# data[].attributes.body
Hver gruppe har deres egen kolonne med en række kort.

Senest dagen inden vi mødes, skal I have gjort følgende:

1. Vælg et gruppenummer

2. Lav et kort med gruppeinfo

3. Lav et kort med beskrivelse af idéer

# data[].attributes.body
Skriv navne på jer, som er i gruppen her, og skriv også jeres email, så vi kan kontakte jer, hvis vi vil have lov til at bruge jeres historie senere.

# data[].attributes.body
I skal finde en idé baseret på:

Noget, I undrer jer over, som I gerne vil undersøge.

Noget, I synes fungerer dårligt, som I kunne gøre bedre

En idé, som har inspireret jer, og som I gerne vil give videre

# data[].attributes.body
Fakta: Find information, der gør folk klogere

Kilder: Hvilke kilder er nødvendige for at fortælle din historie?

Ekstra ting, du kan tænke over:

Forklar, hvorfor din historie er interessant for andre end dig? Hvorfor skal vi bruge tid på det, du har at sige? Brug eksempler og fakta, der viser at historien rummer et generelt perspektiv. Hvad kan vi andre lære af historien? Kan du vise eksempler på løsninger?

# data[].attributes.body
Skriv din vinkel-sætning:

Jeg vil fortælle, at ...

Det vil jeg fortælle, fordi ...

# data[].attributes.body
Skriv de spørgmål ned, du gerne vil besvare i din historie:

Hvad er vigtigt at vide?

Hvem skal spørges om hvad?

Ekstra ting, I kan tænke over:

Hvordan vil I fortælle historien?

Hvem skal interviewes?

Lad de mennesker, der er direkte involveret i historien, fortælle den. Ægte stemmer og interviews giver din historie troværdighed og autenticitet.

Du kan også bruge din egen fortællestemme.

# data[].attributes.body
• People should be taught how to be critical of AI and fake news in school curriculum

•add more laws surrounding AI and it’s public usage

•Neutral news only

# data[].attributes.headline
Journalism of the Future (Magnus, Christian, Mai & Emil)

# data[].attributes.subject
Journalism of the Future (Magnus, Christian, Mai & Emil)

# data[].attributes.body
.Some form of detection within wether an article was written by AI

.Fake news detection of some sort. How? Dont know

.Some form of bias reduction (i.e by automatically including all different perspectives within the topic)

.The inclusion of VR and AR in the way we consume media

.Media would be consumed via Neural link type technology

.Purposefully delayed news in order to ensure information validation. Done so to mitigate biases.

.Events are reported in a vacuum. Analyses and opinions are proposed to the reader form them to chose.

# data[].attributes.body
Hoping that future generations have more objectives and independent way of thinking and learning:

mixtures of media and social media ex. Say you watch the news one night - they might be biased and have a specific narrative, this should not be your only platform with news but a part of how you gather news of the same subject. So after you watched the news on tv, you would go on social media and see the same news but it may be from at different perspective from citizens with freedom of speech. It could also be reading studies and books. But in conclusion, a mixture of different types of news, while forming your independent thoughts while also being curious and open to other views and perspectives.

Ai might ruin this dream cause it can be untrustworthy and used for harmful purposes.

# data[].attributes.body
Tech companies do what they can to survive, warps media

Should media die?

Media literacy is dying

Is it possible to bleed the companies dry? (Consumer strike)

Is it possible to get the facts with no opinion

Age of misinformation

For the future:

can’t reach 100% objectivity, have to accept that

Should be able to have news stories that purely represent the facts

Can we split those facts from opinions, be able to read opinions separate from facts

Norwegian example

# data[].attributes.body
*Fake news AI-filter

*Neuralink brain chip enhancement

# data[].attributes.body
Escapeism - lonely kids will find fake ai friends - augmented reality

ministry for fact checking ai

Earlier critical thinking for navigating the internet - subject(s) in elementary schools

need for human interaction and listening to actual human voices will get bigger - podcasting etc

As a counter reaction to the fake news and ai generated stuff

long term:

decentralized internet

Ai integration

# data[].attributes.body
An app that with a filter option to select a news subject from either a neutral perspective or the perspectives from either sides of the news subject.

Limiting AI access.

Developing apps, such as TikTok closer to “home”. In European data factories.

# data[].attributes.body
Julianno’s Team

Quality over quantity.

Could A.I. destroy biased news?

Competition between news sources. Who makes most profit? / who has the most readers?

# data[].attributes.body
We think that there could be holograms, microchips for your hand (like a smartphone), drones following you arround, and other crazy stuff, but we would prefer having the opportunity to step away from all that.

Finding the balance between new technology and nature/relationships/the present moment.

Possibilities for customization of how you receive media, sort of like a filter(videos < articles). The possibility of disconnecting, when you desire.

Including all social classes, especially if news and media move over to more modern and expensive solutions = the price has to be reasonable, so no one gets excluded.

# data[].attributes.body
Mirror (that is connected to the whole house) that could help humans with organising their day. Suggesting outfits appropriate to the weather, measure the body and it’s needs, read news out loud etc.

# data[].attributes.body
No options for being anonnomous

Display potential biasis' that can be political

More transparency ( being able to choose media and articles)

Higher Age/be More mature to be able to use social media

You need to be educated in social media

More government and juditial oversigt but also available for free speech

- Marcus, Arthur, Yna and Ada

# data[].attributes.headline
- coming back to the "old messenger" way of delivering news : community based of receiving news in the public space

# data[].attributes.subject
- coming back to the "old messenger" way of delivering news : community based of receiving news in the public space

# data[].attributes.body
- data source of first post of image or fact, provenance and co

- removal of advert

-going back to a strong public service away from lobbying and agendas

# data[].attributes.body
• A.I. as a tool (e.g. no creative prompts)

• A.I. news media (no bias)

• A.I. terms of use/laws (limit misuse)

• TikTok, YouTube, Instagram… reels’ regulations & options to turn off similar features

# data[].attributes.body
awereness of bias, the bias of the source is integrated in the news in and of itself. Ai created through the publics opinion of objectivity. (Ideally everyone is a software engineer and collectively work on the AI) everyone is well educated and critically thinking

# data[].attributes.headline
Allistaire, Mia, Elke, Cooper, Victoria, Sebastian B

# data[].attributes.subject
Allistaire, Mia, Elke, Cooper, Victoria, Sebastian B

# data[].attributes.body
Younger people in politics/journalism

Laws and restrictions on AI-generated content

Keep the human connection in media

Accessible news (less paywall)

“Community Notes” in more places

International news can be just as important as national news

Don’t sugarcoat headlines

Sponsors of news sources shouldn’t have influence on their news

News shouldn’t be censored to please a crowd. Positive news shouldn’t be prioritized over negative news.

# data[].attributes.body
More ethical business praktiser for media

More agency for users in regard to your feed etc.

More Data protection and control of your own data for users

Less advertising (control of if you want advertisement)

Better control/more restrictions of how “adictive” a platform is supposed to make itself and how much it’s allowed to access users (eg. notifications and alerts)

More sustainable and environmental

More democratized media platforms instead of corporate ones.

Uniting different platforms/apps etc. that serve the same function but without making it a giant monopoly

Ai not being used for creative works

(Movies and cinema still thriving)

Automatisation etc. being controlled and democratized

More happy news

More focus on actions being taken in relation to reporting on problems etc

Better transparency of the sources of information

Showing differing opinions on the news

Better transparency and agency for users instead of it all being controlled by the companies that own the platforms

# data[].attributes.body
Keys points:

-Quality over quantity

-Stop polarization

-More critical thinking/encourage critical thinking

Right now it’s like a factory, where it’s about the amount of news rather than the quality of the news and the articles addressing these.

Maybe a solution:

Dividing the news in two categories, breaking news and thorough articles. Breaking news are the important news, that actually matter (for instance if the prime minister resigns), whereas the thorough articles addresses the breaking news and not so breaking news once a week in depth.