# data[].attributes.body
Clayton Johnson with his two daughters after being released from prison.

# data[].attributes.body
A picture of Clayton Johnson after being released after his appeal.

# data[].attributes.body
A picture of the Johnson family.

# data[].attributes.body
This is the episode of Forensic Files gives a reenactment of what happened and shows pictures from the investigation and explains specifically what went down and why Clayton Johnson was investigated.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Medical Detectives (Forensic Files) - Season 4, Episode 9 - Accident or Murder?

# data[].attributes.body
This video shows the pictures from the cased and shows Clayton Johnson and his children talk about the case about their wife and mother falling down the stairs and hitting her head and how they felt about the dreadful situations they were in.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Clayton Johnson wrongful murder conviction : Tide of Suspicion (1998) - The Fifth Estate

# data[].attributes.body
This article fully explains the Johnson case in depth and explains how the investigation started that would then make him wrongfully convicted and how he was finally given justice in 2002 after being put in jail in 1993.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Author: Sarah Harland-Logan

Introduction

Clayton Johnson's happy life as a carpenter, high school industrial arts teacher, church volunteer, loving husband and father of two was shattered on February 20, 1989. That morning, his wife, Janice, fell down a flight of stairs, hit her head, and lost consciousness, while Clayton was out of the house on his way to work. Janice's body was found by a neighbour, who called paramedics immediately. Despite their rushing Janice to hospital, it was too late to save her. Janice passed away at 12:04 p.m.[1]

At first, police agreed with the doctor who performed Janice's autopsy that her fatal fall had been accidental. However, the investigation was reopened in the summer of 1989, due to rumours in the community which suggested that Clayton had killed his wife. Specifically, many people were suspicious of the fact that Clayton had recently taken out a life insurance policy that covered Janice. There was gossip suggesting that this decision might be connected to Clayton's new relationship with a young woman named Tina Weybret, which started several months after Janice's death. However, on June 10, 1990, the police again closed the investigation, since they had not found anything that would justify charging Clayton.[2]

Further Police Investigation

Despite the fact that police had not turned up any evidence that Clayton had harmed his wife, RCMP officer Cpl. Brian Oldford took it upon himself to look into the matter further. Cpl. Oldford had not been involved with the case at its earlier stages, but in the summer of 1990, he nonetheless began to conduct his own investigations into Janice's death. He re-interviewed two friends of the family - Mary Davis and Mary Hartley - who had helped to clean up the blood from Janice's head wounds after her death in order to spare her family from seeing it. The two stated that they had observed widespread blood splatter, which was inconsistent with Mary Davis' statement on the day of Janice's death. Mary Hartley had not given a statement at the time of Janice's death. Cpl. Oldford provided these new opinions to Dr. David King, of the Regional Forensic Pathology Unit in Hamilton, Ontario. He did not provide Dr. King with the original police reports, which told a different story. On January 17, 1991, Dr. King concluded that Janice had been struck and killed - and the two Marys' testimony played an important role in his opinion.[3]

Cpl. Oldford then sought a second opinion from forensic pathologist Dr. Charles Hutton, who also was not provided with the original police reports. Dr. Hutton, too, concluded that Janice had been murdered.[4]

Given these two expert opinions, it is not surprising that in April of 1992, Clayton was arrested and charged with the first-degree murder of his wife.[5]

Clayton's Trial and Incarceration

At trial, the prosecution claimed that Clayton had murdered Janice in order to collect on her life insurance policy and pursue a new relationship with Tina. Even though there was no evidence to suggest that Clayton and Tina had been romantically involved before Janice's death, the Crown suggested precisely that. The forensic pathology evidence from Dr. King and Dr. Hutton was the centrepiece of the Crown's case. The jury members were also encouraged to believe that they could discern Clayton's supposed murderous motives and guilty conscience from wildly speculative "evidence" such as "when Clayton cried, or did not cry," "his failure to pass a school bus on the highway," and "his being five minutes later to school than was typical for him."[6]

Clayton staunchly maintained that he was innocent, as he had done ever since his arrest. He told the jury that "I had nothing to do whatsoever with the injuries caused to Jan. I loved her too much, as I love my two girls. I just don't know how the injuries occurred. I know I didn't - let God be my witness, I had nothing to do with it whatsoever."[7]

On May 4, 1993, Clayton was found guilty of the first-degree murder of his wife. After the jury returned this verdict, the trial judge asked Clayton if he had anything to say. His response was simply, "No, other than I didn't do it and I am innocent and that's all I can say."[8]

Clayton was incarcerated at Renous Penitentiary, where he would spend the next five years. Had his wrongful conviction not been discovered, he would still be in prison today: Clayton would not have been eligible for parole until 2018.[9]

Clayton appealed his conviction to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. This Court dismissed his appeal on March 8, 1994. He then applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, which dismissed his application on February 2, 1995. Clayton spent the next five years languishing in prison for committing a murder that had never happened.[10]

A Miscarriage of Justice

Clayton contacted Innocence Canada (formerly AIDWYC) in November of 1995, and the organization took his case. With Innocence Canada's help, Clayton submitted an application for ministerial review of his conviction, under s. 690 (now s.696.1) of the Criminal Code. This application was granted, and Innocence Canada prepared a wide variety of material for the Minister of Justice, which demonstrated that Clayton had been wrongly convicted.[11]

Innocence Canada addressed the blood-spatter question by consulting experts in the field who had been apprised of all the evidence (unlike Dr. King and Dr. Hutton). These experts concluded that Janice's death had been an accident: she had fallen backwards down the stairs, and her head had briefly been wedged between the stairs and the wall. One of the experts spelled out in his report that "There is no question in my mind that the death of Mrs. Johnson was the result of an accident. It was not a homicide."[12]

Furthermore, Innocence Canada demonstrated that the credibility of the evidence from Mary Hartley and Mary Davis regarding the blood stains they claimed to have observed was dubious at best. Mary Hartley was interviewed on November 15, 1990 - nineteen months after Janice's death. The officer's notes indicate that "Mary stated that there was so much blood around now that she thinks of it." However, these notes also explain that "Mary stated that she felt she should tell me [that] ... she took one of the photos partly out of its file" when the officers were out of the room. "She was able to see the wound to the right side of Janice's head. She stated that she never used to think anything other than [that] Janice fell downstairs." After seeing the photo of Janice's head wounds, she had concluded that her original theory "couldn't have happened as there was nothing sharp on the stairs ... to cause what she saw." In other words, Mary Hartley understandably, but destructively, revised her memory to accord with what she had seen in the file.[13]

Mary Davis was interviewed the day after Mary Hartley, and gave a statement that differed dramatically from her original statement. This time around, she too recalled observing a great deal of blood splattered in different locations.[14]

As for the life insurance policy, Innocence Canada pointed out that Clayton had bought this insurance for both himself and his wife after a teachers' union representative suggested that buying life insurance would be a wise choice since Clayton did dangerous construction work in addition to his teaching job. Clayton wanted to know that his wife and daughters would be provided for if something happened to him, so he followed this advice and bought the policy.[15]

Finally, there was no reason at all to believe that Clayton's relationship with Tina had any sinister aspect. He had contacted Tina after his wife's death, initially for emotional support. The pair became romantically interested in each other a few months after Janice's death. The two were very open about their relationship, dating in public places and sitting together in church. On June 30, 1990, Clayton and Tina were married. Tina adopted his daughters, and the pair stayed together until after Clayton's conviction (when, as seen above, he was sent to prison for the indefinite future). The total absence of evidence that Clayton and Tina had done anything wrong did not, however, stop the prosecutor from asking questions that obviously suggested that Clayton had been cheating on Janice with her.[16]

Clayton's Acquittal

On September 21, 1998, the Minister of Justice sent Clayton's case back to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, requiring the court to reopen it. On September 25, Clayton was finally released from prison, after spending five years behind bars for a crime that never occurred.[17]

Three and a half years later, Clayton's name was cleared at long last. On February 18, 2002, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal quashed Clayton's conviction and ordered a new trial that would include the overwhelming new evidence - collected "from 22 experts in forensic pathology, engineering, biomechanics, physics and human postural dynamics" -proving that Janice's death was accidental. However, the Crown decided not to enter any new evidence, meaning that rather than being subjected to a lengthy, painful trial, Clayton was finally free.[18]

Causes of Clayton's Wrongful Conviction

As noted by the Innocence Canada lawyers who composed the s. 690 application for ministerial review, Clayton was wrongly convicted because of a combination of "overzealous police investigation; an overreaching prosecution; misleading expert evidence; and a climate of suspicion in which prejudice and speculation were easily substituted for reason and evidence."[19]

Despite the lack of any concrete reasons to support this theory, some officers (including Cpl. Oldford) reached their own conclusions that Clayton had murdered his wife. In addition to blinding them to evidence of Clayton's innocence that should have led them to drop the investigation, it is possible that the officers unconsciously transmitted their strong beliefs to Mary Hartley and Mary Davis, altering these witnesses' recollections about the day of Janice's death. Human memory is very malleable and fades very quickly. As a result, "people are particularly prone to having their memories affected by misinformation when it is introduced after the passage of time has allowed the original event memory to fade." [20] This fact might explain why it was so easy for both Marys to change their minds - over a year after the fact - about what had happened on the day that Janice passed away, when presented with cues that suggested to them that their friend had actually been murdered.

All of these investigative problems, however, were rooted in the suspicion and baseless gossip that began to swirl around the community after Janice's death. Neither Clayton's decision to purchase a life insurance policy for Janice (and for himself), nor his relationship with Tina, had any relevance at all to his guilt or innocence but the police and prosecutors seemed to become infected by the toxic atmosphere created by community gossip. It is vitally important that law enforcement and officers of the court remember that their role is to be objective and dispassionate in the pursuit of justice, rather than allowing their personal preferences and prejudices to cloud their judgment.[21]

Wounds that Innocence Canada Cannot Heal

Clayton was able to clear his name, but as the judge who released him from his five years in prison pointed out, the time "unjustly taken from him ... can never be restored." Moreover, Clayton was of course separated from his young daughters, who were only 11 and 9 years old at the time of Janice's death. The girls had in effect lost both their parents in rapid succession, and were sent to live with their paternal grandparents while their father was in jail for their mother's murder. As the AIDWYC lawyers put it in their application for ministerial review, these girls "lost their mother through fate; they...lost their father through a miscarriage of justice."[22]

Unlike many other wrongly convicted people, Clayton was lucky enough to be successful in his subsequent lawsuit against the government, in which he argued that he was due compensation for the almost unimaginable losses he sustained. Clayton received $2.5 million dollars.[23] While this figure is substantial, no amount of money could ever replace the loss of five years of his life, which should have been spent with his already grief-stricken family rather than apart from them in jail.

[1] R v Johnson, [1998] NSJ No 381 at para 8, 131 CCC (3d) 343 (Freeman JA) [R v Johnson]; Applicant's Factum in the Matter of an Application Under Section 690 of the Criminal Code, between Her Majesty the Queen (Respondent) and Clayton Johnson (Applicant), dated March 31, 1998, at paras 3-5, 8, 12, 13, 16, 18, 206 [Applicant's Factum]; CBC News: "Clayton Johnson Walks as Crown Balks at New Trial." February 18, 2002, http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/clayton-johnson-walks-as-crown-balks-at-new-trial-1.346679 ["Clayton Johnson Walks"].

[2] Applicant's Factum, supra note 1 at paras 21-24.

[3] Ibid at paras 25, 37, 30.

[4] Ibid at para 31.

[5] "Clayton Johnson," Injustice Busters website: http://injusticebusters.org/index.htm/ClaytonJohnson.htm.

[6] Applicant's Factum, supra note 1 at paras 24, 29, 31, 214.

[7] Ibid at paras 33, 200.

[8] Ibid at para 33.

[9] Ibid at para 1; Richard Perry, Department of Justice: "Clayton Johnson Settlement." June 18, 2008, at Nova Scotia Canada: http://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20040618007 ["Clayton Johnson Settlement"].

[10] Applicant's Factum, supra note 1 at para 1.

[11] Ibid at paras 2, 32, 37.

[12] Ibid at paras 9, 36, 37, 199.

[13] Ibid at para 97.

[14] Ibid at para 92.

[15] Ibid at para 209.

[16] Ibid at paras 225, 228-230.

[17] R v Johnson, "Clayton Johnson Walks," supra note 1.

[18] "Clayton Johnson Walks," supra note 1; Chris Hansen, Public Prosecution Service: "Crown Halts Clayton Johnson Murder Prosecution." February 18, 2002, at Nova Scotia Canada: http://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20020218002.

[19] Applicant's Factum, supra note 1 at para 262.

[20] Elizabeth F Loftus, "Planting Misinformation in the Human Mind: A 30-year Investigation of the Malleability of Memory" (2005) 12 Learning & Memory 361-366 at 361.

[21] Applicant's Factum, supra note 1 at 273-247.

[22] R v Johnson, supra note 1 at para 12; Applicant's Factum, supra note 1 at paras 6, 295.

[23] "Clayton Johnson Settlement," supra note 9.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Author: Sarah Harland-Logan Clayton Johnson's happy life as a carpenter, high school industrial arts teacher, church volunteer, loving husband and father of two was shattered on February 20, 1989. That morning, his wife, Janice, fell down a flight of stairs, hit her head, and lost consciousness, while Clayton was out of the house on his way to work.

# data[].attributes.headline
Clayton Johnson released after over 1,800 days in jail - theglobeandmail.com

# data[].attributes.subject
Clayton Johnson released after over 1,800 days in jail - theglobeandmail.com

# data[].attributes.body
This article explains when Clayton Johnson was released in 2002 after spending 1,872 days in prison for first-degree murder of his wife, Janice.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Canadian justice system conceded another miscarriage of justice yesterday, this time in the bizarre case of a man imprisoned for a murder that most likely was a fluke accident.

After serving 1,872 days behind bars for the first-degree murder of his wife Janice, Clayton Johnson first was granted a new trial and then was acquitted in a day-long roller coaster of legal manoeuvring.

Just five hours after hearing the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal grant his retrial, the 56-year-old man listened in tears as the province's top judge acquitted him and virtually insisted that the country see Mr. Johnson for what he is, an innocent man.

That Mr. Johnson was forced to spend five years behind bars for a crime he didn't commit was, "to state the obvious, regrettable," Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Chief Justice Joseph Kennedy said in a voice tinged with indignation.

"The conviction in this matter has been quashed," he declared loudly. "Let's not be equivocal about it." In an interview shortly afterward, Mr. Johnson expressed thanks to the chief justice. "This not only brings justice for me, but for Janice, too," he said. "Now she can rest in peace."

Mr. Johnson was convicted of the murder three years after his 36-year-old wife died on Feb. 20, 1989. She was found unconscious at the bottom of the basement stairs of their home in Shelburne, N.S.

The basement washing machine was on. Ms. Johnson was lying, gasping for breath, in a large pool of blood. Her car keys were clutched in her hand and a high-heeled shoe was nearby, leaving a clear inference that she had misgauged a step while rushing up to meet a friend who was coming over with his daughter so Ms. Johnson could take the child to a local carnival.

Police looked carefully at Mr. Johnson at the time. He was not charged with murder until 1992 when an officer became suspicious because Mr. Johnson had remarried so soon after the incident and because he had collected on a $125,000 insurance policy following his wife's death.

Yesterday's outcome, engineered behind the scenes by the Nova Scotia Crown in conjunction with James Lockyer and Philip Campbell, lawyers for the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted, was a closely guarded secret to all but the family and close friends.

Two dozen of them sat, alternately teary-eyed and beaming, as Mr. Johnson broke down repeatedly during a press conference and had to ask one of his daughters to read a statement.

"It has been 13 long years, and at last the world knows I didn't kill the woman I loved," 18-year-old Darla Johnson read for him.

Crown officials said they were conceding the case because new scientific evidence left "no reasonable prospect" of convicting Mr. Johnson at a new trial. They refused to express any regrets, insisting at a press conference that they had merely done their duty throughout.

Martin Herschorn, director of public prosecutions, said the majority of the 22 forensic experts who were consulted now believe Ms. Johnson likely died in an accidental fall.

"I don't view this as a failure of the justice system," he said. "This is the justice system functioning as it should."

Mr. Campbell strongly disagreed. He said the justice system became blinded by science and treated a loving husband and father as "some kind of ruthless, deadly assassin."

Had it used plain common sense and reason, Mr. Campbell said, Mr. Johnson would never have been even a suspect. Mr. Lockyer added that at the very least, Mr. Johnson deserves generous compensation and an apology from the provincial government.

Mr. Johnson intends to continue living in the small town of Shelburne, where he has been building furniture and doing home renovations since his release on bail in 1998.

Mr. Johnson's daughters, Darla and Dawn, were 12 and 9 when their mother died. In effect orphaned by their father's conviction, they thanked their community for its support yesterday.

Shortly after Ms. Johnson's death, he married a local woman, Tiny Weybret, in the hope that she could help him raise his two daughters. With her new husband suddenly jailed for life, Ms. Weybret reluctantly divorced him and remarried. The children were left to be raised by relatives. Clayton Johnson and other wrongly accused victims
Wilbert Coffin
1953: The bodies of three American hunters are found in Quebec's Gaspé region.

1956: Mr. Coffin is hanged after being convicted of murder and losing a series of appeals. His defenders argue that he was framed by the government of then premier Maurice Duplessis, which feared the case would hurt tourism if left unsolved.
Steven Truscott
1959: The raped and strangled body of Lynne Harper, 12, is found near Clinton, Ont. Three months later, Steven Truscott, then 14, is convicted.

1969: He is released from prison and begins a long campaign for vindication.

2000: He asks the federal government for a formal review.
David Milgaard
1969: The partly clad body of Gail Miller, 20, is found in a Saskatoon snowbank.

1970: Mr. Milgaard is sentenced to life in prison for murder.

1992: The Supreme Court of Canada recommends a new trail after hearing evidence of a series of rapes committed in Saskatoon by another man. Mr. Milgaard is freed.
Donald Marshall
1971: Sandy Seale, 16, is fatally stabbed in a Sydney, N.S. park where he was seen with Mr. Marshall. Mr. Marshall is convicted of murder.

1982: He is cleared after witnesses in his trial say they lied under pressure from Sydney Police. Another man is later convicted of manslaughter.
Thomas Sophonow
1981: Waitress Barbara Stoppel, 16, is found strangled in a washroom at a St. Boniface, Man., doughnut shop.

1982-85: Mr. Sophonow is arrested, tried three times and convicted twice before being freed by the Manitoba Court of Appeal on grounds of legal errors in the third trial.
Guy Paul Morin
1984: The body of Christine Jessop, 9, is found in a field.

1985-92: Mr. Morin is arrested, tried, acquitted, tried again and convicted of murder.

1995: He is cleared and offered compensation after DNA testing excludes him as the source of semen found on the child's underwear.
Ronald Dalton
1988: Brenda Dalton, 29, dies of asphyxiation in Gander, Nfld.

1989-2000: Mr. Dalton, her husband, is convicted of strangling her and is imprisoned. He eventually wins a new trial at which he is acquitted after forensic pathologists testify that Ms. Dalton choked to death on food.
Clayton Johnson
1989: Janice Johnson, 36, is found with fatal head injuries at the bottom of the basement stairs in her Shelburne, N.S., home.

1993-2001: Mr. Johnson, her husband, is convicted of bludgeoning her to death.

2001: The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal orders a retrial yesterday, then the province's top judge acquits him.
Greg Parsons
1991: Catherine Carroll is killed in her St. John's home.

1994: Mr. Parsons, her son, is convicted of murder.

1998: DNA evidence clears him. Police later charge a former family friend with murder.
Randy Druken
1993: Brenda Marie Young, 26, is found stabbed to death in her St. John's home.

1995: Mr. Druken, her boyfriend, is convicted of murder.

1999-2000: The conviction is set aside and prosecutors halt proceedings after a jailhouse witness recants testimony that Mr. Druken confessed to him.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Wrongly convicted man cleared in wife's death

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Canadian justice system conceded another miscarriage of justice yesterday, this time in the bizarre case of a man imprisoned for a murder that most likely was a fluke accident. After serving 1,872 days behind bars for the first-degree murder of his wife Janice, Clayton Johnson first was granted a new trial and then was acquitted in a day-long roller coaster of legal manoeuvring.

# data[].attributes.body
This article gives a rundown about who Clayton Johnson was and what happened in his case about his wife dying and was basically convicted on no hard evidence.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Clayton Johnson was 56 years old when he was convicted in 1993 for the murder of his wife Janice Johnson, who died on February 20th, 1989. Clayton was a carpenter, high school industrial arts teacher, church volunteer, and father of two. Firstly, I think that the Canadian legal system appears to be fairly inconsistent. This particular case was handed very inadequately. Clayton was convicted on quite literally no concrete evidence. All the evidence provided could be heavily left up to interpretation, and in some cases was falsely constructed (the pathologists' statements). There is no doubt that not enough evidence was given to convict Clayton. Going back to my point, other cases appear to be handled very well. It seems that the quality of the Canadian Legal System varies on a
Clayton had already been heading out to work when Janice died. That morning Janice had fallen down the stairs, hit her head and been knocked unconscious, and by the time her body was discovered and rushed to hospital it had already been too late. She had been found by a neighbour, Robert Molloy, at the bottom of the basement stairs. Initially the police agreed with the doctor who performed the autopsy in that her death was purely an accident. However, a new investigation began into her death in the summer...show more content...
court-to-court basis, and I believe that is something that should be fixed. Secondly, I don't ever believe that spending as long a time in jail as Clayton did can be compensated with money. While he may have been paid a substantial amount of money, that can't be make up the time he spent away from his daughters when he should have been mourning Janice's death with them. Lastly, I think agencies such AIDWYC are vital in helping to prevent wrongful convictions or at least correcting them. They're important because they help keep innocent people out of jail; they try their best to patch up the holes in our legal system. Off of this point I believe that further work needs to be done to prevent these wrongful convictions from happening in the first place, such as looking more extensively into each and every case where more severe sentences may be given out, and making sure personal bias stays out of the entire process. Clayton was more or less sent to jail based on rumours, and I would hope that never happens

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Clayton Johnson was 56 years old when he was convicted in 1993 for the murder of his wife Janice Johnson, who died on February 20th, 1989. Clayton was a carpenter, high school industrial arts teacher, church volunteer, and father of two. Firstly, I think that the Canadian legal system appears to be fairly inconsistent.