# data[].attributes.body
In Min’s interview, the interviewee has a whole picture of the purpose, while in Paul’s  interview, the student doesn’t.

# data[].attributes.body
in Paul's interview, every question asked is detailed and small, and students answers the questions one by one passively, while in Min's interview, students have more freedom to express and produce more.

# data[].attributes.body
Paul’s interview is at the stage of beginning. So it looks like a natural chatting. Min’s interview comes to the main part. It mainly focuses on the retrospective questions.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the reason why Min's interview is more longer because the interviewee had rich background information for this interview. He or she know the interview was about the picture. Also his or her idea,inner thought had developed  clearly through draw. So she or he know what wre going to talk about. So the interviewee was like a leader.
But for the paul one, Paul was the leader.

# data[].attributes.body
In Min's Blind Portrait Research, the art-based method is used with the narratively-oriented discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
we think Paul's questions are easy and like a small talk with a friend, we did not find what he want to explore.

Min's interview is more purposeful and he really respect the participator and try to help the P articulate more about her painting.

# data[].attributes.body
1. the length of the answer. MIng's is longer;
2. the openness of the respondent: Ming's respondent is more open;
Reasons for that are:
1. different situations
2. different relationships between interviewer and interviewee;
3. different topics involved

# data[].attributes.headline
In Min’s interview, both questions and answers are longer than that in Paul’s and more formal.

# data[].attributes.subject
In Min’s interview, both questions and answers are longer than that in Paul’s and more formal.

# data[].attributes.body
For Ming's interview, there was a picture drew blindly by the interviewee right before. Thus it might be easier for Ming to sense sth and use it in the interview.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Maria’s response was more sophisticated. She used some metopher and simile to explain her emotion and thoughts.

# data[].attributes.body
In Min's interview, maybe the interviewee is not native speaker, so she may explain more to make sense

In Paul’s interview, maybe they’re both native speakers

# data[].attributes.body
In our group, we think that Paul's questions are more straightforward and casual in a way. This might due to the setting and participant's relationship with the interviewer.

On the other hand, Min's questions are more open-ended and formal. It requires participant to respond in long answers.

# data[].attributes.headline
the length complexity and validity of the answers

# data[].attributes.subject
the length complexity and validity of the answers

# data[].attributes.body
the easier and shorter the answers are, the easier it is for the researchers to collect the data

the personality of the participants
and the preparation of the participants