# data[].attributes.body
how does this link to devotion-object activity.

# data[].attributes.body
extra news story

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A man who had worked at the same railway station for 44 years says he has been left "completely shattered" by being fired for trying to take a 20 minute break during an eight hour shift.

Peter Lee, 60, has worked as a railway signalman at Arundel Station for his entire life and says he had never been disciplined for his behaviour before the incident.

But in May this year he was dismissed by Network Rail for gross misconduct for wanting to take a 20 minute break on his eight hour shift.

"They have taken everything from me," he said.

'It's my whole life'

"I started here as a box boy when I was 16 - it's my whole life, and it's completely shattered.

Read more: High street losing 50,000 jobs this year so far - the list in full

"I have given them everything and they have just cut it off for want of a rest break."

Mr Lee first won the right to take legal rest breaks in 2015 after following Network Rail's own grievance procedure.

The Working Time Regulations Act 1998 states anyone working more than six hours at a time is entitled to a 20-minute rest break.

The result of Mr Lee's action meant that workers at the station were able to take a 20 minute break on their eight hour early or late shift, Monday to Saturday, but not during the 12 hour shifts on Sundays.

Shifts left him 'absolutely drained'

As a signalman, Mr Lee said he moved 36 trains an hour, operated CCTV crossings and level crossings, various occupational crossings for farmers and machinery moving across the line, and monitored track worker safety and blockages as part of his responsibilities.

"It's a myriad of things. You've got to be alert at all times and you can't be away from the panel as there is a train on it at every minute of every day. You've got to regulate the service, that's the hardest part. My manager always said we think of you as air traffic control," he said, adding that there is barely any time to use the toilet during the shift unless on a break.

"I come away from that signal box absolutely drained, and that's just on an eight hour shift," he added. "Try working on a Sunday."

Lack of cover

On 8 January, Mr Lee said he arrived at work to be told his break that Thursday was cancelled as there would be no-one to cover for him.

He said he had found three other people on the rota who could have covered his break, and informed his manager he would still take the 20 minutes he was entitled to, insisting it was his legal right.

The signalman then called up the surrounding stations and warned them not to send any trains through. He claimed this action resulted in one train out of the 36 that usually come through the area being delayed by 20 minutes.

But when he began shutting the signal box, which takes around 30 minutes, two of his managers arrived to inform him he had been suspended.

'I would never put anyone in danger'

"I never got the chance to close the signal box as the managers approached me to suspend me before I could," said Mr Lee.

"I found three people who could have done that job and nope, they sacked me instead," he said.

"I would never put anyone travelling or working on the railway in any danger."

He was suspended with full pay until 18 May, when he was dismissed.

Dismissal upheld

A spokesman for Network Rail said Mr Lee had closed a signal box "at the height of the weekday rush hour," a claim that Mr Lee refutes.

They said: "It is true that he gave notice of this intention, but he was given a direct instruction by management not to do so, was reminded of the agreed process that was in place and advised of the potential consequences."

"He was therefore disciplined for gross misconduct in failing to follow a reasonable management instruction.

"His dismissal was later upheld at appeal," the spokesperson said. The appeal was conducted by Network Rail.

'Duty to protect public'

"Network Rail has a duty to protect members of the public and staff, together with upholding the operational integrity and safe running of the railway, the spokesperson added.

Read more: Government plans to help ex-offenders back into work could boost economy, supporters say

"The provision of an additional member of staff for meal break relief at Arundel was agreed collectively with the trade unions following a grievance procedure in 2015.

"The agreement includes a process for financial recompense when a meal break is not able to be provided due to short notice sickness, vacancies etc.

"The signaller is well aware of this process, having received payments as part of the local agreement on more than 20 occasions.

"If a meal break cannot be provided we work around it and agree a course of action with staff.

"This local agreement has generally worked well, the right to a break being balanced with the requirement to continually operate a train service.

"The agreement recognises that if an uninterrupted break is not provided, staff will not close the signal box as this would cause significant disruption to the travelling public, as happened in this case."

Protest held

Mr Lee has denied the claim that he received payments as part of the local agreement.

A petition against the dismissal has gained more than 6,300 signatures and Mr Lee conducted a protest at Arundel Station on Monday.

A spokesman from the union for Rail, Maritime and Train workers (RMT) said: "RMT has supported Brother Lee throughout the disciplinary process. We continue to provide him with that support and the union is currently in the process of preparing an industrial action ballot."

Next week Mr Lee plans to travel to Network Rail's offices with members of his local RMT branch to hand in his petition and protest outside the headquarters.

RMT has made an application to take Mr Lee's case to employment tribunal.
The original source of this article is the West Sussex County Times
Read more on employment: Self-employed people are happier at work despite the precarious hours Wagamama, TGI Friday's and Marriott Hotels named and shamed for underpaying thousands of minimum wage workers
I lost everything when I became a refugee - but finding work has helped me to rebuild my life

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Railway man fired after 44 years at the same station for trying to take 20-minute break

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A man who had worked at the same railway station for 44 years says he has been left "completely shattered" by being fired for trying to take a 20 minute break during an eight hour shift.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jonny Brownlee helped over line by brother Alistair

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Three basic items are worn during Jewish prayer: head covering, prayer shawl, and phylacteries - in Hebrew, kippah, tallit, and tefillin.

Kippah: Head Covering

The kippah (in Yiddish, yarmulke) is worn during prayer services by men, and has become optional for women as well in Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist congregations. (In some Reform congregations, the kippah is also optional for men.) Jewish tradition does not require any specific type of head covering.

A kippah can be worn conveniently under a street hat, as was the custom of most Jews in the first half of the 20th century. It is still the practice of many Orthodox Jewish men to wear a head covering throughout the day, not just during prayer. (One tradition holds that a Jewish man should not walk more than four cubits in any direction with an uncovered head.)

Tallit: Prayer Shawl

The tallit is a large rectangular shawl made of wool, cotton or synthetic fibers. In each of the four corners of the shawl are strings tied in a particular pattern, called tzitzit. The origin of the tzitzit is biblical; the practice is prescribed in Numbers 15. The precept is to put these strings on the four corners of one's garment - in ancient tradition, with a single strand of blue as well-as a reminder of the duties and obligations of a Jew. Since we no longer wear four-cornered garments, the tallit is worn specifically to fulfill the biblical precept.

Traditionally, men wear a tallit during morning services; in non-Orthodox synagogues, many women also wear a tallit. In some Orthodox congregations, only married men wear a tallit. One may see people gathering the tzitzit in their left hand and kissing them when the paragraph from the Torah referring to them is recited.

Tefillin: Phylacteries

The tefillin consist of two black leather boxes and straps to hold them on. One is worn on the biceps, and its strap, which is tied with a special knot, is wound by the wearer seven times around the forearm and hand-on the left arm for right-handed people and on the right for those who are left-handed. The second box is worn on the forehead at the hairline, with its straps going around the back of the head, connected at the top of the neck with a special knot, and hanging in front on each side.

Four passages in the Torah call upon the Israelites to keep God's words in mind by "bind[ing] them as a sign upon [their] hands and making them totafot [an enigmatic term] between [their] eyes." Tefillin, as ordained by the rabbinic leaders of classical Judaism, are intended to fulfill that commandment.

The tefillin are worn during morning services except on Shabbat or festivals. Most men wear tefillin in Orthodox and Conservative congregations, as do some women in Conservative congregations. The use of tefillin is less prominent in Reform and Reconstructionist congregations by both men and women. Inside the tefillin are handwritten parchments with texts from the four passages mentioned above.
Learn how to buy tefillin. Learn how to put on tefillin.
Gartel

Some men in Hasidic communities wear a cloth belt, called a gartel, during prayer. Some take it as a symbol of "girding one's loins with strength" - a potent biblical image.

The use of special garments for prayer is full of historic and contemporary symbolism. One envelops oneself in the tallit, creating a private space for prayer and meditation in the midst of the larger congregation, its tzitzit providing a reminder of one's duties and obligations as a Jew. The binding of the arm and the head with tefillin reminds the wearer to use her or his physical and mental powers for the service of God throughout the day, controlling action and thought in order to bring blessing to others and self. Jewish men have been wearing these items for more than two millennia, and so they are a powerful symbol of continuity over time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kippah, Tallit and Tefillin | My Jewish Learning

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Three basic items are worn during Jewish prayer: head covering, prayer shawl, and phylacteries - in Hebrew, kippah, tallit, and tefillin. The kippah (in Yiddish, yarmulke) is worn during prayer services by men, and has become optional for women as well in Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist congregations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Piers Morgan Debates Headscarf Ban With Muslim Women | Good Morning Britain

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
There is only one way to show devotion assessment