# data[].attributes.body
C1: The keys are not representative, and doesn’t make sense, the graph doesn’t answer a question or represent a clear idea

C2: Too many graphs, in a small space, the pie chart on the bicycle is not clear, other ways of transportation are excluded such as train or remote work

C3: the map graph is clear and nice however it doesn’t specify what tech job is meant here it would be better if it was specified because it could be a technical support and a CTO, and the average here doesn’t make sense, also some other countries are missed and number of hours per week specially that it mentioned something about global average

C4: the first graph is high level and misses percentages and the coloring is bad it was supposed to be based on intensity,

The second graph is bad in term of coloring and misses legends ( what are these percentages are for?)

The third plot is 3D and is not clear

# data[].attributes.body
C1: The size of pictures and the appearance of the statistics reflects wrong numbers.

C2: The summation of the types of commuting is not 100%. And the picture does not reflect the right picture where are there are missing data.

C3: The price shown are in various currencies. And The scattered plots are missleading due to the changes in Yaxis.

C4: The three pie charts has its critics where all of them have the same rate of color. The first pie chart does not shows the percentages while the second one does not have the key points. And for the last pie chart they used 3D graph which is not clear.

# data[].attributes.body
Group ( Yara - Ahdwa - lolwah - Hailah )

Critique 1:
The large size of the horse indicates that a lot of people owns horses more than the other animals. This is a misleading because all anime have the same value (50)
- Purpose of the graph is not clear e.g no title.

Critique 2: Display of graph is misleading because the structure is confusing, too many visualization objects and information

Critique 3 :
The graph misleading to the
1. Outline ( longitude and latitude)  for each city
2. It would be great if the designer combine the lines into one line chart each line with different color

Critique 4:
All the pie charts have ambiguous titles to deliver the idea from the visualization
Graph 1: missing the percentages for each part.
Graph 2: provides percentages without subject.
Graph 3: using 3D graphics doesn't give clear views of percentages for data presented in the pie chart.

# data[].attributes.body
1- the size of horse is misleading where give indication that horse number is highest
2- the numbers % are not true not reaching 100%, some fact have big font and presented in front
3-  global avarage not representative for chosen cities , axis not clear
4- pie chart not labeled correctly so no information deliverd and 3d pie give wrong message some pie capture more attention other not clear

# data[].attributes.body
C1) The graph shows the people like horses more than any other animals. But acutly the people like more cats.
C2)graph is very complix, the presentage is higher  than 100%
C3)the average is less than 135$
C4) messege is not clear and color is not good
Also 3D is not clear

# data[].attributes.body
C1: One of misleadings in the graph is the size each picture of animals (keys) have differen size. The misleading message is that shows the audience the bigger is the pet the large number of pets the Pearson have.

C4: The mistakes are the graphs are duplicated, for optimaizing it better to use only one graph that have all information such as: percentages. The 3D graph is misleading due to give unreadable information

# data[].attributes.body
C1: The graph is misleading because it looks like people who like horses are more than people who like cats whereas infact, people who like cats are more than double the people who like horses.

C2: There are so much information so viewers will not be able to focus on the important information that needs to be highlighted.

C3: The graph displays the average which can be misleading because it doesn't reflect the numbers in the map

C4: The first pie chart doesn't display percentages, second pie chart doesn't have the legends (Source), and the third pie chart is 3D pie chart which makes skill looks like it is the have of the pie chart while it's closer to the reader.

# data[].attributes.body
Critique 1

The size of the picture should be of the same size because you can see that the fish and the horse are the same number but the horse looks more  similar for the cat and dog

Critique 4

The first graph has no percentage to show if it was divided corectly , the second there is no labels for the colors to know what each color represent , the third graph in 3D which hidde some information and the front part shows that is bigger.

Critique 2

The  size of the bus is bigger although the car has heigher  percentage , there is no consistency in percentage writing and sign, no title to show what the comparison stands for , the pie chart does not show which percentage for.

# data[].attributes.body
Najla’a & Areej
Critique 1
1-The size of the animals misleads the recipient
2- it is not clear what 50 people actually represents
3- the number of cats is 7 and the dogs is 5, but it seems like the dogs is greater than cats
Critique 2
1- the total of the percentage is not 100%
2- the pie chart doesn’t clarify the 69% represent what?
3- the sum of bike percentages should be 31 but it is 27

Critique 4
1- 3D charts is not good to represents the data
2- the colors’ order should be rearranged

# data[].attributes.body
C1
1-  the graph is not shown any message because there are no title and x axis
2- the graph shows the amount of horses are more than fish because of the size of the pictograms are not the same

C2
1- too much information
2-Sum of the percentages is not 100%

C3
1-  sample size is too small to be consider as global
2- the intervals of the y axises are not identical

C4
1- the 3D pie chart is misleading, skill seems too large while it is just 35%

# data[].attributes.body
Critique#1 the size of the images used to represent the categories are misleading, since they look different in size but in fact they have the same amount.

Critique#2
The message is not clear, and it is hard to interpret what they intend to convey, the pictures used to present data are overlapped.
1- the size of the car is smaller than the bus, where in fact the percentage of car drivers is higher than the bus users by nearly 50%

Critique#3
1- Does the global average takes into account all the cities of the world ??
2- The world map is distorted.

Critique #4
The 3D map is not clear

# data[].attributes.body
1-The size of the pictures are misleading because some pictures are bigger than the other and thus the hours look’s bigger than the dogs

2-Too many pictures and this is making the information not clear

3-Y axis interval are changing in each graph

4-The purple pie chart is 3D and this can confuse the reader . Also the orange pie chart doesn’t have any percentage to clear the variance. The blue pie chart doesn’t have and attributes and this make it difficult to understand the meaning of the percentage

# data[].attributes.headline
Critique 1

What is wrong with this pictogram showing the number of people who own diﬀerent types of pets? Identify atleast two(2) mistakes in the given pictogram and suggest a solution for an improved visualization.

# data[].attributes.subject
Critique 1

What is wrong with this pictogram showing the number of people who own diﬀerent types of pets? Identify atleast two(2) mistakes in the given pictogram and suggest a solution for an improved visualization.

# data[].attributes.body
The following graph from a survey of inner city apartment dwellers in Wellington, New Zealand was published in the Dominion Post newspaper on Monday 13 April, 2009. What is misleading in this graph

# data[].attributes.body
It’s pretty standard for people in tech to take home some big salaries. But just how much money are these people making? A recent study by Hired.com analyzed data from more than 69,000 job seekers and 10,000 companies, as well as surveying more than 700 tech workers, to uncover salary trends among tech workers in major cities around the world. For a closer look at the tech salary trends of major cities, refer to the infographic given
What's wrong with the map given  as “2017 Tech Worker salary”? Discuss two(2) reasons to justify your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Examples are given for bad pie charts, Justify your answer