# data[].attributes.body
So many different approaches from institutions in the pilot

# data[].attributes.body
conflicting projects covering similar areas

# data[].attributes.body
The group meetings showed a range of similar background issues impacting progress (eg financial or staff issues)

# data[].attributes.body
Planning to run Digital Insights survey with students to start getting more of the student voice - currently planned for mid - late November

# data[].attributes.body
Especially staff capacity and finances

# data[].attributes.body
Trying to move beyond token support from Snr management

# data[].attributes.body
Getting the central IT board to take ownership of progress

# data[].attributes.body
Moving forward with the areas we identified for development and, where appropriate, make use of other Jisc maturity models to support us (Data, AI)

# data[].attributes.body
Planning a big push on the Discovery Tool as part of our student-facing EdTech service; and continuing to build our Digital CoP for teaching staff.

# data[].attributes.body
Had not been involved in action learning sets before but found them really useful

# data[].attributes.body
It would be great to see this model adopted across the sector and thereby potentially provide a mechanism for benchmarking.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally would not want to have a colleague from my institution in the same ALS. In our set we covered challenges about projects that also touched upon individual challenges. I would not have wanted to share in the same way had a close colleague been present.

# data[].attributes.body
Turbulence and distraction is proving challenging to move on as effectively as we might have.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, ALS was more about individual Professional Development and support. I would not have wanted a colleague in the same ALS group.

# data[].attributes.body
suggest a spreadsheet version of the MM rather than Word doc

# data[].attributes.body
SImilar issues across participant institutions- but lots of different ways to tackle it, or priorities. Interesting to see what worked better than others.

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps have an interactive spreadsheet that generates a heat map where institutions need to focus efforts. I've seen some corporate consultancy companies effectively doing this

# data[].attributes.body
DX is a process, whose output can be measured/sampled at points in time. DX involves people and happens within a changing environment. It would be useful to understand if the Jisc framework is intended to be more a of yardstick to measure progress, and/or a tool to actively manage/shape change (a change management framework)?

# data[].attributes.body
Limited Resource (mostly people but also financial investment) and capacity to dive forward change.

# data[].attributes.body
Something/ reflections on the experience relating to how easy or not, specific challenges or differences in the DX process depending on where the org is in terms of the different stages of maturity.

# data[].attributes.body
Some of the evidence based practices we piloted in the jisc trial are being rolled out in our institution, and something that was so clear in the trial was that nothing is successfully transformed if we don’t get input and buy in from staff at all levels to start with and deal with barriers in that change management before we begin.