# data[].attributes.body
In "A'int I a Woman" the authors point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is people don't have to be smarter to have rights. In the text, it states: "Then they talk about this thing in the head; what's this they call it? [member of audience whispers "intellect"] That's it, honey. What's that got to do with woman's rights or negroes' rights?" This evidence shows us that no matter you smart or not smart, but everyone should have their rights.

The author uses the analogy "pint vs quart" to explain that everyone should have the same rights, no matter what color your skin is. In the text, it states: "If my cup won't hold but a pint, and yours holds a quart, wouldn't you be mean not to let me have my little half measure full?" This evidence shows us that quart is white people, pint is black people. Pint is less than quart, so white people is more than black people. This is also means that white people have their own rights and they're respected, but black people didn't have their own right, they're not respected.

# data[].attributes.body
In ''A'int the I a Woman'' the authors point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that women don't need to be intelligent because men and women don't need to have intelligent

# data[].attributes.body
In A'int I a Woman"the author's view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that woman don't need to be intelligent  to have equal rights we are born with it. according to the text it state" Then they talk about this thing in the head; what’s this they call it?
[member of audience whispers, “intellect”] That’s it, honey.What’s that got to do with women’s rights or Negroes’ rights?" This evidence shows that no matter how smart you think you are you should always treat people equally.

# data[].attributes.body
In "A'int i a Woman", the author's point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that women don't need to be intelligent just to have rights.

# data[].attributes.body
In A'int I a Woman" the authors point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is......

The author uses the analogy "pint vs quart" to explain...

# data[].attributes.body
The author’s point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights are that you don't need to be smart to have equal rights because in ain't i a woman it states Then that little man in black there, he says women can’t have as much
rights as men, ‘cause Christ wasn’t a woman!. This shows that they did not give woman the same rights as men.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that women need to be smart because everyone was born with rights. Truth uses the pint vs quart analogy to convey her view by Truth using symbolism to show the rights that black and whites have; whites have a "quart" of rights, and blacks have a "pint" of rights. However, since Truth is not only black, but a woman, she doesn't even have her "pint" full, meaning she has less than white men, white women and black men.  According to the text," Then they talk about this thing in the head; what’s this they call it?
[member of audience whispers, “intellect”] That’s it, honey. What’s that got to do with women’s rights or Negroes’ rights?" This evidence shows that Truth's point of view talks about how intellect has nothing to do with equal rights. The text states that," If my cup won’t hold
but a pint, and yours holds a quart, wouldn’t you be mean not to let me have my little half measure full?" This evidence demonstrates that the black people have pints of rights while the black people have quarts of rights and the black people are wishing for the white people to give the black people some rights. This is the author’s view of the relationship between intellect and rights and how Truth uses the pint vs quart analogy to convey her view.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that women don't need to be intelligent to have equal rights in fact what does intelligent have to do with anything, we were born with equal rights but some people gang up on us we could of fought back.

# data[].attributes.body
In "A'int I a Women" the authors point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that women could have equal rights by not being smart. We are born with it. And that women could do things that men can do but better.  According to the text "Then they talk about this thing in the head; what’s this they call it? [member of audience whispers, “intellect”] That’s it, honey. What’s that got to do with women’s rights or Negroes’ rights?"  This evidence shows that to her one thing doesn't mean anything to her to get her equal right.  Additionally, according to the text, it states "Look at me! Look at my arm! I have ploughed and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could head me! And ain’t I a woman?"  This evidence shows that she works harder than a men.  Yet people dont; value her for what she does.  She could do it better than a men could do it.  Therefore, this proves the authors believes that intellect has nothing to do with rights.

The author uses the analogy "pint vs quart" to explain that she wants half of the rights that other men have.  According to the text it sates "If my cup won’t hold but a pint, and yours holds a quart, wouldn’t you be mean not to let me have my little half measure full?" This evidence shows that men have all of the powers and she wants it. The rights that she wants is to be able to vote and work outside. Therefore, this proves that men have more rights than women.

# data[].attributes.body
In "A'int I a Woman" the authors point of view of the relationship between intellect and rights is that woman don't have to be smart or skilled for their rights, they are born with the rights they need. The author uses the analogy "pint vs quart" to explain that that black and whites have; whites have a "quart" of rights, and blacks have a "pint" of rights. The text states that, " Then they talk about this thing in the head; what’s this they call it?
[member of audience whispers, “intellect”] That’s it, honey. What’s that got to do with women’s rights or Negroes’ rights?"