# data[].attributes.body
Students use Google Forms or Jamboard to analyze the Constitution's Preamble using readability scores (Flesch Reading Ease: 2.0; Gunning Fog: 18.1; ARI: 29.6). They examine how language complexity affects understanding and answer guided questions about accessibility and meaning.

# data[].attributes.body
Students rewrite the Preamble in modern, accessible language while maintaining its original meaning. They then use readability tools to compare their version's scores with the original, discussing how language choices impact comprehension.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In today's fast-paced world, clear communication is key. Whether you're a professional writer, an educator, or simply someone who wants to make your content more accessible, understanding the type of readers who can read your text can lead to better engagement and comprehension.

Our newReadability Scoring System is a state-of-the-art tool that evaluates the complexity of a text and assigns it a score based on internationally recognized scales such as Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG. It provides insights into the reading age, word usage, sentence length, and overall comprehension level required to understand the content. Assess the readability of texts across different scales, including individual sentences, paragraphs, or complete documents. Our platform is designed for users of all technical levels.

We've improved both the Dale-Chall and Spache word-list formulas to include their original and updated calulations. We've also added the Fry Sight 1000K Words Assessment, a unique tool that helps you determine which words readers will find familiar or difficult and at what grade-level. Each word-based formula also helps you analyze questionable words, familiar words, and difficult words based on their specific word-lists.

In addition to the readability text tools above, we have a separate readability calculator called, the Fry Graph and Raygor Graph Text Tool, which will score a sample of your text and visually plot the grade level onto each graph.

The Fry readability formula measures English texts to provide you with a reading/grade level based on two criteria: 1) the average number of sentences, and 2) syllables per hundred words. We plot these averages onto The Fry Graph to visually show you the grade level of your readers.

Similar to The Fry Graph, The Raygor readability formula also measures text based on the average number of sentences and letters per hundred words. We plot these two averages on the Raygor Graph to visually show you the reading/grade level of your readers. The Raygor Graph is largely used in secondary education to assess teaching materials and books, whereas The Fry Graph is commonly used on a broader range of texts.

Many writers, professionals and amateurs, face the dilemma of writing materials above the reading level of their readers. The best way to write for your target audience is to learn how to make your writing more readable by removing unnecessary words, using more familiar words, and sticking to a shorter sentence length. We invite you to peruse through our many articles on how to write better using readability formulas. Our authors offer you their best writing tips to help you identify and remedy problem areas in your writing and write in plain English-the preferred writing style for a public readership. See all articles about readability and writing.

Who Can Benefit from Readability Formulas?

Writers & Editors: Enhance the quality and accessibility of your writing.

Educators: Tailor educational material to match the reading level of your students.

Marketing Professionals: Craft messages that resonate with your target market.

Healthcare Providers: Ensure patient materials are easy to understand.

Government Agencies: Communicate clearly with constituents.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Readability Formulas | Free readability assessment tools

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ReadabilityFormulas.com is a free website to automatically calculate the reading level and grade level of your materials. We also offer advice on how to improve your writing and write effectively for your readers.

# data[].attributes.body
Students identify archaic or complex words in the Preamble (e.g., 'ordain,' 'posterity,' 'tranquility') and research their 18th-century meanings versus modern usage. They create a glossary with visual aids to help younger students understand the text.

# data[].attributes.body
Students break down the Preamble's complex sentences into shorter, simpler sentences. They analyze how sentence length and structure contribute to reading difficulty and practice using comparative language to describe text complexity.

# data[].attributes.body
Students debate whether founding documents should be written in accessible language or maintain their original form. They consider how language barriers affect civic participation and democratic engagement, using evidence from readability data.

# data[].attributes.body
Students compare texts written at different grade levels (elementary textbook excerpt, newspaper article, academic paper, Constitution) using readability scores. They walk around stations and analyze how audience and purpose affect language complexity.

# data[].attributes.body
Students research the education levels and literacy rates of Americans in 1787 versus today. They analyze whether the Constitution's complexity was intentional or reflective of the era's writing style, and discuss implications for modern democracy.

# data[].attributes.body
Before revealing actual scores, students predict readability levels for various constitutional passages. They justify their predictions using text features they observe, then compare with actual data and reflect on their analytical skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Students role-play as delegates debating how to write the Preamble for maximum public understanding versus formal authority. They draft alternative versions and test them with readability tools, arguing for their approach's effectiveness.

# data[].attributes.body
Students create visual infographics explaining the Preamble's meaning and readability challenges. They use charts, graphs, and simplified language to make constitutional concepts accessible to middle school students.

# data[].attributes.body
Students examine preambles from other countries' constitutions and compare their readability scores with the U.S. version. They analyze how different democratic societies approach accessibility in their founding documents.

# data[].attributes.body
Students write analytical essays exploring how the Constitution's reading difficulty affects modern civic engagement. They use comparative language and readability data as evidence, connecting historical language choices to contemporary democratic participation.