# data[].attributes.headline
You never know if someone is supporting the war effort.... You can't just ask them.

# data[].attributes.subject
You never know if someone is supporting the war effort.... You can't just ask them.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on how much the military needs their help.

# data[].attributes.body
It is impossible for the enemy to know whether a citizen encouraging the war or not

# data[].attributes.body
It's never immoral unless bombing a neutral country.

# data[].attributes.body
It is moral to kill civilians in war if they are directly contributing to the war effort. People that are supplying soldiers with weapons in factories and other supplies for war are fine targets. People that are supplying soldiers with basic human needs like food are not good targets because they are supplying the entire country; The soldiers are part of that country. Also, people that are supplying the country with materials that are also being used in factories for war are not good targets. (Primary supporters are fine, secondary are not)

# data[].attributes.headline
War is pretty much the taking of human rights. This is always immoral, and as such, killing civilians is immoral. 

# data[].attributes.subject
War is pretty much the taking of human rights. This is always immoral, and as such, killing civilians is immoral. 

# data[].attributes.body
even though some civilians support the war, some don't, so you can never know who actually is a combatant.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tyler.  Supporting the war (through their work) is different from being in favor of the war. Nations will start wars with the collective resources, despite there being differing opinions amongst the people.  

# data[].attributes.subject
Tyler.  Supporting the war (through their work) is different from being in favor of the war. Nations will start wars with the collective resources, despite there being differing opinions amongst the people.  

# data[].attributes.body
the civilians are the ones who support the war. If you don't agree with what in going on in the country, get out of the country. I really think that, to win a war, you need to accept that people are going to die. civilians are going to die no matter what you do. the war would have gone on for a lot longer with japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki hadn't happened. Civilians were killed and it ended the war. it may not be nice, people may hate it, but you can't deny the effectiveness.

# data[].attributes.body
It is not immoral because civilians are supporting the war effort. Civilians are paying taxes which gives money to the government, and undoubtedly the government are using much of the tax money on the war effort. But then again, money is just paper with ink. But it is generally accepted that money is worth something. People that do not support the war effort would be prisoners and criminals. They are not supporting the war because they are taking money away from the government that could be used to the war. Not jailed anti war people would be people who refuse to pay taxes or support the military. Children would also be exempt but most of them have done something which nullify their innocence. They could have sent a letter that would say that 'I like you fighting for us', it could be a school project to send a positive letter to the gov. or military.  There is also a question of what is immoral because morality is one's person beliefs that vary so it is relative.

# data[].attributes.body
Civilians are vital to running the country especially during war time. Kill them, and you will weaken the country. As for children, they are the future; if you kill future people, the country will cease to survive

# data[].attributes.headline
It is sometimes immoral to kill civilians in war because you never know if they are an innocent person or if they are someone that is supportive of the war. 

# data[].attributes.subject
It is sometimes immoral to kill civilians in war because you never know if they are an innocent person or if they are someone that is supportive of the war. 

# data[].attributes.body
Stephanie Yue

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on how involved citizens are in the war effort.

# data[].attributes.body
It Depends

# data[].attributes.body
Civilians sometimes don't have a choice whether or not they agree with the reasons that their country is at war.  The only people who should be killed are those who are a direct threat to the opposing nation.

# data[].attributes.body
Civilians can be future soldiers, and future soldiers are considered combatants. Also, all citizens can benefit their home country by supporting the economy. If you kill all the citizens, you kill the future soldiers, kill the economy, and you easily win the war.

# data[].attributes.body
it depends because a lot of civilians agree with what their government but are not in the army. But children can not be killed because they dont know what is going on with their government.

# data[].attributes.body
It is sometimes immoral to kill civilians in war because they are support their government and military for defense to survive the possible war crimes; And other times, they are combatants and supporters of their military, therefore they choose to fight.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think it's right for civilians to be killed in war, even if they support the war, I only think its right to do that if a citizen tries to attack first.

# data[].attributes.body
Although the civilians are paying tax money to the government it doesn't mean that the they have a direct connection to the government due to people paying taxes even when a war is not present. So it is also impossible to tell who is directly contributing to the war effort for their side or who is on the sidelines.

# data[].attributes.body
Killing citizens during wartime is usually not immoral, but there are always those people who refuse to participate in war, and you can't consider those people combatants.

# data[].attributes.body
sometimes civilians support the government by paying taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it is immoral, because the civilians are not making themselves clear targets of attack the way that somebody who is a part of the military is. It makes sense that the occasional civilian would be killed on accident with the use of bombs, but I don't think either side should intentionally kill someone who is not asking to be involved.

# data[].attributes.headline
It is immoral to kill civilians during war because they should not be targeted being innocent people, in addition by doing this it gives the civilians more determination to fight back. 

# data[].attributes.subject
It is immoral to kill civilians during war because they should not be targeted being innocent people, in addition by doing this it gives the civilians more determination to fight back. 

# data[].attributes.body
Alexis Gregorios

# data[].attributes.body
Civilians don't always have a choice on whether they can or can not agree with their countries reasoning with of going into war

# data[].attributes.body
It is always immoral because they are innocent civilians who are just living in country where war is taking place. It wasn't their chose to go to war the government decided for them.