# data[].attributes.body
Bush v. Gore was a case in 2000 that was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to settle a dispute due to a recount in Florida’s presidential election which questioned our 14th amendment/The Equal Protection Clause.

# data[].attributes.body
Do standardless manual recounts violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Constitution?

The issue in the case was that the U.S. Supreme court issued a recount in the Florida presidential election. Bush did not want a recount therefore he issued a stay on the recount. It was later questioned if the recount would be violating the Equal Protection Clause.

# data[].attributes.body
The Court concluded on December 12, 2000  issue a recount but bush did not want a recount and filed a stay because that would violate the Equal Protection Clause because Florida did not have a statewide vote recount standard.yet the reason the court decided to not do the recount was because a manual recount is unconstitutional.(7-2)

# data[].attributes.body
The effects of the Bush v. Gore case was that Bush became president of the U.S. and that issuing a recount would violate or 14th amendment, the Equal Protection Clause.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF_2FAJzJ94

# data[].attributes.body
Presidential Election in Florida was close and Gore demanded a recount of 9,000 votes in Palm Beach county

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the manual recount is unconstitutional because all of the votes are not counted in the same way.

# data[].attributes.body
G