# data[].attributes.body
Loving vs. Virginia is about  a married couple that where different skin colors and the couple got arrested and they went court and got banned from Virginia for 25 years.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs The Board of Education in (1954) was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.

# data[].attributes.body
Was a landmark, it does cause it changed schools, that people even separated them.

# data[].attributes.body
So the loving vs. Virginia is about a married couple in Virginia they both has different skin color and race. In a summer at night the loving family got arrested. They soon went to court, and the judge said they were banished from Virginia for 25 years.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1972, UC had a man named Allan Bakke apply for their medical school. He was a white male that rejected. He believed that he was only rejected because of his race, because there was a limited number of whites, and minorities they could accept, making the college a more diverse college for students. Let's look at his stats before I continue onwards:

(Taken from

"University of California v. Bakke | Affirmative Action and 'Reverse Discrimination' ")

Allan Bakke-
White Male
Overall GPA: 3.46
Science GPA: 3.44
MCAT
Verbal:96
Quantitative: 94
Science: 97

These stats were above the stats you needed to apply, but he was rejected. He applied another time, and he was also rejected. There were 2 admission systems. The regular admission system was available to all eligible candidates with an undergraduate GPA of 2.5 or above. The special system for admission was designed to allow more races into the school, and there was no minimum GPA requirement. He took this information in. And sued in 1972. His reasoning was that he was denied because of his race, violating the 14th amendment. He also claimed that he was a victim of reverse discrimination. But UC argued that they would of denied him regardless or race, which wouldn't be proven when the judge asked for the evidence. In the end, the judge ruled that UC had to accept him into the college, and that racial quotas were illegal, and also said that UC can't reject a person of their race in favor of a less qualified candidate. Racial quotas was also not allowed in the admission process of UC anymore.

This represents due process because one of the amendments that helps support due process is the 14th amendment which is equal protection under the law under all races. That amendment was violated when UC rejected Allan Bakke because of his race.

One surprising thing to me was that Allan Bakke was actually denied with his stats that he had (in the time of 1972).

# data[].attributes.body
1. Allan Bakke was a 35 year old white man who worked NASA and already gotten a Masters and Bachelors Degrees on Mechanical Engineering and had interest in medicine. He can't get admitted to the college even though he scored a 3.5 GPA while to get admitted, you would need a 2.5 GPA. He then took the school to court and claimed he was a victim of reverse discrimination, thus claiming his rights of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th amendment has been violated. The court ordered the university to show proof that Bakke would've been rejected regardless of his race, and the university had no proof, the court claimed it was unconstitutional to have a race quota and the court ordered the university to accept Bakke into its medical school.
2. It represents due process because due process laws were followed for Allan Bakke to be able to argue that his rights were being violated.
3. It was interesting to me because, you know, California is usually a liberal-friendly or leftist state. If you know all about liberals/leftists, they think that minorities should get reparations for their ancestors getting enslaved, getting offended easily, promotes abortion, wants to ban guns, thinks that the government should control everything and hates "hate speech" which is free speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs. The Board of Education of Topeka, (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.

# data[].attributes.body
On 17 December 1956, the Supreme Court rejected city and state appeals to reconsider their decision, and three days later the order for integrated buses arrived in Montgomery. On 20 December 1956 King and the Montgomery Improvement Association voted to end the 381-day Montgomery bus boycott. In a statement that day, King said: “The year-old protest against city buses is officially called off, and the Black citizens of Montgomery are urged to return to the buses tomorrow morning on a non-segregated basis” The Montgomery buses were integrated the following day

# data[].attributes.body
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs Board of Education was a decision of the U.S Supreme Court . They wanted for blacks not be equal with whites so they couldn't do anything. Schools were segregated and even bus stops.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs Board is a Supreme Court case

# data[].attributes.body
The loving vs. Virginia was about a couple living in Virginia, The man was white and the women was black, in Virginia at the time, that was illegal, so the couple got arrested.When they went to court, the court judge asked them home do they plead and they pleaded guilty and they were banned from Virginia for 25 years. In opinion of Chief Justice warren, they said that a state law prohibiting marriage based on race was unconstitutional

# data[].attributes.body
The Brown vs Board of Education was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.

# data[].attributes.body
establishing racial segregation

# data[].attributes.body
In the case 5 women told the court that segregation on a bus was illegal. The Supreme Court said bus segregation was unconstitutional. The people involved with this case were Aurelia Browder , Jo Ann Robinson, Claudette Colvin. The case represented due process because The Supreme Court had to go through the order of due process and disagreed with the law they had. Now blacks and whites can sit on the bus together. What I found interesting is that the Court agreed with them.

# data[].attributes.body
The Brown vs The Board of Education was a court case that was about segregation and trying to limit it or get rid of it. Eventually the Supreme Court decided that schools shouldn't be segregated anymore, but it took a while because at the first court case the Supreme Court decided that schools should still be segregated. . This was one of the inspirations to the civil rights movement. Even though schools were no longer segregated most things still were. Water fountains, restrooms, parks, and more. It is crazy just how it was basically one family who had helped schools be unsegregated. It took citizens a long time to figure out that segregation was not right.

# data[].attributes.body
Bakke was a 35 year old who had not only already gotten his masters but also worked at NASA and had a 3.5 GPD. he was denied the civil rights act and the 14th amendment. he ended up winning the court case and was accepted into medical school. the supreme court said that it was unconstitutional for the college to have a race quota.
this represents due process because the due process laws were followed and because he was complaining about his rights getting violated.
What I found interesting was that a white man was discriminated against. also that the blacks had been complaining for years but they were not listened to until the civil rights act, but when a white man complained they actually looked into it.

# data[].attributes.body
The brown vs The Board of Education was about a case that involved segregation. The Supreme Court decided that schools should not be segregated. This inspired the civil rights movement. The Supreme Court allowed African American and White's facility's to stay separate. Nearly all public places and parks were separated.

# data[].attributes.body
they made a protes about this becuase when the were segergated black pepole had bad education but white pepole had better thats why the had a protest on it.

# data[].attributes.body
1 The court cas Brown vs board of education was a little ricky too understand so it all began when a black girl named linda brown was not allowed too attend a white school that was near her house instead she was forced too go too a black school farther away from her house and then thurgood marshall took on this case and thats just the begining of it 2. this case repersents due process when they go into court and then supreme 3. i found intresting that they would not let a like 9 year oldgirl into

# data[].attributes.body
brown vs the board of education they made a protest about it becuase white pepole and black pepole were segergated in schools but their education was unequal the white pepole had better and black pepole had worst

# data[].attributes.body
1. A 35 year old man filled an application to get into the University of California twice, but both times was rejected even though he exceeded required GDP. This was because a certain number of spots were meant for minorities and there was no spot left for majorities. He took this to court and they ruled that racial discrimination took place against not a minority but a majority.
2. This case represents due process by showing how a person, was able to have a voice and talk in court about something he believed was wrong. Like in due process, the Supreme Court justices took a look a the law and it violated the 14th amendment. This way, it was ruled that racial quotas would be banned.
3. One that I was surprised about is the University of California saying wouldn't let Bakke in even if they didn't have a racial quotas when clearly his GDP exceeded average.

# data[].attributes.body
So the first thing that had happened was that a store got robed and a witness saw Gideon come out with a wine bottle and a lot of money so then he got to court and he asked for a lawyer but the judge said that you cant have a lawyer that is only for serious cases so then he found himself guilty and got sentenced to 5 years in prison while he was in prison he studied law and wrote a letter to the supreme court that not giving him a lawyer was unconstitutional. So after that he had another chance to prove himself innocent this time with a lawyer.He still was found guilty and off to jail again after that they gave him one more chance then he gets a really good lawyer and he covens es them in 1 hour he was out of jail!!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Oliver Brown had went to an all-whites-school to have his daughter (Who was black) educated, but was turned down. He decide to take the problem up to the Supreme Court. Soon the U.S Supreme court ruled that laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are, indeed, unconstitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
U.S. Supreme court in which the court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional.
2) It represents due process because   it showed how much the blacks wanted the same rights as the whites going to school.
3) I am interested in how everything was separated even school's

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Brown vs education

# data[].attributes.body
1. The court case was when oliver brown tried to get his daughter in to a all white school.
2.It is due process because they couldn't just make one person guilty without evidence.
3. This court case was Thurgood marshall's first court case as a lawyer.

# data[].attributes.body
In this court case Browder vs. Gayle  5, women stood up to the court and now bus segregation illegal.The court said it was unconstitutional. Some of the people that were in the court case were Aurelia Browder , Jo Ann Robinson, Claudette Colvin. This represents due process because the court had to go thought the steps of due process to say that it was unconstitutional.Also that blacks and whites could sit with each other. I found this interesting because i wanted to know more about it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The court case was about how much the blacks wanted the basically the same rights to go to school and have fair treatment there. They didn't want to have separate schools.
2. It represents due process because   it showed how much the blacks wanted the same rights as the   whites going to school.
3. Sit ins were another way for blacks to protest to get equal rights.

# data[].attributes.body
in the brown vs board of education was the blakes wanted as much as rights as the white like they wanted the same education as white people

# data[].attributes.body
1.   In the court case Browder vs. Gayle,  5 women stood up to the court and made bus segregation laws unconstitutional. This court case included Aurelia Browder,  Jo Ann Robinson, Claudette Colvin, Susie McDonald, and Mary Louise Smith.

2.  This represents due process because the 14th amendment shows how some people in some states must be segregated and unfairly treated while some states have different rules.

3. An interesting thing I learned was that the article states that Rosa Parks is not listed among the plaintiffs because she and Martin Luther King Jr. led the bus boycott and decided to let the other women who had experienced the same thing to lead a court case that would change the U.S.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Brown vs. The Board was when Blacks and Whites were separate but equal as they thought.
2. This represents due process because it was a court case and in the plessy vs. Ferguson they went through court to find out that blacks and whites were not equal.
3. Something I found interesting was that the school were equal but they were separated by skin color. How is that fair?

# data[].attributes.body
Gideon went to the florida judge for a lawyer to assist him, but the judge did not let Gideon because they said he was guilty.Then he went to prison and many times.Gideon then wrote a letter to the supreme court.The supreme court agreed wth all of what he said.Then Gideon was able to get out of prison.When that happened he then had his court and the supreme gave him a lawyer in Washington.                                                This represents Due Process because Gideon was able to say what he wanted to say to the court which was having to do with the 14th amendment. Something interesting that I read was that this was dicid in March 18,1963.Another interesting thing is that Gideon died on Missouri in 1972.Something that surprised me was that Gideon had some good luck even though he went to prison many times.

# data[].attributes.body
Gideon asked the judge for a lawyer to defend him, saying that in the 6th amendment it states that everyone is allowed a lawyer in court. The judge said that that only applied to capital offenses where death could be the punishment, and declined the request. So, Gideon had to defend himself, and he didn't do a very good job, so he was found guilty and sent to jail. While in jail, Gideon researched law, getting more and more sure that the 6th amendment allowed everyone to have a lawyer. He then wrote a letter directly to the Supreme Court. They agreed to go to court for it and Gideon won the case. They then had another hearing for Gideon with a lawyer this time, and Gideon was found not guilty and released from prison.

# data[].attributes.body
The Brown vs. The Board of Education is when blacks and whites were separate but equal. Some white people made it like it was separate but not equal. That changed when Thurgood Marshall, a black lawyer, went into court and reported this. Marshall won and there was now only equal.

# data[].attributes.body
The The Brown vs. The Board of education is about how people are seprate but equal

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs. The Board of Education was a famous court case in the U.S about segregation and mostly how schools were segregated. The Supreme Court and the white people thought it was "Separate but equal," and blacks knew that was false because white schools had better materials, teachers, and buildings. While black schools had terrible materials, leaks, the teachers weren't that good. This all changed when Thurgood Marshall saw that. Thurgood Marshall worked for the NAACP, and argued that segregation of schools violated the 14th Amendment. White people didn't agree with him. Then, the Governor Earl Warren saw the segregation was unconstitutional, and stated that school should not be segregated anymore. Many in the south still kept schools segregation, but over time schools are no longer segregated! I'm surprised how just one person (Thurgood Marshall) can change the world into a better place. :)

# data[].attributes.headline
Brian Folarin                       Three hundred and eighty-one days after the Montgomery Bus Boycott began, the Supreme Court had upheld a lower court ruling in favor of desegregating the buses, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and the doctrine of separate but equal that had supported Jim Crow segregation in the United States.                                   

# data[].attributes.subject
Brian Folarin                       Three hundred and eighty-one days after the Montgomery Bus Boycott began, the Supreme Court had upheld a lower court ruling in favor of desegregating the buses, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and the doctrine of separate but equal that had supported Jim Crow segregation in the United States.                                   

# data[].attributes.body
Shortly after beginning the Montgomery bus boycott local leaders begin to prepare illegal challenge to the segregation laws

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs Board of education was a court case about segregation and how schools had to be separated and places had to be doing stuff like buying groceries or having food.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown V. Board of Education was a court case about schools during segregation in the U.S. There were a lot of segregation problems in the U.S. at the time and black people wanted out. They protested and protested. This case was the first major change. As Thurgood Marshall as a lawyer for the black people and Jack Greenberg for the whites. This case was denied by the state and it was now in the U.S. Supreme Court level. They argued back and forward. One phrase that was key was "separate but not equal." which made a lot of sense because whites had better materials. Also, whites had better building that weren't damaged and leaking. Obviously, Thurgood Marshall won. This case shows due process because it violated people's rights. It violated the fourteenth amendment and the due process clause in the fifth amendment. Something that surprised me was how whites accepted defeat and stopped trying in these cases. It's crazy because all they have done to blacks and they finally see that this is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
brown vs the board of education was bad because people were being mean against blacks.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1954,segregation was one of the main problems of the U.S.A.
the words"separate but not equal. This means that although they are different

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs. Board of Education was in 1954. This was a court case for a young girl named Linda Brown and her father named Thurgood Marshal. The court case was about the schools being segregated and how Black schools are not equal to white schools. The case was put on hold when the Justice died and he had to be replaced by Earl Warren.When they did start the court case they won.

# data[].attributes.body
At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney.The Gideon v Wainwright case was when Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaking and entering.At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. He had no money so he asked the judge for an attorney.   The trial judge denied Gideon’s request  and Gideon was found  guilty of the crime. when he was in prison he was writing about law and the supreme Court of the United States heard his case. He was able to have an attorney and was found not guilty of the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
Browder v. Gayle, 142 F. Supp. 707, was a case heard before a three-judge panel of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama on Montgomery and Alabama state bus segregation laws.  also i think that the browder was really

# data[].attributes.body
The Brown vs. The Board of Education was in 1954. The court used the words “separate but equal,” and that is not true! Thurgood  Marshal argued schools were violating the 14th amendment.The people who had the same type of case a came together to the court. There was a girl named Linda Brown and her case stood out.She was first denied  to be able to go to white schools and had to go to a colored school miles away from her.People thought that was equal ,but Thurgood Marshall didn’t.They said “Can schools be really equal if they are separated by skin color”? The case got put on hold and when it was on hold the justice died and was replaced with governor Earl Warren. They won the case ,but people were not happy.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1954, the U.S. supreme court said that all public schools are not segregated anymore. Before this happened, in 1896 it was legal to have African Americans and Whites use separate facilities. In the 1940s the NAACP started to support a couple African American kid who applied to a white school. When they were not accepted, NACCP then used a lawsuit against school boards. They wanted to do separate but equal schools. Then five cases were put together and brought to Supreme Court. The Supreme Court agreed and a African American lawyer, Thurgood Marshall represents the student. But this only applied to schools.

# data[].attributes.body
The courts case was about how black and white schools shouldn't be segregated and white schools learn more than black people. This case represents the due process because should not be segregated. They were segregated in everything that's important to me.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown vs. The Board of Education was a court case about the segregation of Whites and African Americans in public schools. They finally decided public schools could not be segregated.
It wasn't only schools either. Public services (like bathrooms) were also segregated at the time. Brown vs. The Board of Education kickstarted what's known as the Civil Rights Movement.
Brown vs. The Board of Education was the first court case to dent segregation. The lawyer who helped with the case was named Thurgood Marshall. Eventually he was the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court.

# data[].attributes.body
In the case brown vs board of

# data[].attributes.body
The Loving vs. Virginia was about this couple Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving. Mildred was a black woman and Richard was a white man. However the Virginia laws banned blacks and whites from being married. So they traveled to Washington D.C to get married. When they got back to Virginia they charged with unlawful cohabitation and had to do jail time. After all that they left Virginia to go live with their relatives in Washington D.C . A few years later when they went back to visit family they were arrested again for traveling with each other. After that Mildred wrote Robert F. Kennedy for help. They were then referred to the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). Then they had  a Supreme Court case and the ACLU represented them. The court ruled that the banning of blacks and whites not being married was unconstitutional.
One thing I found interesting is that they were inspired by the Civil Rights Union to write a note to Robert F. Kennedy. If Mildred Loving hadn't said anything to him we would probably still have that interracial ban. Blacks and whites would still be banned from getting married.

# data[].attributes.body
1.The Brown vs The Board of Education is about segergated school's.White's,and black's were seperated in school's,and parks, restaurants, movie theaters, and drinking fountains.The NAACP (National Association for Advancement of Colored People)  supported several African American children who had applied to all-white schools. The children were not accepted into the schools. The NAACP then brought lawsuits against the school boards. Eventually five of the cases were combined and brought before the Supreme Court. Thurgood Marshall repersented the students so he argued with the Supreme Court, untill the Supreme Court made it that school's weren't separated.

2.It represents due process by violating the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment is '' No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws''.It made Linda Brown walk miles to get to her school (Colored school) even though she was close to white school's. It messed up her life,and liberty.

3.It was interesting how everything was separated even school's. It surprise me how LInda Brown had to walk miles to get to her school (Colored school).

# data[].attributes.body
1. In the court case Brown vs Bourd of Education a girl named linda brown who was black was not allowed too go too a white school that was closer to her home then the black school so she was forced too walk miles too her school and thats how it all started thugoord marshal was going on this case 2. it repesents due process because