# data[].attributes.body
The website I evaluated was about the Velcro crop in California by Ken Umbach from umbachconsouting.com. There's was a link provided to view the biography of the author. While this would normally be a good thing, if you scroll to the bottom of the website, it tells you that it is a "totally bogus biography and completely fictional catolage of preposterous events." This is our first clue that this website is not credible. The website is just an article with a chart. While this makes it easy to read and there was no ads, there also was no list of sources or any sponsors, leading us even further to believe that  this source is not credible. This article wa made in December or 1996 and has never been updated. While some of the things about the website leads you to believe that this source is credible, more evidence about it suggests that it is not credible. Therefore, this is website is not credible and you shouldn't use ot trust the information provided.

# data[].attributes.body
1 of the 2 websites i did was Aluminum foil deflector Beanies and right away at first glance it was not a credible site because I searched the authors

# data[].attributes.body
The website I evaluated was the eighth website. When I first looked at it, it looked very credible. There

# data[].attributes.body
the website i got was number 14 , and i'm sure that it is credible because it is a vacation resort called mankato and its in minnesota and it has alot of information about it , also the author is r. bruce farnsworth you canfind out info about him in the links on the site

# data[].attributes.body
The website I evaluated was number 11 Google Job Opportunities. Since it collaborated with Google I thought it would be credible, but as I answered the 5W's I realized it didn't even have an author or a description of the author. It was most likely created during 2007 since that's when the job opportunities began, and last updated on 2011. The only thing that I thought would lead to an author was a tab About Google, but it only brought me to another website with Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Classroom. I'm actually still not sure it's credible because it associates with Google but there is no author.

# data[].attributes.body
The website i had received was Number 5 Burmese Mountain Dog. It wasn't really precise of the information witch it had no Author or Publisher. And there where no purpose for the website to be published. And there where no Biography on the breed of the animal.

# data[].attributes.body
The website I researched was 10. At first it seemed like it could be a real website that just had a weird topic but I looked around the website more and found out that it was published today even though I was on it the other day. The website had many authors and research from the 1950s so that proves this site was not credible.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose to evaluate the 6th website about buying a ancestor. it is not a credible site because it doesn't have an author and the last time it was updated was in 2012 but it has awards and a sponsor. It has a lot of ads, when you look up the company nothing comes up and it is looking more money that it is putting into it.

# data[].attributes.body
The website I got was about Dihydrogen monoxide. This site looks very credible because it is updated every day. Also, there are very few ads. The site is credible because the author is Tom Way and when you look him up he has Phd in chemistry.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose to evaluate the 5th website about Burmese mountain dogs. This website was not credible because the name of an author was not even mentioned- so there's is no way to tell if the person who wrote this is an expert . The fact that there is not an author mentioned is a major red flag since people who are normally experts in something like showing that they are knowledgeable and qualified. Also, on the website there is no date when the website was created or updated, meaning that there is a big chance that this information has not been updated in awhile. However, there is a .org in the URL, which is only given to certain organizations. But the fact that no author or date the website was created was included, makes me believe that this website is uncredible.

# data[].attributes.body
For my website I evaluated  the 1st website. The site looked credible because the site had no adds, but is was a .com. after reading about the website I started considering that it wasn't credible. I Looked at the authors name of Lyle Zapato and he was an internet hoax icreated in 1998

# data[].attributes.body
For my website I evaluated the 6th website. This is not a credible website. Evidence that proves this is the website was a ".com" which shows it is mostly opinionated. The I say also no author of the text and the website is about making money. The final piece of evidence that proves thit isn't credible is that there are ads almost everywhere on the website

# data[].attributes.body
the first website i Evaluated was #5 the title was Burmese Mountain Dogs 2. the website was nothing you would think, it had no search bar, no author, not even a link. The only way i would use that site would be for a little knowledge on the dog nothing else. The other website i Evaluated was #8 (Case analysis Of A Historical Killer Tornado). This website was much better than the other one it had the authors names, links, references, when it was made. But it didn't have a search bar, and when it was updated.

# data[].attributes.body
The website I received was "Burmese Mountain Dog" at first glance this website looked very credible but as I went down the paper question after question this website looked more bias than credible. Dr. Charlie white wrote this website and updates it quite often but there was no biography, doesn't say what the purpose was of the website but the website is very organized and gives you-easy-to-read information and was last updated on January 3rd 2017. My conclusion is that this website is not credible.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the numbers I got for a website was number 12. This website was not credible because it did not list the author or have a biography about the author, therefore there was no way to find anything else out about the person who wrote this information. Also, when I was looking at when the site was made and last updated, it said it was made and last updated in 2002 as an April fools joke. This clearly showed me that the website was not credible.

# data[].attributes.body
The site that I had was the 5th site which was about Burmese mountain dogs 2. Within the website was decent information for the avid dog whisperer, but if you aren't one, the site I still very un reliable, lacking in an author, any hyperlinks to a other site, and had no information on any sponser and or other website that would prove it being credible.

# data[].attributes.body
The website i received was number twelve. The websites title was "Case Analysis of a Killer Tornado event in Kansas on 10 June 1938". At first glance it looked not credible, after reading it thoroughly and realizing that this was a full analysis of the tornado in "The Wizard of Oz", but with the author being Charles A. Doswell III, a well known meteorologist and prolific severe convective storm researcher, i decided to dig deeper. This website is a sub-website of the Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, the URL is cimms.ou.edu. This being an educational website and putting two and two together, this was obviously a link to a lesson from Doswell about a famous tornado to give students a better understanding on how to identify tornadoes by images and data. The website goes into detail about the distanced traveled, wind patterns, and the type of tornado that it was. Also, at the bottom of the page it has references  to Grazulis, T.P. and  Marshall, T.P. who were said in the article to "brought discrepancy top the death count to attention". So. this website is credible.

# data[].attributes.body
The 18th website is not credible. At first read it seems strange, but when finding the author and researching him, I found out that he is a hoax website creator. So this is obviously a fake website. The authors purpose is to inform people of the fake Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus, but there is a link to the authors gift shop which is obviously a way for him to earn money. Not to mention that the gift shop is for the fake Tree Octopus. There also is not an area where it shows the date it was published. Furthermore, there are no links to other websites where the author got information. This website is most fake and no one should use this information in a project or presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
The website number I got was 12. This website not credible because it explicitly says at the bottom that it was created as an April Fools joke in 2002. Another reason is that there is no author listed, this means I don't know if they know what their talking about. The last time this site was even updated was 2002, this shows that the information is unreliable because it is old news. This proves that this information is not useful or credible.

# data[].attributes.body
My number was 12, and the website was about google's behind the scenes. This site is totally unreliable . The Author, Google, gave no sort of information about itself. The page was posted on April First, 2002 and hasn't been updated since. The page includes information about how google is run by pigeons. The fact that Google is ran by pigeons kind of gave it away

# data[].attributes.body
The website I chose was the 13th website which was about Jacopo. This website is credible because in the URL it has .edu which means it's meant for educating people and not for commercial or entertainment. However, the website doesn't have any contact information about the author or writer, but it does state where they found the information from which was a Professor at a college. The website has no information about when it was published or when it was at updated, not place or established, so therefore the website is not credible enough to use for any research or to take any information from.

# data[].attributes.body
my site was the 5th burmese mountain dogs 2.
this site was incredibly unrelaible. No information about or on the author, no date for when it was created or updated, and no information on where the information came from or who the sponsor is. This websites purpose is to tell me information on Burmese mountain dogs and thats it as far as I can tell based on what the sites given me. If this were for my project using this information would be a bad idea. Theres no point of credablity

# data[].attributes.body
One website number I was received was 17. I read about "The Ova Prima Foundation." The chairman of the board was listed at the bottom of the page as Dr. Joel David Foresyte.  However, there was no further information on the author. I researched about Dr. Foresyte and he is actually a librarian. The website's mission is to spread the importance of the egg in a nonviolent way and prove that the egg came first which is ridiculous.  When going onto the "news" page, none of the news stories have dates to them nor do they show where they got their information from. The site uses the word "ovaprimatology" as the study which isn't even a word. When typing in "ovaprimatology," each site states, "A term used throughout the Ova Prima web hoax." This shows that the site is clearly fake. The website was created in 1998 and last updated in 2013.

# data[].attributes.body
The topic I got for one of my websites was "Buy an Ancestor Online". This website was no credible it was not well made, and had many adds. It gave no information about who wrote it. If you wanted to be George Washington's ancestor, it would only cost $1, so this is obviously fake. This website was made in 1999, and looks like it hasn't been updated at all. It was hard to navigate the site, and the pictures used on the site make no sense.