# data[].attributes.body
THAQIF & JEHAN

For the first article by Jayna Solinger is a well-written because it has clear main point and make the reading easier. For example, the article provide subtopic for each paragraph to ease the reader to know and understand what exactly the paragraph is about. Moreover, the second article is from online sources and it had no authors. So it is poorly written because it mix up the main point in one paragraph and make the reader hard to understand and confused to identify the content. For instance, in paragraph 6, it had two main points in one paragraph which make the reader had to read multiple times in order to understand the content. Therefore, it is proven that the first article have the characteristic to be well written meanwhile the second article does not fulfill the requirement.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the most important criteria to fulfil in order to produce a well written is clarity. Clarity in writing is introduced when readers are able to easily understand the messages and intentions of the author. For the first article, on each paragraph the author already put the subtopic to make readers understand it in a better manner. It is said so because the article has good contention and messages to deliver to the readers. Hence, it was a well written article. For the second article, the author's name are not provided and the article is unwell organized. To elaborate, it can lead to make readers having a hard time to read it. Moreover, it will make it even more harder on recognising the writer purpose and contention. As a result, it was a bad written article.

AFIF & POLIS

# data[].attributes.body
Maizatul & Fatini

One of the elements of well written is clarity. Jayna Solinger clearly stated their purpose The purpose of this report is to illustrate that teens that are involved in extracurricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities. moreover, the author main reason is clearly stated in the thesis statement “The main reason that

this correlation exists because of organization skills, parents’ involvement, and the need these students have to excel”. Her reason explains well the pattern of thought based on what we read so, this helps the reader to read and understand easily.

Meanwhile the poorly written article, the author failed to provide the purpose of the writing.for instance “Extracurricular activities, such as basketball, baseball, tennis, debating, chess

clubs, student government, yearbook, drama, choir and computer clubs can round out students' academics. Thus his writing is solely addressing examples rather than explaining them. As a result, readers will have difficulty in understanding the author.

Thus, it is evident that Jayna Solinger has managed to provide enough clarity in his article that makes it

worthy of being categorized as a well-written article, much compared to the latter.

# data[].attributes.body
The first criteria for producing a well-written article is clarity. Clarity in writing is when readers think it is easy to follow and understand the author's message. From the first article,which is a well-written article,the purpose of the paper can be easily identified in the sentence stated by Jayna Solinger."The purpose of this report is to illustrate that teens that are involved in extracurricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities." She has also stated in the thesis statement that "the main reason that this correlation exists is because of organisation skills, parents’ involvement, and the need for these students to excel." She gives a clear elaboration for each point that is easy to understand. For the second article,which is poorly written, the author does not provide a clear purpose, and the paragraphs are unorganised. The author only provides points about the benefits of extracurriculars and not the students's involvement that could lead to good grades. For example,besides being fun and a great way to socialise with peers, extracurricular activities can enhance students' time management and stress management skills, improving overall productivity." Thus,it is proven that Jayna managed to provide enough clarity,so her article is a well-written one compared to the second article.

Alya,Shaz

# data[].attributes.body
Syafiqah and Ilyana

One of the significant standards to determine a well-written paper is clarity. Clarity existed when thinking easy to follow whereby in the written paper should be each paragraph should make just a single clear theme. According to the well-written article, the purpose of the paper are demonstrably by Jayna to illustrate that teens that are involved in extracurricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are not. Jayna also claimed that there are three main reasons that involved in extracurricular activities leads to better grade which are the organizational skills that students has, the parent’s involvement with their students, and the need of the individual students has to excel. Each paragraphs was elaborated clearly by Jayna. Meanwhile for the poor written-article, the contents are not well-constructed in each paragraphs. Therefore, it is rigid to understand due to unclear arrangements. It is because this paper started the paragraphs with weak topic sentences and not straightforward. For example, in paragraph seven, it started by asking question instead of strong content.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the most important criteria to fulfill in order to produce a well-written paper is clarity.Clarity in writing means that the writing is confirmed when readers are able to easily understand the messages and intention of the author.For the first article,the purpose and contention of this paper are distinctly stated by Jayna Solinger in which she wrote that "All of the sources that talked about this subject suggested that there is a strong positive correlation between extra-curricular activities and good grades."Jayna also gives further elaboration on each of her ideas in a way that is clear and easy to understand.However,for the poorly written article,the author did mention the purpose of the article but doesn't clearly stand with one point . This is because in the first paragraph , they stated that " Academics are an important part of each student's high school years, especially since high school grades  play an integral role in college acceptance". The disagreement with the statement that made in the same paragraph which is they stated that they believe that " Extracurricular activities, such as basketball, baseball, tennis, debating, chess  clubs, student government, yearbook, drama, choir and computer clubs can round out students' academic  careers to great effect". With that being said, the article by Jayna Solinger is well written than the unknown author .

xoxo, h&i

# data[].attributes.body
Aliah & Iman

One of the crucial characteristics that can fulfill in order to to produce a well-written paper is clarity. Clarity in writing is established when readers are able to easily understand the message and intentions of the author. For the first article, the purpose and contention of the paper are distinctly stated by Jayna Solinger in which she wrote that "The purpose of this report is to illustrate that teens that are involved in extracurricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities". Jayna Solinger has also mentioned beforehand the three main ideas that are to be elaborated further throughout the paper in her thesis statement " The main reason that this correlation exists is because of organization skills, parents' involvement, and the need these students have to excel". She then gives further elaboration on each of her ideas in a way that is clear and easy to understand. For the poorly written article, it is retrieved online and has no author, briefly mentions the purpose of the paper, the author had failed to provide straightforward eloboration for each points which causes readers to be unable to fully graps the message that the author wishes to convey. One good example of this can be seen in the statement made by Kenny Smith, "Studies show that students in extracurricular

activities have higher [academic] scores. They learn to manage their time, relieve stress and learn to strive for excellence in more than one thing." Here, the author intends to eloborate on the effects of students involved with extracurricular activities. Therefore, it is evident that Jayna Solinger has managed to provide enough clarity in her article that makes it worthy of being categorised as well-written article much compare to the latter.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the most important criteria to fulfill in order to produce a well-written paper is clarity. Clarity in writing is established to help readers to understand the message better. For the first article, the purpose and contention of the paper are distinctly stated by Jayna Solinger in which she wrote that "The aim of this paper is to illustrate that teens that are involved in extra-curricular activities generally

get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities". Jayna Solinger has also mentioned beforehand, there are three main ideas that are to elaborated further throughout the paper in her thesis statement; "The main reason that

this correlation exists is because of organization skills, parents’ involvement, and the need these students

have to excel". She then gives further elaboration on each of her ideas in a way that is clear and easy to understand. For the poorly written article, there is no clear purpose to indicate the issue therefore the reader was unable to grasp and understand the message that the article stated. One good example to take from the article are "Studies show that students in extracurricular

activities have higher [academic] scores. They learn to manage their time, relieve stress and learn to strive

for excellence in more than one thing," says Kenny Smith, a school counselor in Thatcher, Arizona." Here the author try to elaborate on why the student who participated in extracurricular will intend to have higher grades. The writer seems to have just provided a reasons that are related to this issues, without clearly explaining the correlation between the reasons and the problem until the end of the paragraph. Hence, It's evidence that this poorly written essay are not written well.

najwa & tasha

# data[].attributes.body
By JENNA & RUTH

One of the most important criteria to fulfill in order to produce a well-written page is clarity. Clarity in writing is established when readers are able to easily understand the messages and intentions of the author. For the first article, the purpose and contention of the paper are distinctly stated by Solinger in which she wrote that "The purpose of this report is to illustrate that teens that are involved in extra-curricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities. " Solinger also mentioned beforehand that the three main ideas that are to be elaborated futher throughout the paper in his thesis statement; "The main reason that this correlation exists is because organisation skills, parents's involvement and the need these students have to excel." For the poorly written article without the author there is no clear purpose of the article. Hence the article is difficult to read because there is no clear purpose and contention. One good example of this can be seen in "Data shows that participants have a higher GPA (0.98 percent),fewer suspensions (13.9 percent), and better attendance (15.8 percent) than non-participants." This is because there is a lack of evidence of the data. Thus, Solinger has managed to provide enough clarity in her article that makes it worthy of being categorised as a well-written article, much compared to the letter.

# data[].attributes.body
NOPAL BAU ARAB, HANNANI, AFIQAH

One of the most important criteria to fulfill in order to produce a well-written paper is clarity. Clarity in writing is established when readers are able to easily understands the messages and intentions of the author. For the first article, the purpose and contention of the paper are distinctly stated by Jayna Solinger in which she wrote that “ The aim of this paper to illustrate that teens that are involved in extra-curricular activities generally get higher grades.” Jayna Solinger has also mentioned beforehand, the three main reasons that are to be elaborated further throughout the paper in her thesis statement; “The three main reasons that this correlayion exists is because of organization skills, parents’ involvement and the need this students have to excel.” She then gives further elaboration on each of her idea in a way that is clear and easy to understand. For the poorly written article, though the writer briefly mentions the purpose of the paper he had failed to provide straightforward elaboration for each point which causes readers to be unable to fully grasp the message that the author try to convey. One good example of this can be seen in the statement made by a school counselor Kenny Smith, “study show students in extra-curricular activities have higher score. They learn to manage their time, relieve stress, and learn to strive for excellence in more than one thing”. Here, the author intends to elaborate on the effects of students joining extracurricular activities. Thus, it is evident that Jenna Solinger has managed to provide enough clarity in her article that makes it worthy of being categorised as well-written article, much compared to the latter.

# data[].attributes.body
anis and najihah

One of the primary requisites for crafting a high-quality paper lies in achieving clarity. Writing achieves clarity when the audience can readily grasp the author's messages and intentions without difficulty. For the well-written article , the purpose and contention of the paper are distinctly stated by Jayna Solinger is " The purpose of this report is to illustrate that teens are involved in extra curricular activities generally  get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities ". Jayna Solinger also stated that "Some of the research for this report was  acquired through the Internet and some of it was obtained through surveys of 120 high school students,  grades ten through twelve (see Appendix A)". She then talked about subject suggested  that there is a strong positive correlation between extra-curricular activities and good grades . On the other hand , for the poorly written article , the purpose that made by the unknown author doesn't clearly stand with one point . This is because in the first paragraph , they stated that " Academics are an important part of each student's high school years, especially since high school grades  play an integral role in college acceptance". They also said that " Parents spend a lot of time encouraging their teens to study  more and play less in the pursuit of this goal". This contradict with the statement that made in the same paragraph which is they stated that they believe that " Extracurricular activities, such as basketball, baseball, tennis, debating, chess  clubs, student government, yearbook, drama, choir and computer clubs can round out students' academic  careers to great effect". Therefore , it is proven that article that made by Jayna Solinger is well written than the unknown author .

# data[].attributes.body
Carrie & Anisa

The first element that will be discussed is clarity. Clarity in writing is when readers are able to understand the messages and the intentions of the authors. In the first article, which is the well-written article, the purpose of the article is stated by Jayna Solinger clearly at the beginning of the article, which she wrote "The purpose of this report is to illustrate that teens that are involved in extra-curricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are involved in activities." The purpose is easy to be understand and it is easier to be detected by the reader. For the second article, the poorly-written article, the purpose of the article is not stated clearly by the author, where the author only explained "However, there is another more playful component of a well-rounded education - outside the regular academic program - that may positively students' success. Extracurricular activities, such as basketball, baseball, tennis, debating, chess clubs, student government, yearbook, drama, choir and computer clubs can round out students' academic careers to great effect." While we can get a general idea of the article, it is still hazy and difficult to understand as it is jumbled up in the article. The author jumped to the topic without giving any of his intention to write the article. Thus, it is evident that Jayna has managed to provide enough clarity in her article that makes it worthy of being categorised as a well-written article, much compared to the latter.

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis involves critically examining a written piece, typically a scholarly article, to understand its main arguments, methodologies, evidence, and conclusions. For the purpose of our analysis, we have chosen two articles out of five to discuss. The well written article entitled 'A Student's Involvement Encourages Good Grades' by Jayna Solinger. The article discuss about how involvement of extracurricular activities and good grades. Next, the poorly written article is "The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens" that has no author. This article focuses on extracurricular more than maintaining impacts on students. The elements we have chosen to compare between the two articles are clarity, counter- argument, appeal to emotion and relevance.

-afiqah

# data[].attributes.body
Naufal

Article anysis is a process involved comparing two articles in the terms of similarity and differences. The well-written article entitled ‘A student’s involvement encourages good grades’ is written by Jayna Solinger. It discussed about positive correlation between extra-curricular activities and getting a good grades.The poorly written article titled ‘The importance of extracurricular activities for teens’ and it has no mentioned authors, so the credibility of this article can be questioned. This article discussed about how extracurricular activities is importance for teens. In this analysis, we will compare these two articles based on clarity, evidence, opposing view points and logical order

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis inspects two independent articles to identify which is the best written and which is the most poorly written article by observing the comparability between the two papers in terms of similarities and differences. The first article entitled  ‘ A students’ Involvement Encourages Good grades ‘ by Jayna Solinger  clearly explain the strong positive correlation between extra-curricular activities and good grades . We have decided to compare the following aspect of the two articles from clarity,evidence,counter argument and relevant

Ainaa

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis is a process that involves compsring two articles in terms of their similarities and differences to determine the best article and the worst from the pair. The well written article A Students’ Involvement Encourages Good Grades by

Jayna Solinger. This analysis delves into two articles that explore the multifaceted benefits of extracurricular engagement. The first article underscores the holistic advantages of participation, emphasizing how activities such as sports, clubs, and volunteering cultivate essential life skills, garnering attention from colleges for their insights into students' character and abilities. Conversely, the second article is poorly written which is The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens delves into the specific correlation between extracurricular involvement and academic achievement, drawing from empirical research and surveys to highlight the pivotal role of organizational skills, parental support, and students' ambition in fostering higher grades. Through a comparative examination of these articles, this analysis seeks to elucidate the profound significance of extracurricular activities in shaping students' academic success and overall well-being. In order to compare the two articles, the elements of clarity, appeal to emotion and counter argument.

HANNANI

# data[].attributes.body
THAQIF AND JEHAN BOS

Article analysis is the process of evaluating two articles to identify which is the best and which is the worst by analyzing their similarities and differences. To discuss, the well article is a students' involvement encourage good grades by jayna solinger. it is said that after school activities could give a huge benefit to students as well as creating a chance to brighten their future. The poorly article is the importance of extracurriculur activities for teen that retrieve from online and no authors that examines the relationship of extracurriculur activities with good grades. we can compare the two article according to clarity, evidence, opposing view point and logical order as element to identify the article either well written or poorly written.

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis examines two articles to identify the well written and poorly written article. The first is a well written article that entitled A students’ Involvement Encourages Good Grade by Jayna Solinger where she discusses teens that are involved in extracurricular activities generally get higher grades than those who are not. The second article is a poorly written entitled “The importance of extracurricular Activities for teens” where this article discusses why students should be involved in extracurricular activities. the element of the article that will be analyzed are clarity, opposing viewpoint, evidence, and logical order

Maizatul & Fatini

# data[].attributes.body
Our purpose doing this article analysis is to identify the well written and poorly written article. The worst one is titled 'Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teen' and there is no specific author for this article. Next, the well written article is entitle 'A Student Involvement Encourage Good Grades' by Jayna Solinger. Students academic performance are strongly influence by their participation on the extra curricular activities. It is said so because most of the athlete students are not joining or participating in any extra curricular activities and its effecting their academic grades. There is many ways to prevent this thing to happen and help the student itself to improve their academic grades. In order to analyse the two articles, the elements of clarity, opposing views, evidence and logical order will be discussed.

apip pasum

aiman polis

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis involves examining two separate articles to determine which one is well-written and which one is poorly written. This is done by comparing the similarities and differences between the two papers to gauge their quality and effectiveness in conveying information. The first article entitled “ A Students Involvement Encourage Good Grade” by Jayna Solinger. This article is acknowledged as well-written because it has a positive correlation about extra-curricular and good grades. Meanwhile the worst article entitled “The Importance  Extra-curricular Activities For Teens” was retrieved from an online website and its credibility was questionable. In order to compare these articles, we will be looking and analyzing by using four elements which are clarity, evidence, opposing viewpoint and logical order.

Tasha and Najwa

# data[].attributes.body
Syafiqah Maisara & Nuralifah Ilyana

Article analysis is to examine two articles to identify in which is the best written and the poorly written article by investigating the comparison between the two articles out of five in terms of similarities and differences. “A Students’ Involvement Encourages Good Grades” by Jayna Solinger being the title as the first article given further explanation about why there is correlation between extracurricular activities and good grades among students. This article is very precise in an organized manner with complete matters and facts that determine it is a well-written article. Conversely, the second article entitled “The Importance of Extracurricular Activities For Teens” that not published by any author. This article emphasized on the benefits of joining extracurricular especially in college acceptance in teenagers. The elements that have been chosen by us to compare between these two articles are clarity, evidence, opposing viewpoints and logical order.

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis is a process that involves comparing two articles in terms of their similarities and differences to determine the well-written and poorly written articles. The first article which is a written article entitled “A Students’ Involvement Encourages Good Grades” by Jayna Solinger clearly explains about positive correlation between extra-curricular activities and good grades. The second article which is poorly written article entitled “The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens, was rethrift online and is without author. The comparison made between these two articles is based on 4 elements which are clarity, evidence, logical order, and opposing viewpoints.

Shaz,Aliah,Diyana

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis is a process that involves comparing two articles in terms of their similarities and differences to determine the best article and the worst from the pair. For the purpose of our analysis, we have chosen two articles out of five to discuss. The best article is entitled A Students' Involvement Encourages Good Grades by Jayna Solinger examines teens that are involved in extra-curricular activities generally get higher grades than before than those who are not involved in activities. The worst article entitled The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens. It discusses about how extracurricular activities is important for teen. In order to compare the two articles, the elements sufficiency, clarity, relevance and completeness will be discussed.

JENNA AND RUTHIE SAMANTHA

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis examines two separate articles to determine which is the best written and which is the worst written by comparing the similarities and differences between the two publications.The first article entitled "A Students’ Involvement Encourages Good Grades" by Jayna Solinger clearly explains that teens that are involved in extra-curricular activities generally

get higher grades than those who are not involved in activities. The article is written in a very concise and objective manner such that it is deserving of being acknowledged as a well-written article.

On the other hand, the second article that we chose is entitled "The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens" that has no author . This article generally focuses extracurricular rather than maintaining objectivity which severely impacts the quality of the article.

We have decided to compare the following aspects of the two articles from relevance, opposing view , clarity, and counter argument.

- mimie

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis involves two articles to identify which is the best written and which is the most poorly written article by observing the comparability between two articles in terms of similarities and differences. The first article, which is the best written article, entitled A Students' Involvement Encourages Good Grades written by Jayna Solinger. It discusses that there is a strong positive correlation between extra-curricular activities and good grades. The second article, which is the worst written article, entitled The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens discusses about the advantages or benefits for teens to participate in extracurricular activities. In order to compare the two articles, the elements of clarity, evidence, opposing view points and logical order shall be discussed further.

Carrie & Anisa

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis is to identify whether the article is well written and vice versa in terms of similarities and differences. For the purpose of our analysis we have chosen two out of five articles to be in our article analysis. The worst article was titled the importance of extra curricular activities for teens and there is no author for this article. Briefly, it stated that the advantage of joining the extra curricular activities. However, the well written articles that we chose is students involvement encourages good grades by Jayna Solinger. Briefly, it emphasizes on positive correlation between extra curriculars and academics impact on student. Hence, to come out with this decision we use four elements in this article which are clarity, appeal to emotion, counter argument and relevant.

# data[].attributes.body
imang

Article analysis is a process that involves comparing two articles in terms of their similarities and differences to determine the well - written article and the worst from the pair. For the purpose of our analysis, we have chosen two articles out of five to discuss. The well- written article entitled A Students' Involvement Encourages Good Grades by Jayna Soliger. The purpose of this article is the correlation between extra-curricular activities and good grades than those who are not involved in activities. Next, the poor written article entitled The Importance of Extracurricular Activities for Teens that is has no author. It discusses the important of each high school to join extracurricular activities that can lead them to get students' success. In order to compare the two articles, the elements of clarity, evidence, opposing view point, and logical order.

# data[].attributes.body
A process that involves comparing two articles in terms of their similarities and differences to determine the best article and the worst from the pair is called article analysis. For the purpose of our analysis we have chosen two articles out of 5 to discuss. The worst article is entitled 'THE IMPORTANCE OF EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES FOR TEENS' which was published without an author that examines the importance of extracurricular activities for teens. The best article is entitled 'A STUDENTS' INVOLVEMENT ENCOURAGES GOOD GRADES' by JAYNA SOLINGER. It discusses how good grades can be achieved by involving in extracurricular activities. In order to compare the two articles, the elements of clarity, logical, evidence, and opposing points will be discussed.

xoxo, h&i

# data[].attributes.body
Article analysis is to identify whether the article is well written and vice versa in terms of simlarities and differences. First article was titled a student involvement encourages good grades by Jayna Solinger. It clearly explains about the teens that involved in extra curriculars are generally gets higher grades and those who are not involved in any extra curriculars activities get lower grades. This article was written in a clear way regarding advantages of joining extra curriculars activities.