# data[].attributes.headline
Level 3 Criminology WJEC – Revision Content

# data[].attributes.subject
Level 3 Criminology WJEC – Revision Content

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
GCSE and A-level revision with everything in one place

Your revision timetable, done for you

Get motivated with progress tracking

Access unlimited past papers with examiner feedback

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Free Level 3 Criminology WJEC Revision Content - Study Rocket

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Browse hundreds of lessons for Level 3 Criminology WJEC to study for free with assessment questions, text & videos.

# data[].attributes.headline
Student Workbooks and Revision Guides for WJEC Criminology

# data[].attributes.subject
Student Workbooks and Revision Guides for WJEC Criminology

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Grade Booster exam workshops for 2024. Join us in to Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, London, Manchester and Newcastle

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
WJEC Level 3 Applied Certificate & Diploma Criminology: Revised Edition: Amazon.co.uk: Henderson, Carole A: 9781912820986: Books

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Buy WJEC Level 3 Applied Certificate & Diploma Criminology: Revised Edition by Henderson, Carole A (ISBN: 9781912820986) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

# data[].attributes.headline
Spotify: Criminology – Emash Digital, Mike Ferguson and Mike Morford

# data[].attributes.subject
Spotify: Criminology – Emash Digital, Mike Ferguson and Mike Morford

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Podcast · Emash Digital & Mike Ferguson, Mike Morford · Criminology is a true crime podcast that takes a deep dive into some of the most famous cases in the annals of crime. Hosts Mike Ferguson and Mike Morford will give you every details of these infamous crimes.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When a defendant is found guilty, a judge or magistrate will sentence them. They do this by following the relevant sentencing guidelines. These guidelines set out the minimum and maximum sentences for an offence (in line with the law) and provide guidance as to where on that scale the sentence should fall.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As the 25th anniversary of the murder of teenager Stephen Lawrence approaches, his mother Doreen has suggested it is time for the police investigation to be closed.
It is one of the recent developments in the long-running story surrounding Stephen's murder in 1993.

Read the timeline to find out more about the case:

The 18-year-old is stabbed to death in an unprovoked attack by a gang of white youths as he waits at a bus stop in Eltham, south-east London, with his friend Duwayne Brooks.

23 April 1993 - Suspects identified

The day after the murder, a letter giving the names of the suspects is left in a telephone box. Police surveillance begins on their homes four days later.

Stephen's family hold a press conference to complain not enough is being done to catch the killers. They meet Nelson Mandela two days later.

Police arrest brothers Neil and Jamie Acourt, David Norris, Gary Dobson and Luke Knight, and search their homes. Neil Acourt and Luke Knight are identified by Duwayne Brooks at ID parades as part of the gang responsible and the pair are charged with murder. They deny the charges.

29 July 1993 - Charges dropped

The CPS drops the prosecution as it says the ID evidence from Duwayne Brooks is unreliable.

22 December 1993 - Inquest halted

The Southwark coroner, Sir Montague Levine, halts an inquest into Stephen's death after the family's barrister, Michael Mansfield QC, says there is "dramatic" new evidence.

There is insufficient evidence to bring charges based on the new evidence, which was believed to be the identification of further suspects - the CPS says.

Stephen's parents, Doreen and Neville Lawrence, launch a private prosecution against Gary Dobson, Luke Knight and Neil Acourt. All three deny the charges. A private prosecution is the same as a standard criminal trial but not brought by the CPS.

December 1994 - Police surveillance

Covert video shot over several days in Dobson's flat captures him and Norris using strong racist and violent language. Neil Acourt and Luke Knight are also caught on camera using violent and racist language.

The murder trial begins against Neil Acourt, Luke Knight and Gary Dobson at the Old Bailey. But the case collapses when Mr Justice Curtis rules that identification evidence from Brooks is inadmissible. All three are acquitted.

13 February 1997 - Inquest verdict

The inquest resumes and the five suspects refuse to answer questions. A verdict of unlawful killing "in a completely unprovoked racist attack by five youths" is delivered by Sir Montague.

The Daily Mail newspaper uses its front page to name the five men it says killed Stephen Lawrence. It invites them to sue if it is wrong.

The Kent Constabulary launches its probe into police conduct, which nine months later highlights "significant weaknesses, omissions and lost opportunities". But it says there is no evidence of racist conduct.

July 1997 - Public inquiry announced

Home Secretary Jack Straw says there will be a judicial inquiry into the killing and subsequent investigation - to identify lessons for police in dealing with racially motivated crimes. It will be chaired by Sir William Macpherson, a retired High Court judge.

March 1998 - Inquiry opens

The five suspects are told to give evidence or face prosecution. In June, they appear and are pelted with bottles by protesters as they leave, after being accused of being evasive.

July 1998 - Police apology

The Lawrence family call on the Met Police Commissioner Sir Paul Condon to resign. He apologises to them when he appears in October, admitting there had been failures.

It accuses the Metropolitan Police of institutional racism and makes 70 recommendations, many aimed at improving police attitudes to racism. It also includes some proposals for changes in the law, including strengthening the Race Relations Act to try to clamp down on discrimination.
September 2002 - Norris jailed
David Norris and former suspect Neil Acourt (right) are jailed for 18 months for a racist attack on an off-duty police officer in Eltham in 2001. Norris, a passenger in a car driven by Acourt, threw a drink and shouted racist abuse at the black officer.

May 2004 - Trial ruled out

The CPS finally announces there is insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone for Stephen's murder following a review.

Government drops the legal principle which prevents suspects being tried twice for the same crime.

July 2006 - BBC documentary

A BBC documentary investigating the case raises fresh questions about the prime suspects, prompting the Metropolitan Police to review their evidence. In October 2007, the Independent Police Complaints Commission says it has found no evidence of wrong-doing by an officer as alleged in part of the documentary.

November 2007 - Forensics review

Police confirm they are investigating new forensic evidence in the case after a police review, staffed by 32 officers, was launched the previous summer. It examined evidence gathered at the time, looking at opportunities to use new technology to find leads.

February 2008 - Memorial opens

Doreen Lawrence opens a £10m architecture centre in honour of her son. Two weeks later vandals smash its windows in a suspected racist attack.

February 2009 - Report anniversary

Ten years on from the Macpherson inquiry, a report from a member of its panel, Dr Richard Stone, says the police have made significant progress in reforming but charges of racism remain. Justice Secretary Jack Straw says the Met is no longer institutionally racist, but Stephen's mother says police still fail black Britons.

July 2010 - Dobson jailed

Gary Dobson starts a five-year jail term for supplying a class B drug after being caught during a sting by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca).

Gary Dobson and David Norris are to face trial over the murder of Stephen Lawrence following a review of forensic evidence. The Court of Appeal decides there is enough new and substantial evidence to allow Dobson's acquittal to be quashed. The pair had been charged the previous September.

November 2011 - Trial begins

The trial of Dobson and Norris begins at the Old Bailey. The jury hears that Stephen's DNA was found on the defendants' clothes.

January 2012 - Guilty of murder

Dobson and Norris are both found guilty of murder at the end of a six-week trial into the death of Stephen Lawrence. During the trial, the court hears that microscopic evidence found on clothing belonging to the accused links them to the murder. The jury takes two-and-a-half days to reach its decision. Both men receive life sentences; Dobson is jailed for a minimum of 15 years and two months, Norris for 14 years and three months.

The prime minister calls for an immediate investigation into reports the police wanted to smear Stephen Lawrence's family. The Guardian claims former officer Peter Francis went under cover to infiltrate the family's campaign for justice in 1993. Mr Francis tells the paper and Channel 4's Dispatches programme he was looking for "disinformation" to use against those criticising the police.

On a dramatic day of developments, a review into the original murder investigation - by the barrister Mark Ellison - finds that an undercover Met Police officer worked within the "Lawrence family camp" while an inquiry into the handling of the murder was under way.

It also finds there are reasonable grounds to suspect at least one detective on the team was corrupt. This leads Home Secretary Theresa May to announce a new public inquiry into undercover policing.

A separate report into Operation Herne - an investigation launched by the Met into the allegations made by former undercover officer Peter Francis - finds no evidence to back claims he was tasked to smear the Lawrence family. But it does find failings regarding allegations about undercover officers indulging in inappropriate sexual relationships.

A public inquiry into the abuse of undercover techniques by police officers is launched. While its scope is wide - it includes, for example, the use of dead children's names in fake identities - one of its main focus points is the infiltration of the Lawrence campaign for justice.

Over the next three years the inquiry suffers setbacks due to a burgeoning list of participants and issues around revealing the identities of former undercover police officers.

In March 2018, campaigners stage a walk-out during proceedings and call for the inquiry's current chair, Sir John Mitting, to step down from his post.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) confirms it has been investigating alleged police corruption during 1993 murder inquiry for months.

The new investigation is prompted by the findings of the 2014 Ellison review. Any findings are to be reported back to the police watchdog and could result in criminal or misconduct proceedings.

The police watchdog finds ex-Met Police commander Richard Walton would have had to answer a case for misconduct after meeting an undercover police officer during the Stephen Lawrence inquiry.

Mr Walton met the officer in 1998, allegedly obtaining information about the Lawrence family and their supporters.

The watchdog said he would have faced a disciplinary hearing but had retired. Lawyers for Neville Lawrence unsuccessfully urged the force to halt Mr Walton's retirement earlier that year.

Mr Walton said the Met had rejected the watchdog's findings and "did not plan to bring misconduct proceedings".

Scotland Yard announces it has received "significant information" after a BBC Crimewatch reconstruction.

Detectives attempt to identify a woman whose DNA was on a handbag strap found close to the murder scene and a separate possible witness.

The Met says the investigation into Stephen's murder is "unlikely to progress" without new information.

Doreen Lawrence tells the Daily Mail she believes detectives have run out of lines of inquiry and calls on them to "be honest" about the likelihood that anyone else will be convicted over his murder.

Neville Lawrence tells BBC News he would accept the inquiry being scaled back but believed it should not be completely closed.

Dr Lawrence adds he remains hopeful that, with the publicity around the 25th anniversary of his son's death and a BBC documentary, Stephen: The Murder That Changed A Nation, someone would come forward.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Stephen Lawrence murder: A timeline of how the story unfolded

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A timeline setting out the history of the Stephen Lawrence case.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Campaign for Change | Raneem’s Law
Background to the Campaign: Raneem’s Law was introduced in response to the tragic murders of 22-year-old Raneem Oudeh and her mother, Khaola Saleem, in 2018. Raneem had been a victim of domestic abuse and had made multiple emergency calls reporting threats to her life. Despite her repeated pleas for help, the lack of proper response from authorities resulted in their deaths. This devastating failure of the emergency services highlighted the need for urgent reforms in how domestic violence cases were handled. The case revealed systemic issues, including a lack of specialist knowledge among emergency responders and insufficient prioritisation of domestic abuse calls.
Aims of the Campaign: The campaign for Raneem’s Law aimed to improve the emergency response to domestic abuse incidents and ensure that victims’ voices were heard and acted upon. A key objective was to guarantee that calls related to domestic violence were treated with the urgency and seriousness they required. The campaign also sought to establish robust protective measures for victims, such as long-term Domestic Abuse Protection Orders (DAPOs), offering enhanced safety and security. Furthermore, it aimed to ensure better training for emergency call handlers so they could recognise signs of domestic abuse and respond appropriately.
Key People Involved: Raneem’s aunt, Nour Norris, played a pivotal role in the campaign. Motivated by the loss of her niece and sister, she became a passionate and tireless advocate for domestic abuse victims. Her dedication to justice and commitment to ensuring no other family experienced a similar tragedy fuelled the campaign’s momentum. Nour Norris worked closely with domestic abuse charities and support organisations, as well as legal experts and government officials, to push for comprehensive legal reforms. Their collective efforts helped bring the issue to national attention and created a strong foundation for legislative change.
Processes Used: The campaign utilised a wide range of methods to push for change. Media engagement was crucial, with Nour Norris sharing Raneem’s story through interviews, articles, and social media to raise awareness of the failures that led to their deaths. Collaborations with domestic abuse organisations strengthened the campaign’s credibility and provided expert insights into the changes needed. Public petitions demonstrated widespread support for the campaign’s objectives, while meetings with policymakers and law enforcement agencies ensured that the proposed reforms were feasible and well-informed. Awareness-raising events and community outreach further galvanised support, creating a powerful movement for change.
Outcome of the Campaign: Raneem’s Law was enacted in 2024, bringing vital and long-overdue changes to the way domestic abuse cases were managed in the UK. The law mandated the embedding of domestic abuse specialists within 999 control rooms, ensuring that emergency calls from abuse victims were prioritised and handled by trained experts. It also introduced Domestic Abuse Protection Orders, offering long-term safety measures such as electronic tagging for perpetrators and more stringent restrictions on their behaviour. These measures provided victims with enhanced protection and support, helping to prevent future tragedies. Raneem’s Law has been hailed as a significant advancement in safeguarding domestic abuse victims and ensuring their cries for help are never ignored again.
For further information on Raneem’s Law see the following links: BBC (February 2025) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/art...
Karma Nirvana (Domestic Abuse Charity) (February 2025) https://karmanirvana.org.uk/ne…

# data[].attributes.body
Letby: The New

Evidence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It looks like you are trying to access 5 app from outside the UK.

# data[].attributes.headline
The psychology of evil | Philip Zimbardo

# data[].attributes.subject
The psychology of evil | Philip Zimbardo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The psychology of evil | Philip Zimbardo

# data[].attributes.body
Have a look at what Criminology is all about and the potential career opportunities.

# data[].attributes.headline
Criminology and Criminal Profiling for beginners

# data[].attributes.subject
Criminology and Criminal Profiling for beginners

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Criminology and Criminal Profiling for beginners: (crime scene forensics, serial killers and sects) by Cabula, Ilaria; E, Frank Paul: Good Paperback (2020) | ThriftBooks-Atlanta

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ISBN: 9781654727239 - Paperback - Independently Published - 2020 - Condition: Good - No Jacket - Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less - Criminology and Criminal Profiling for beginners: (crime scene forensics, serial killers and sects)

# data[].attributes.headline
Documentary: The Ted Bundy Tapes - Netflix

# data[].attributes.subject
Documentary: The Ted Bundy Tapes - Netflix

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Watch Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes | Netflix Official Site

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Present-day interviews, archival footage and audio recordings made on death row form a searing portrait of notorious serial killer Ted Bundy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Families of some of those killed in the Hillsborough disaster fear they may once again be denied full accountability when the long-delayed report into police conduct surrounding the stadium crush is published later.
Several people who worked on the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation - including a former director - have told the BBC they doubt the report will deliver all the answers survivors and bereaved relatives were promised.

Some have warned that it may lead to accusations of another Hillsborough cover-up.

Families have also criticised the length and cost of the investigation - the largest of its kind ever carried out in England and Wales.

The police watchdog has spent more than 13 years examining the actions of South Yorkshire Police and other forces in the aftermath of the 1989 disaster in which 97 Liverpool supporters were killed during an FA Cup semi-final at Sheffield Wednesday's Hillsborough ground.

The IOPC had planned to publish its full report - which BBC News understands runs to several thousand pages - but will now release a "more focused" 400-page version.

It said the change was prompted by "concerns" from survivors and relatives about the sensitivity of some material and is intended to avoid undermining previous inquiries.

Jenni Hicks, whose teenage daughters Sarah and Victoria died at Hillsborough, said she would have preferred families to see the longer report before any decision was made about publication.

"I am not expecting any great revelations," she said. "I'm very disappointed that we are not getting the full report.

"I would have liked to have seen what it's taken 13 years to produce."

Some insiders said they believe the process has been hampered by internal disagreements, overlapping inquiries and a lack of momentum.

Mike Benbow, who previously led the investigation for five years, said: "The investigation was partly about trying to restore faith and trust in a judicial process that had let families down for many years.

"It remains to be seen whether we have achieved closure for anyone.

"After 13 years, people deserve more than a 400-page report."

Another insider, who did not want to be named, said: "It will be the equivalent of doing a house viewing through a keyhole.

"It will tell you absolutely nothing. It will just be an executive summary and a timeline of what went on."

The IOPC said the full report would be placed in the National Archives and that the transfer would begin next year, though no deadline has been set.

The IOPC investigation ran alongside Operation Resolve, a criminal inquiry focused on the day of the disaster.

Both were set up in 2012 following revelations of a widespread cover-up in which police leaders were found to have spread false narratives blaming Liverpool fans and withheld evidence of their own failings.

Officials promised a new era of transparency.

At that time, the families bereaved by the disaster - and the thousands who survived it - were daring to feel optimistic for the first time in more than 20 years.

Investigators were aware of the weight of their responsibility, to put right the wrongs of the past.

In 2013, Deborah Glass, then deputy chair of the IPCC - the IOPC's predecessor - told the BBC she hoped the investigation could be completed within two years.

"Hillsborough has a history of failed inquiries done by other bodies leading to results that people had no confidence in. We can't have more of that," she said.

"What we need to deliver here is the last definitive investigation into Hillsborough so the next generation isn't still looking for answers. We have to succeed."

More than £150m has been spent across the IOPC and Operation Resolve investigations, BBC analysis of the accounts has found.

This includes more than £56m on IOPC staff, which peaked at about 200 employees, at least £10m on accommodation, with dedicated offices in Warrington, and as much as £18,000 per year of IOPC spending on stationery.

In the early years of the investigation, teams navigated practical and technological challenges.

On a visit to the archive in 2016, the BBC saw original police notebooks kept for 25 years in a lock-up.

Some were so neglected they had to be cleaned of rat droppings before they could be analysed.

Evidence on VHS tapes and floppy disks required resurrected 1980s computers to view and modern facial-recognition tools had to be used to track fans' movements frame by frame.

The scale was unprecedented and there was a sense of purpose. Yet, 13 years on, the optimism felt by survivors and families has ebbed away.

After the criminal trials ended without significant convictions and after the police commander David Duckenfield was acquitted, many bereaved relatives began to lose faith in the process.

Several told the BBC they felt there was no point to the IOPC investigation.

They knew that all of the police officers involved had either retired or died. Even if they were found to be guilty of misconduct, no sanction could be imposed.

"I hope it's not going to be a waste of taxpayers' money," Ms Hicks said.

"We've just had the Budget and people are struggling. Perhaps the money would have been better spent on the NHS, or somewhere else it's desperately needed."

Charlotte Hennessy was only six years old when her father, James, was killed in the disaster.

She said the length of the investigations, as well as the original cover-up, has resulted in Hillsborough haunting her adult life.

"The process has been extremely lengthy and I have no doubt it will only leave us feeling frustrated," she said.

"We want to be able to live our lives but we keep getting pulled back into this."

She added: "There has been no empathy for my own mental health, no compassion for how distressing the outcome may be."

Ms Hennessy also feels uncomfortable about the cost of such a long-term investigation.

"You can't put a price on my dad's life but I would never have wanted public money to be used in this way. It's an appalling waste," she said.

Families received the full report on Monday though those who submitted complaints had already been notified of the outcomes.

Many have not been upheld, with the IOPC citing a lack of evidence.

This has been hard to stomach for complainants who felt they had read plenty of evidence in the Hillsborough Independent Panel report in 2012 which exposed the cover-up, and who had heard plenty more at the inquests that followed.

For them, it has had the effect of turning back the dial on justice.

Ms Hennessy had complained of police gross negligence after the 2016 Hillsborough inquests found that her father might have survived with better emergency medical care.

She has now been informed that the IOPC found no case to answer.

"I'm really frustrated," she said.

"They've had a decade to write this and I don't think it's worth the paper it's written on. No number of reports will change the facts."

Debbie Matthews, whose brother Brian was killed at Hillsborough, made two complaints alleging that officers had fabricated evidence and given false statements.

She said one was not upheld while the other was deemed outside the scope of the investigation.

"We've already been through hell and back and it feels like they are kicking us again," she said.

"We are really, really frustrated. Our mental health is suffering really badly because of this."

Andy Burnham, the Merseyside-born mayor of Greater Manchester, who was culture secretary when renewed scrutiny of Hillsborough began, said he hopes the report will result in senior police officers from the time being held to account.

"The campaign we worked on established the truth about Hillsborough... that there was a failure of police control at an unsafe ground," he told BBC Radio Manchester last week.

"What it has never achieved is individual accountability on officers who led a cover-up and attempted to blame the Liverpool supporters."

The report's publication comes as the Public Office (Accountability) Bill - widely known as the Hillsborough Law - continues its passage through Parliament.

The legislation aims to ensure that victims of major incidents receive greater transparency and accountability in future and that public bodies have a legal duty to be truthful and fully cooperate with investigations.

The bill is backed by Sir Keir Starmer, who Ms Hennessy said personally promised her that it would be implemented.

Mr Burnham has also renewed his call for a permanent victims' advocate body to support bereaved families in holding institutions to account.

Many of those who once felt hopeful now approach the IOPC's findings with a sense of resignation.

Families who celebrated the publication of the Independent Panel report and cried with joy after the inquests verdicts in 2016 felt they were getting to the truth but they also wanted justice and accountability.

An IOPC spokesperson said: "Our investigations are part of what have been very lengthy, complex and unprecedented processes including the longest inquests in English legal history.

"We share the frustrations about the length of time these processes have taken with survivors, bereaved families and all of those who have campaigned so long for answers - and we have said to them, they deserve better.

"We are now preparing to publish our findings and the report of our investigations."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Hillsborough families fear police report won't 'give all answers'

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A long-delayed report into police conduct at Hillsborough is due to be published by the Independent Office for Police Conduct.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The CPS works in partnership with the police, courts, the Attorney General's Office, the Home Office, the Ministry of Justice and other agencies throughout the criminal justice system (CJS).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The CPS works in partnership with the police, courts, the Attorney General's Office, the Home Office, the Ministry of Justice and other agencies throughout the criminal justice system (CJS).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
ByDominic Casciani , Home and legal correspondent and Tom McArthur

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jury trials scrapped for crimes with sentences of less than three years

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The reforms are being brought in to tackle unprecedented delays in the Crown Court.

# data[].attributes.headline
Criminology In The News | Unsafe Convictions

# data[].attributes.subject
Criminology In The News | Unsafe Convictions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Criminology In The News | Unsafe Convictions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The use of DNA evidence in serious cases of violence, murder and sexual assault is commonplace in contemporary police investigations, in part due to the advances in technology over the past few decades. Forensic evidence is often vital in confirming the identity of a criminal, but this has not always been the case.

# data[].attributes.headline
WJEC Criminology Campaigns | Ronan's Law

# data[].attributes.subject
WJEC Criminology Campaigns | Ronan's Law

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
WJEC Criminology Campaigns | Ronan’s Law

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Campaign for Change | Ronan’s Law
Background to the Campaign: Ronan’s Law was introduced following the tragic murder of 16-year-old Ronan Kanda in 2022. Ronan was attacked and fatally stabbed near his home in Wolverhampton in a case of mistaken identity. The weapons used in the attack were purchased online without any proper age or identity verification, raising serious concerns about the ease with which dangerous weapons could be accessed by minors. This horrifying incident underscored the loopholes in existing legislation, highlighting the urgent need for stricter regulations on the sale of knives and other offensive weapons. The Kanda family’s grief turned into a determined effort to prevent such tragedies from happening again, leading to the formation of a campaign demanding robust controls over weapon sales.
Aims of the Campaign: The primary aim of Ronan’s Law was to ensure tighter restrictions on the sale of knives and other dangerous weapons online, particularly to prevent underage individuals from accessing them. The campaign sought to close the legal loopholes that allowed weapons to be purchased without sufficient age verification. Another key objective was to hold retailers accountable for their role in enabling illegal sales, pushing for stricter penalties on businesses failing to comply with safety measures. By implementing these changes, the campaign aimed to reduce knife crime, safeguard communities, and prevent further loss of young lives.
Key People Involved: The campaign was spearheaded by Ronan’s mother, Pooja Kanda, and his sister, Nikita Kanda. Their loss and unwavering commitment to justice drove the campaign forward, turning their pain into a powerful call for change. They were supported by various anti-knife crime organisations and members of the local community who rallied behind their cause. The campaign also attracted attention from national media and politicians, with several legal experts and public figures endorsing the push for stricter weapon control measures.
Processes Used: The campaign employed a combination of public advocacy and media engagement to drive awareness and support. By sharing Ronan’s story through national and local press, as well as social media platforms, the family raised widespread awareness about the dangers of unregulated online weapon sales. Collaborations with anti-knife crime organisations amplified their message, creating a united front against inadequate legislation. Petitions played a crucial role in demonstrating public support for the cause, gathering thousands of signatures to show the demand for change. Additionally, the Kanda family engaged directly with government officials, attending meetings and presenting evidence to push for the introduction of more rigorous regulatory measures.
Outcome of the Campaign: In 2025, Ronan’s Law was enacted by the UK government, marking a significant step forward in combating knife crime and enhancing public safety. The law introduced enhanced age verification processes for online weapon sales, requiring photographic ID checks at both purchase and delivery stages. Retailers were also mandated to report suspicious or bulk purchases of knives to the authorities to prevent misuse. The law imposed stricter penalties, including up to two years’ imprisonment for businesses selling knives to minors and four years for possession of an offensive weapon with intent. Ronan’s Law has been widely recognised as a crucial development in addressing the growing issue of knife crime and protecting future generations.
For further information on Ronan’s Law, see the following links: Gov. UK (February 2025) https://www.gov.uk/government/...
Guardian (February 2025) https://www.theguardian.com/uk…

# data[].attributes.headline
Are Serial Killers Born or Made? | Hannah Briant

# data[].attributes.subject
Are Serial Killers Born or Made? | Hannah Briant

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.