# data[].attributes.body
The ongoing trade and changes that are all over the news presently are about China's exports and imports and how our president reflects on these topics. China is one of the primary sources that United States has benefitted from with their growth economically the gap between non negotiations and conflicts is rising. The GDP is measurable when referring to the benefits both countries receive by the exchanges of goods. Profitable exchanges and growth prospectives makes this topic at the center of the economics. Although some of the exchanges between countries involves interactions and promises like the Chinese government’s promise to purchase $40-50bn of agricultural products should help American farmers (assuming that the sales happen at a sufficiently high price). Tis does not mean it will see better outcomes for future reproductive possibility.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
COULD IT be a ceasefire at last? After months of rising tension and threats of ever higher tariffs, American and Chinese negotiators agreed to a mini-truce on October 11th. In exchange for America holding off on a tariff increase planned for October 15th, the Chinese government offered to buy American agricultural products. China also pledged to do more to liberalise its financial services sector, tighten up its intellectual property rules and be more transparent with its interventions in currency markets. President Donald Trump described the talks as "a love fest".

The details of the agreement are still unclear. Chinese state media did not even describe it as a deal, instead saying that substantial progress had been made in talks. Still, a ceasefire is better than higher tariffs and it might produce real gains. More transparency for China's opaque currency regime, for example, would not hurt. The same day, in state-run media, China announced a timetable for liberalising the financial services sector, which should benefit the Chinese economy as well as foreign companies.
Get our daily newsletter
Yet the agreement, such as it is, seems more like a demonstration of goodwill than a resolution of the trade dispute. America's concession is minor: although a tariff increase from 25% to 30% on around $250bn of imports from China will no longer go ahead, other tariffs are still scheduled to rise on December 15th. The Chinese government's promise to purchase $40-50bn of agricultural products should help American farmers (assuming that the sales happen at a sufficiently high price). But trade is supposed to be about markets, not state intervention; trade experts fear that a move towards "managed trade" will further undermine the global trading system. China's announced reforms to financial services are largely a restatement of old promises and may well not be implemented effectively. Lifting restrictions on foreign ownership within finance, for example, is not much use if the government then uses other regulations to hinder American companies.

The big question for American businesses is whether this detente will hold. Progress so far seems to have been achieved by negotiators compartmentalising their differences. Mr Trump called the agreement "phase one" and added that the final deal would be so big that it would have to be completed sequentially. When negotiators move on to China's subsidies, state-owned enterprises or data policies, talks are likely to get trickier.

There are also live disputes that go beyond just trade. Robert Lighthizer, the United States Trade Representative, said that the matter of Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications giant that faces restrictions on its ability to sell to American companies owing to security concerns, was not part of the current round of discussions. On October 7th the Trump administration added 28 Chinese companies to its "entity list", making it harder for them to do business with America, in response to the Chinese government's human-rights abuses in the province of Xinjiang. A Chinese spokesman labelled the move "a grave violation of basic norms governing international relations and a flagrant interference in China's internal affairs."

For now the atmosphere among the trade negotiators has clearly improved. But truces have emerged before, only to collapse under a barrage of tweets. Ominously the two sides offered neither a joint statement nor a formal text setting out the deal. It is possible that, as in past rounds of talks, there are still misunderstandings that will only become apparent as the deal is formalised. The love fest may not endure.

Over the coming weeks negotiators will try to hammer out the precise details. Mr Trump will then meet Mr Xi in Chile during a meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum on November 13th and 14th, where he hopes to sign the text. Even if the two leaders do put pen to paper, businesses will still face immense uncertainty and hefty tariffs. The end of phase one may be in sight. But the end of this conflict is not.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A mini-truce between America and China has investors feeling hopeful

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
COULD IT be a ceasefire at last? After months of rising tension and threats of ever higher tariffs, American and Chinese negotiators agreed to a mini-truce on October 11th. In exchange for America holding off on a tariff increase planned for October 15th, the Chinese government offered to buy American agricultural products.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose this article because of its graphs and how it discusses inflation, in the first part of the article explains the differences of how in the 1970s inflation was about introducing the WIN. Todays policies are more so to benefit the higher beneficiary. Selected countries market capitalism by distributing a percentage. An interesting point in one of the graphs was measuring the population and its livelihood. For example Englewood’s population is 25,000, nearly 40% smaller than in 2000, as people have fled violence, poverty and poor housing. This suggested that using life expectancy in a state that is experiencing high levels of disparity can result in shorter lives. This can relate to many aspects of population contribution to development and economics.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
IN THE mid-1970s Gerald Ford, America's president, distributed buttons bearing the acronym WIN, for "whip inflation now". Nowadays policymakers strive to revive inflation rather than thrash it into submission. In rich economies rates above 2% are rare; inflation has tumbled in developing economies, too. Our special report this week argues that the anchoring of inflation expectations, technological change and globalisation have conspired to make inflation a less meaningful indicator. Policy has to adapt to the strange new rules that now govern economies.
Get our daily newsletter

Three years after Saudi Arabia's crown prince, Muhammad bin Salman, suggested floating up to 5% of Saudi Aramco, the world's biggest oil company is eager to get the job done. It may well announce its intentions this month. It is making plans to list at first on the Tadawul, Riyadh's stockmarket, which it would dominate, even if the company is valued well below the $2trn the prince first hoped for. Some international investors have voiced concern about a lack of liquidity on the Saudi exchange.

India's banks have had problems for a long time. But concern is turning to panic. A run on PMC, an Indian co-operative bank, is in its third week. PMC's troubles have investors on edge. Shares in most listed banks have suffered and those of one, Yes Bank, have collapsed by 40% in the past month. Concern also swirls around India's shadow banks, which back long-term loans with short-term debt; some are suffering a severe funding squeeze. Perhaps a tenth of all loans, maybe more, are dud. Cleaning up the financial system is a gigantic but necessary task.

A baby born in Streeterville, a prosperous district served by the Red Line on the "L", Chicago's rapid-transit system, can expect to live for 90 years. That is 30 years longer than an infant born in the most blighted parts of Englewood, farther south on the same line. No American city has a bigger gap. Englewood's population is 25,000, nearly 40% smaller than in 2000, as people have fled violence, poverty and poor housing.

The Nobel science prizes for 2019 were awarded this week. Half of the physics prize went to Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz, who in 1995 were the first researchers to discover a planet beyond the solar system-a mere 50 light-years away. Their method relies on the Doppler effect: as a planet orbits its star, its gravity causes the star to move, which in turn causes the frequency of the starlight reaching Earth to oscillate-in the same way as the frequency of an ambulance siren shifts as the vehicle passes you in the street. The other half-prize went to James Peebles, who turned cosmology into a rigorous discipline.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
IN THE mid-1970s Gerald Ford, America's president, distributed buttons bearing the acronym WIN, for "whip inflation now". Nowadays policymakers strive to revive inflation rather than thrash it into submission. In rich economies rates above 2% are rare; inflation has tumbled in developing economies, too.

# data[].attributes.body
This article reminds me of how other countries can gain and what they can obtain when country is having a difficult time in the economy.When someone is in hardships another will prosper. Singapore using the failure that hong king is having to regain the shipping hub and commercial inventories on the coast of Asian. It open its doors to more tourist Singapore saw an increase of 4% on the other hand in Hong Kong they saw a decrease of 39%. Tourist contribute to more availability and therefore access to opportunities.

# data[].attributes.body
Stocks and scares is the title of this article that encompasses international events that produce more income to certain areas, In Japan for example no tax is popular but consumption tax has an unusually fraught history. The article gives an example of how much booze is hold in local bars where World cups are held. Small businesses run out of alcohol because of the high increase of people visiting while following their favorite team. I found this very interesting because you just assume the amount of people entering different countries not realizing that they may not accommodate everyones needs. This incoming could support different countries by allowing more people to consume and help support the economy in that particular country for a short period.

# data[].attributes.headline
"you can keep some of the people down some of the time, and most of the people down most of the time, but you can’t keep all of the people down all of the time.” 

# data[].attributes.subject
"you can keep some of the people down some of the time, and most of the people down most of the time, but you can’t keep all of the people down all of the time.” 

# data[].attributes.body
Powerful statement that is logical. Based on an article found in the economist return from Gilead. Margaret Atwood wrote a book and explains in this article all the actions taken by women who portray a book named "The Handmaids Tale" it refers to women's oppression. Women dress in special clothing that represents  without any verbal interactions what they symbolize. The article states that Ms. Atwood believes while we were turning in the 21st century towards equality we are now turning backwards. It involves politics and politicians who promise a better future but not for everyone. The sequel to “The Handmaid’s Tale” explores the workings of repression