# data[].attributes.body
She has awareness that it is a situation she needs to reflect on . Able to identify some feelings eg relief/overwhelmed.

No structure used to aid her reflection

Descriptive of the scenario and gives good detail of what happened but didn't detail her reflection - we don't know what aspects she has reflected on or how she would improve this.

No further analysis.

Nothing to make goals from and evidence of how she will use this experience to develop practice.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths - Descriptive of scenario.
Listed 3 goals at the end that were given for improvement, however she has not then expanded on how she would develop these further.

Limitations - Lacked depth.
We don't know how they felt about the situation.
Lack of self-awareness/self reflection.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths-Quite detailed in description and events.
Was aware of flaws. Some feelings identified

Weaknesses-Lacked depth. Lack of analysis and action plan for development in future practice. Lack of emotional intelligence

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths - More self reflection on how she actually felt in the scenario e.g. felt nervous because of their peer watching.
More acknowledgement of the feelings that occurred.

Limitations - Questions are asked, but not development actions made as to how they would develop this further/how they would improve.
They were given pointers to improve on, but no action plan to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: she was brave enough to give the task a go even though she didn't feel competent, she was already reflecting on her review prior to receiving feedback.

Weakness: she didn't follow up on the feedback from her supervisor which won't allow her to fully understand what she can do to improve.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: More reflective than first one.
Relates experience to her own skills and previous experience
Started analysis process
Gives more context to the scenario which adds detail

Limitations:
Could have continued with reflections raised by asking herself so what does this mean  and how will i learn from this and what will i do now .

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: description of scenario including context
Weaknesses: focus of description of scenario. Mentioned what supervisor Feeded back but nothing regarding reflective practice.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths- Recollects past experience and incorporates it to the situation. Reflected in more context but did not delve into depth. Challenges self to some degree.

Weaknesses- Reflection still not fully deep. Analysis still unclear and no further action plans made. Not challenging self. Reflection still descriptive. Negative reflection rather than proactive.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths - A lot more discussion of depth of feelings and reflecting/relating these to past experiences.
Reflecting on her past skills in previous roles.
Reflecting on feelings of colleagues.
Acknowledging barriers - she felt she was unable to speak with her supervisor.

Limitations - Although barriers are being acknowledged, there is no action plan to discuss where she is going to develop these areas further.
She took on her supervisor's pointers but there is no expansion as to how she will progress onwards with this feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: Relating to herself and reflection throughout stages of the scenario.
Weaknesses: focus on negative. What to do next time?

# data[].attributes.body
strengths: undrstanding and perceptions of what others feel and viewpoints.

Weaknesses: more concise? long
Took on boards supervisors advise but no expansion on how to improve further as such.
? codes of conduct and theory

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: More descriptive reflections on her personal life, self awareness of her weaknesses, very aware of the environment and how she needs to tailor herself to match it,

Weakness: Telling herself she was nervous, very analytical, overthinking and questioning herself too much

# data[].attributes.body
A good description of the scenario was given in all three, although level of detail varied - we could understand to some degree what was going on.
Using questions highlights the thought process.
Limitation of all three scenarios - no action plan given for how they would improve on feedback in the future.
Reflecting on past experiences appears to be a useful tool for reflections.
Acknowledgement of guidelines would be recommended if this was an assessment, rather than a diary reflection.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths : Much deeper reflection
More awareness and dissection of thoughts that occurred during each part of scenario and tried to rationalise things
Able to link back to previous experience.
Able to realise multiple different perspectives that went through mind
Able to reflect on own skills /own culture and background
Able to use reflection to see how if did things differently, how it could have impacted the situation.
Reflection abled identification of weaknesses
Reflection allowed her to identify some positives from situation e.g. she was given an opportunity which was something wanted to do for a while.

Limit - how can she work on assertiveness ? Action plan could have been more detailed. We don't know if she set any specific goals and how she was going to do it

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths-Strong, in depth reflection. Acknowledges some aspects of barriers to communication. In depth analysis. Critical demonstration of critical thinking. Deep reflection. Reflects upon past experiences. Displays understanding an acknowledges barriers of why feedback was not sought from supervisor.

Weaknesses-Still no clear action plan-list out specific areas for improvement in regards to communication. Understands weaknesses and how it affects practice but fails to set a detailed action plan and set clear goals for future improvement.

# data[].attributes.body
Key features of good reflective writing:
-Self awareness
-EI
-Ability to recognise and critically discuss positive and negative experiences
-Evaluate external factors and how they can affect practice
-Setting clear action plans

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: she is think more critically now and more of a deeper reflective. More proactive with the feedback, not dwelling on it but speaking with her classmate and planning for the future. Made an action plan with want to shadow more dietitians.

Weaknesses: Still having those self doubting thoughts, still didn't want to disrupt the supervisor,

# data[].attributes.body
Deep reflection - Reflection 3
- demonstration of 'standing back' from the event.
- Acknowledging and understanding peers and patients emotions
- asking questions