching the benefit of his country," and he was awarded his master's degree on schedule.

Marlowe as a Secret Agent?

The nature of Marlowe's service to England was not specified by the council, but the letter sent to Cambridge has provoked abundant speculation, notably the theory that Marlowe had become a secret agent working for Sir Francis Walsingham's intelligence service. No direct evidence supports this theory, but the council's letter clearly suggests that Marlowe was serving the government in some secret capacity.

Surviving Cambridge records from the period show that Marlowe had several lengthy absences from the university, much longer than allowed by the school's regulations. And extant dining room accounts indicate that he spent lavishly on food and drink while there, greater amounts than he could have afforded on his known scholarship income. Both of these could point to a secondary source of income, such as secret government work.

But with scant hard evidence and rampant speculation, the mystery surrounding Marlowe's service to the queen is likely to remain active. Spy or not, after attaining his master's degree, Marlowe moved to London and took up writing full-time.

Early Writing Career

After 1587, Christopher Marlowe was in London, writing for the theater and probably also engaging himself occasionally in government service. What is thought to be his first play, Dido, Queen of Carthage, was not published until 1594, but it is generally thought to have been written while he was still a student at Cambridge. According to records, the play was performed by the Children of the Chapel, a company of boy actors, between 1587 and 1593.

Marlowe's second play was the two-part Tamburlaine the Great (c. 1587; published 1590). This was Marlowe's first play to be performed on the regular stage in London and is among the first English plays in blank verse. It is considered the beginning of the mature phase of the Elizabethan theater and was the last of Marlowe's plays to be published before his untimely death.

There is disagreement among Marlowe scholars regarding the order in which the plays subsequent to Tamburlaine were written.

Some contend that Doctor Faustus quickly followed Tamburlaine, and that Marlowe then turned to writing Edward the Second, The Massacre at Paris, and finally The Jew of Malta. According to the Marlowe Society's chronology, the order was thus: The Jew of Malta, Doctor Faustus, Edward the Second and The Massacre at Paris, with Doctor Faustus being performed first (1604) and The Jew of Malta last (1633).

What is not disputed is that he wrote only these four plays after Tamburlaine, from c. 1589 to 1592, and that they cemented his legacy and proved vastly influential.

The Plays
The Jew of Malta
The Jew of Malta (fully The Famous Tragedy of the Rich Jew of Malta), with a prologue delivered by a character representing Machiavelli, depicts the Jew Barabas, the richest man on all the island of Malta. His wealth is seized, however, and he fights the government to regain it until his death at the hands of Maltese soldiers.

The play swirls with religious conflict, intrigue and revenge, and is considered to have been a major influence on Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The title character, Barabas, is seen as the main inspiration for Shakespeare's Shylock character in Merchant. The play is also considered the first (successful) black comedy, or tragicomedy.

Barabas is a complex character who has provoked mixed reactions in audiences, and there has been extensive debate about the play's portrayal of Jews (as with Shakespeare's Merchant). Filled with unseemly characters, the play also ridicules oversexed Christian monks and nuns, and portrays a pair of greedy friars vying for Barabas' wealth. The Jew of Malta in this way is a fine example of what Marlowe's final four works are in part known for: controversial themes.
Edward the Second
The historical Edward the Second (fully The Troublesome Reign and Lamentable Death of Edward the Second, King of England, with the Tragical Fall of Proud Mortimer) is a play about the deposition of England's King Edward II by his barons and the queen, all of whom resent the undue influence the king's men have over his policies.

Edward the Second is a tragedy featuring a weak and flawed monarch, and it paved the way for Shakespeare's more mature histories, such as Richard II, Henry IV and Henry V.

It is the only Marlowe plays whose text can be reliably said to represent the author's manuscript, as all of Marlowe's other plays were heavily edited or simply transcribed from performances, and the original texts were lost to the ages.
The Massacre at Paris
The Massacre at Paris is a short and lurid work, the only extant text of which was likely a reconstruction from memory, or "reported text," of the original performance. Because of its origin, the play is approximately half the length of Edward the Second, The Jew of Malta and each part of Tamburlaine, and comprises mostly bloody action with little depth of characterization or quality verse. For these reasons, the play has been the most neglected of Marlowe's oeuvre.

Massacre portrays the events of the Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 1572, in which French royalty and Catholic nobles instigated the murder and execution of thousands of protestant Huguenots. In London, agitators seized on its theme to advocate the murders of refugees, an event that the play eerily warns the queen of in its last scene. Interestingly, the warning comes from a character referred to as "English Agent," a character who has been thought to be Marlowe himself, representing his work with the queen's secret service.
Doctor Faustus
Marlowe's most famous play is The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus, but, as is the case with most of his plays, it has survived only in a corrupt form, and when Marlowe actually wrote it has been a topic of debate.

Based on the German Faustbuch, Doctor Faustus is acknowledged as the first dramatized version of the Faust legend, in which a man sells his soul to the devil in exchange for knowledge and power. While versions of story began appearing as early as the 4th century, Marlowe deviates significantly by having his hero unable to repent and have his contract annulled at the end of the play. He is warned to do so throughout by yet another Marlowe variation of the retelling--a Good Angel--but Faustus ignores the angel's advice continually.

In the end, Faustus finally seems to repent for his deeds, but it is either too late or just simply irrelevant, as Mephistopheles collects his soul, and it is clear that Faustus exits to hell with him.

Arrest and Death

The constant rumors of Christopher Marlowe's atheism finally caught up with him on Sunday May 20, 1593, and he was arrested for just that "crime." Atheism, or heresy, was a serious offense, for which the penalty was burning at the stake. Despite the gravity of the charge, however, he was not jailed or tortured but was released on the condition that he report daily to an officer of the court.

On May 30, however, Marlowe was killed by Ingram Frizer. Frizer was with Nicholas Skeres and Robert Poley, and all three men were tied to one or other of the Walsinghams--either Sir Francis Walsingham (the man who evidently recruited Marlowe himself into secret service on behalf of the queen) or a relative also in the spy business. Allegedly, after spending the day together with Marlowe in a lodging house, a fight broke out between Marlowe and Frizer over the bill, and Marlowe was stabbed in the forehead and killed.

Conspiracy theories have abounded since, with Marlowe's atheism and alleged spy activities at the heart of the murder plots, but the real reason for Marlowe's death is still debated.

What is not debated is Marlowe's literary importance, as he is Shakespeare's most important predecessor and is second only to Shakespeare himself in the realm of Elizabethan tragic drama.

Related Videos

Fact Check

We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn't look right, contact us!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Born in Canterbury, England, in 1564. While Christopher Marlowe's literary career lasted less than six years, and his life only 29 years, his achievements, most notably the play The Tragicall History of Doctor Faustus, ensured his lasting legacy. Christopher Marlowe was born in Canterbury around February 26, 1564 (this was the day on which he was baptized).

# data[].attributes.body
The article talks about a Marlowes life, his beliefs, rumors, and death.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe (1564-1593) is best-known as being the playwright who created , as well as writing the Tamburlaine the Great plays, The Massacre at Paris, The Jew of Malta, and the epic poem Hero and Leander. Evidence suggests he was also a spy for Her Majesty's government, a heretic, a counterfeiter, a homosexual, and an atheist.

Who killed him and why? The short answer is Ingram Frizer, allegedly in self-defence. The long answer is much more interesting, representing a five hundred-year-old literary mystery full of intrigue, betrayal, political machinations, and poetry.

Born the son of a Canterbury shoemaker in 1564, Marlowe clearly was a bright boy, and attended The King's School in Canterbury on a scholarship, then Corpus Christi College in Cambridge, where he wrote Dido Queen of Carthage.

It's from his time at university that we see the first evidence that Marlowe began working as a government spy. Suspicion fell on Marlowe after he travelled to Rheims, the location of a Catholic seminary (and Elizabethan England was brimming with suspicion regarding illicit Catholic activities, particularly given the 1586 Babington Plot involving Mary Queen of Scots). However, the government issued a letter saying that despite Cambridge's apparent reluctance, Marlowe "should be furthered in the degree he was to take this next Commencement: Because it was not her Majesties pleasure the anie one emplied as he had been in matters touching the benefitt of his Countrie should be defamed by those that are ingorant in th'affaires he went about".

Upon graduation Marlowe began working as a playwright with Thomas Walsingham (nephew of the spymaster Sir Francis Walsingham) as his not particularly lucrative patron, but in all likelihood supplemented his income by continuing to spy on dissenters for the crown. In 1592 he was arrested in Flushing, Holland for coining (creating counterfeit coins), and allegedly would later claim that he "had as good a right to coin as the Queen of England." He escaped hanging, and no record survives to indicate who intervened on his behalf.

In May of 1593 the Dutch Church Libel, a document threatening wealthy Protestant Dutch immigrants in very poor verse, was posted on the wall of the French Church. Despite the unlikelihood of Marlowe having produced something so poetically unsound, the libel was signed 'Tamburlaine', one of Marlowe's most popular characters, and contained references to The Jew of Malta and The Massacre at Paris. When investigations began, Marlowe's former roommate, Thomas Kyd (author of The Spanish Tragedy: check out Emma Smith's podcast about Kyd) was arrested and tortured. During his interrogation he would claim heretical papers found in his possession belonged to Marlowe. Kyd never recovered from his torture, and died three months later. Marlowe was arrested and confined to remain within the verge, a twelve-mile radius of the court.

Around this time, Marlowe's one-time friend and co-conspirator at Flushing, Richard Baines, was presented the Baines Note, or "A Note Containing the Opinion of One Christopher Marly Concerning his Damnable Judgment of Religion, and scorn of gods word", a list of the heresies uttered by Christopher Marlowe. These included:
- He affirmeth that Moses was but a Juggler
- That the first beginning of Religion was only to keep men in awe
- That Christ was a bastard and his mother dishonest
- That all they that love not tobacco and boys were fools
- That in almost every company Marlowe persuades men to atheism, willing them not to be afraid of bug-bears and hobgoblins

There's no question that Marlowe's writings show a disregard for authority, and at times a borderline nihilism. Tamburlaine is a professed atheist, and women have little purpose in his plays. Still, we can't know how much of what appears in the Baines note Marlowe actually said. Even if it is accurate, we don't know how much of it Marlowe meant. He may have been encouraged to utter libels in order to draw out atheists and conspirators who could then be turned over to the crown. If he did believe what he said, were these always his views, or had he begun saying them for England, then become so enraptured with the language he used and the part he was playing that he even convinced himself?

And so on 30 May 1593, Marlowe found himself in the house of Elizabeth Bull in Deptford accompanied by Ingram Frizer, Nicholas Skeres, and Robert Poley, all employees of one of the Walsinghams. By the time lunch finished Marlowe would be dead, stabbed in the eye. Those present would claim that he attacked Frizer over a 'reckoning', or settling the bill. But why did the other two men not intervene in such a fight? Why did Frizer's injuries suggest he had been pommelled with the handle of a dagger, an attack designed to wound but not kill? And what had the men gathered to discuss on that fateful day?

No matter what the real reason, the world lost a tremendous literary talent on 30 May, 1593. Shakespeare would pay homage to Marlowe in As You Like It when he wrote:
"Dead shepherd, now I find thy saw of might,
Who ever loved that loved not at first sight?"
(As You Like It, III.v)
It's easy to romanticize Marlowe, thinking of him as a man who swam the Hellespont to live a life of passion and drowned in the attempt.
It's easy, but it might not be entirely inaccurate.

For more information about Marlowe's death, check out Charles Nicholl's The Reckoning. For more information about Marlowe's life and works, check out his writing, or David Riggs' The World of Christopher Marlowe.

See also:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Who Killed Christopher Marlowe (and Why)?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe (1564-1593) is best-known as being the playwright who created , as well as writing the Tamburlaine the Great plays, The Massacre at Paris, The Jew of Malta, and the epic poem Hero and Leander . Evidence suggests he was also a spy for Her Majesty's government, a heretic, a counterfeiter, a homosexual, and an atheist.

# data[].attributes.body
A quick rundown of different types of tragedy from different eras from Cal Polly

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
English Department, California Polytechnic State University

The genre of tragedy is rooted in the Greek dramas of Aeschylus (525-456 B.C., e.g. the Oresteia and Prometheus Bound), Euripides (ca. 480?-405 B.C., e.g. Medea and The Trojan Women) and Sophocles (496-406 B.C., e.g. Oedipus Rex and Antigone). One of the earliest works of literary criticism, the Poetics of the Greek philosopher (384-322 B.C.), includes a discussion of tragedy based in part upon the plays of Aeschylus, Euripides, and Sophocles. While Shakespeare probably did not know Greek tragedy directly, he would have been familiar with the Latin adaptations of Greek drama by the Roman (i.e. Latin-language) playwright Seneca (ca. 3 B.C.-65 A.D.; his nine tragedies include a Medea and an Oedipus). Both Senecan and Renaissance tragedy were influenced by the theory of tragedy found in Aristotle's Poetics.

Classical Tragedy: According to Aristotle's Poetics, tragedy involves a protagonist of high estate ("better than we") who falls from prosperity to misery through a series of reversals and discoveries as a result of a " tragic flaw," generally an error caused by human frailty. Aside from this initial moral weakness or error, the protagonist is basically a good person: for Aristotle, the downfall of an evil protagonist is not tragic (Macbeth would not qualify). In Aristotelian tragedy, the action (or fable) generally involves revolution (unanticipated reversals of what is expected to occur) and discovery (in which the protagonists and audience learn something that had been hidden). The third part of the fable, disasters, includes all destructive actions, deaths, etc. Tragedy evokes pity and fear in the audience, leading finally to catharsis (the purgation of these passions).

Medieval tragedy: A narrative (not a play) concerning how a person falls from high to low estate as the Goddess Fortune spins her wheel. In the middle ages, there was no "tragic" theater per se; medieval theater in England was primarily liturgical drama, which developed in the later middle ages (15th century) as a way of teaching scripture to the illiterate (mystery plays) or of reminding them to be prepared for death and God's Judgment (morality plays). Medieval "tragedy" was found not in the theater but in collections of stories illustrating the falls of great men (e.g. Boccacio's Falls of Illustrious Men, Chaucer's Monk's Tale from the Canterbury Tales, and Lydgate's Falls of Princes). These narratives owe their conception of Fortune in part to the Latin tragedies of Seneca, in which Fortune and her wheel play a prominent role.

Renaissance tragedy derives less from medieval tragedy (which randomly occurs as Fortune spins her wheel) than from the Aristotelian notion of thetragic flaw, a moral weakness or human error that causes the protagonist's downfall. Unlike classical tragedy, however, it tends to include subplots and comic relief. From Seneca, early Renaissance tragedy borrowed the "violent and bloody plots, resounding rhetorical speeches, the frequent use of ghosts . . . and sometimes the five-act structure" ( Norton Anthology of English Literature, 6th ed., vol. I, p. 410). In his greatest tragedies (e.g. Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth), Shakespeare transcends the conventions of Renaissance tragedy, imbuing his plays with a timeless universality.

Modern theories of Tragedy: Most modern theorists build upon the Aristotelian notions of tragedy. Two examples are the Victorian critic A.C. Bradley ( Shakespearean Tragedy, 1904) and Northrop Frye ( The Anatomy of Criticism, 1957). Keep these theories in mind as you read; consider whether and how they are helpful in understanding Shakespeare's work.

A. C. Bradley divides tragedy into an exposition of the state of affairs; the beginning, growth, and vicissitudes of theconflict; and the finalcatastrophe or tragic outcome. Bradley emphasizes the Aristotelian notion of thetragic flaw: the tragic hero errs by action or omission; this error joins with other causes to bring about his ruin. According to Bradley, "This is always so with Shakespeare. The idea of the tragic hero as a being destroyed simply and solely by external forces is quite alien to him; and not less so is the idea of the hero as contributing to his destruction only by acts in which we see no flaw." Bradley's emphasis on the tragic flaw implies that Shakespeare's characters bring their fates upon themselves and thus, in a sense, deserve what they get. It should however be noted that in some of Shakespeare's plays (e.g.King Lear), the tragedy lies less in the fact that the characters "deserve" their fates than in how much more they suffer than their actions (or flaws) suggest they should.

Northrop Frye distinguishes five stages of action in tragedy:1) Encroachment. Protagonist takes on too much, makes a mistake that causes his/her "fall." This mistake is often unconscious (an act blindly done, through over-confidence in one's ability to regulate the world or through insensitivity to others) but still violates the norms of human conduct.2) Complication. The building up of events aligning opposing forces that will lead inexorably to the tragic conclusion. "Just as comedy often sets up an arbitrary law and then organizes the action to break or evade it, so tragedy presents the reverse theme of narrowing a comparatively free life into a process of causation."3) Reversal. The point at which it becomes clear that the hero's expectations are mistaken, that his fate will be the reverse of what he had hoped. At this moment, the vision of the dramatist and the audience are the same. The classic example is Oedipus, who seeks the knowledge that proves him guilty of murdering his father and marrying his mother; when he accomplishes his objective, he realizes he has destroyed himself in the process.4) Catastrophe. The catastrophe exposes the limits of the hero's power and dramatizes the waste of his life. Piles of dead bodies remind us that the forces unleashed are not easily contained; there are also elaborate subplots (e.g. Gloucester inKing Lear) which reinforce the impression of a world inundated with evil.5) Recognition. The audience (sometimes the hero as well) recognizes the larger pattern. If the hero does experience recognition, he assumes the vision of his life held by the dramatist and the audience. From this new perspective he can see the irony of his actions, adding to the poignancy of the tragic events.

Click here for information about Revenge Tragedy

Contents of this and all linked pages Copyright Debora B. Schwartz, 1996-2005

Return to ENGL 204 Home Page
Return to ENGL 339 Home Page
Return to Dr. Schwartz's Teaching Page
Return to Dr. Schwartz's Home Page
Send me mail!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
English Department, California Polytechnic State University The genre of tragedy is rooted in the Greek dramas of Aeschylus (525-456 B.C., e.g. the Oresteia and Prometheus Bound), Euripides (ca. 480?-405 B.C., e.g. Medea and The Trojan Women) and Sophocles (496-406 B.C., e.g. Oedipus Rex and Antigone).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The word "tragedy" traditionally refers to a genre of serious, dramatic work in which a heroic individual meets with or causes terrible and awe-inspiring events. We can broadly distinguish classical tragedy, a dramatic form that directly developed from these rituals and was performed in ancient Greece, and modern tragedy, a dramatic form written and performed today.

The Origins of Tragedy

Tragedy has its roots in the Bacchanalia, religious rituals to the god Dionysus held in ancient Greece. Scholars believe that the earliest forms of these rituals may have been fertility feasts featuring dancers to celebrate the new harvest. Over time, other elements were added: a speaker, then dialogue between the speaker and the dancers. The playwright Aeschylus is often credited as the first to add a second speaker, and thereby create the form of tragedy.

Classical Tragedy

In his "Poetics," Aristotle identifies the elements of classical tragedy, based primarily on the work of the playwrights Aeschylus, Euripides and Sophocles. Classical tragedy is the imitation of a single action, in which a hero of high status falls from fortune to misfortune. The fall must occur because of a "tragic flaw," or some error or shortcoming in an otherwise good protagonist, and not by vice or depravity. The purpose of tragedy, in Aristotle's view, is to provoke pity and terror in the audience, leading to a catharsis, or cleansing of these emotions.

From Classical to Modern Tragedy

Between classical and modern tragedy, we find the medieval and Renaissance forms of tragedy. Medieval tragedy mostly took the form of narratives, rather than plays, and focused on the fall of great men caused, not by a tragic flaw, but instead the spinning of fortune's wheel. Renaissance tragedy took its inspiration from classical tragedy, while changing the form in important ways, by including subplots, comic relief and expanding the possibilities for the tragic hero. Christopher Marlowe's "Edward II," who is driven by vice which causes his downfall, could not have featured as a protagonist in classical tragedy.

Modern Tragedy

Whereas in classical tragedy, the protagonist is of noble or prestigious standing, modern tragedy is more likely to focus on the "common man." A modern audience is expected to relate to, rather than look up to, the protagonist; and while the classical tragic hero's death is an event to be collectively mourned onstage, the modern tragic hero often dies unrecognized as a hero. The modern tragedy is also more likely to focus on society, rather than fate or fortune, as that which oppresses the hero. However, the modern tragedy retains a highly solemn tone and focus on matters of grave and ultimate importance, features common to tragedy throughout its history.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Difference Between a Classical & a Modern Tragedy in Literature

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The word "tragedy" traditionally refers to a genre of serious, dramatic work in which a heroic individual meets with or causes terrible and awe-inspiring events. We can broadly distinguish classical tragedy, a dramatic form that directly developed from these rituals and was performed in ancient Greece, and modern ...

# data[].attributes.body
Below, it talks about Marlowe's style of writing and how much impact it had on author's even today.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Marlowe's Versification and Style on JSTOR

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tucker Brooke, Marlowe's Versification and Style, Studies in Philology, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Apr., 1922), pp. 186-205

# data[].attributes.body
the article discusses what is needed to make a film or literature considered a tragedy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
What makes a story tragic is not only what kind emotion it incites in the reader's heart. Most people mistakenly associate tragedy with sadness or pessimism. A tragedy goes beyond emotions to reach pathos --- an identification with the character's worldview, and to suffer, in vicarious ways, like she suffers. For example, a story of a soldier killed in a war is sad, not tragic. But a story of a soldier killed in a war despite her heroic effort to end the war can be tragic, if it includes other elements of a tragedy.

The Plot

The important thing about the plot is not what the characters feel but what they do. Feelings are secondary. They do not trouble the writer of tragedies because they are the byproduct of the action in the story. According to Aristotle's "Poetics," the plot must contain three basic elements: a unity of plot, peripety and discovery. Unity of plot means all action must be relevant, probable and believable. Peripety means a reversal of fortune by the end of the story, and discovery means the main character gains a new understanding of her situation, something she didn't know before.

A Tragic Flaw

The tragic flaw is a trait in the main character in the story that leads to her destruction. It is responsible for foolish or unfortunate --- generally bad --- actions, which in turn arouse tragic emotions of pity and terror. It does not have to be a bad quality. A good quality taken to extreme, such as pride, can count as a tragic flaw. The main character commits a mistake either consciously, such as Othello, or unconsciously, such as Oedipus. Aristotle stipulated that the tragic hero should be of noble birth, a man who is essentially good but makes a great mistake that leads to his downfall.

Catharsis

An essential quality of a tragedy is that it arouses emotions of terror and pity. But by the end of the story, the reader is purged of the negative emotions and feels rejuvenated. Aristotle called this purification of the soul catharsis. Nobody knows for certain why tragedies are cathartic, although psychologists claim that by showing us that terror can be overcome, it prevents the subconscious from developing neurosis. Contrary to Aristotle, Nietzsche claimed that cathartic experiences prove we can celebrate life even in --- not despite --- great suffering.

Tragedy in Modern Times

Although Aristotle's "Poetics" still remains the starting point in discussions about tragedy, this art form has evolved over the millennia. Along with democratization of the political sphere, modern writers of tragedies have turned their gaze on the plight of the common man. "The commonest of man take that stature," wrote Arthur Miller, speaking of the tragic stature that was once attached only to the royal or the noble-born. For Miller, a story becomes tragic when the common man, to gain his dignity, fights against his world and circumstances, despite all odds against him, and loses.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What makes a story tragic is not only what kind emotion it incites in the reader's heart. Most people mistakenly associate tragedy with sadness or pessimism. A tragedy goes beyond emotions to reach pathos --- an identification with the character's worldview, and to suffer, in vicarious ways, like she suffers.

# data[].attributes.body
watch this for an overview of Dr. Faustus

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Doctor Faustus Summary & Analysis (Marlowe) – Thug Notes

# data[].attributes.body
this a book written by Haskell M. Block about some noted on the problems of modern tragedies

# data[].attributes.body
The story of Doctor Faustus is thought to have its earliest roots in the New Testament story of the magician Simon Magus.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Faust legend had its inception during the medieval period in Europe and has since become one of the world's most famous and oft-handled myths. The story is thought to have its earliest roots in the New Testament story of the magician Simon Magus (Acts 8:9-24). Other references to witchcraft and magic in the Bible have always caused people to look upon the practice of magic as inviting eternal damnation for the soul.

During the early part of the fifteenth century in Germany, the story of a man who sold his soul to the devil to procure supernatural powers captured the popular imagination and spread rapidly. The original Faust has probably been lost forever. In various legends, he was named Heinrich Faust, Johann Faustus, or Georg Faust. But whatever his first name really was, this Faust was apparently a practitioner of various magical arts. A cycle of legends, including some from ancient and medieval sources that were originally told about other magicians, began to collect around him. One of the most widely read magic texts of the period was attributed to Faust, and many other books referred to him as an authority.

Later in the fifteenth century, around 1480, another German magician gave further credence to the legend by calling himself "Faustus the Younger," thus capitalizing on the existing cycle of legends about the older Faust. This later Faust was a famous German sage and adventurer who was thought by many of his contemporaries to be a magician and probably did practice some sort of black magic. After a sensational career, this Faust died during a mysterious demonstration of flying which he put on for a royal audience in 1525. It was generally believed that he had been carried away by the devil. Owing to his fame and mysterious disappearance, popular superstition prompted many more stories to grow up around the name of Faust, thus solidifying the myth and occult reputation of the legendary character of Faust.

During the sixteenth century, additional stories of magical feats began to attach themselves to the Faust lore, and eventually these stories were collected and published as a Faust-Book. A biography of Faust, the Historia von D. Johann Fausten, based upon the shadowy life of Faust the Younger, but including many of the fanciful legendary stories, was published in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1587. That same year it was translated into English as The Historie of the damnable life and deserved death of Doctor John Faustus. In both these popular editions of the Faust-Book, the famed magician's deeds and pact with the devil are recounted, along with much pious moralizing about his sinfulness and final damnation. In fact, the moral of the story is emphasized in the title of the English translation. It was in these versions that the legend took on a permanent form.

When the Renaissance came to northern Europe, Faust was made into a symbol of free thought, anticlericalism, and opposition to church dogma. The first important literary treatment of the legend was that of the English dramatist Christopher Marlowe.

Marlowe, unfortunately, allowed the structure of his drama to follow the basic structure of the Faust-Book, thus introducing one of the structural difficulties of the play. The first part of the book (through Chapter 5) showed Faustus' determination to make a pact with the devil, and after this is accomplished, the large middle portion of the Faust-Book handles individual and unrelated scenes showing Faustus using his magic to perform all types of nonsensical pranks. Finally, the Faust-Book ends with Faustus awaiting the final hour of his life before he is carried off to eternal damnation by the agents of the underworld.

Marlowe's rendition of the legend was popular in England and Germany until the mid-seventeenth century, but eventually the Faust story lost much of its appeal. The legend was kept alive in folk traditions in Germany, though, and was the popular subject of pantomimes and marionette shows for many years.

The close of the eighteenth century in Germany was a time very much like the Renaissance. Before long, the old Faust story, with its unique approach to the problems of period, was remembered. The German dramatist Lessing (1729-81) wrote a play based on the legend, but the manuscript was lost many generations ago and its contents are hardly known.

Perhaps the most familiar treatment of the Faust legend is by the celebrated German poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, one of the rare giants of world literature. A brief outline of Goethe's Faust will show both similarities and differences in the handling of this famous theme.

Heinrich Faust, a learned scholar, feels that none of his many achievements has provided him with satisfaction or a sense of fulfillment. He yearns to gain knowledge of truth and the meaning of existence. Faust turns to magic in the hope of finding a way to transcend human limitations. When Mephistophilis appears to him, Faust is willing to make a pact with the devil but includes many conditions in his agreement. He will yield his soul only if the devil can provide him with an experience so rewarding that he will want the moment to linger forever. But this experience will have to combine extreme opposite emotions such as love and hate at the same time. Furthermore, Faust knows that his essential nature is one of upward striving, and if the devil can help him strive upward enough, then Faust will be at one with God. There is no mention of the traditional twenty-four years of servitude.

In Part I of Goethe's drama, Faust attempts, with the devil's help, to find happiness through emotional involvement. He has an exciting but tragic relationship with the beautiful and chaste Gretchen which ends in her disgrace and death, but Faust is much chastened by this experience. In Part II, he tries to satisfy his craving through temporal accomplishments and exposure to all that the world can offer in terms of ideas and externalized gratifications. He attains an important position at the Imperial Court, learns much from the figures of classical antiquity, woos Helen of Troy, wins great victories, and is renowned for his public works, but none of these things gives him that complete satisfaction which transcends human limitations.

When Faust's death approaches, the devil is there to claim his soul, but a band of heavenly angels descend and carry him off triumphantly to heaven.

The chief philosophical difference between Marlowe's and Goethe's treatments lies in the final scene of the drama, where Marlowe's Faustus is dragged off to the horrors of hell but Goethe's Faust is admitted to heaven by God's grace in reward for his endless striving after knowledge of goodness and truth and his courageous resolution to believe in the existence of something higher than himself.

Furthermore, Goethe introduced the figure of Gretchen. The Faust-Gretchen love story occupies most of Part I of the drama, whereas Marlowe confined himself to showing tricks performed by Doctor Faustus.

Goethe's great tragedy struck a responsive chord throughout Europe and reinforced the new interest in the Faust story. Since his time, it has stimulated many creative thinkers and has been the central theme of notable works in all fields of expression. In art, for instance, the Faust legend has provided fruitful subjects for such painters as Ferdinand Delacroix (1798-1863). Musical works based on the Faust story include Hector Berlioz' cantata, The Damnation of Faust (1846), Charles Gounod's opera, Faust (1859), Arrigo Boito's opera, Mefistofele (1868), and Franz Lizt's Faust Symphony (1857). Even the motion picture has made use of the ancient story, for a film version of Goethe's Faust was produced in Germany in 1925. But most important, the legend has continued to be the subject of many poems, novels, and dramatic works, including the novel Doctor Faustus (1948) by Thomas Mann and the poetic morality play An Irish Faustus (1964) by Lawrence Durell.

Each succeeding artist has recast the rich Faust legend in terms of the intellectual and emotional climate of his own time, and over the past few centuries this tale has matured into an archetypal myth of our aspirations and the dilemmas we face in the effort to understand our place in the universe. Like all myths, the Faust story has much to teach the reader in all its forms, for the tale has retained its pertinence in the modern world. The history of the legend's development and its expansion into broader moral and philosophical spheres is also an intellectual history of humankind.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Faust legend had its inception during the medieval period in Europe and has since become one of the world's most famous and oft-handled myths. The story is thought to have its earliest roots in the New Testament story of the magician Simon Magus (Acts 8:9-24).

# data[].attributes.body
Doctor Faustus was Marlowe’s first tragedy. The paly had a heavy influence from the conflict between religion and the Renaissance.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The first tragedian worthy of the tradition of the Greeks was Christopher Marlowe. Of Marlowe's tragedies, Tamburlaine (1587), Doctor Faustus ( c. 1588), The Jew of Malta (1589), and Edward II ( c. 1593), the first two are the most famous and most significant. In Tamburlaine, the material was highly melodramatic; the historical figure's popular image was that of the most ruthless and bloody of conquerors. In a verse prologue, when Marlowe invites the audience to "View but his [Tamburlaine's] picture in this tragic glass," he had in mind little more, perhaps, than the trappings and tone of tragedy: "the stately tent of war," which is to be his scene, and "the high astounding terms," which will be his rhetoric. But he brought such imaginative vigour and sensitivity to bear that melodrama is transcended, in terms reminiscent of high tragedy. Tamburlaine, a Scythian shepherd of the 14th century, becomes the spokesman, curiously enough, for the new world of the Renaissance-iconoclastic, independent, stridently ambitious. Just as the Greek tragedians challenged tradition, Tamburlaine shouts defiance at all the norms, religious and moral, that Marlowe's generation inherited. But Tamburlaine, although he is an iconoclast, is also a poet. No one before him on the English stage had talked with such magnificent lyric power as he does, whether it be on the glories of conquest or on the beauties of Zenocrate, his beloved. When, still unconquered by any enemy, he sickens and dies, he leaves the feeling that something great, however ruthless, has gone. Here once again is the ambiguity that was so much a part of the Greek tragic imagination-the combination of awe, pity, and fear that Aristotle defined.

In Doctor Faustus the sense of conflict between the tradition and the new Renaissance individualism is much greater. The claims of revealed Christianity are presented in the orthodox spirit of the morality and mystery plays, but Faustus's yearnings for power over space and time are also presented with a sympathy that cannot be denied. Here is modern man, tragic modern man, torn between the faith of tradition and faith in himself. Faustus takes the risk in the end and is bundled off to hell in true mystery-play fashion. But the final scene does not convey that justice has been done, even though Faustus admits that his fate is just. Rather, the scene suggests that the transcendent human individual has been caught in the consequences of a dilemma that he might have avoided but that no imaginative man could have avoided. The sense of the interplay of fate and freedom is not unlike that of Oedipus. The sense of tragic ambiguity is more poignant in Faustus than in Oedipus or Tamburlaine because Faustus is far more introspective than either of the other heroes. The conflict is inner; the battle is for Faustus's soul, a kind of conflict that neither the Greeks nor Tamburlaine had to contend with. For this reason, and not because it advocates Christian doctrine, the play has been called the first Christian tragedy.

Shakespeare was a long time coming to his tragic phase, the six or seven years that produced his five greatest tragedies- (written c. 1599-1601), (written c. 1603-04), ( c. 1605-06), ( c. 1606-07), and Antony and Cleopatra ( c. 1606-07). These were not the only plays written during those years. Troilus and Cressida (1601-02) may have come about the same time as or shortly after , All's Well That Ends Well (1601-05) shortly before or after , and Measure for Measure (1603-04) shortly before . But the concentration of tragedies is sufficient to distinguish this period from that of the comedies and history plays before and that of the so-called romances afterward. Although the tragic period cannot entirely be accounted for in terms of biography, social history, or current stage fashions, all of which have been adduced as causes, certain questions should be answered, at least tentatively: What is Shakespeare's major tragic theme and method? How do they relate to Classical, medieval, and Renaissance traditions? In attempting to answer these questions, this proviso must be kept in mind: the degree to which he was consciously working in these traditions, consciously shaping his plays on early models, adapting Greek and Roman themes to his own purpose, or following the precepts of Aristotle must always remain conjectural. On the one hand, there is the comment by Ben Jonson that Shakespeare had "small Latin and less Greek," and John Milton in "L'Allegro" speaks of him as "fancy's child" warbling "his native wood-notes wild," as if he were unique, a sport of nature. On the other hand, Shakespeare knew Jonson (who knew a great deal of Latin and Greek) and is said to have acted in Jonson's Sejanus in 1603, a very Classical play, published in 1605 with a learned essay on Aristotle as preface. It can be assumed that Shakespeare knew the tradition. Certainly the Elizabethan theatre could not have existed without the Greek and Roman prototype. For all of its mixed nature-with comic and melodramatic elements jostling the tragic-the Elizabethan theatre retained some of the high concern, the sense of involvement, and even the ceremonial atmosphere of the Greek theatre. When tragedies were performed, the stage was draped in black. Modern studies have shown that the Elizabethan theatre retained many ties with both the Middle Ages and the tradition of the Greeks.

From comedy to tragedy

Shakespeare's earliest and most lighthearted plays reveal a sense of the individual, his innerness, his reality, his difference from every other individual, and, at times, his plight. Certain stock characters, to be sure, appear in the early comedies. Even Falstaff, that triumphant individual, has a prototype in the braggadocio of Roman comedy, and even Falstaff has his tragic side. As Shakespeare's art developed, his concern for the plight or predicament or dilemma seems to have grown. His earliest history plays, for instance (, Parts 1, 2, and 3), are little more than chronicles of the great pageant figures-kingship in all its colour and potency. Richard III (1592-94), which follows them, focuses with an intensity traditionally reserved for the tragic hero on one man and on the sinister forces, within and without, that bring him to destruction. From kingship, that is, Shakespeare turned to the king, the symbolic individual, the focal man, to whom whole societies look for their values and meanings. Thus Richard III is almost wholly sinister, though there exists a fascination about him, an all but tragic ambiguity.

Although Shakespeare's developing sense of the tragic cannot be summed up adequately in any formula, one might hazard the following: he progressed from the individual of the early comedies; to the burdened individual, such as, in , Prince Hal, the future Henry V, who manipulates, rather than suffers, the tragic ambiguities of the world; and, finally, in the great tragedies, to (in one critic's phrase) the overburdened individual, Lear being generally regarded as the greatest example. In these last plays, man is at the limits of his sovereignty as a human being, where everything that he has lived by, stood for, or loved is put to the test. Like Prometheus on the crag, or Oedipus as he learns who he is, or Medea deserted by Jason, the Shakespearean tragic heroes are at the extremities of their natures. Hamlet and Macbeth are thrust to the very edge of sanity; Lear and, momentarily, Othello are thrust beyond it. In every case, as in the Greek plays, the destructive forces seem to combine inner inadequacies or evils, such as Lear's temper or Macbeth's ambition, with external pressures, such as Lear's "tiger daughters," the witches in Macbeth, or Lady Macbeth's importunity. Once the destructive course is set going, these forces operate with the relentlessness the Greeks called Moira, or Fate.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tragedy - Marlowe and the first Christian tragedy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tragedy - Tragedy - Marlowe and the first Christian tragedy: The first tragedian worthy of the tradition of the Greeks was Christopher Marlowe. Of Marlowe's tragedies, Tamburlaine (1587), Doctor Faustus (c. 1588), The Jew of Malta (1589), and Edward II (c. 1593), the first two are the most famous and most significant.

# data[].attributes.body
Marlowe Autobiography

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe Biography

Christopher Marlowe was the son of a wealthy Canterbury shoemaker who was an influential citizen in his community. Marlowe was born on February 6, 1564, and was baptized at Saint George's church in Canterbury on February 26. After attending King's School in Canterbury, Marlowe went to Corpus Christi College in Cambridge in December 1580. He attended on a scholarship founded by Archbishop Parker which was granted for six years to those who were studying for a career in the church. From this fact, it appears that it was Marlowe's intention to go into the church, even though in the college records he first appears as a student of dialectics.

Marlowe received his B.A. in 1584, and three years later he received his M.A. degree. His academic career was fairly conventional except for some long periods of absences during his second year. The only trouble which Marlowe had was just before he was granted his M.A. degree. Because of the prevalence of certain rumors, the college was going to hold up his degree. The Privy Council of the queen wrote a letter to the university assuring the college about Marlowe's character and asserting that he had been of service to her majesty. The purpose of this letter was to allay rumors that Marlowe planned to join the English Catholics at Reims in France.

Marlowe appears to have performed services for the government during these years, such as carrying dispatches overseas or else acting as a spy in the service of Sir Francis Walsingham, who was the head of Queen Elizabeth's secret service. No direct evidence, however, remains as to what his specific tasks or assignments were in the service of the queen.

After receiving his M.A. from the university, he moved to London, where he was a part of a brilliant circle of young men which included Rawley, Nashe, and Kyd. Before the end of the year 1587, both parts of his first play, Tamburlaine the Great, had been performed on the stage. At this time, Marlowe was a young man of only twenty-three and already established as a known dramatist as a result of the success of this first play.

In the remaining six years of his life after he had left the university, he lived chiefly in the theatrical district of Shoreditch in London. Although he traveled a great deal for the government during this time, he always retained this London address. For a time, he had as his roommate Thomas Kyd, who is also the author of a very popular Elizabethan play, The Spanish Tragedy. Kyd later made the statement that Marlowe had a violent temper and a cruel heart.

In September of 1589, Marlowe was imprisoned in Newgate for his part in a street fight in which William Bradley, the son of a Holborn innkeeper, was killed. One of Marlowe's friends named Watson had actually killed the man with his sword, so Marlowe was not charged with murder himself. He was released on October 1, on a bail of forty pounds, and was discharged with a warning to keep the peace.

Three years later, in 1592, Marlowe became involved in a court action as he was summoned to court for assaulting two constables in the Shoreditch district. The officers said that they had been in fear of their lives because of Marlowe's threats. He was fined and released.

In the spring of 1593, Marlowe again found himself in difficulty with the Privy Council on the charge of atheism and blasphemy. Thomas Kyd had been arrested for having in his possession certain heretical papers denying the deity of Christ. Kyd denied that they belonged to him and maintained that they were Marlowe's. Marlowe was then summoned to the Privy Council, which decreed that he must appear daily before them until he was licensed to the contrary.

Then, twelve days later, Marlowe was killed in a tavern in Deptford, a dockyard adjacent to Greenwich. On that day, Marlowe had accepted an invitation from Ingram Frizer to feast at the tavern with several other young men of dubious reputation who had been mixed up in confidence games, swindles, and spy work. After supper, Marlowe got into an argument with Frizer over the tavern bill. When Marlowe struck Frizer on the head with a dagger, Frizer twisted around somehow and thrust the dagger back at Marlowe, striking him on the forehead and killing him.

During his short career as a dramatist, Marlowe gained a significant reputation on the basis of four dramas. Other than his first play, Tamburlaine, he was also the author of Faustus in 1589 or 1592, The Jew of Malta in 1589, and Edward II in 1592. In addition to his dramatic pieces, he translated Lucan's Pharsalia and Ovid's Amores. He also wrote poems, among which his most famous are "The Massacre of Paris" and "Hero and Leander."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe was the son of a wealthy Canterbury shoemaker who was an influential citizen in his community. Marlowe was born on February 6, 1564, and was baptized at Saint George's church in Canterbury on February 26. After attending King's School in Canterbury, Marlowe went to Corpus Christi College in Cambridge in December 1580.

# data[].attributes.body
A little info on Dr. Faustus

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read about 'Marlowe's Doctor Faustus, 1631' on the British Library website

# data[].attributes.body
This is about Shakespearean Tragedy.

# data[].attributes.body
This article talks about what the ancient tragedies where.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble stature and the transcendent realm of tragedy. One could, in short, measure oneself against the larger, universal background of what constitutes tragedy, as rendered by an Aeschylus and a Sophocles in, respectively, an Agamemnon or an Oedipus. A certain greatness, immensity, and exceptionality surrounded the tragic dimension, even as tragedy connoted something greater than immediate life, from which, of course, it emerged and the reality of which it reflected to a heightened, ultimate degree.

An epic poem like Homer's Iliad is fraught with tragic meaning and destiny, its heroes immense, even overwhelming in their tragic circumstances and predicament-in their fatedness ( moira). Their tragic qualities help to place their tragic experience on the highest level of moral significance. The tragedy of Achilles, like his shield, depicts what is astonishing and enormous in consequence, trans-human and superhuman. His suffering, no less than his weakness and sin ( hamartia), overshadows everything else in the epic tragedy of the Iliad. His demise, unalterable, dramatizes tragic lessons in wisdom and insight for those who discern the spectacle of his glory and destruction. A monumental essence radiates in his every act and gesture, in his heroic praxis and doxai. In association with Achilles, what is terribly human attains its highest measure of worth.

The line of descent and connection from Achilles to Agamemnon to Oedipus to Antigone to Medea is one that discloses a kind of spiritual angst, at once terrifying and redeeming. In these tragic figures and in the dilemma of each hero's agon, we recognize the deeper parts of our extended selves in the undulant process of purification and expiation. In their pathos we perceive our own-and we take note of the redemptive context of reverence. Their tragedy helps us to understand our limits, our limitations. Such tragedy, at once humane and humanizing, helps us to encounter and also to measure our humanity. It enables us to perceive, even if from a distance, what is called, in Hellenic contexts, a "vision of the agathon " as a dimension of a "divine paradigm," and always against the background of those "unwritten laws" that Sophocles describes in Antigone:

"The immortal unwritten laws of Heaven,
they were not born today nor yesterday;
They die not; and none knoweth whence they sprang."

Ancient tragedy, it can be said, has its ground of being in these "laws," these first and last principles, the arche and telos of all human experience and meaning. This is tragedy of transcendence, as it were, with its informing metaphysic in relation to human nothingness ("I count your life as equal to zero," the Chorus cries in Oedipus Rex) and also, in the end, to the suffering which also brings a cleansing self-recognition-a kind of grace at the edge of redemption in the country of the spirit: "Submit, you fool. Submit. In agony learn wisdom," as Aeschylus declares in Prometheus. Ancient tragedy is, thus, the experience of transformation (not "transfiguration" in the later Christian sense), enacted in the contexts of what Goethe terms the "divine worth of tones and tears." That, too, Greek tragedy has, in its unique way, a religious center, even, that is, a spiritual essence, is an incontrovertible fact. For the Greek tragedians, as teachers of virtues, were deeply involved with religious questions-ultimate questions revolving around man's worth and destiny-with some super-human power ( theos), and with man's fate. "The Greeks of the sixth and fifth centuries," writes Werner Jaeger in Paideia (1939-1944), "had long been brooding on the great religious problem: why does God send suffering into the life of man?"

The Greek tragedians, hence, stressed the eternal fact that man must not forget his unconscious and yet transcendent ties to the unwritten laws and his need for reverence ( eusebeia) for the unknown, the mysterious. Their tragedies, in effect, provided a dramatic interpretation of life, both moral and spiritual in principle. And these tragedies, more specifically, focused on some heroic figure-some superior being-in whom some fateful problem was to be enacted, particularly the great religious problem of suffering and sin, of punishment and expiation. "Behind all suffering," G. Lowes Dickinson writes in The Greek View of Life (1896), "behind sin and crime, must lie a redeeming magnanimity." A Greek tragedy, by becoming a "moving sculpture" and "a sleep of music," also was to become a study of Man ( anthropos), finally transporting the audience to a world of higher reality and permanence from the material world of terror and flux.

Clearly, ancient tragedy contains a humanistic orientation: that is, a fervent and consummate preoccupation with the nature of man, his predicament and his fate. Man, in short, is the center, though that center has its added metaphysical dimension, its added center, in the universe (in the cosmos), so that to concentrate solely on the first center to the neglect of the second center breeds arrogance, insolence, impiety, overweening pride- hubris. Aeschylus's Agamemnon depicts precisely this centeredness of the self and images its destructive process when he walks on the purple carpets reserved only for the Gods and thus courts punishment and doom itself. He glorifies what Simone Weil calls "the empire of might" (in all of its consequences) as it collides with the "justice of Zeus," and with the "law of measure" ("nothing in excess," to recall the Greek warning).

Greek tragedy also becomes a drama of discrimination, seeking as it does to present itself as a mode of explaining the world-the human condition-and knowing it. In Sophocles this form of tragedy-of tragic discrimination-affirms man's greatness in the face of cruel adversity; affirms man's heroic capacity within the scope of a heroism of dignity, which constitutes, for the ancients, true humility and final redemption. Sophocles, in this respect, is a tragic poet of order, reverence, proportion, above all, of sophrosyne, the supreme Hellenic virtue.

Attic tragedy records the disorder of eros and the yearning for order; it records, in effect, the constant collision between gravity and grace, between disequilibrium and equilibrium, between nothingness and being, between courage and nihilism. Tragedy, of its very nature, must bear "the burden of vision" for eternity itself. It should not go unnoticed that ancient and modern tragedy do have a connecting link in Euripides, the perturbing Greek dramatist who, as Jaeger was to observe, "discovered the soul in a new sense-who revealed the troubled world of man's emotions and passions."

Unlike Aeschylus and Sophocles, Euripides confronted the cold, hard face of reality as he saw it; showed fierce understanding of what he saw; and fiercely condemned those conditions that he exposed. Indeed, Euripides has been described as a dramatist who had a "modern mind," the first of the moderns; Aristophanes, in fact, charged that Euripides taught the Athenians to "think, see, understand, suspect, question everything," and no words better prophesy the "modern temper" than these.

That, too, Euripides belonged essentially to a destructive analytical spirit, that he took things rebelliously, that he reflected an age of movement and transition, that he echoed the sophistic spirit, that all truth is relative-it is this sophism that Plato equated with intellectual and moral anarchy: these aspects of his thought and dramatic achievement anticipate the modern age and what Thomas Hardy specifies as "the ache of modernism." In Euripides we have a prophetic glimpse of the crisis of modernism in the destructive forms of disorder, discontinuity, disinheritance: of a modern world that is "a broken center," when as Rilke declares, "the world...passed out of the hands of God into the hands of men."

Walter Pater cogently summarizes our modernity when he writes: "Modern thought is distinguished from ancient by its cultivation of the 'relative spirit' in place of the 'absolute."' This modernity, pervasive and irreversible, spells the "doom of orthodox sophrosyne," which signifies the law of measure. The Russian poet F. I. Tiutshev (1803-1873) registers the modern predicament when he writes in his poem "The Abyss":

Behold man, without home,
orphaned, alone, impotent,
facing the dark abyss; ...
And in this strange mysterious night
he sees and knows a Fatal heritage.

The "fatal heritage" that Tiutshev speaks of in his poem is also that which Matthew Arnold, in his poem "The Scholar Gypsy," associates with "this strange disease of modern life/ With its sick hurry, its divided aims." William Butler Yeats, in "The Second Coming" (1919), also underlines the ravages and the desperation of such a heritage of fatal consequences in modern life: "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;/ Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world."

In his book The End of the Modern World (1956) Romano Guardini declares that "Man has no place-absolutely no place-in the universe," words that embody not only the essence of modernity but also its tragic essences that culminate in the modern waste land that T.S. Eliot renders. The sustaining and redeeming principles of conservation and correction espoused by Edmund Burke, as well as the disciplines of continuity intimately connected with these, have been superseded, or contravened, by what the philosopher Michael Polanyi calls a "positivistic empiricism," or as he further observes: "...[the] idea of unlimited progress, intensified to perfectionism, has combined with our sharpened skepticism to produce the perilous state of the modern mind."

Human meaning, then, is "reduced to the condition of things," reduced, in effect, to a concern with "the idea of man...[as an] administrative number," without a past and without memory, when, as Samuel Beckett declares, "it is not for man to act, but to be acted upon: man can only despair of hope, can only not wait or wait." Spiritual inertia, which results from this process of cruel reductionism in a pluralist society, leads to a malaise that afflicts human existence and that adopts, for example, the belief that, in Simone Weil's words, "matter is a machine for manufacturing good."

Such a belief plunges modern man deeper into Plato's "Cave of Illusion" and renounces the redemption that resides in humility, perhaps the highest spiritual quality to be found in the "tragic sense of life": "Without humility, all the virtues are finite," Simone Weil further states. "Only humility makes them infinite." Indeed, humility is the omega-point of a metaphysics of tragedy-of tragic meaning, experience, destiny. It is a paradigm of tragedy, which if it is scorned or repudiated leads precisely to the annihilation of the tragic spirit that makes tragedy non-tragic in modern life; in short, transforms tragedy into paradox, which thrusts one "beyond tragedy," that also signalizes "the death of tragedy."

Nicola Chiaromonte, the late Italian social critic (1905-1972), is much to the point when he writes concerning the nihilism and violated principles shaping and finally destroying human meaning in modern civilization:

"The sickness of our times is egomania. It renders the individual radically impious and makes him ignore everything that does not serve his immediate objectives (which never extended beyond the limits of his own lifetime), thereby denying all that is ineffable, secret, and arcane in the world-the 'divine' inherent in all things and in every impulse of the spirit."

Impiety, that which for Virgil constituted an ultimate discordance found in furor impius, is a major part of the disorientation in modern life that breaks and diminishes the patience and magnanimity that inhere redemptively in genuine tragic experience as it depicts the search for order of the soul. "No-more'' and "Not-yet," Heidegger's "double Not," now make the tragic sense a "senseless fatality"; the so-called modern hero is just "anybody," just another "sleep-walker'' in "kosmos Kafka," for whom "eternity is replaced by endlessness" and who bleakly gives us news, as Kafka would have it, of "the abandoned world" in which he lives.

In the modern age, which one critic terms "an age of bad faith" commencing with August 1914, when the Great War broke out, tragic vision and experience undergo a radical change-a devaluative pulverizing process in which what for the ancients is noble, elevated, and heroic now becomes trivial, minimal, and common. A modern victim's tragedy lacks stature or grandeur, and is often one that underlines a victim's grotesqueness, meaninglessness, rootlessness, his absurdity, his non-being. In the modern world in which the idea of transcendence has neither place nor meaning tragedy itself is a victim of what Eric Voegelin calls "existential deformation."

If in ancient tragedy a tragic hero is shrouded in a world of mystery, possesses a noumenal quality of human worth, has a standard of character in an ascending pattern of development and meaning, in modern tragedy a tragic figure is identified by demystification and by dehumanization, by lostness and rootlessness. His world, in a sense, has no universal frontiers and is reduced in its physical and spiritual horizons; that is, it is a localized, non-ontological, non-organic world in which man himself is reduced, or neutralized, or denatured; a disinherited, displaced person, as it were, and, indeed, a non-person consigned to a "cancer ward," or exiled, forever, to a Siberian gulag, the modern forms of tragic fate in "the heart of darkness." These are our conditions of modern tragedy, or better our pseudonyms of tragedy.

In the ancient world tragedy contained and was nourished by the "religious sense," that is to say, by the elements of piety and humility, by an intuitive veneration of "the idea of the holy," of the sacred logos as opposed to the profane impulse, by an intuitive pull towards the transcendent as opposed to the present and the nominal. Sophocles's Oedipus at Colonus is perhaps the most vivid illustration of the religious sense and of the religious acceptation in a tragic context. Oedipus, now an exile and wanderer, recognizes his moira -''In suffering I was born." "The sap of earth dries up," he confesses almost abjectly.

"Flesh dies, and while faith withers falsehood blooms.
The spirit is not constant from friend to friend, from city to city;
it changes, soon or late."

His end, in a scene that is perhaps grander than any in Greek tragedy, we view the aged and blind Oedipus disappearing into a sacred grove-"And the place is holy." Oedipus now encounters the " mysterium tremendum ":

...suddenly a Voice called him, a terrifying voice at which all trembled and hair stood on end. A god was calling to him. "Oedipus! Oedipus!" it cried, again and again. "It is time: you stay too long." He heard the summons, and knew that it was from God.

Oedipus passes from the human world to the divine-to "holy ground." His end, his disappearance into the divine unknown, into the divine otherness, emphasizes the religious sense as it conjoins with the tragic sense, each deepening and enhancing the other in relation to the huge cosmic mystery, wondrous in its breadth and depth.

This religious sense, in its Hellenic constituents, should not be forcibly amalgamated or confused with the religious sense in its Christian contexts. Oedipus's tragic passion and fate, whatever their religious feeling and pull, must be differentiated from the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The religious dimension of Greek tragedy revolves around moral struggle, but it is obviously removed from the Christian vision of redemption. Greek tragic heroes are finite beings even in their religious nobility, whereas a Christian tragic hero (as in the fiction of a Dostoevsky) is a creature of freedom, sin, guilt, and salvation.

Greek tragedy venerates the transcendent, in its awe and sanctity, but it is teleological in its experiential qualities of pity and terror. The eschatological character of the Christian religious sense must not be ignored-that subsuming religious sense that has its ultimates in the coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the Last Judgment. Both Greek tragedy and modern tragedy are anchored in time, in chronos-in measured time that has a beginning and ending; that has boundaries at once temporal and spatial. For the Christian, on the other hand, all tragedy ends in grace, attains its finality, its telos, in ultimate time, in kairos, in that time, to kairo ekino: in divine time that is timeless and that fuses beginnings and endings, endings and beginnings.

For the Christian, tragedy ends not in the heroic suffering of the Greeks or in the perverse skepticism of the moderns, but in Revelation. "For those who have faith to trust in the revelation that is the Christ," Preston T. Roberts, Jr., writes in a masterful essay, "A Christian Theory of Dramatic Tragedy," "evil, sin, the devil, death-in short all that is cursed, wretched, and miserable about this life-becomes redeemable in principle and redeemed at certain points and moments in fact."

Modern tragedy, having increasingly repudiated the religious sense that radiated in and even renewed ancient tragedy by endowing it with a metaphysical yearning, registers the nothingness, the "nameless, ultimate fear, a horror of the completely negative," that Dr. F.R. Leavis perceives in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land (1922):

After the torchlight red on sweaty faces
After the frosty silence in the garden
After the agony in stony places
The shouting and the crying
Prison and palace and reverberation
Of thunder of spring over distant mountains
He who was living is now dead
We who were living are now dying
With a little patience.

It can be said that modern tragedy is the tragedy of experiencing "the agony in stony places" and yet learning nothing from this tragic experience: or of hearing the " ou-boum" ("utterly dull") which, in E. M. Forster's novel A Passage to India (1924), merely states, now and forever, in this world and in all worlds, "Everything exists, nothing has value." Forster's words evoke the import of tragedy in the modern world even as they severely constrict the boundaries of tragic vision. This constriction signals not only the crisis of modernity but also the tragedy of modernity as we live and experience it in the "antagonist world."
Reprinted with the gracious permission of Modern Age (Fall 1997).
The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics-we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble

# data[].attributes.body
Marlowe wrote Dr. Faustus and showed the different sides of the character by showing his ambiguity

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An introduction to Doctor Faustus: morality and sin

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Eric Rasmussen and Ian DeJong explore the ambiguities and dualities of Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus.

# data[].attributes.body
Article talking about the essence of capturing Shakespearean tragedy, how many different elements and characteristics lead to an ending in death.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In the late 1960's Dr. Wickes taught a Shakespeare class at Harvey Mudd College attended by more "Scripsies" (humanities majors from the liberal arts college across the street) than "Mudders" (us science and engineering types). A few of us cut class one day for some reason I can't recall, and in so doing we missed a quiz.

# data[].attributes.body
This pdf says how in Marlowe's plays tragedy is not caused by an external source but instead is caused by an internal source

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Mathew R. Martin analyses Christopher Marlowe's tragedies as 'narratives of physical and psychological wounding and its consequences' (p. 1). In the Introduction, Martin reviews the early modern notion of tragedy and modern critical responses to the genre. His original thesis examines Marlowe's plays using 'Lacanian psychoanalysis and trauma theory' by focusing on mimesis (p. 6). Martin argues that in Marlowe's plays tragedy is not an external event inflicted on characters; instead, it is internalised by the traumatised subjects through the mimetic effects of tragic events.

Chapter 1 analyses Dido, Queen of Carthage, Marlowe's interpretation of Virgil's Aeneid. Martin contends that Marlowe's Aeneas is more ambiguous than previous critics have recognised. Trapped by repetitive history and the demands of persistently immoral gods, Marlowe's Aeneas becomes a 'traumatized subject of faith' (p. 32). Martin then argues that Marlowe's version of Aeneas's attempt to leave Carthage is the play's most complex moment. It is only on the second attempt that Aeneas successfully departs the city through repeating the trauma of leaving Troy. Therefore, for Martin, Dido, Queen of Carthage is a play about historical narratives repeating trauma. The repetition of trauma throughout history is further expressed through Dido's suicide. Martin traces the tension between a defiant queen and a pitiful martyr to conclude that a triumphant history is only a fleeting moment within a greater narrative.

In Chapter 2, Martin examines the sadistic Tamburlaine the Great, Part I. Here, traumatic repetition demonstrates how identity is fundamentally split: it is the incompatibility of these parts that drives Tamburlaine's endless bloodlust. It is only through Zenocrate, Martin argues, that Tamburlaine's violence can be countered by motherly compassion. Therefore, through Lacan's notion of the anamorphic gaze, Martin states that Zenocrate mediates the spectator's traumatised gaze when faced with annihilation.

Chapter 3 continues Martin's analysis with Tamburlaine the Great, Part II. In Marlowe's sequel, Zenocrate's role changes so that the barbaric Tamburlaine can be civilised. Challenging the critical consensus that the play's opening battle is superfluous, Martin contends that it acknowledges a lost opportunity to end brutal conflict. As such, the traumatic mastery Tamburlaine displayed in Part I is replaced by a loss of control. Tamburlaine, however, as Martin concludes, still cannot be defeated by death. Rather, his death signifies the end of the world through the loss of a great military leader.

In Chapter 4, Martin examines the psychotic Barabas from The Jew of Malta. His psychosis stems from his refusal to enter the Lacanian symbolic order. His narcissism is equated with the wealth kept in his protective 'little [End Page 230] room': this womblike space ensures endless profit mirrors Barabas's refusal to be the stereotypical Jewish scapegoat. His killing spree transforms the victimised Jew into a masterful perpetrator.

With Chapter 5, Martin tackles how history denies pain in Edward II. He initially compares the humiliated and tortured king to Jesus Christ, whose suffering becomes an opportunity to flourish in eternal life. Martin argues, though, that Marlowe's play articulates the impossibility of using Christ's suffering to define history through pain and that Marlowe's allusions to Jesus indicate that suffering is misrecognised. At the end of the play, Edward's screams during his horrific murder further signify how pain resists meaning.

Chapter 6 defends The Massacre at Paris against the allegation that it is Marlowe's worst play. Instead, Martin finds in the 'textually corrupt, poetically impoverished' play traumatic realism (p. 126). Marlowe's play is not simply interested in replicating historical events, but its affective traumatic residue. More specifically, Martin argues that the play dramatises 'the relationship between trauma and witnessing as a form of engagement' (p. 129). By recording traumatic history, witnesses become part of the bloodshed. The play's fast movement from one location to another and inexorable barbarism replicates a breakdown...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Mathew R. Martin analyses Christopher Marlowe's tragedies as 'narratives of physical and psychological wounding and its consequences' (p. 1). In the Introduction, Martin reviews the early modern notion of tragedy and modern critical responses to the genre. His original thesis examines Marlowe's plays using 'Lacanian psychoanalysis and trauma theory' by focusing on mimesis (p.

# data[].attributes.body
Shakespearian tragedy is all over the place, but when I think, "Shakespearian Tragety" I think of the time when Macbeth found out that Lady Macbeth had died.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Macbeth
Please see the bottom of the page for full explanatory notes and helpful resources.

ACT V SCENE V

Dunsinane. Within the castle.

[ Enter MACBETH, SEYTON, and Soldiers, with drum and colours ]

MACBETH

Hang out our banners on the outward walls;

The cry is still 'They come:' our castle's strength

Will laugh a siege to scorn: here let them lie

Till famine and the ague eat them up:

Were they not forced with those that should be ours,

We might have met them dareful, beard to beard,

And beat them backward home.

[ A cry of women within]

What is that noise?

SEYTON

It is the cry of women, my good lord.

[ Exit]

MACBETH

I have almost forgot the taste of fears;

The time has been, my senses would have cool'd

10

To hear a night-shriek; and my fell of hair

Would at a dismal treatise rouse and stir

As life were in't: I have supp'd full with horrors;

Direness, familiar to my slaughterous thoughts

Cannot once start me.

[ Re-enter SEYTON]

Wherefore was that cry?

SEYTON

The queen, my lord, is dead.

MACBETH
She should have died hereafter;

There would have been a time for such a word.

To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,

Creeps in this petty pace from day to day

20

To the last syllable of recorded time,

And all our yesterdays have lighted fools

The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!

Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more: it is a tale

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,

Signifying nothing.

[ Enter a Messenger]

Thou comest to use thy tongue; thy story quickly.

Messenger

Gracious my lord,

30

I should report that which I say I saw,

But know not how to do it.

MACBETH

Well, say, sir.

Messenger

As I did stand my watch upon the hill,

I look'd toward Birnam, and anon, methought,

The wood began to move.

MACBETH

Liar and slave!

Messenger

Let me endure your wrath, if't be not so:

Within this three mile may you see it coming;

I say, a moving grove.

MACBETH

If thou speak'st false,

Upon the next tree shalt thou hang alive,

Till famine cling thee: if thy speech be sooth,

40

I care not if thou dost for me as much.

I pull in resolution, and begin

To doubt the equivocation of the fiend

That lies like truth: 'Fear not, till Birnam wood

Do come to Dunsinane:' and now a wood

Comes toward Dunsinane. Arm, arm, and out!

If this which he avouches does appear,

There is nor flying hence nor tarrying here.

I gin to be aweary of the sun,

And wish the estate o' the world were now undone.

50

Ring the alarum-bell! Blow, wind! come, wrack!

At least we'll die with harness on our back.

[ Exeunt]

Next: Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 6
______

Explanatory Notes for Act 5, Scene 5
From Macbeth. Ed. Thomas Marc Parrott. New York: American Book Co.
(Line numbers have been altered.)
______

In this scene more perhaps than in any other of the play the poet arouses our sympathy for Macbeth. Deserted by his followers, forced to await the attack of his enemies instead of meeting them "dareful, beard to beard," he is plunged into still greater misery by the news of his wife's sudden death. He even seems to contemplate suicide, when the shock of the messenger's report brings him back to himself. He begins at last to realize that the powers of evil have been deceiving him, and with a sudden resolution to trust henceforth to the- strength of his own arm and to die, if needs be, with harness on his back, he sallies out to meet the foe.

It is worth noting how little is said of Lady Macbeth. We hear the cry of her women and the brief report of her death, - nothing more. Shakespeare wishes at this point to concentrate all our interest and sympathy on the hero of the drama. It is not the manner of Lady Macbeth's death, but the way in which it affects her husband that he wishes us to notice.

14. slaughterous thoughts, thoughts of bloodshed.

Please click here for full soliloquy annotations and analysis.

17, 18. She should ... word, she must have died sometime; there must have come a time for such an announcement. This speech of Macbeth's does not show callous indifference to his wife's death, as some critics have supposed. It rather shows him so sunk in misery that he thinks life not worth living. He can hardly grieve for his wife's death; sooner or later she must have died, and what does it matter whether early or late? The following lines continue the same train of thought.

22. lighted, guided, as a servant with a torch guides his master.

23. Out ... brief candle. Dr. Liddell suggests that these words show that Macbeth is on the point of killing himself.

24. a walking shadow, a flitting unreality.

31. should report, am bound to report to you.

42. pull in resolution, check my courage. Such, at least, is the meaning of the words as they stand. Various emendations have, however, been proposed, of which "pall" i.e. "languish," "grow weak" is the most plausible.

43. To doubt ... fiend, to fear that the devil (who inspired the witches when they uttered their predictions) has been equivocating with me.

46. arm, and out. In his rage at having been deceived by the "fiend," Macbeth abandons his prudent plan of permitting the enemy to waste their strength in a vain siege, and sallies out to meet them. This act throws away his last chance, for it gives his men a chance to desert him (see v. 7. 25) and brings him face to face with the man who is destined to slay him.
How to cite the explanatory notes:
Shakespeare, William.Macbeth. Ed. Thomas Marc Parrott. New York: American Book Co., 1904. Shakespeare Online. 10 Aug. 2010. < http://www.shakespeare-online.com/plays/macbeth_5_5.html >.
________

________

More Resources The Chronology of Shakespeare's Plays
Establishing the Order of the Plays
How Many Plays Did Shakespeare Write?
Shakespeare Timeline

Shakespeare's Reputation in Elizabethan England
Words Shakespeare Invented
Quotations About William Shakespeare

Portraits of Shakespeare
Shakespeare's Boss: The Master of Revels
Top 10 Shakespeare Plays

Shakespeare's Metaphors and Similes
Shakespeare's Blank Verse
Shakespeare Timeline

Edward Alleyn (Actor)
What is Tragic Irony?
Characteristics of Elizabethan Tragedy

More to Explore

Macbeth: The Complete Play with Annotations and Commentary
The Metre of Macbeth: Blank Verse and Rhymed Lines
Macbeth Character Introduction
Metaphors in Macbeth (Biblical)

Macbeth Q & A
Essay Topics on Macbeth
Aesthetic Examination Questions on Macbeth
What is Tragic Irony?

Macbeth, Duncan and Shakespeare's Changes
King James I and Shakespeare's Sources for Macbeth
Contemporary References to King James I in Macbeth
The Royal Patent that Changed Shakespeare's Life

_____

The queen, my lord, is dead ... "It is one of the finest thoughts in the whole drama, that Lady Macbeth should die before her husband; for not only does this exhibit him in a new light, equally interesting morally and psychologically, but it prepares a gradual softening of the horror of the catastrophe. Macbeth, left alone, resumes much of that connection with humanity which he has so long abandoned; his thoughtfulness becomes pathetic, -- his sickness of heart awakens sympathy; and when at last he dies the death of a soldier, the stern satisfaction with which we contemplate the act of justice that destroys him is unalloyed by feelings of personal wrath or hatred. His fall is a sacrifice, not a butchery." Anon. ( Edin. Rev. as quoted in Furness' Variorum Macbeth)

_____

Origin of the Weird Sisters
Crafting a Sympathetic Macbeth
The Moral Character of Macbeth

Soliloquy Analysis: If it were done when 'tis done (1.7.1-29)
Soliloquy Analysis: Is this a dagger (2.1.33-61)
Soliloquy Analysis: To be thus is nothing (3.1.47-71)
Soliloquy Analysis: She should have died hereafter (5.5.17-28)

Elizabethan Use of Mummified Flesh
Three Apparitions in Macbeth
Supernatural Soliciting in Shakespeare
Explanatory Notes for the Witches' Chants (4.1)

_____

Points to Ponder ... In this final soliloquy we uncover the ultimate tragedy of Macbeth. "It is the tragedy of the twilight and the setting-in of thick darkness upon a human soul" (Dowden 66). Macbeth's heinous acts throughout the play have resulted in his last, horrible conclusion about life: it is utterly meaningless. Our days on this earth serve no purpose other than to thrust us toward "dusty death." Read on...

_____

Macbeth Plot Summary (Acts 1 and 2)
Macbeth Plot Summary (Acts 3, 4 and 5)
How to Stage a Production of Macbeth (Scene Suggestions)

A Comparison of Macbeth and Hamlet
Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth
Shakespeare's Sources for Macbeth
The Curse of Macbeth

Explanatory Notes for Lady Macbeth's Soliloquy (1.5)
The Psychoanalysis of Lady Macbeth (Sleepwalking Scene)
The Effect of Lady Macbeth's Death on Macbeth
Is Lady Macbeth's Swoon Real?

Stages of Plot Development in Macbeth
Time Analysis of the Action in Macbeth
Macbeth Study Quiz (with detailed answers)
Quotations from Macbeth (Full)
Top 10 Quotations from Macbeth

Temptation, Sin, Retribution: Lecture Notes on Macbeth
Untie the winds: Exploring the Witches' Control Over Nature
Shakespeare on Omens

Characteristics of Elizabethan Tragedy
Why Shakespeare is so Important
Shakespeare's Language
Shakespeare's Influence on Other Writers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
lady macbeth dies in this scene dunsinane macbeth learns of lady macbeth's death

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Macbeth Act 5 Scene 5 - Macbeth finds out Lady Macbeth is dead

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Please see the bottom of the page for full explanatory notes and helpful resources. ACT V SCENE V Dunsinane. Within the castle.

# data[].attributes.body
This article discusses the role religion plays in Doctor Faustus, including if Catholicism is being praised or mocked in the play

# data[].attributes.body
The true differences between modern and classic forms of tragedy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Main Difference - Classical vs Modern Tragedy

A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores,
1. What is a Classical Tragedy? 2. What is a Modern Tragedy?
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
3. What is the difference between Classical and Modern Tragedy?

What is a Classical Tragedy

Tragedy is a popular form of drama that originated from Greek literary tradition. Aristotle defines tragedy as a unified work that covers one time span, story, setting, and a main protagonist. The plot of the drama consists of one great, complete action.

The protagonist of classical tragedies is typically from a royal or noble family. Antigone, Oedipus, and Agamemnon are some examples of protagonists in classical tragedies. These brave and noble heroes often face a reversal of fortune. This reversal is typically due to a tragic flaw in the character and the influence of a divine power. Fate also plays a major role in classical tragedies.

Some examples of classical tragedies include Oedipus Rex, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Medea, Antigone and Prometheus Bound.

Given below are some elements of a classical tragedy.

Hamartia - A mistake or a fault that is committed in ignorance; this is usually a mistake made by a morally good person

Hubris - the false pride that leads to ruin; this is the opposite of rectitude

Peripeteia - the reversal fortune

Catharsis - feeling of emotional release felt at the end of the tragedy

What is a Modern Tragedy

Modern drama refers to tragedies that were written and performed from the twentieth century. Some examples of modern tragedies include Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman", "A View from the Bridge", "The Misfits" and David Mamet's "Glengarry Glen Ross are some examples of modern tragedies.

Unlike classical tragedies, modern tragedies are typically centered around ordinary people and their problems. Thus, they are more realistic than classical tragedies. The conflict in modern tragedies are caused by flaws in the characters, society or the law; fate and divine power do not play a major role in modern tragedies. Modern tragedies may also have multiple plots and more than one central character. The action in the story may also span several weeks, months or years - the differences in time is managed by elements such as flashbacks, pauses, flash-forwards, and narrations. Modern playwrights also use elements such as irony and sarcasm to highlight the flaws in characters.

Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy

Characters

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically have one main character.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have more than one central character.

Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: Protagonist is typically from a wealthy, noble or royal family.

Modern Tragedy: Protagonist usually has a common, middle-class background.

Nature of the Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: The protagonist is usually a noble and heroic character, but has a tragic flaw.

Modern Tragedy: The protagonist may be a white, black or gray character.

Plot

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one unified plot.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have multiple plots.

Timeline

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one time span.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies have more realistic time spans; there are breaks and flashbacks.

Story

Classical Tragedy: The story is about nobility or royalty, their ambitions, attempts to unify or save a kingdom, etc.

Modern Tragedy: The story is about ordinary people and their problems, ambitions and aspirations; thus, the stories are more realistic.

Elements

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically contain elements such as hubris, hamartia, and catharsis.
Image Courtesy: "Bénigne Gagneraux, The Blind Oedipus Commending his Children to the Gods" By Bénigne Gagneraux - Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia "Death of Salesman Set" By Chelsea Tenenbaum - Own work (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Commons Wikimedia
Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies use elements like irony and sarcasm.

Fate and Divine power

Classical Tragedy: Fate and divine power are important elements in classical tragedies.

Modern Tragedy: Fate and divine power rarely play a role in modern tragedies; they are more concerned with realistic, common problems.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy | Definition, Features, Examples, Elements

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores, 1.

# data[].attributes.body
The legacy of Doctor Faustus explores why and how Germany chose to ally itself with dark forces.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Info Print

Cite

Feedback

Share

Doctor Faustus, in full Doctor Faustus: The Life of the German Composer, Adrian Leverkühn, As Told by a Friend, German Doktor Faustus: Das Leben des deutschen Tonsetzers Adrian Leverkühn, erzählt von einem Freunde, novel by German writer Thomas Mann, published in 1947. It is a reworking of the Faust legend in the form of a biography of a fictional 20th-century composer.

Summary

Doctor Faustus is the story of the rise and fall of Adrian Leverkühn, and it is told through the eyes of his friend, Serenus Zeitblom, who narrates the tale as a reminiscence undertaken in the 1940s. Leverkühn is born in 1885 near the fictional town of Kaisersaschern, Germany. While in high school, he studies piano and attends lectures by the musicologist Wendell Kretzschmar. Leverkühn later goes to the University of Halle, but, when Kretzschmar is appointed to the conservatory at Leipzig, Leverkühn follows him.

Leverkühn subsequently becomes obsessed with a prostitute whom he calls Esmeralda, and he eventually has sex with her despite the fact that she has syphilis. Although he seeks medical attention, the first doctor he consults dies before completing his treatment, and a second doctor is arrested. At this point Leverkühn gives up trying to find a cure. His music become wildly inventive, gaining critical praise, though his musical idioms are too difficult to win popular acceptance. Among the works is a song cycle inspired by the poetry of Clemens Brentano. One of Leverkühn's friends, the translator Rüdiger Schildknapp, persuades him to write an opera based on Shakespeare's Love's Labour's Lost, with a libretto by Zeitblom.

In 1910 Leverkühn moves to Munich, where he takes a room with Frau Rodde and her daughters, Clarissa and Ines. He spends a summer in Palestrina, Italy, with Schildknapp. Here he has a conversation with the Devil, according to papers later found by Zeitblom. During their discussion, it is stated that when Leverkühn was infected with syphilis, he entered into a pact with the Devil, agreeing to deny himself any form of love in exchange for 24 years of compositional genius.

Leverkühn moves to Pfeiffering, outside Munich, and writes increasingly successful vocal music. Ines Rodde falls in love with the violinist Rudolf Schwerdtfeger, though she is married to another man. Later Leverkühn asks Schwerdtfeger to approach Marie Godeau, a young woman he thinks he loves, on his behalf, but she falls for Schwerdtfeger. Before they can be married, a jealous Ines shoots Schwerdtfeger to death. An oratorio that Leverkühn has written during this time is performed a year later and is a great success.

Leverkühn then begins work on his masterpiece, the cantata The Lamentation of Dr. Faustus. During this time Leverkühn's young nephew is sent to live with him. The composer becomes fond of the young boy, but the child dies of meningitis. In 1930, 24 years to the day after he became infected with syphilis, Leverkühn prepares to perform the cantata for his friends. He first tells them about his pact with the Devil. When he begins playing the piano, he collapses and spends the final 10 years of his life ravaged by dementia.

Legacy

Interwoven with the narration of Leverkühn's life, his bargain with the Devil, and the pact's repercussions is an exploration of how and why Germany chose to ally itself with dark forces in its embrace of fascism through Adolf Hitler. Doctor Faustus engages with the ideas of many European philosophers and thinkers, elaborating its own unique vision. Particularly brilliant are Mann's meditations on the evolution of musical theory over the course of the 19th and 20th centuries, including the advent of the 12-tone system of Arnold Schoenberg, the composer on whom Leverkühn is partly based (the character is also partly based on Friedrich Nietzsche). Also in strong evidence is Mann's preoccupation with the ruthless demands of creative life. Leverkühn suffers excruciating periods of pain punctuated by short bouts of breathtaking genius.

Many of the finest passages are those that explore the relationship between illness and creativity. The novel's major achievement is its eloquent synthesis of complex ideas on art, history, and politics, as well as its elaborate meditation on the relationship between the artist and society. The final description of Leverkühn's fate is tinged with the despair and isolation that Mann himself endured as he pondered the future of his native Germany from the vantage point of his exile in California. The novel was first translated into English by H.T. Lowe-Porter. A new English translation, by John E. Woods, was issued in 1997.

Christopher C. Gregory-Guider The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

German literature: Other works of German Modernism

...the aesthetic, Doktor Faustus (1947; Doctor Faustus). Anna Seghers's novel Das siebte Kreuz (1942; The Seventh Cross) depicts the escape of seven prisoners, only one of whom survives, from a concentration camp. Other important exile writers were Bertolt Brecht, Joseph Roth, Franz Werfel, Arnold Zweig, and Stefan Zweig....

Thomas Mann: Later novels

In Doktor Faustus, begun in 1943 at the darkest period of the war, Mann wrote the most directly political of his novels. It is the life story of a German composer, Adrian Leverkühn, born in 1885, who dies in 1940 after 10 years of mental alienation....

...Mann's novel Doktor Faustus (1947; Doctor Faustus)....

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Doctor Faustus | Summary, Legacy, & Facts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Doctor Faustus, novel by German writer Thomas Mann, published in 1947. It is a reworking of the Faust legend in the form of a biography of a fictional 20th-century composer and is interwoven with an exploration of how and why Germany chose to ally itself with dark forces in its embrace of fascism.

# data[].attributes.body
a lot of Shakespearean tragedies also include a large amount of comedy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The original classification of Shakespeare's plays - ' Comedies', ' Tragedies', ' Histories' and ' Roman plays' - don't adequately describe all of Shakespeare's plays, and scholars have come up with more names to do so. The most widely used categories are ' Romance Plays', ' Problem Plays', and Shakespeare's 'Tragicomedy Plays'. The plays in those categories have much in common, but there are enough differences to prevent some of them to fall into all three. The Winter's Tale, for example is a play that does have the features of all three, however.

A tragicomedy is a play that is neither a comedy nor a tragedy, although it has the features of both. Tragedies are usually focused almost exclusively on the central character, the tragic hero (although Shakespeare's tragedies can sometimes be a double tragedy, with two tragic heroes, like Romeo and Juliet). The audience has insights into his mind and goes deeply in, as he does in or .

Comic plays, on the other hand, remove that focus and the concerns are diversified so that the action is made up of the stories of several characters, particularly pairs of lovers. The shadows in human emotions are usually minor in the comedies: they are such things as misunderstandings, playful deceptions and so on.

Plays that fall between the two stools of tragedy and comedy are sometimes referred to as 'Problem Plays.' so the whole area of classification is a very difficult one. It shouldn't be necessary to classify them but scholars need a language in which to talk about the plays.

The Merchant of Venice can be seen as a tragicomedy. It has a comic structure but one of the central characters, Shylock, looks very much like a tragic character. The play has a comedy ending with the lovers pairing off but we are left with taste in the mouth of the ordeal of Shylock, destroyed by a combination of his own faults and the persecution of the lovers who enjoy that happy ending. The feeling at the end of the play is neither joy nor misery. The play has a decidedly comic structure but there is also a powerful tragic story. It can therefore be called a tragicomedy.

Shakespeare' tragicomedies usually have improbable and complex plots; characters of high social class; contrasts between villainy and virtue; love of different kinds at their centre; a hero who is saved at the last minute after a touch-and- go experience; surprises and treachery. The Winter's Tale and are two plays that fit that tragicomical pattern.

Shakespeare's plays generally accepted as tragicomedy plays are:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shakespeare's Tragicomedy Play: Tragicomedies by Shakespeare

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Overview of Shakespeare's 'Tragicomedy Plays': The original classification of Shakespeare's plays - 'Comedies', 'Tragedies', 'Histories' and 'Roman plays' - don't adequately describe all of Shakespeare's plays, and scholars have come up with more names to do so. The most widely used categories are 'Romance Plays', 'Problem Plays'...

# data[].attributes.body
Dr. Faustus Summary

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SparkNotes: Doctor Faustus: Plot Overview

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A short summary of Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus. This free synopsis covers all the crucial plot points of Doctor Faustus.

# data[].attributes.body
A simple and to the point explanation of classical vs. modern tragedy, if you're looking for a basic summary

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The word "tragedy" traditionally refers to a genre of serious, dramatic work in which a heroic individual meets with or causes terrible and awe-inspiring events. We can broadly distinguish classical tragedy, a dramatic form that directly developed from these rituals and was performed in ancient Greece, and modern tragedy, a dramatic form written and performed today.

The Origins of Tragedy

Tragedy has its roots in the Bacchanalia, religious rituals to the god Dionysus held in ancient Greece. Scholars believe that the earliest forms of these rituals may have been fertility feasts featuring dancers to celebrate the new harvest. Over time, other elements were added: a speaker, then dialogue between the speaker and the dancers. The playwright Aeschylus is often credited as the first to add a second speaker, and thereby create the form of tragedy.

Classical Tragedy

In his "Poetics," Aristotle identifies the elements of classical tragedy, based primarily on the work of the playwrights Aeschylus, Euripides and Sophocles. Classical tragedy is the imitation of a single action, in which a hero of high status falls from fortune to misfortune. The fall must occur because of a "tragic flaw," or some error or shortcoming in an otherwise good protagonist, and not by vice or depravity. The purpose of tragedy, in Aristotle's view, is to provoke pity and terror in the audience, leading to a catharsis, or cleansing of these emotions.

From Classical to Modern Tragedy

Between classical and modern tragedy, we find the medieval and Renaissance forms of tragedy. Medieval tragedy mostly took the form of narratives, rather than plays, and focused on the fall of great men caused, not by a tragic flaw, but instead the spinning of fortune's wheel. Renaissance tragedy took its inspiration from classical tragedy, while changing the form in important ways, by including subplots, comic relief and expanding the possibilities for the tragic hero. Christopher Marlowe's "Edward II," who is driven by vice which causes his downfall, could not have featured as a protagonist in classical tragedy.

Modern Tragedy

Whereas in classical tragedy, the protagonist is of noble or prestigious standing, modern tragedy is more likely to focus on the "common man." A modern audience is expected to relate to, rather than look up to, the protagonist; and while the classical tragic hero's death is an event to be collectively mourned onstage, the modern tragic hero often dies unrecognized as a hero. The modern tragedy is also more likely to focus on society, rather than fate or fortune, as that which oppresses the hero. However, the modern tragedy retains a highly solemn tone and focus on matters of grave and ultimate importance, features common to tragedy throughout its history.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Difference Between a Classical & a Modern Tragedy in Literature

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The word "tragedy" traditionally refers to a genre of serious, dramatic work in which a heroic individual meets with or causes terrible and awe-inspiring events. We can broadly distinguish classical tragedy, a dramatic form that directly developed from these rituals and was performed in ancient Greece, and modern ...

# data[].attributes.body
This article goes into detail what really defines a Shakespearean Tragedy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
An excerpt from "What is Shakespearean Tragedy?" forthcoming in The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy
The question "What is Shakespearean Tragedy?" can understandably prompt one to start listing distinctive features of various plays by Shakespeare - as if a successful enumeration of its characteristics would amount to an understanding of the genre....

...However, rather than approach Shakespearean tragedy as the sum-total of certain features or "facts," or as a generic object of study, I propose that we see Shakespearean tragedy as a discrete form of art - as the birth of a distinctive art form, the same way we think of "painting on canvas" or "symphonic music" as art forms that arrived on the world stage at a particular place and time.[1] Whereas a "genre" purports to be a collection of objects that share common, taxonomically graspable features or techniques, there is no exhaustive list of features that 'add up' to Shakespearean tragedy - since, for a start, it is up to us to discern, decide, or debate, what will even count as features of this art form. Moreover, if Shakespearean tragedies all shared certain inherent, generic characteristics, then it would be difficult to distinguish between Macbeth and Hamlet and Othello - but of course we all know that each of these is an entirely different play; each brings to light new features or expressive possibilities for Shakespearean tragedy, helping us to better discern the art form as such, to better see its purview or expressive task. Shakespearean tragedies show what they are, as an art form, in light of one another. For the same reason, though it is unconventional to say so, we should probably regard Shakespearean tragedy not just as a finite, canonical collection of plays by William Shakespeare [ Hamlet, Macbeth, Othello, King Lear and so forth] but as a novel, modern artistic practice - instanced with special power in a range of works by Shakespeare, but still practicable by others afterwards. Shakespeare may have been the first, or the most successful or the most indispensable, to work in the medium of Shakespearean tragedy, but he was not the last.[2]

To see Shakespearean tragedy as art form, then, is to see it a practice that, having originated somewhere and sometime (with Shakespeare, in this instance), takes on a life of its own by generating new features, techniques and characteristics - thereby resisting any final taxonomy, at least so long as the art form remains vital as a human practice. If to delimit a "genre" is to circumscribe a domain of objects or experiences according to constitutive traits or attributes, then art forms or practices take it upon themselves to "work through," or make sense of, their own socio-historical and material pre-conditions - as if expressing a newly discovered need for such sense-making.

All this gets me to the question that I really want to raise in this brief essay: What does the art form of Shakespearean tragedy "work through," respond to, and make sense of?

In what follows, I will propose at least one answer to this:Shakespearean tragedy works through the loss of any "given" - nature, or God, or "fate" - that might explain human societies, histories, actions, destinies, relationships and values. Shakespeare challenges us to understand tragedies not as responding to existential facts (desire, or mortality) or historical situations (Henry V's invasion of France, or the fate of the Roman republic), but as responding to the fact that there are no givens that fully govern our activities. At the same time, Shakespearean tragedy works through the loss of social bonds on which we depend for the meaning and worth of our lives together - showing those bonds to be, in spite of that dependence, fully dissolvable. In this way, Shakespearean tragedy helps us make sense of how we interact one another - without the help of any Archimedean standpoint, with only the interactions themselves as sources of intelligibility and meaning. In Shakespearean tragedy, our actions (must) explain themselves.... To say it all at once: Shakespearean tragedy displays our provisional self-determination as subjects in the world - while at the same time asking us to see our actions as intelligible, as somehow meaningful, as something more than the vanity of "so-and-so" doing "this-or-that." The loss of "givens" (the death of old gods, the devaluation of our highest values) that Shakespeare "works through" does not leave us with a desperate nihilism - but rather with the sense that it is precisely this loss of "givens" that, finally, allows us to see ourselves as provisionally free in the world, and as reckoning with the implications of this new self-understanding....
NOTES
[1] Having said this, I must quickly add that I am not concerned with establishing which play is the "first" Shakespearean tragedy, any more than I would want to fix a precise date or origin for painting on canvas, or for orchestra music. Such matters are subject to debate, and we can change our minds about the particulars. The larger point is that every artistic medium emerges historically - it was not always "there" - and unfolds through a certain historical development that can be examined. Which means the point of "changing our mind" about the particulars, or dates, would be the new historical-self-understanding such a change of mind would amount to (and not just a different chronology).

[2] By "indispensable," I mean that we need Shakespeare's work, especially, in order to understand later developments in the "art of Shakespearean tragedy." Though I do not have the space here to discuss what might be called the history of Shakespearean tragedy since Shakespeare, I would note that Friedrich Schlegel and Goethe - like many German romantics - saw modern drama, the novel and romantic literature as developments of Shakespearean drama; just as Jan Kott saw Beckett's work as traversing the terrain of King Lear; just as Stanley Cavell sees Hollywood comedies of remarriage as extending Shakespearean romance - a suggestion that is being developed by Sarah Beckwith in her recent work on The Winter's Tale and its inheritors. [To say nothing of the New York Times, in which one reads recently, "Haven't you heard TV is the new Shakespeare?"] My suggestion, at any rate, is that we regard Shakespearean tragedy as inaugurating an artistic form whose possibilities have been explored by other artists in Shakespeare's wake - from Ibsen and Beckett, to Sarah Kane and Pedro Almodovar and on and on - though obviously one can regard Shakespeare as a "master" of the form. [See Charles Isherwood, The New York Times, "Too Much Shakespeare? Be Not Cowed," 12 September 2013.]

Also for you:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
An excerpt from 'What is Shakespearean Tragedy?' forthcoming in The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy The question 'What is Shakespearean Tragedy?' can understandably prompt one to start listing distinctive features of various plays by Shakespeare - as if a successful enumeration of its char

# data[].attributes.body
a article that discusses differences in modern and classic tragedy's.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Classical tragedy preserves the unities -- one timespan, one setting, one story -- as they originated in the Greek theater. It also defines a tragic plot as one with a royal character losing, through his own pride, a mighty prize. Modern tragedy redefines the genre, with ordinary protagonists, realistic timelines and settings, and multiple plots.

Unified Classic Tragedy

According to Aristotle's Poetics, the tragic playwright must create a unified work. The play's running time must be the exact timespan of the tragedy, with no breaks or flashbacks; the setting must remain in one place. Most importantly, the action follows one inevitable course, and the tragic hero must be royal or highborn. In addition, this hero desires a greater good, such as the rescue or unification of his kingdom, and he places that prize at great risk with his own choices.

The Elements of a Tragic Fall

Aristotle further elaborates that the tragic hero must, by the play's end, lose everything he has gained through hubris -- blind pride that defies the gods. In Sophocles' Oedipal cycle, Oedipus tries to discover his birth secret, while Creon refuses honorable burial to Antigone's brother. Both heroes lose their kingdoms as a result. Shakespeare carries Greek-style hubris even further, as he has Macbeth lose his soul, Lear his sanity and Hamlet his conscious identity, before robbing each character of his life and kingdom as well.

A Critic Defines Modern Tragedy

Critic Pauline Kael, in reviewing the movie of Arthur Miller's "A View from the Bridge," gives an excellent definition of modern tragedy when she notes that a tragic hero "must have greater aspirations, ambitions ... what does Eddie Carbone [the Miller tragic hero] want? He wants his wife's niece." The modern tragedy is thus redefined: in modern tragedies, smaller men with smaller dreams act through impulse, rather than hubris. The unities are ignored -- Miller's work spans weeks, with subplots -- although the characters' ends are still tragic.

Modern Tragedy Adds Irony

Miller produced several modern tragedies about ordinary men with puny dreams and sorrowful finales; the most famous is "Death of a Salesman." Another contemporary example is David Mamet's "Glengarry Glen Ross," in which tragically small-minded salesmen fight over crooked sales jobs. Modern tragedy therefore adds irony to Aristotle's mix, reducing once-heroic tragic figures to the size of ordinary humanity.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Difference Between a Classical & a Modern Tragedy in Literature

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Classical tragedy preserves the unities -- one timespan, one setting, one story -- as they originated in the Greek theater. It also defines a tragic plot as one with a royal character losing, through his own pride, a mighty prize. Modern tragedy redefines the genre, with ordinary protagonists, realistic timelines and ...

# data[].attributes.body
learn the difference between classic tragedy and modern tragedy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Main Difference - Classical vs Modern Tragedy

A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores,
1. What is a Classical Tragedy? 2. What is a Modern Tragedy?
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
3. What is the difference between Classical and Modern Tragedy?

What is a Classical Tragedy

Tragedy is a popular form of drama that originated from Greek literary tradition. Aristotle defines tragedy as a unified work that covers one time span, story, setting, and a main protagonist. The plot of the drama consists of one great, complete action.

The protagonist of classical tragedies is typically from a royal or noble family. Antigone, Oedipus, and Agamemnon are some examples of protagonists in classical tragedies. These brave and noble heroes often face a reversal of fortune. This reversal is typically due to a tragic flaw in the character and the influence of a divine power. Fate also plays a major role in classical tragedies.

Some examples of classical tragedies include Oedipus Rex, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Medea, Antigone and Prometheus Bound.

Given below are some elements of a classical tragedy.

Hamartia - A mistake or a fault that is committed in ignorance; this is usually a mistake made by a morally good person

Hubris - the false pride that leads to ruin; this is the opposite of rectitude

Peripeteia - the reversal fortune

Catharsis - feeling of emotional release felt at the end of the tragedy

What is a Modern Tragedy

Modern drama refers to tragedies that were written and performed from the twentieth century. Some examples of modern tragedies include Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman", "A View from the Bridge", "The Misfits" and David Mamet's "Glengarry Glen Ross are some examples of modern tragedies.

Unlike classical tragedies, modern tragedies are typically centered around ordinary people and their problems. Thus, they are more realistic than classical tragedies. The conflict in modern tragedies are caused by flaws in the characters, society or the law; fate and divine power do not play a major role in modern tragedies. Modern tragedies may also have multiple plots and more than one central character. The action in the story may also span several weeks, months or years - the differences in time is managed by elements such as flashbacks, pauses, flash-forwards, and narrations. Modern playwrights also use elements such as irony and sarcasm to highlight the flaws in characters.

Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy

Characters

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically have one main character.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have more than one central character.

Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: Protagonist is typically from a wealthy, noble or royal family.

Modern Tragedy: Protagonist usually has a common, middle-class background.

Nature of the Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: The protagonist is usually a noble and heroic character, but has a tragic flaw.

Modern Tragedy: The protagonist may be a white, black or gray character.

Plot

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one unified plot.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have multiple plots.

Timeline

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one time span.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies have more realistic time spans; there are breaks and flashbacks.

Story

Classical Tragedy: The story is about nobility or royalty, their ambitions, attempts to unify or save a kingdom, etc.

Modern Tragedy: The story is about ordinary people and their problems, ambitions and aspirations; thus, the stories are more realistic.

Elements

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically contain elements such as hubris, hamartia, and catharsis.
Image Courtesy: "Bénigne Gagneraux, The Blind Oedipus Commending his Children to the Gods" By Bénigne Gagneraux - Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia "Death of Salesman Set" By Chelsea Tenenbaum - Own work (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Commons Wikimedia
Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies use elements like irony and sarcasm.

Fate and Divine power

Classical Tragedy: Fate and divine power are important elements in classical tragedies.

Modern Tragedy: Fate and divine power rarely play a role in modern tragedies; they are more concerned with realistic, common problems.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy | Definition, Features, Examples, Elements

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores, 1.

# data[].attributes.body
Found a brief article about Marlowe's Doctor Faustus. Not only the play but a little about impact.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read about 'Marlowe's Doctor Faustus, 1631' on the British Library website

# data[].attributes.body
the differences between classic and modern tragedies.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Main Difference - Classical vs Modern Tragedy

A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores,
1. What is a Classical Tragedy? 2. What is a Modern Tragedy?
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
3. What is the difference between Classical and Modern Tragedy?

What is a Classical Tragedy

Tragedy is a popular form of drama that originated from Greek literary tradition. Aristotle defines tragedy as a unified work that covers one time span, story, setting, and a main protagonist. The plot of the drama consists of one great, complete action.

The protagonist of classical tragedies is typically from a royal or noble family. Antigone, Oedipus, and Agamemnon are some examples of protagonists in classical tragedies. These brave and noble heroes often face a reversal of fortune. This reversal is typically due to a tragic flaw in the character and the influence of a divine power. Fate also plays a major role in classical tragedies.

Some examples of classical tragedies include Oedipus Rex, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Medea, Antigone and Prometheus Bound.

Given below are some elements of a classical tragedy.

Hamartia - A mistake or a fault that is committed in ignorance; this is usually a mistake made by a morally good person

Hubris - the false pride that leads to ruin; this is the opposite of rectitude

Peripeteia - the reversal fortune

Catharsis - feeling of emotional release felt at the end of the tragedy

What is a Modern Tragedy

Modern drama refers to tragedies that were written and performed from the twentieth century. Some examples of modern tragedies include Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman", "A View from the Bridge", "The Misfits" and David Mamet's "Glengarry Glen Ross are some examples of modern tragedies.

Unlike classical tragedies, modern tragedies are typically centered around ordinary people and their problems. Thus, they are more realistic than classical tragedies. The conflict in modern tragedies are caused by flaws in the characters, society or the law; fate and divine power do not play a major role in modern tragedies. Modern tragedies may also have multiple plots and more than one central character. The action in the story may also span several weeks, months or years - the differences in time is managed by elements such as flashbacks, pauses, flash-forwards, and narrations. Modern playwrights also use elements such as irony and sarcasm to highlight the flaws in characters.

Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy

Characters

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically have one main character.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have more than one central character.

Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: Protagonist is typically from a wealthy, noble or royal family.

Modern Tragedy: Protagonist usually has a common, middle-class background.

Nature of the Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: The protagonist is usually a noble and heroic character, but has a tragic flaw.

Modern Tragedy: The protagonist may be a white, black or gray character.

Plot

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one unified plot.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have multiple plots.

Timeline

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one time span.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies have more realistic time spans; there are breaks and flashbacks.

Story

Classical Tragedy: The story is about nobility or royalty, their ambitions, attempts to unify or save a kingdom, etc.

Modern Tragedy: The story is about ordinary people and their problems, ambitions and aspirations; thus, the stories are more realistic.

Elements

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically contain elements such as hubris, hamartia, and catharsis.
Image Courtesy: "Bénigne Gagneraux, The Blind Oedipus Commending his Children to the Gods" By Bénigne Gagneraux - Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia "Death of Salesman Set" By Chelsea Tenenbaum - Own work (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Commons Wikimedia
Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies use elements like irony and sarcasm.

Fate and Divine power

Classical Tragedy: Fate and divine power are important elements in classical tragedies.

Modern Tragedy: Fate and divine power rarely play a role in modern tragedies; they are more concerned with realistic, common problems.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy | Definition, Features, Examples, Elements

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores, 1.

# data[].attributes.body
This video gives a brief summery and analysis of Dr Faustus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_8Yybo4q_A

# data[].attributes.body
This talks about the religion aspect of Dr. Faustus. Whether or not it rejects the idea of God.

# data[].attributes.body
An article introducing the characteristics of Shakespearean Tragedies.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An introduction to Shakespearean tragedy | The British Library

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By using this site, you agree we can set and use cookies. For more details of these cookies and how to disable them, see our cookie policy. An introduction to Shakespearean tragedy Despite their dazzling diversity, the tragedies of Shakespeare gain their enduring power from a shared dramatic vision, argues Kiernan Ryan.

# data[].attributes.body
This page talks about how different styles of tragedy are played out and shows where tragedy originally roots from.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
English Department, California Polytechnic State University

The genre of tragedy is rooted in the Greek dramas of Aeschylus (525-456 B.C., e.g. the Oresteia and Prometheus Bound), Euripides (ca. 480?-405 B.C., e.g. Medea and The Trojan Women) and Sophocles (496-406 B.C., e.g. Oedipus Rex and Antigone). One of the earliest works of literary criticism, the Poetics of the Greek philosopher (384-322 B.C.), includes a discussion of tragedy based in part upon the plays of Aeschylus, Euripides, and Sophocles. While Shakespeare probably did not know Greek tragedy directly, he would have been familiar with the Latin adaptations of Greek drama by the Roman (i.e. Latin-language) playwright Seneca (ca. 3 B.C.-65 A.D.; his nine tragedies include a Medea and an Oedipus). Both Senecan and Renaissance tragedy were influenced by the theory of tragedy found in Aristotle's Poetics.

Classical Tragedy: According to Aristotle's Poetics, tragedy involves a protagonist of high estate ("better than we") who falls from prosperity to misery through a series of reversals and discoveries as a result of a " tragic flaw," generally an error caused by human frailty. Aside from this initial moral weakness or error, the protagonist is basically a good person: for Aristotle, the downfall of an evil protagonist is not tragic (Macbeth would not qualify). In Aristotelian tragedy, the action (or fable) generally involves revolution (unanticipated reversals of what is expected to occur) and discovery (in which the protagonists and audience learn something that had been hidden). The third part of the fable, disasters, includes all destructive actions, deaths, etc. Tragedy evokes pity and fear in the audience, leading finally to catharsis (the purgation of these passions).

Medieval tragedy: A narrative (not a play) concerning how a person falls from high to low estate as the Goddess Fortune spins her wheel. In the middle ages, there was no "tragic" theater per se; medieval theater in England was primarily liturgical drama, which developed in the later middle ages (15th century) as a way of teaching scripture to the illiterate (mystery plays) or of reminding them to be prepared for death and God's Judgment (morality plays). Medieval "tragedy" was found not in the theater but in collections of stories illustrating the falls of great men (e.g. Boccacio's Falls of Illustrious Men, Chaucer's Monk's Tale from the Canterbury Tales, and Lydgate's Falls of Princes). These narratives owe their conception of Fortune in part to the Latin tragedies of Seneca, in which Fortune and her wheel play a prominent role.

Renaissance tragedy derives less from medieval tragedy (which randomly occurs as Fortune spins her wheel) than from the Aristotelian notion of thetragic flaw, a moral weakness or human error that causes the protagonist's downfall. Unlike classical tragedy, however, it tends to include subplots and comic relief. From Seneca, early Renaissance tragedy borrowed the "violent and bloody plots, resounding rhetorical speeches, the frequent use of ghosts . . . and sometimes the five-act structure" ( Norton Anthology of English Literature, 6th ed., vol. I, p. 410). In his greatest tragedies (e.g. Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth), Shakespeare transcends the conventions of Renaissance tragedy, imbuing his plays with a timeless universality.

Modern theories of Tragedy: Most modern theorists build upon the Aristotelian notions of tragedy. Two examples are the Victorian critic A.C. Bradley ( Shakespearean Tragedy, 1904) and Northrop Frye ( The Anatomy of Criticism, 1957). Keep these theories in mind as you read; consider whether and how they are helpful in understanding Shakespeare's work.

A. C. Bradley divides tragedy into an exposition of the state of affairs; the beginning, growth, and vicissitudes of theconflict; and the finalcatastrophe or tragic outcome. Bradley emphasizes the Aristotelian notion of thetragic flaw: the tragic hero errs by action or omission; this error joins with other causes to bring about his ruin. According to Bradley, "This is always so with Shakespeare. The idea of the tragic hero as a being destroyed simply and solely by external forces is quite alien to him; and not less so is the idea of the hero as contributing to his destruction only by acts in which we see no flaw." Bradley's emphasis on the tragic flaw implies that Shakespeare's characters bring their fates upon themselves and thus, in a sense, deserve what they get. It should however be noted that in some of Shakespeare's plays (e.g.King Lear), the tragedy lies less in the fact that the characters "deserve" their fates than in how much more they suffer than their actions (or flaws) suggest they should.

Northrop Frye distinguishes five stages of action in tragedy:1) Encroachment. Protagonist takes on too much, makes a mistake that causes his/her "fall." This mistake is often unconscious (an act blindly done, through over-confidence in one's ability to regulate the world or through insensitivity to others) but still violates the norms of human conduct.2) Complication. The building up of events aligning opposing forces that will lead inexorably to the tragic conclusion. "Just as comedy often sets up an arbitrary law and then organizes the action to break or evade it, so tragedy presents the reverse theme of narrowing a comparatively free life into a process of causation."3) Reversal. The point at which it becomes clear that the hero's expectations are mistaken, that his fate will be the reverse of what he had hoped. At this moment, the vision of the dramatist and the audience are the same. The classic example is Oedipus, who seeks the knowledge that proves him guilty of murdering his father and marrying his mother; when he accomplishes his objective, he realizes he has destroyed himself in the process.4) Catastrophe. The catastrophe exposes the limits of the hero's power and dramatizes the waste of his life. Piles of dead bodies remind us that the forces unleashed are not easily contained; there are also elaborate subplots (e.g. Gloucester inKing Lear) which reinforce the impression of a world inundated with evil.5) Recognition. The audience (sometimes the hero as well) recognizes the larger pattern. If the hero does experience recognition, he assumes the vision of his life held by the dramatist and the audience. From this new perspective he can see the irony of his actions, adding to the poignancy of the tragic events.

Click here for information about Revenge Tragedy

Contents of this and all linked pages Copyright Debora B. Schwartz, 1996-2005

Return to ENGL 204 Home Page
Return to ENGL 339 Home Page
Return to Dr. Schwartz's Teaching Page
Return to Dr. Schwartz's Home Page
Send me mail!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
English Department, California Polytechnic State University The genre of tragedy is rooted in the Greek dramas of Aeschylus (525-456 B.C., e.g. the Oresteia and Prometheus Bound), Euripides (ca. 480?-405 B.C., e.g. Medea and The Trojan Women) and Sophocles (496-406 B.C., e.g. Oedipus Rex and Antigone).

# data[].attributes.body
Talks about the differences between classical and modern tragedys

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Main Difference - Classical vs Modern Tragedy

A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores,
1. What is a Classical Tragedy? 2. What is a Modern Tragedy?
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
3. What is the difference between Classical and Modern Tragedy?

What is a Classical Tragedy

Tragedy is a popular form of drama that originated from Greek literary tradition. Aristotle defines tragedy as a unified work that covers one time span, story, setting, and a main protagonist. The plot of the drama consists of one great, complete action.

The protagonist of classical tragedies is typically from a royal or noble family. Antigone, Oedipus, and Agamemnon are some examples of protagonists in classical tragedies. These brave and noble heroes often face a reversal of fortune. This reversal is typically due to a tragic flaw in the character and the influence of a divine power. Fate also plays a major role in classical tragedies.

Some examples of classical tragedies include Oedipus Rex, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Medea, Antigone and Prometheus Bound.

Given below are some elements of a classical tragedy.

Hamartia - A mistake or a fault that is committed in ignorance; this is usually a mistake made by a morally good person

Hubris - the false pride that leads to ruin; this is the opposite of rectitude

Peripeteia - the reversal fortune

Catharsis - feeling of emotional release felt at the end of the tragedy

What is a Modern Tragedy

Modern drama refers to tragedies that were written and performed from the twentieth century. Some examples of modern tragedies include Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman", "A View from the Bridge", "The Misfits" and David Mamet's "Glengarry Glen Ross are some examples of modern tragedies.

Unlike classical tragedies, modern tragedies are typically centered around ordinary people and their problems. Thus, they are more realistic than classical tragedies. The conflict in modern tragedies are caused by flaws in the characters, society or the law; fate and divine power do not play a major role in modern tragedies. Modern tragedies may also have multiple plots and more than one central character. The action in the story may also span several weeks, months or years - the differences in time is managed by elements such as flashbacks, pauses, flash-forwards, and narrations. Modern playwrights also use elements such as irony and sarcasm to highlight the flaws in characters.

Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy

Characters

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically have one main character.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have more than one central character.

Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: Protagonist is typically from a wealthy, noble or royal family.

Modern Tragedy: Protagonist usually has a common, middle-class background.

Nature of the Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: The protagonist is usually a noble and heroic character, but has a tragic flaw.

Modern Tragedy: The protagonist may be a white, black or gray character.

Plot

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one unified plot.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have multiple plots.

Timeline

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one time span.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies have more realistic time spans; there are breaks and flashbacks.

Story

Classical Tragedy: The story is about nobility or royalty, their ambitions, attempts to unify or save a kingdom, etc.

Modern Tragedy: The story is about ordinary people and their problems, ambitions and aspirations; thus, the stories are more realistic.

Elements

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically contain elements such as hubris, hamartia, and catharsis.
Image Courtesy: "Bénigne Gagneraux, The Blind Oedipus Commending his Children to the Gods" By Bénigne Gagneraux - Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia "Death of Salesman Set" By Chelsea Tenenbaum - Own work (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Commons Wikimedia
Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies use elements like irony and sarcasm.

Fate and Divine power

Classical Tragedy: Fate and divine power are important elements in classical tragedies.

Modern Tragedy: Fate and divine power rarely play a role in modern tragedies; they are more concerned with realistic, common problems.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy | Definition, Features, Examples, Elements

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores, 1.

# data[].attributes.body
top 10 tragedies specifically related to Shakespearean and Greek ideas

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Taste of Cinema - Movie Reviews and Classic Movie Lists

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Tragedy for the purposes of this list does not mean films that are very sad. Rather the films selected explore themes associated with Greek and sometime Shakespearian Tragedy. Throughout this list, philosophers and theorists of the tragic have been cited. This use of theory to discern what is properly tragic is controversial.

Raymond Williams for instance argued that the tragic was not an elite experience but rather one that evolved to incorporate modernity itself, including ordinary experiences of sadness and alienation. Terry Eagleton, a literary theorist, argues that perhaps the only workable definition of tragedy is very sad. However, why then not do a list of very sad films? Why use the term tragic at all?

For this list, the films evoke more philosophic conceptions simply to distinguish the tragic from the sad, which is not intended to be an absolute distinction. The list does not include tragic TV series such as The Wire-which was inspired by the idea of postmodern tragedy where bureaucracy functions as the inescapable and undefeatable necessity sanctioned by the Gods-and Breaking Bad-which seems to frame the transformation of the anti-hero into a tyrant.

10. Town Without Pity

According to GWF Hegel there is nothing more tragic than a conflict between two rights, where characters come into conflict who both embody conceptions of what the right thing to do is. For Hegel, justice in tragedy comes at the price of injustice.

When a 16 year old woman, Karin Steinhof, is raped by American soldiers during the US occupation of Germany, a conflict arises for Steve Garrett played by Kirk Douglas. He must defend these men even though he knows they are guilty. Initially he tries to bargain that the men will admit their guilt and serve their time provided they are spared the death penalty. He does not wish to see them die. When that fails he tries to convince Karin's father, Karl Steinhoff to drop the charges. Garrett discerns the greys but saves the men at the expense of Karin Steinhof, destroying her account on the witness stand.

The town horrifically condemns Karin Steinhof, insinuating that she invited the attention of the soldiers and while Garrett attempts to help her his loyalties are with the accused. The court at the end of the trial, with Karin Steinhof's withdrawal from the process, can no longer execute the men. But the court, taking the place of the chorus dishonorably discharges the soldiers and sentences them to prison for their horrific crime. A journalist reporting the events initially despises Garrett but comes to recognize his dilemma.

Hegel framed the conflict of right largely through ancient tragedy, particularly Antigone where Antigone represents the family and Creon the law. With modern tragedy the divided self becomes paramount according to Hegel. As such characters in modern tragedy can no longer have clear convictions.

Rather their will drives them forward even when their beliefs undergo doubt. But the tragedy is of course more than Garrett's tragedy. It is Karin Steinhof's tragedy most of all. Caught in fate's clutches, tragic notions of destiny are reconfigured along gendered lines. Unfortunately the film, while showing the very real consequences for Karin Steinhof who commits suicide, often switches focus to the tragedy of deciding between rights as well as the cruelty of the town.

9. The Killing of a Sacred Deer tie with A History of Violence

Both Yorgos Lanthimos' The Killing of a Sacred Deer and David Cronenberg's A History of Violence explore the notion of being punished for past crimes and the notion of familial guilt. In the former case, The Killing of a Sacred Deer is a sort of reinterpretation and reworking of Euripides Iphigenia in Aulis. When a surgeon kills a boy's father on the operating table, the boy gives him the alternative of killing one of his family members: either son, daughter or wife, or otherwise watching them die from a mysterious illness brought about by his curse.

According to George Steiner, tragedy entails people being punished in excess of their guilt. We never know exactly how culpable the protagonist is. Steiner states that tragedy concerns dark and mysterious forces that torment humanity for sport. Such seems to be the implication of The Killing of a Sacred Deer as the crimes of the father affect the children and his wife. This notion of predestined suffering is a thematic common in Greek tragedy and although Shakespearian tragedy often suggests that fate may well be superstition, there is nevertheless lip-service to predestination and fate.

A History of Violence doesn't quite go down the Steinerian path, but it does convey a sense of inescapable reckoning associated with Greek and Shakespearean tragedy. A History of Violence follows Tom Stall works in a dinner. When the diner is robbed, he kills both robbers, defending waitress' life. Gaining media recognition, Tom who had previously been involved in gangs must defend his family from them. Indeed, he must even kills his mobster-brother to do so.

In Greek tragedy, one's crimes as with Oedipus, inevitably catch-up with the protagonist who suffers until he or she, through a ritual act of transgressive suffering or violence, can be cleansed.

Although Aristotle's catharsis has been hotly disputed with perhaps the most credible translation of the word being clarification rather than cleansing, purification or purgation, the possibly misinformed lexicology has generated a productive way of interpreting tragedy that is perhaps truer than the account proffered in the Poetics. Moreover, the conflict within the family and the notion of violent redemption is key to so many tragedies including the Oresteia.

8. The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover

According to Jean-Pierre Vernant and Pierre Vidal-Naquet in their masterful study, Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, Greek tragedy problematizes the notion of the mythic hero. Greek tragedies wee reproduced in democratic Athens and as such they reflect, so the scholars argue, an ambivalence to the cult of the hero. Greek myth shows how rulers and heroes established and defended city-states and Greek Tragedy similarly honors them for their service. However, as the tragic hero is often a tyrant, the hero poses a threat to democracy.

Peter Greenaway turns ambivalence into denunciation, taking motives associated with tragic narratives such as revenge and cannibalism as well as cruel justice, to examine Thatcherite Britain. Greenaway himself has said that the film is a parable but more than just a parable of Thatcherism. The film concerns a mobster, the thief who murder's his wife's lover. In vengeance, the wife kills the thief but not before forcing him to eat a piece of her dead lover.

How, one may ask, is this a parable for capitalism without limits? Well, the thief is clearly an image of a businessman, indeed a criminal businessman, and mobsters have long been associated with corporate CEOs. He further acts cruelly to the poor and the unfortunate and represents the cruelty of the world and also the capitalist system. Borrowing from a Shakespearian framing of villainy, there is no ambiguity to the thief's villainy, only a figure driven by appetite.

7. Throne of Blood

Kurosawa's Throne of Blood is possibly the greatest cinematic adaptation of Shakespeare ever made while also reworking the story in a radically different way. The film opens with fog and dark mountains and mounds of barren earth, accompanied by the sound of people singing "Look upon the ruins of the castle of delusion. Haunted only now by the spirits of those who perished.

A scene of carnage." Whereas Macbeth concerns time being out of joint, hurried and frenzied, there is a sense in Throne of Blood that the only thing constant is time itself, and that human beings and their desires are transient hauntings that disappear of their own hubris. Hegel in his description of tragedy claims that tragic personages perish and become 'shadowy-picture thoughts', almost forgotten. He argues that tragic heroes are wrong to trust divination, the utterances of Gods, the spirits and witches. Accordingly, divine knowledge lies: it is true but deceptively true-just as the Macbethian protagonist in Throne of Blood discovers.

There is a temptation to read Throne of Blood along the contours of the Shakespearian reformulation of the tragic flaw of the protagonist, namely ambition. But there is another, non-Aristotelian way of understanding Throne of Blood. According to Friedrich Nietzsche in a footnote in his work, The Case of Wagner, the tragic does not concern tragic action but is rather a type of ritual establishing a sense of place through a sacred story of suffering. Is this not the very opening of Throne of Blood?

6. Antichrist

The emphasis on place is very evident in Lars von Trier's great exploration of sublime horror. Antichrist is about a couple, known only as He and She, who after the loss of their son retreat to a cabin in the woods, theologically named Eden.

There is a strong sense that they are returning to some sort of primal world inhabited by destructive spirits. He has taken her to the cabin to help her deal with her grief, and represents a masculinist rendition of reason. She allies herself with the destructiveness of nature and its cycles, warning that she and by extension nature are evil. When he ignores her warnings, she castrates him. He eventually believes she is a witch and burns her body.

At the end of the film, he wonders through the woods, eating berries and then witnesses faceless women walking either side of him. The ending could suggest that he is condemned but another interpretation is that by killing She, he has purged woman and by extension nature of the evil attributed to it.

From this reading, she becomes a tragic scape-goat, that like the tragic hero, accepts her destiny as a sort of purifying sacrifice. Still another reading would hold that He is purged of his tyrannical reason and now open to the scary, pagan properties of both women and nature. Certainly, according to Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy, the hero must be humbled and negated before he can be rid of his painful individuality and return to the earth mother, via a Dionysian ritual.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tragedy for the purposes of this list does not mean films that are very sad. Rather the films selected explore themes associated with Greek and sometime Shakespearian Tragedy. Throughout this list, philosophers and theorists of the tragic have been cited. This use of theory to discern what is properly tragic is controversial.

# data[].attributes.body
In Shakespeare's plays, he implements tragedy into every one of his plays to create suspense.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Shakespeare is perhaps most famous for his tragedies-indeed, many consider " Hamlet" to be the best play ever written. Other tragedies include " Romeo and Juliet," " Macbeth" and "King Lear," all of which are immediately recognizable, regularly studied, and frequently performed.

In all, Shakespeare wrote 10 tragedies. However, Shakespeare's plays often overlap in style and there is debate over which plays should be classified as tragedy, comedy, and history. For example, " Much Ado About Nothing" is normally classified as a comedy but follows many of the tragic conventions.

Key Takeaways: Common Features of Shakespeare's Tragedies

Elements of Shakespeare's Tragedies

In Shakespeare's tragedies, the main protagonist generally has a flaw that leads to his downfall. There are both internal and external struggles and often a bit of the supernatural thrown in for good measure (and tension). Often there are passages or characters that have the job of lightening the mood (comic relief), but the overall tone of the piece is quite serious.

All of Shakespeare's tragedies contain at least one more of these elements:

A tragic hero

A dichotomy of good and evil

A tragic waste

Hamartia (the hero's tragic flaw)

Issues of fate or fortune

Greed

Foul revenge

Supernatural elements

Internal and external pressures

The paradox of life

The Tragedies

A brief look shows that these 10 classic plays all have common themes.

1) "Antony and Cleopatra": Antony and Cleopatra's affair brings about the downfall of the Egyptian pharaohs and results in Octavius Caesar becoming the first Roman emperor. Like Romeo and Juliet, miscommunication leads to Anthony killing himself and Cleopatra later doing the same.

2) "Coriolanus": A successful Roman general is disliked by the "play Bienz" of Rome, and after losing and gaining their trust throughout the play, he is betrayed and assassinated by Aufidius, a former foe using Coriolanus to try to take over Rome. Aufidius felt like Coriolanus betrayed him in the end; thus he has Coriolanus killed.

3) "Hamlet": Prince Hamlet devotes himself to avenging his father's murder, committed by his uncle, Claudius. Hamlet's quest for revenge causes the deaths of many friends and loved ones, including his own mother. In the end, Hamlet is lured into a fight to the death with Laertes, brother of Ophelia, and is stabbed by a poisoned blade. Hamlet is able to kill his attacker, as well as his uncle Claudius, before dying himself.

4) "Julius Caesar": Julius Caesar is assassinated by his most trusted friends and advisers. They claim they fear he is becoming a tyrant, but many believe Cassius wants to take over. Cassius is able to convince Caesar's best friend, Brutus, to be one of the conspirators in the death of Cesar. Later, Brutus and Cassius lead opposing armies into battle against each other. Seeing the futility of all they have done, Cassius and Brutus each order their own men to kill them. Octavius then orders Brutus be buried honorably, for he was the noblest of all Romans.

5) "King Lear": King Lear has divided his kingdom and given Goneril and Regan, two of his three daughters, each a part of the kingdom because the youngest daughter (Cordelia), previously his favorite, would not sing his praises at the dividing of the kingdom. Cordelia vanishes and goes to France with her husband, the prince. Lear attempts to get his two oldest daughters to take care of him, but neither wants anything to do with him. They treat him poorly, leading him to go mad and wander the moors. Meanwhile, Goneril and Regan plot to overthrow each other leading to many deaths. In the end, Cordelia returns with an army to save her father. Goneril poisons and kills Regan and later commits suicide. Cordelia's army is defeated and she is put to death. Her father dies of a broken heart after seeing her dead.

6) "Macbeth": Due to an ill-timed prophecy from the three witches, Macbeth, under the guidance of his ambitious wife, kills the king to take the crown for himself. In his increasing guilt and paranoia, he kills many people he perceives are against him. He is finally beheaded by Macduff after Macbeth had Macduff's entire family assassinated. The "evilness" of Macbeth and the Lady Macbeth's reign comes to a bloody end.

7) " Othello ": Angry that he was overlooked for a promotion, Iago plots to overthrow Othello by telling lies and getting Othello to cause his own downfall. Through rumors and paranoia, Othello murders his wife, Desdemona, believing she has cheated on him. Later, the truth comes out and Othello kills himself in his grief. Iago is arrested and is ordered to be executed.

8) "Romeo and Juliet": Two star-crossed lovers, who are destined to be enemies because of the feud between their two families, fall in love. Many people try to keep them apart, and several lose their lives. The teens decide to run away together so that they can wed. To fool her family, Juliet sends a messenger with news of her "death" so they will not pursue her and Romeo. Romeo hears the rumor, believing it to be true, and when he sees Juliet's "corpse," he kills himself. Juliet wakes up and discovers her lover dead and kills herself to be with him.

9) "Timon of Athens": Timon is a kind, friendly Athenian nobleman who has many friends because of his generosity. Unfortunately, that generosity eventually causes him to go into debt. He asks his friends to help him financially, but they all refuse. Timons invites his friends over for a banquet where he serves them only water and denounces them; Timons then goes to live in a cave outside of Athens, where he finds a stash of gold. An Athenian army general, Alcibiades, who has been banished from Athens for other reasons, finds Timons. Timons offers Alcibiades gold, which the general uses to bribe the army to march on Athens. A band of pirates also visits Timons, who offers them gold to attack Athens, which they do. Timons even sends his faithful servant away and ends up alone.

10) "Titus Andronicus": After a successful 10-year war campaign, Titus Andronicus is betrayed by the new emperor, Saturninus, who marries Tamora, Queen of the Goths, and despises Titus for killing her sons and capturing her. Titus's remaining children are framed, murdered, or raped, and Titus is sent into hiding. He later cooks up a revenge plot in which he kills Tamora's remaining two sons and causes the deaths of his daughter, Tamora, Saturninus, and himself. By the end of the play, only four people remain alive: Lucius (Titus's only surviving child), young Lucius (Lucius's son), Marcus (Titus's brother), and Aaron the Moor (Tamora's former lover). Erin is put to death and Lucius becomes the new emperor of Rome.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Makes Shakespeare's Tragedies Tragic?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shakespeare is perhaps most famous for his tragedies-indeed, many consider " Hamlet" to be the best play ever written. Other tragedies include " Romeo and Juliet," " Macbeth" and "King Lear," all of which are immediately recognizable, regularly studied, and frequently performed. In all, Shakespeare wrote 10 tragedies.

# data[].attributes.body
Talks about the differences of modern and classical tragedy  https://penandthepad.com/difference-between-classical-modern-tragedy-literature-12288215.html

https://www.bl.uk/shakespeare/articles/an-introduction-to-shakespearean-tragedy

# data[].attributes.body
In Doctor Faustus , Christopher Marlowe complicates his story by incorporating debates about faith, power and the pursuit of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Analysis Pages

Marlowe based the The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus, commonly called Doctor Faustus, off of the German legend The History of the Damnable Life and Deserved Death of Doctor John Faustus. Though the source text shares a very similar story of a scholar selling his soul for knowledge and power, Marlowe complicates his story by incorporating contemporary debates about faith, power, and the pursuit of knowledge. The Renaissance, a movement that began in Italy and valued education, human interests, and the individual rather than theological concerns, coincided with the Protestant Reformation, a religious movement that challenged Catholic doctrine in places such as Germany and England. Both movements challenged the social, religious, and political frameworks that shaped the medieval world. Humanism, a cultural and intellectual movement that rejected medieval scholasticism in favor of ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, is particularly important to understanding Doctor Faustus. Like Shakespeare and other contemporaries, Marlowe includes numerous allusions and references to ancient Greek and Roman literature.

Versions of the Text: While originally composed between 1588 and 1592, Doctor Faustus was not printed until 1604. This version of the text is referred to as the "A Text." The "B Text" was published in 1616. It is significantly longer and altered to comply with censorship laws that were passed in 1604. Additions to this text reference people and events that occurred after Marlowe died. Thus, the "A Text" is considered to be closer to Marlowe's original.

Historical Context Examples in Doctor Faustus:

Analysis Pages

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Analysis Pages Marlowe based the The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus, commonly called Doctor Faustus, off of the German legend The History of the Damnable Life and Deserved Death of Doctor John Faustus.

# data[].attributes.body
A short introduction to Shakespearean Tragedy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An introduction to Shakespearean tragedy | The British Library

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By using this site, you agree we can set and use cookies. For more details of these cookies and how to disable them, see our cookie policy. An introduction to Shakespearean tragedy Despite their dazzling diversity, the tragedies of Shakespeare gain their enduring power from a shared dramatic vision, argues Kiernan Ryan.

# data[].attributes.body
General Tragedy overview https://owlcation.com/humanities/Shakespearean-Tragedy-Definition-and-Characteristics-of-Shakespearean-Tragedy

# data[].attributes.body
Found some general biography information on Christopher Marlowe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Christopher Marlowe (baptized Feb. 26, 1564, Canterbury, Kent, Eng.-died May 30, 1593, Deptford, near London) was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse.

Early years

Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first schooling, but on Jan. 14, 1579, he entered the King's School, Canterbury, as a scholar. A year later he went to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Obtaining his bachelor of arts degree in 1584, he continued in residence at Cambridge-which may imply that he was intending to take Anglican orders. In 1587, however, the university hesitated about granting him the master's degree; its doubts (arising from his frequent absences from the university) were apparently set at rest when the Privy Council sent a letter declaring that he had been employed "on matters touching the benefit of his country"-apparently in Elizabeth I's secret service.

Last years and literary career.

After 1587 Marlowe was in London, writing for the theatres, occasionally getting into trouble with the authorities because of his violent and disreputable behaviour, and probably also engaging himself from time to time in government service. Marlowe won a dangerous reputation for "atheism," but this could, in Elizabeth I's time, indicate merely unorthodox religious opinions. In Robert Greene's deathbed tract, Greenes groats-worth of witte, Marlowe is referred to as a "famous gracer of Tragedians" and is reproved for having said, like Greene himself, "There is no god" and for having studied "pestilent Machiuilian pollicie." There is further evidence of his unorthodoxy, notably in the denunciation of him written by the spy Richard Baines and in the letter of Thomas Kyd to the lord keeper in 1593 after Marlowe's death. Kyd alleged that certain papers "denying the deity of Jesus Christ" that were found in his room belonged to Marlowe, who had shared the room two years before. Both Baines and Kyd suggested on Marlowe's part atheism in the stricter sense and a persistent delight in blasphemy. Whatever the case may be, on May 18, 1593, the Privy Council issued an order for Marlowe's arrest; two days later the poet was ordered to give daily attendance on their lordships "until he shall be licensed to the contrary." On May 30, however, Marlowe was killed by Ingram Frizer, in the dubious company of Nicholas Skeres and Robert Poley, at a lodging house in Deptford, where they had spent most of the day and where, it was alleged, a fight broke out between them over the bill.

In a playwriting career that spanned little more than six years, Marlowe's achievements were diverse and splendid. Perhaps before leaving Cambridge he had already written Tamburlaine the Great (in two parts, both performed by the end of 1587; published 1590). Almost certainly during his later Cambridge years, Marlowe had translated Ovid's Amores ( The Loves) and the first book of Lucan's Pharsalia from the Latin. About this time he also wrote the play Dido, Queen of Carthage (published in 1594 as the joint work of Marlowe and Thomas Nashe). With the production of Tamburlaine he received recognition and acclaim, and playwriting became his major concern in the few years that lay ahead. Both parts of Tamburlaine were published anonymously in 1590, and the publisher omitted certain passages that he found incongruous with the play's serious concern with history; even so, the extant Tamburlaine text can be regarded as substantially Marlowe's. No other of his plays or poems or translations was published during his life. His unfinished but splendid poem Hero and Leander -which is almost certainly the finest nondramatic Elizabethan poem apart from those produced by Edmund Spenser-appeared in 1598.

There is argument among scholars concerning the order in which the plays subsequent to Tamburlaine were written. It is not uncommonly held that Faustus quickly followed Tamburlaine and that then Marlowe turned to a more neutral, more "social" kind of writing in Edward II and The Massacre at Paris. His last play may have been The Jew of Malta, in which he signally broke new ground. It is known that Tamburlaine, Faustus, and The Jew of Malta were performed by the Admiral's Men, a company whose outstanding actor was Edward Alleyn, who most certainly played Tamburlaine, Faustus, and Barabas the Jew.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Christopher Marlowe | English Playwright & Poet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Christopher Marlowe was an Elizabethan poet and Shakespeare's most important predecessor in English drama, who is noted especially for his establishment of dramatic blank verse. Marlowe was the second child and eldest son of John Marlowe, a Canterbury shoemaker. Nothing is known of his first

# data[].attributes.body
This article goes in depth about the comparative characteristics and elements of classical v. modern tragedy and how to properly identify them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Main Difference - Classical vs Modern Tragedy

A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores,
1. What is a Classical Tragedy? 2. What is a Modern Tragedy?
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
- Definition, Features, Examples, Elements
3. What is the difference between Classical and Modern Tragedy?

What is a Classical Tragedy

Tragedy is a popular form of drama that originated from Greek literary tradition. Aristotle defines tragedy as a unified work that covers one time span, story, setting, and a main protagonist. The plot of the drama consists of one great, complete action.

The protagonist of classical tragedies is typically from a royal or noble family. Antigone, Oedipus, and Agamemnon are some examples of protagonists in classical tragedies. These brave and noble heroes often face a reversal of fortune. This reversal is typically due to a tragic flaw in the character and the influence of a divine power. Fate also plays a major role in classical tragedies.

Some examples of classical tragedies include Oedipus Rex, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Medea, Antigone and Prometheus Bound.

Given below are some elements of a classical tragedy.

Hamartia - A mistake or a fault that is committed in ignorance; this is usually a mistake made by a morally good person

Hubris - the false pride that leads to ruin; this is the opposite of rectitude

Peripeteia - the reversal fortune

Catharsis - feeling of emotional release felt at the end of the tragedy

What is a Modern Tragedy

Modern drama refers to tragedies that were written and performed from the twentieth century. Some examples of modern tragedies include Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman", "A View from the Bridge", "The Misfits" and David Mamet's "Glengarry Glen Ross are some examples of modern tragedies.

Unlike classical tragedies, modern tragedies are typically centered around ordinary people and their problems. Thus, they are more realistic than classical tragedies. The conflict in modern tragedies are caused by flaws in the characters, society or the law; fate and divine power do not play a major role in modern tragedies. Modern tragedies may also have multiple plots and more than one central character. The action in the story may also span several weeks, months or years - the differences in time is managed by elements such as flashbacks, pauses, flash-forwards, and narrations. Modern playwrights also use elements such as irony and sarcasm to highlight the flaws in characters.

Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy

Characters

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically have one main character.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have more than one central character.

Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: Protagonist is typically from a wealthy, noble or royal family.

Modern Tragedy: Protagonist usually has a common, middle-class background.

Nature of the Protagonist

Classical Tragedy: The protagonist is usually a noble and heroic character, but has a tragic flaw.

Modern Tragedy: The protagonist may be a white, black or gray character.

Plot

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one unified plot.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies may have multiple plots.

Timeline

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies have one time span.

Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies have more realistic time spans; there are breaks and flashbacks.

Story

Classical Tragedy: The story is about nobility or royalty, their ambitions, attempts to unify or save a kingdom, etc.

Modern Tragedy: The story is about ordinary people and their problems, ambitions and aspirations; thus, the stories are more realistic.

Elements

Classical Tragedy: Classical tragedies typically contain elements such as hubris, hamartia, and catharsis.
Image Courtesy: "Bénigne Gagneraux, The Blind Oedipus Commending his Children to the Gods" By Bénigne Gagneraux - Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia "Death of Salesman Set" By Chelsea Tenenbaum - Own work (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Commons Wikimedia
Modern Tragedy: Modern tragedies use elements like irony and sarcasm.

Fate and Divine power

Classical Tragedy: Fate and divine power are important elements in classical tragedies.

Modern Tragedy: Fate and divine power rarely play a role in modern tragedies; they are more concerned with realistic, common problems.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Difference Between Classical and Modern Tragedy | Definition, Features, Examples, Elements

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A tragedy can be defined simply as a play that has a sad and depressing ending. Although both classical and modern tragedies have a tragic ending, there are several differences between them. The main difference between classical and modern tragedy is that classical tragedies have a unified plot with one royal or noble protagonist whereas modern tragedies feature ordinary people with realistic problems. This article explores, 1.

# data[].attributes.body
This website contains Dr. Faustus characters and their descriptions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Everything you ever wanted to know about the characters in Doctor Faustus, written by experts just for you.

# data[].attributes.body
Here's a cool collection about Christoper Marlowe's works and life. It's really cool. :)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Research Guides: Shakespeare Studies: Christopher Marlowe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A guide for students and professors interested in the study of Shakespeare's life and works

# data[].attributes.body
An article about the different characteristics and aspects of ancient vs. modern tragedy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble stature and the transcendent realm of tragedy. One could, in short, measure oneself against the larger, universal background of what constitutes tragedy, as rendered by an Aeschylus and a Sophocles in, respectively, an Agamemnon or an Oedipus. A certain greatness, immensity, and exceptionality surrounded the tragic dimension, even as tragedy connoted something greater than immediate life, from which, of course, it emerged and the reality of which it reflected to a heightened, ultimate degree.

An epic poem like Homer's Iliad is fraught with tragic meaning and destiny, its heroes immense, even overwhelming in their tragic circumstances and predicament-in their fatedness ( moira). Their tragic qualities help to place their tragic experience on the highest level of moral significance. The tragedy of Achilles, like his shield, depicts what is astonishing and enormous in consequence, trans-human and superhuman. His suffering, no less than his weakness and sin ( hamartia), overshadows everything else in the epic tragedy of the Iliad. His demise, unalterable, dramatizes tragic lessons in wisdom and insight for those who discern the spectacle of his glory and destruction. A monumental essence radiates in his every act and gesture, in his heroic praxis and doxai. In association with Achilles, what is terribly human attains its highest measure of worth.

The line of descent and connection from Achilles to Agamemnon to Oedipus to Antigone to Medea is one that discloses a kind of spiritual angst, at once terrifying and redeeming. In these tragic figures and in the dilemma of each hero's agon, we recognize the deeper parts of our extended selves in the undulant process of purification and expiation. In their pathos we perceive our own-and we take note of the redemptive context of reverence. Their tragedy helps us to understand our limits, our limitations. Such tragedy, at once humane and humanizing, helps us to encounter and also to measure our humanity. It enables us to perceive, even if from a distance, what is called, in Hellenic contexts, a "vision of the agathon " as a dimension of a "divine paradigm," and always against the background of those "unwritten laws" that Sophocles describes in Antigone:

"The immortal unwritten laws of Heaven,
they were not born today nor yesterday;
They die not; and none knoweth whence they sprang."

Ancient tragedy, it can be said, has its ground of being in these "laws," these first and last principles, the arche and telos of all human experience and meaning. This is tragedy of transcendence, as it were, with its informing metaphysic in relation to human nothingness ("I count your life as equal to zero," the Chorus cries in Oedipus Rex) and also, in the end, to the suffering which also brings a cleansing self-recognition-a kind of grace at the edge of redemption in the country of the spirit: "Submit, you fool. Submit. In agony learn wisdom," as Aeschylus declares in Prometheus. Ancient tragedy is, thus, the experience of transformation (not "transfiguration" in the later Christian sense), enacted in the contexts of what Goethe terms the "divine worth of tones and tears." That, too, Greek tragedy has, in its unique way, a religious center, even, that is, a spiritual essence, is an incontrovertible fact. For the Greek tragedians, as teachers of virtues, were deeply involved with religious questions-ultimate questions revolving around man's worth and destiny-with some super-human power ( theos), and with man's fate. "The Greeks of the sixth and fifth centuries," writes Werner Jaeger in Paideia (1939-1944), "had long been brooding on the great religious problem: why does God send suffering into the life of man?"

The Greek tragedians, hence, stressed the eternal fact that man must not forget his unconscious and yet transcendent ties to the unwritten laws and his need for reverence ( eusebeia) for the unknown, the mysterious. Their tragedies, in effect, provided a dramatic interpretation of life, both moral and spiritual in principle. And these tragedies, more specifically, focused on some heroic figure-some superior being-in whom some fateful problem was to be enacted, particularly the great religious problem of suffering and sin, of punishment and expiation. "Behind all suffering," G. Lowes Dickinson writes in The Greek View of Life (1896), "behind sin and crime, must lie a redeeming magnanimity." A Greek tragedy, by becoming a "moving sculpture" and "a sleep of music," also was to become a study of Man ( anthropos), finally transporting the audience to a world of higher reality and permanence from the material world of terror and flux.

Clearly, ancient tragedy contains a humanistic orientation: that is, a fervent and consummate preoccupation with the nature of man, his predicament and his fate. Man, in short, is the center, though that center has its added metaphysical dimension, its added center, in the universe (in the cosmos), so that to concentrate solely on the first center to the neglect of the second center breeds arrogance, insolence, impiety, overweening pride- hubris. Aeschylus's Agamemnon depicts precisely this centeredness of the self and images its destructive process when he walks on the purple carpets reserved only for the Gods and thus courts punishment and doom itself. He glorifies what Simone Weil calls "the empire of might" (in all of its consequences) as it collides with the "justice of Zeus," and with the "law of measure" ("nothing in excess," to recall the Greek warning).

Greek tragedy also becomes a drama of discrimination, seeking as it does to present itself as a mode of explaining the world-the human condition-and knowing it. In Sophocles this form of tragedy-of tragic discrimination-affirms man's greatness in the face of cruel adversity; affirms man's heroic capacity within the scope of a heroism of dignity, which constitutes, for the ancients, true humility and final redemption. Sophocles, in this respect, is a tragic poet of order, reverence, proportion, above all, of sophrosyne, the supreme Hellenic virtue.

Attic tragedy records the disorder of eros and the yearning for order; it records, in effect, the constant collision between gravity and grace, between disequilibrium and equilibrium, between nothingness and being, between courage and nihilism. Tragedy, of its very nature, must bear "the burden of vision" for eternity itself. It should not go unnoticed that ancient and modern tragedy do have a connecting link in Euripides, the perturbing Greek dramatist who, as Jaeger was to observe, "discovered the soul in a new sense-who revealed the troubled world of man's emotions and passions."

Unlike Aeschylus and Sophocles, Euripides confronted the cold, hard face of reality as he saw it; showed fierce understanding of what he saw; and fiercely condemned those conditions that he exposed. Indeed, Euripides has been described as a dramatist who had a "modern mind," the first of the moderns; Aristophanes, in fact, charged that Euripides taught the Athenians to "think, see, understand, suspect, question everything," and no words better prophesy the "modern temper" than these.

That, too, Euripides belonged essentially to a destructive analytical spirit, that he took things rebelliously, that he reflected an age of movement and transition, that he echoed the sophistic spirit, that all truth is relative-it is this sophism that Plato equated with intellectual and moral anarchy: these aspects of his thought and dramatic achievement anticipate the modern age and what Thomas Hardy specifies as "the ache of modernism." In Euripides we have a prophetic glimpse of the crisis of modernism in the destructive forms of disorder, discontinuity, disinheritance: of a modern world that is "a broken center," when as Rilke declares, "the world...passed out of the hands of God into the hands of men."

Walter Pater cogently summarizes our modernity when he writes: "Modern thought is distinguished from ancient by its cultivation of the 'relative spirit' in place of the 'absolute."' This modernity, pervasive and irreversible, spells the "doom of orthodox sophrosyne," which signifies the law of measure. The Russian poet F. I. Tiutshev (1803-1873) registers the modern predicament when he writes in his poem "The Abyss":

Behold man, without home,
orphaned, alone, impotent,
facing the dark abyss; ...
And in this strange mysterious night
he sees and knows a Fatal heritage.

The "fatal heritage" that Tiutshev speaks of in his poem is also that which Matthew Arnold, in his poem "The Scholar Gypsy," associates with "this strange disease of modern life/ With its sick hurry, its divided aims." William Butler Yeats, in "The Second Coming" (1919), also underlines the ravages and the desperation of such a heritage of fatal consequences in modern life: "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;/ Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world."

In his book The End of the Modern World (1956) Romano Guardini declares that "Man has no place-absolutely no place-in the universe," words that embody not only the essence of modernity but also its tragic essences that culminate in the modern waste land that T.S. Eliot renders. The sustaining and redeeming principles of conservation and correction espoused by Edmund Burke, as well as the disciplines of continuity intimately connected with these, have been superseded, or contravened, by what the philosopher Michael Polanyi calls a "positivistic empiricism," or as he further observes: "...[the] idea of unlimited progress, intensified to perfectionism, has combined with our sharpened skepticism to produce the perilous state of the modern mind."

Human meaning, then, is "reduced to the condition of things," reduced, in effect, to a concern with "the idea of man...[as an] administrative number," without a past and without memory, when, as Samuel Beckett declares, "it is not for man to act, but to be acted upon: man can only despair of hope, can only not wait or wait." Spiritual inertia, which results from this process of cruel reductionism in a pluralist society, leads to a malaise that afflicts human existence and that adopts, for example, the belief that, in Simone Weil's words, "matter is a machine for manufacturing good."

Such a belief plunges modern man deeper into Plato's "Cave of Illusion" and renounces the redemption that resides in humility, perhaps the highest spiritual quality to be found in the "tragic sense of life": "Without humility, all the virtues are finite," Simone Weil further states. "Only humility makes them infinite." Indeed, humility is the omega-point of a metaphysics of tragedy-of tragic meaning, experience, destiny. It is a paradigm of tragedy, which if it is scorned or repudiated leads precisely to the annihilation of the tragic spirit that makes tragedy non-tragic in modern life; in short, transforms tragedy into paradox, which thrusts one "beyond tragedy," that also signalizes "the death of tragedy."

Nicola Chiaromonte, the late Italian social critic (1905-1972), is much to the point when he writes concerning the nihilism and violated principles shaping and finally destroying human meaning in modern civilization:

"The sickness of our times is egomania. It renders the individual radically impious and makes him ignore everything that does not serve his immediate objectives (which never extended beyond the limits of his own lifetime), thereby denying all that is ineffable, secret, and arcane in the world-the 'divine' inherent in all things and in every impulse of the spirit."

Impiety, that which for Virgil constituted an ultimate discordance found in furor impius, is a major part of the disorientation in modern life that breaks and diminishes the patience and magnanimity that inhere redemptively in genuine tragic experience as it depicts the search for order of the soul. "No-more'' and "Not-yet," Heidegger's "double Not," now make the tragic sense a "senseless fatality"; the so-called modern hero is just "anybody," just another "sleep-walker'' in "kosmos Kafka," for whom "eternity is replaced by endlessness" and who bleakly gives us news, as Kafka would have it, of "the abandoned world" in which he lives.

In the modern age, which one critic terms "an age of bad faith" commencing with August 1914, when the Great War broke out, tragic vision and experience undergo a radical change-a devaluative pulverizing process in which what for the ancients is noble, elevated, and heroic now becomes trivial, minimal, and common. A modern victim's tragedy lacks stature or grandeur, and is often one that underlines a victim's grotesqueness, meaninglessness, rootlessness, his absurdity, his non-being. In the modern world in which the idea of transcendence has neither place nor meaning tragedy itself is a victim of what Eric Voegelin calls "existential deformation."

If in ancient tragedy a tragic hero is shrouded in a world of mystery, possesses a noumenal quality of human worth, has a standard of character in an ascending pattern of development and meaning, in modern tragedy a tragic figure is identified by demystification and by dehumanization, by lostness and rootlessness. His world, in a sense, has no universal frontiers and is reduced in its physical and spiritual horizons; that is, it is a localized, non-ontological, non-organic world in which man himself is reduced, or neutralized, or denatured; a disinherited, displaced person, as it were, and, indeed, a non-person consigned to a "cancer ward," or exiled, forever, to a Siberian gulag, the modern forms of tragic fate in "the heart of darkness." These are our conditions of modern tragedy, or better our pseudonyms of tragedy.

In the ancient world tragedy contained and was nourished by the "religious sense," that is to say, by the elements of piety and humility, by an intuitive veneration of "the idea of the holy," of the sacred logos as opposed to the profane impulse, by an intuitive pull towards the transcendent as opposed to the present and the nominal. Sophocles's Oedipus at Colonus is perhaps the most vivid illustration of the religious sense and of the religious acceptation in a tragic context. Oedipus, now an exile and wanderer, recognizes his moira -''In suffering I was born." "The sap of earth dries up," he confesses almost abjectly.

"Flesh dies, and while faith withers falsehood blooms.
The spirit is not constant from friend to friend, from city to city;
it changes, soon or late."

His end, in a scene that is perhaps grander than any in Greek tragedy, we view the aged and blind Oedipus disappearing into a sacred grove-"And the place is holy." Oedipus now encounters the " mysterium tremendum ":

...suddenly a Voice called him, a terrifying voice at which all trembled and hair stood on end. A god was calling to him. "Oedipus! Oedipus!" it cried, again and again. "It is time: you stay too long." He heard the summons, and knew that it was from God.

Oedipus passes from the human world to the divine-to "holy ground." His end, his disappearance into the divine unknown, into the divine otherness, emphasizes the religious sense as it conjoins with the tragic sense, each deepening and enhancing the other in relation to the huge cosmic mystery, wondrous in its breadth and depth.

This religious sense, in its Hellenic constituents, should not be forcibly amalgamated or confused with the religious sense in its Christian contexts. Oedipus's tragic passion and fate, whatever their religious feeling and pull, must be differentiated from the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The religious dimension of Greek tragedy revolves around moral struggle, but it is obviously removed from the Christian vision of redemption. Greek tragic heroes are finite beings even in their religious nobility, whereas a Christian tragic hero (as in the fiction of a Dostoevsky) is a creature of freedom, sin, guilt, and salvation.

Greek tragedy venerates the transcendent, in its awe and sanctity, but it is teleological in its experiential qualities of pity and terror. The eschatological character of the Christian religious sense must not be ignored-that subsuming religious sense that has its ultimates in the coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the Last Judgment. Both Greek tragedy and modern tragedy are anchored in time, in chronos-in measured time that has a beginning and ending; that has boundaries at once temporal and spatial. For the Christian, on the other hand, all tragedy ends in grace, attains its finality, its telos, in ultimate time, in kairos, in that time, to kairo ekino: in divine time that is timeless and that fuses beginnings and endings, endings and beginnings.

For the Christian, tragedy ends not in the heroic suffering of the Greeks or in the perverse skepticism of the moderns, but in Revelation. "For those who have faith to trust in the revelation that is the Christ," Preston T. Roberts, Jr., writes in a masterful essay, "A Christian Theory of Dramatic Tragedy," "evil, sin, the devil, death-in short all that is cursed, wretched, and miserable about this life-becomes redeemable in principle and redeemed at certain points and moments in fact."

Modern tragedy, having increasingly repudiated the religious sense that radiated in and even renewed ancient tragedy by endowing it with a metaphysical yearning, registers the nothingness, the "nameless, ultimate fear, a horror of the completely negative," that Dr. F.R. Leavis perceives in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land (1922):

After the torchlight red on sweaty faces
After the frosty silence in the garden
After the agony in stony places
The shouting and the crying
Prison and palace and reverberation
Of thunder of spring over distant mountains
He who was living is now dead
We who were living are now dying
With a little patience.

It can be said that modern tragedy is the tragedy of experiencing "the agony in stony places" and yet learning nothing from this tragic experience: or of hearing the " ou-boum" ("utterly dull") which, in E. M. Forster's novel A Passage to India (1924), merely states, now and forever, in this world and in all worlds, "Everything exists, nothing has value." Forster's words evoke the import of tragedy in the modern world even as they severely constrict the boundaries of tragic vision. This constriction signals not only the crisis of modernity but also the tragedy of modernity as we live and experience it in the "antagonist world."
Reprinted with the gracious permission of Modern Age (Fall 1997).
The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics-we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In the ancient world the perimeters of tragic vision and experience were clearly established and recognized. One could be quite clear as to the meaning of tragedy and the manifestations of tragic experience and tragic heroism. One could readily comprehend the noble

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about Shakespearean Tragedy. The things it includes and and elements. Also, it's origin and how it started.