# data[].attributes.body
Our proposes are great because they are very important and help our colony grow and pros pure.

# data[].attributes.body
Our proposal was kind of right because they did send solider to stop the war in america. We choose these three proposals because they were reasonable and were worded well. The proclamation was not effective because they couldn't do anything to stop them.

# data[].attributes.body
The three we chose had good details, and was persuasive. Their word choices also effected the way their proposal was laid out. Our proposal was very similar to what happened because we said they would send troops to fight against the Indians, and raise taxes to pay for the debt. What was diferent was that we did not expect them to have a war.

# data[].attributes.body
The three we chose were overall very descriptive and was pretty persuasive to me. We had the same proposal, but we didn't want the taxes to increase. We also wanted to settle on the land not be prohibited from entering it. Our proposal was much more effective because it was a win win for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
The proposal that we made was different than what really happened because we wanted them to not start a war because of the more debt, but they still started a war, which the British had won. The British Parliament told the colonists to not move West, when in our proposal, we wanted them to move West because they wanted to fertile land and soil. We chose those 3 particular proposals because they clearly stated the point and showed us the pro's and cons of each idea.

# data[].attributes.body
The 3 posts we chose were easy to read and explained their point well. They were also persuasive, detailed, and showed the benefit and drawback. Our proposal could've been more effective than what was decided because we said they could pay taxes so they would help us pay our debt but we didn't know that that would start a war.

# data[].attributes.body
It was the same because they did sent soldiers out to help but what they should have done is try to talk to the Indians first before attacking.If they had talked to them than they could have worked something out.

# data[].attributes.body
If King George the II and Parliament, it would be much more effective than the Banning settlement on the west. According to page 86, it stated that, there was no possible way to *enforced* the ban. Meaning that the tacit that the British government is not quite effective. That being said, distributing the land would be much more beneficial than something that cannot be enforced what so ever.

# data[].attributes.body
These three posts explained the proposal the best and shows that the British or American colonists would greatly benefit from them.

Compare
- Taxed colonists to help pay for the troops

Contrast
- First tried to compromise with Native Americans

It could have been more effective if they told the American colonists to pay for the troops or no troops for them!!

# data[].attributes.body
We chose these 3 particular proposals because they were worded in a clear and had supporting evidence. With pros and cons to their final call of action. Our proposal was similar to what really happened because we proposed that the British Parliament tell the colonists to not move west. Our proposal could have been more effective than what was decided by King George III and Parliament because it wouldn't have angered the colonists by suggesting rather than not giving them a right to reside.

# data[].attributes.body
Our proposal would've caused more conflict between the British and Indians and would've caused a bigger war.