# data[].attributes.body
Modern maps very clearly distinguish between landmasses and bodies of water. The distinctions on this map are not as clear, and there isn't any sort of color-coding to indicate what is within one "border" and what is not (which is something modern maps usually feature). Modern maps also typically do not have tons of tiny labels, even when focusing on a particular area, and will just include names of a handful of significant areas (like capital cities, very populated cities, inland bodies of water, etc.).

# data[].attributes.body
I can't necessarily speak to the accuracy of this map, but the Carte Pisane definitely focuses on navigation around this specific area, rather than global navigation. I don't see any country borders on this map, instead the map focuses on accessing port cities by showing ways to reach them. This shows a terrestrial-focused worldview, where people use the ocean as a means of connection between landmasses. The lack of borders and emphasis on ports suggests to me an emphasis on trade and commerce, rather than imperial or political power.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is it “less accurateˮ—or just different in purpose?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is it “less accurateˮ—or just different in purpose?

# data[].attributes.body
It's just different in that it was designed specifically for navigators - to help them sail from one port to another. So while it may look less accurate by modern standards, it was very accurate for its time and its purpose: coastal navigation.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the people who made the Carte Pisane were focused on the idea of trade. This is from the perspective of the people who are in charge of the population. The coastal cities are the first thing that stands out to me about the map.

# data[].attributes.body
This map reflects the mediterranean sea’s important port cities. It’s vague with any cities or land features that are away from the sea. This shows us that this map was most likely used by merchants and traders to navigate to appropriate ports and cities. Rather than imposing a certain empire’s power over a region, it reflects the vast area that was available for merchants to access.

# data[].attributes.headline
How does it reflect access rather than control? - Ruby

# data[].attributes.subject
How does it reflect access rather than control? - Ruby

# data[].attributes.body
The map represents a more homogenized region without clear borders or definable land masses. It details each border city along the perimeter, connecting it to other cities, reflecting its overall accessibility. Also, there are no great big powers or large empires depicted, instead, everyone is represented equally and, navigationally, in relation to each other.

# data[].attributes.headline
The importance of connecting rather than dividing- Tamara Salmeron

# data[].attributes.subject
The importance of connecting rather than dividing- Tamara Salmeron

# data[].attributes.body
The Carte Pisane lacks detail representations of inland topography, borders or political divisions. This absence shows a focus on sea based interactions and a network of ports instead of defined nation states. This makes me think that at the time, sea based connections were more important than modern day borders.

# data[].attributes.headline
A World without borders - Jonathan Stenger

# data[].attributes.subject
A World without borders - Jonathan Stenger

# data[].attributes.body
This Map represents a world without borders because quite literally, there are no labelled borders that are drawn, or lines dividing kingdoms. Based on how the map is designed, it seems like the only type of labelling are just names of port cities and/or towns (should the map be a landmass rather than solely the ocean. Moreover, a world without borders would accentuate access rather than control, in which this map illustrates by not drawing lines that divide nations as well as the clear use of latitudinal, longitudinal lines and other visual aids for navigation. Individuals like merchants would use a map like such to navigate their way to a desired port.

# data[].attributes.headline
Navigation vs Colonization - Finley Lindstrom

# data[].attributes.subject
Navigation vs Colonization - Finley Lindstrom

# data[].attributes.body
This map is different from many of the others we examined in its complete lack of property claims. I can't find any flags, and the writing is mostly unreadable, but it appears that this map is purely for navigational purposes, rather than political ones. Even land and sea aren't as delineated as one might be used to, though I think that could be because of weathering. I'm reminded of the Cantino Planisphere from only a few centuries later, which was littered with flags and territory claims between Spain and Portugal-- comparatively, this map is empty, but it still contains a lot of information on port cities. Altogether, it paints the world as very traversable- if you can read the map, I get the feeling that you'll be able to find your way.

# data[].attributes.body
This map differs greatly from what comes to mind when the word map pops into your head, it completely excludes land masses. The exclusion of boarders provides evidence that this map was not used in the political sphere, but instead to understand coastlines, ports, and maritime routes -- extremely practical for trading routes.