# data[].attributes.body
Maximum 6 points
Examiner gives 5 points

# data[].attributes.body
Maximum 6 points
Examiner gives 6 points

# data[].attributes.body
Maximum 12 points
Examiner gives 11 points

# data[].attributes.body
Maximum 4 points
Examiner gives 4 points

# data[].attributes.body
Maximum 6 points
Examiner did not grade (<2018)

# data[].attributes.body
Topic is communicated accurately and effectively.

The research question is clearly stated and focused.

Methodology of the research is complete.

# data[].attributes.body
Knowledge and Understanding is excellent.

Use of terminology and concepts is good.

If the topic or research question is deemed inappropriate for the subject in which the essay is registered no more than 4 marks can be awarded for this criterion.

# data[].attributes.body
The research is excellent.

Analysis is excellent.

Discussion and Evaluation is excellent.

Research is appropriate to the research question; is analysed effectively and clearly focused.

Conclusions to individual points of analysis are effectively supported by evidence.

An effective and focused reasoned argument is developed from the research with a conclusion reflective of the evidence presented.

This reasoned argument is well-structured and coherent.

The research has been critically evauated.

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation is good.

Structure of essay is appropriate in terms of expected conventions.

Layout are present and applied correctly.

Structure and layout support reading, understanding, and evaluation of the essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Engagement is excellent.

Reflections on Decision-making and planning are evaluative and include reference to the student's capacity to consider actions and ideas in response to challenges experienced in the research process.

These reflections communicate a higher degree of intellectual and personal engagement with the research focus and process of research, demonstrating authenticity, intellectual initiative and/or creative approach in the student voice

# data[].attributes.body
Kristine H-S. gives 5 points

# data[].attributes.body
Kristine H-S. gives 6 points

# data[].attributes.body
Kristine H-S gives 10 points

# data[].attributes.body
Kristine H-S gives 4 points

# data[].attributes.body
Kristine H-S. gives 6 points

# data[].attributes.body
Vera gives 6, I didn't find faults in it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Marks from Vera on Knowledge and Understanding

# data[].attributes.subject
Marks from Vera on Knowledge and Understanding

# data[].attributes.body
Vera gives 6

# data[].attributes.body
Vera gives 10 - The research is to really appropriate to the research question. I saw that the examiner found the same thing. I used to be a scientist for 10 years, and although the work is excellent, it doesn't directly answer the question.

# data[].attributes.body
Vera gives 4 points

# data[].attributes.body
Vera gives 6 points - absolutely

# data[].attributes.body
I also give 6 points.

# data[].attributes.headline
Marks from Guyslaine Knowledge and Understanding

# data[].attributes.subject
Marks from Guyslaine Knowledge and Understanding

# data[].attributes.body
Guyslaine gives 6

# data[].attributes.headline
Mark from Guyslaine on Critical Thinking

# data[].attributes.subject
Mark from Guyslaine on Critical Thinking

# data[].attributes.body
I would give 11, but 10 is probably the right choice. But I am influeced because I did my Master study on EEG and know how difficult this topic is. How can a student at this age already use and evaluate EEG measurements? This is brilliant! Do schools have EEG electrodes? I think for this age the student did really well, althought there are some parts missing, like Vera mentioned.

# data[].attributes.body
4 points. Structure and layout perfect.

# data[].attributes.body
As I mentioned, this topic is really difficult so the student put a lot of effort and time into this study!!
6 points!

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
10 points

# data[].attributes.body
4 points

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
5 points, I miss a more clear and reasonable argument, why he have chosen this topic. Just because of he is a musician (?) seems a little bit random to me.

# data[].attributes.body
great job, 6 points.

# data[].attributes.body
11 points, arguments like Guyslaine´s - at this age such a research! He almost continuous followed his research question

# data[].attributes.body
4 points. Scientific conventions fulfilled.

# data[].attributes.body
6 points.

# data[].attributes.body
5 points. I agree with Steve that there is still room for improvement and therefore I gave also 5 points.

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
11 points

# data[].attributes.body
4 points (agreed with other reply)

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
5 points.
I also agree that it was not cleared why he chose this topic except the fact that he is a musician. I also had to reread the question a few times in order to understand it properly.

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
10 points
I think that it is a good report for an interesting research. I agree with Vera that the answer to the question is missing some clarity as well as not being quite complete.

# data[].attributes.body
4 points. all above comments are accurate to me

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
5 points
I also agree, the reason seems a bit vague. I agree with Helene - I had to reread it a few times

# data[].attributes.body
6 points also
Excellent knowledge and understanding and well written

# data[].attributes.body
11 points
The research is excellent! Very impressed for a student of this age, it worries me regarding what we will be able to achieve at my school, we will need to spend time working on the EE

# data[].attributes.body
4 points -Excellent presentation

# data[].attributes.body
6 points - Excellent engagement, he satisfies all the points in this section!

# data[].attributes.body
4 points.

# data[].attributes.body
6 points. Excellent use of terminology and sources.

# data[].attributes.body
10 points.

# data[].attributes.body
4 points.

# data[].attributes.body
6 points.The engagement was obvious to me.

# data[].attributes.body
5 points
I reread the questions more than thrice to actually understand it!
Hence the 1 point less...

# data[].attributes.body
6 points.Knowledge and understanding,use of terminology were both up to the mark in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
2017)
The research is excellent.
Analysis is excellent.
Discussion and Evaluation is excellent.
Research is appropriate to the research question; is analysed effectively and clearly focused.
Conclusions to individual points of analysis are effectively supported by evidence.
An effective and focused reasoned argument is developed from the research with a conclusion reflective of the evidence presented.
This reasoned argument is well-structured and coherent.
The research has been critically evauated.
Marks from Course Participants
Marks from Course Participants
Kristine H-S gives 10 points
Marks from Vera on Critical Thinking
Marks from Vera on Critical Thinking
Vera gives 10 - The research is to really appropriate to the research question. I saw that the examiner found the same thing. I used to be a scientist for 10 years, and although the work is excellent, it doesn't directly answer the question.

Mark from Guyslaine on Critical Thinking
Mark from Guyslaine on Critical Thinking
I would give 11, but 10 is probably the right choice. But I am influeced because I did my Master study on EEG and know how difficult this topic is. How can a student at this age already use and evaluate EEG measurements? This is brilliant! Do schools have EEG electrodes? I think for this age the student did really well, althought there are some parts missing, like Vera mentioned.
Ana - Critical Thinking
Ana - Critical Thinking
10 points
Steve on critival thinking
Steve on critival thinking
11 points, arguments like Guyslaine´s - at this age such a research! He almost continuous followed his research question
Kavita S.: critical thinking
Kavita S.: critical thinking
11 points
Helene B: critical thinking
Helene B: critical thinking
10 points
I think that it is a good report for an interesting research. I agree with Vera that the answer to the question is missing some clarity as well as not being quite complete. 
Kate T on critical thinking
Kate T on critical thinking
11 points
The research is excellent! Very impressed for a student of this age, it worries me regarding what we will be able to achieve at my school, we will need to spend time working on the EE
María Isabel
María Isabel
10 points.  
 
add
 CRITERIA D
PRESENTATION
PRESENTATION
Maximum 4 points
Examiner gives 4 points
Guide (p. 99, EE guide 2017)
Guide (p. 99, EE guide 2017)
Presentation is good.
Structure of essay is appropriate in terms of expected conventions.
Layout are present and applied correctly.
Structure and layout support reading, understanding, and evaluation of the essay.
Marks from Course Participants
Marks from Course Participants
Kristine H-S gives 4 points
Marks from Vera on Presentation
Marks from Vera on Presentation
Vera gives 4 points 
Marks from Guyslaine
Marks from Guyslaine
4 points. Structure and layout perfect.
Ana - Presentation
Ana - Presentation
4 points
Steve on presentation
Steve on presentation
4 points. Scientific conventions fulfilled.
Kavita S.: Presentation
Kavita S.: Presentation 
4 points (agreed with other reply)
Helene B: presentation
Helene B: presentation
4 points. all above comments are accurate to me
Kate T on structure
Kate T on structure
4 points -Excellent presentation
María Isabel
María Isabel
4 points.
 
add
 CRITERIA E
ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT
Maximum 6 points
Examiner did not grade (<2018)
Guide (p. 99-100, EE guide 2017
Guide (p. 99-100, EE guide 2017
Engagement is excellent.
Reflections on Decision-making and planning are evaluative and include reference to the student's capacity to consider actions and ideas in response to challenges experienced in the research process.
These reflections communicate a higher degree of intellectual and personal engagement with the research focus and process of research, demonstrating authenticity, intellectual initiative and/or creative approach in the student voice
Marks from Course Participants
Marks from Course Participants
Kristine H-S. gives 6 points
Marks from Vera on Engagement
Marks from Vera on Engagement
Vera gives 6 points - absolutely
Marks from Guyslaine on Engagement
Marks from Guyslaine on Engagement
As I mentioned, this topic is really difficult so the student put a lot of effort and time into this study!!
6 points!
Ana - Engagement
Ana - Engagement
6 points
Steve on engagement
Steve on engagement
6 points.
Kavita S.: Engagement
Kavita S.: Engagement
6 points
Helene B: engagement
Helene B: engagement
6 points
Kate T on Engagement
Kate T on Engagement
6 points - Excellent engagement, he satisfies all the points in this section!
María Isabel
María Isabel 
6 points.The engagement was obvious to me.
 
add

# data[].attributes.body
Wow! impressive research work ,and at school level!Having said that ,I am of the opinion that the research question was not answered  clearly and completely.
10 points

# data[].attributes.body
4 points
all the requisite conventions were well structured and utilise

# data[].attributes.body
the effort and dedication was evident  without a doubt! So its a 6 from me
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
5 points

# data[].attributes.body
6 points

# data[].attributes.body
10 points

# data[].attributes.body
4 points

# data[].attributes.body
5 points