# data[].attributes.body
talk abiout the potion and how it makes people think they can get away with anything

# data[].attributes.body
add music

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Editor's Note: For a recent Making Sen$e segment, economics correspondent Paul Solman spoke with Dacher Keltner, a professor of psychology at University of California, Berkeley known for his research on power. His new book is "The Power Paradox: How We Gain and Lose Influence." In a previous post, Keltner and Paul discussed how people gain power and esteem in the eyes of their peers. Today, Keltner explains the paradox part - why once we gain power, we lose the very skills that got us there and take more than our fair share. You can watch the full report below.

- Kristen Doerer, Making Sen$e Editor

Dacher Keltner: Power, new studies in economics have shown, comes from sharing resources and bringing out the welfare of others. Power comes from a kind of humble language. There are actually new studies showing if you are humble and respectful, people respect you more. So that's the rise to power. Here's the problem: When we feel powerful, we have these surges of dopamine going through our brain. We feel like we could accomplish just about anything. That's where the power paradox begins, which is that very sense of ourselves when feeling powerful leads to our demise, leads to the abuse of power.

Paul Solman: That's Paul Piff's experiment that I participated in playing Monopoly. I was simply designated the more powerful person, and I began to behave in relatively anti-social ways.

Dacher Keltner: You're a special case, Paul...

"That's where the power paradox begins, which is that very sense of ourselves when feeling powerful leads to our demise, leads to the abuse of power."

Paul Solman: But it was true. He was calling me on it, saying, "Look how you're talking." I had a sense of that I was going to win the game and that I was stronger than he, all because I got $200 when I passed "Go" and he got $100. It absolutely affected my mood.

Dacher Keltner: This is what's striking when you bring people into the lab, and you randomly give them power. You say, "You're in charge," or in that case with the monopoly game, "You have more money," or perhaps you get to evaluate other people and allocate rewards. Just the random assignment of power, and all kinds of mischief ensues, and people will become impulsive. They eat more resources than is their fair share. They take more money. People become more unethical. They think unethical behavior is okay if they engage in it. People are more likely to stereotype. They're more likely to stop attending to other people carefully. It's just this paradoxical quality of power, which is the good in human nature gets us power, and then power leads to the bad in human nature.

Paul Solman: So power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely?
READ MORE: Why Those Who Feel They Have Less Give More
Dacher Keltner: Well, I think Lord Acton was on to something which is that there are dozens of studies showing who's more likely to speak rudely within an organization? High power people or low power people? High power people. Who's more likely to have sexual affairs? High power people or low power people? High power people. Who's more likely to take more resources that aren't theirs? High power people. You go down the list. It kind of looks like an absolute story.

Paul Solman: What kinds of studies show that people with more power take a lion's share of the resources?

Dacher Keltner: That's where I really began my studies of power, Paul. People have this deep sense of fairness. They really have a preference if people have roughly the same amount. And if you look out in the world, you can't help but notice that people with power seem to be enjoying more resources right? Wealthy nations eat more of the world's protein. A lot of people are really concerned about executive compensation. Why should this person make 10 million bucks a year and I make 12 bucks an hour?

"Two-thirds of the time it's our person in the position of power who unconsciously feels entitled to take more of the sweets."

And I was thinking about how we demonstrate this in the lab, and so we did this crazy study that gained a lot of traction and has come to be known as the "Cookie Monster Study." We bring three people to the lab, and we randomly assign one person to the role of leader. We say you're in charge, and then over the course of the experiment, these three students have to write policies for the university. They bring together facts, they write policies, they submit them, and we gather these written products. Half-way into the experiment, we bring a plate of five delicious chocolate chip cookies. We put them down and that's actually where the experiment really begins. So everybody takes a cookie. They eat very happily and are grateful for it. All groups leave one cookie on the plate because they don't like to take that last cookie, because you don't want to be the person who takes the last piece of food. So the key question is who takes that fourth cookie, and indeed, it's our person in the position of power who reaches out and grabs the cookie and says that's mine.

Paul Solman: Is it every time that it's the leader?

Dacher Keltner: Most of the time. Two-thirds of the time it's our person in the position of power who unconsciously feels entitled to take more of the sweets. One of my grad student came to me and said, "You know, I'm convinced that they're eating differently." So we spent several months coding the videotapes of people eating, and we found our person in power is more likely to eat with their mouths open, limps smacking, crumbs falling down on their sweaters. And that set in motion this whole exploration. And it's so fundamental. Humans are this balance of impulse and our ego, our sense of morality and our sense of what other people think of us, and power shifts this balance. Suddenly when I feel powerful, I can eat the cookies however I want to. I can swear at my colleagues. I can touch people in a way that feels good to me, but not necessarily worry about how it feels to them. That really set in motion this idea that power leads people to feel entitled to take more resources.
READ MORE: Why the secret to gaining power is different today
Paul Solman: Are there other examples?

Dacher Keltner: One really interesting area of research is work in organizations. We know you create a better team if as a leader you speak in a respectful way. You compliment. You bring out the best, you praise people. You ask good questions. And so researchers have been asking who is more likely to swear in a rude fashion at their work colleagues. And three out of the four acts of rudeness come from people in positions of power in organizations in different sectors. If you're going to be told you're an idiot, it's going to probably come from people in positions of power.

"Who's more likely to blaze through a pedestrian zone on the road and think that their time is more important than the safety of the pedestrian? It's people driving more high power, wealthier cars."

Here's one of my favorites. I could not believe this finding. Investigators were interested in who's more likely to shoplift. Shoplifting costs America over $10 billion a year. So the question is who is likely to walk into the store and pocket something that they don't pay for, and indeed, it is high power, wealthier people who are more likely to shoplift. There are famous car studies with Paul Piff that look at who's more likely to blaze through a pedestrian zone on the road and think that their time is more important than the safety of the pedestrian? It's people driving more high power, wealthier cars.

Everywhere you turn, you see this finding that power makes us feel entitled to more.
Watch the viral Making Sen$e report on Paul Piff's famous car study above.
Paul Solman: So what do you do about it?

Dacher Keltner: I think that that's the great question of societies. Studies are finding - and it's very intuitive - that if you make people feel accountable, and you say, "Paul, a committee is evaluating how you allocate these resources," and you're in a position of power and now allocate the resources, you become more ethical in how you allocate resources.

Paul Solman: If I think somebody's watching.
READ MORE: How do humans gain power? By sharing it
Dacher Keltner: Yeah, and the sense of accountability or the sense of being scrutinized is so powerful. All you have to do in studies now is actually place a geometric arrangement of dots, with two dots at the top and the little dot at the bottom, that kind of resembles the human face. If I am have sense of being watched, I become less greedy and less entitled in taking resources in positions of power. Accountability is really important.

Paul Solman: So if you're the designated leader in some experiment and you're beginning to lord it over the others, and there's a picture that has four dots kind of in the array of a face in the room, you're less likely to do so?

Dacher Keltner: Yes. Let's say that I'm in an experiment and I have an opportunity to use resources to my benefit to the cost of other people. If I'm simply aware that other people are going to know of my actions, I act in a much more ethical fashion. I avoid the abuses of power. There are studies that show if I have a chance to take resources, and there's this geometric arrangement of dots that looks like a human face, I take fewer of the resources for myself. I leave more for the public good. It's very powerful.

There's a concern right now that the wealthiest in our society are beyond scrutiny. No one even knows who they are, these people making $300 million a year. We don't know where they live. We don't know how their wealth generates, and that basic social condition spells trouble, and it spells a greater likelihood for the abuse of power.

"When I'm aware of what other people think of me, when I'm aware of my reputation, I cooperate more in economic gains."

As we think about inequality in the United States, one of the really interesting developments is the efforts that have sprung up to scrutinize the people with the most power. The journalist Michael Massing just wrote this nice essay about why there should be journalism about the one percent and what they're really doing so that we as a country know what they're doing with the resources and what we can make of it.

Paul Solman: So your belief is that to the extent that there's journalism about the top 1 percent and how they behave, it will modify their behavior?

Dacher Keltner: Yes. This really interesting new literature shows that when I'm aware of what other people think of me, when I'm aware of my reputation, I cooperate more in economic gains. I am more likely to sign up for environmentally efficient services. I am more likely to pay taxes. Just this sense that my actions are being scrutinized and my reputation is at stake produces better behavior for the public good or the greater good. And I think that one of the ironies is that if we build up more awareness of the most powerful and the sense that their reputations are at stake, they'll actually engage in more noble actions. They'll be more giving to society. They'll feel better about it. There's a rich literature behind that, and so there are benefits for them as well.
READ MORE: Money can buy happiness, especially when you invest it in others

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The science behind why power corrupts and what can be done to mitigate it

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We gain power by advancing the welfare of other people, and yet, when we feel powerful, we lose those very skills that got us there and take more than our fair share.

# data[].attributes.headline
how MIKE TYSON's sexual assault charge relates to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

# data[].attributes.subject
how MIKE TYSON's sexual assault charge relates to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
According to a lawsuit filed in Albany County Court in January under the New York Adult Survivors Act, Mike Tyson is being accused of raping a woman in the early 1990s.

The victim, who wishes to remain anonymous, stated in a sworn affidavit that she and her friend were outside a New York dance club called September when they were invited to a party by Tyson and his limousine driver.

The unnamed woman alleges that when she followed Tyson into the limo alone, he began to touch and kiss her, despite her repeatedly telling him to stop. She claims Tyson then forcibly removed her pants and raped her.

Youtuber and filmmaker Jon Bravo has mentioned this in one of his latest videos, and asserted that Tyson's previous statements can get him in trouble and be used as evidence against him in this case.

In the video Tyson can be heard talking to an unknown man in 2011, and saying:

I'm not above violating a woman, but I didn't violate that woman.

He was referring to some other women that accused him of raping her.

The victim in this latest case is now seeking $5 million in damages for the "physical, psychological, and emotional injury" she has suffered, including depression, anxiety, violent tendencies, and drug and alcohol addiction.

She chose to file her lawsuit anonymously due to fearing being attacked by the media due to Tyson's status as a celebrity.

Tyson was the undisputed world heavyweight champion from 1987 to 1990 and is widely considered to be one of the greatest boxers of all time. However, his personal life has been marred by legal issues and controversy.

He served three years in prison after being convicted of rape in 1992, and he has also been charged with drug possession, driving under the influence, and physical abuse.

The N.Y. Adult Survivors Act, passed in May 2022, created a "one-year lookback window" for adult survivors of sexual assault to sue their abusers, regardless of when the abuse occurred.

Tyson's first wife, Robin Givens, accused him of being physically abusive, and in a controversial 2009 Oprah Winfrey interview, Tyson joked about 'socking' her.

In 1997, he also bit off a piece of Evander Holyfield's ear during a boxing match. These legal issues, along with other controversies, have led to Tyson's reputation being marred.

The lawsuit filed against Tyson is still pending and he has yet to publicly comment on the allegations.

It is unusual that a victim comes forth after 30 years to press charges, and it remains to be seen if the prosecution will be able to use this statement from Mike Tyson successfully against him in court.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Mike Tyson admits he used to rape women?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
According to a lawsuit filed in Albany County Court in January under the New York Adult Survivors Act, Mike Tyson is being accused of raping a woman in the early 1990s.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Defendant: Michael Gerard Tyson
Crimes Charged: Rape, criminal deviant conduct, and confinement
Chief Defense Lawyers: Kathleen I. Beggs, Vincent J. Fuller, and F. Lane Heard
Chief Prosecutors: David Dreyer, J. Gregory Garrison, and Barbara J. Trathen
Judge: Patricia J. Gifford
Place: Indianapolis, Indiana
Dates of Trial: January 26-February 10, 1992
Verdict: Guilty
Sentence: 10 years imprisonment

SIGNIFICANCE: As with his colorful and controversial boxing career, Mike Tyson's trial-saturated with titillating accounts of sex and violent assault-was eagerly followed by fans and foes alike, although subsequent events would return him to the headlines.

At age 25, Mike Tyson had already won and lost the world heavyweight boxing championship. Seemingly on the verge of challenging to regain his crown, in July 1991 he attended the Black Expo in Indianapolis. One of the scheduled events was the Miss Black America pageant and one of the contestants was Desiree Washington, the 18-year-old Miss Rhode Island. Tyson, whose fondness for and occasional problems with attractive young women were well documented, invited Washington to his hotel room. Around 2:00 a.m. on July 19, she agreed. Three days later Washington went to the police. What she had to say resulted in Tyson facing charges of rape and related offenses.

Once the jury was impaneled on January 29, and after Judge Patricia J. Gifford had denied a request from Tyson's chief attorney, Vincent J. Fuller, that the accuser's sexual history be admitted into evidence, it was time for the opening statements.

Prosecutor J. Gregory Garrison delivered a ringing indictment of the defendant. "This man," he said, pointing at Tyson, "is guilty of pinning that 18-year-old girl to a bed and confining her... callously and maliciously raping her even though she cried out in pain."

Fuller, on the other hand, depicted a calculating vixen "mature beyond her 18 years," sophisticated and poised and out for money, an educated overachiever more than a match for a high-school dropout like Tyson. To be sure, Washington's level of sophistication had unnerved prosecutors before the trial, but when it came time for her testify she did so in a childlike voice, peppering her speech with expressions like "yukky."

She described receiving a phone call from Tyson at 1:36 a.m. Minutes later, believing herself to be en route to a party, she joined Tyson in his limousine. As soon as she entered the car Tyson grabbed her: "I kind of jumped back because I was surprised that, being who he is, he acted like that and, besides, his breath smelled kind of bad."

Instead of the expected party, they drove to Tyson's hotel. Once inside his room Tyson resumed his advances. At that point, Washington said, she told him that she was "not like the girls he must be used to hanging out with." Tyson, undeterred, pinned her down on the bed with one arm and used his free hand to undress her. All the while, she said, he mocked her efforts to resist, saying, "Don't fight me. Don't fight me."

Brutal Attack

Then the alleged rape took place. Washington described the pain as "excruciating," and that when she began to cry, "he started laughing like it was a game or something, like it was funny." Then she ran from the room, shoes in hand. Outside she saw Tyson's chauffeur who offered to drive her back to her hotel.

When cross-examined, Washington conceded that on several occasions she had the opportunity to leave the hotel room but chose not to do so. Fuller probed reports that after meeting Tyson, she had told other pageant contestants, "He's rich. Did you see what Robin Givens [Tyson's ex-wife] got out of him? Besides, he's dumb." Washington denied that any such exchange had ever taken place. Neither had she sung "Money, money, money, money, money," from the song "For the Love of Money" to a girlfriend later, as alleged.

Partial corroboration of Washington's story came from the chauffeur, Virginia Foster, 44. When Washington returned to the limousine, said Foster, "She looked like she may have been in a state of shock ... dazed, disoriented. She seemed scared." (Earlier the defense had successfully petitioned to have disallowed as evidence Foster's claim that Tyson had been sexually aggressive toward her also. No charges were ever filed.)

Dr. Thomas Richardson, the emergency room physician who examined Washington more than 24 hours after the incident, confirmed the presence of abrasions "consistent with forced or very hard intercourse."

Earlier prosecution comparisons between Tyson's menacing bulk and Washington's slight 98-pound stature came into stark relief as the defendant took the stand. He began by saying that everything had taken place with Washington's full cooperation and consent. Asked by Fuller if he forced himself upon her, Tyson replied, "No, I didn't. I didn't violate her in any way, sir."

In graphic terms Tyson described the encounter, but denied Garrison's claims that he had willfully misled Washington, insisting she had been aware of his sexual intentions beforehand and had only become annoyed when he remained in bed afterwards and refused to accompany her downstairs. "I told her that was the way it was. I said 'The limousine is downstairs. If you don't want to use the limousine, you can walk.'"

Quizzed by Garrison on why he had urged Washington to wear loosefitting clothes, Tyson admitted that he had planned to have sex in the limousine, and tight-fitting jeans "would have complicated it."

Ten hours of jury deliberation produced a guilty verdict. On March 26, 1992, Judge Gifford passed sentence: 10 years imprisonment, with the last four suspended. With time off for good behavior, Tyson would be eligible for parole in 1995.

Often, in trial by jury, demeanor is everything. In the words of her deputy defense counsel, Barbara Trathen, Desiree Washington made "a great victim" on the stand, demure, almost adolescent. By contrast, Tyson's untutored responses to questioning came across as brutish and arrogant.

After learning on March 71, 1994, that the Supreme Court had refused to hear his appeal, Tyson applied to the Indianapolis Parole Board. On June 13, 1994, a hearing was convened to consider the application. His lawyers, arguing that their client was a rehabilitated man, produced three witnesses who testified that Tyson's attitude behind bars had undergone a change. Under cross-examination, however, all three said they had never heard Tyson admit to raping Washington. Tyson himself was oddly belligerent on this point when questioned. He told the court, "I have done no criminal conduct. The jury said I did."

It was an attitude that cut little ice with Judge Gifford, who had presided over Tyson's trial. She noted that Tyson had failed to meet the legal requirement of completing an educational or vocational course while in prison, which defense lawyers attributed to the constant stream of visitors that made it difficult for Tyson to concentrate. Without Tyson's acknowledgement of his "inexcusable conduct," Judge Gifford was unprepared to grant his parole request.

In March 1995, having served three years behind bars, Tyson was released with four years' probation. Controversy continued to plague the disgraced fighter when, in April 1996, a young woman claimed he had sexually assaulted her in a Chicago nightclub. However, these allegations were later dismissed.

As expected, Tyson resumed his boxing career and on June 27, 1997, he challenged Evander Holyfield for the world heavyweight title. In front of thousands of appalled live spectators at Las Vegas' MGM Grand Garden arena and millions more television viewers worldwide, Tyson bit a chunk out of Holyfield's ear and was disqualified from the fight. Soon afterward, the Nevada State Athletic Commission revoked Tyson's boxing license and fined him $3 million (10 percent of his earnings from the fight, the maximum allowable by law).

Just over one year later, on August 31, 1998, Tyson again made the headlines when a car driven by his wife, Monica, was involved in a minor traffic accident with two other vehicles in Gaithersburg, Maryland. An argument broke out between Tyson and the other car operators. One of the drivers, Richard Hardick, 50, alleged that Tyson had attacked him, while the second driver, Abmielec Saucedo, 62, claimed that he had been punched in the face by the boxer. Early speculation that Tyson would settle both incidents out of court proved to be accurate.

Things seemed to settle down for Tyson and on September 9, 1998, he went before the Nevada Athletic Commission, requesting that his license be reinstated. They deferred a decision pending psychiatric evaluations. All five doctors who examined Tyson concurred that he was unlikely to repeat the earbiting incident, and that he had shown genuine remorse for his actions. Guided by this testimony, on October 19, the Nevada Athletic Commission ruled 4-1 to return Tyson's license, although he was warned by Elias Ghanem, the panel's chairman, "This will be your last chance."

Unexpectedly six days later Maryland state's attorney, Robert Dean, resurrected the August "road rage" incident, declaring his intention of pursuing a criminal case against Tyson. On December 1, Tyson pleaded no contest to misdemeanor criminal charges of assault, aware that he risked being returned to prison.

On February 5, 1999, in a Rockville, Maryland, courtroom, despite Tyson's written plea for mercy and the testimony by his victims that they had forgiven his attack, Judge Stephen Johnson ruled in agreement with the warning of prosecutor Carol Crawford that Tyson was "a time-bomb buried in our own backyard," and handed down two concurrent two-year sentences, with all but one year suspended. He also fined Tyson $5,000 and gave him two years' probation after his release from jail.

How long Tyson would actually spend in prison now rested with the original judge, Patricia J. Gifford. If she decided that this latest offense amounted to a parole violation, he could be returned to Indiana to serve the remainder of his sentence. Following the Maryland Parole Commission's decision on Friday, May 21, 1999, to reduce Tyson's sentence to time served, Judge Gifford announced the following Monday that Tyson's probation for the 1992 rape conviction had ended, thus clearing the way for his immediate release from prison.

Suggestions for Further Reading

"Boxer Mike Tyson Convicted of Rape." Facts On File (February 13, 1992): 97ff.

Jet (February 24, 1992): 16ff.

Oates, Joyce Carol. "Rape and the Boxing Ring." Newsweek (February 24, 1992): 60ff.

Steptoe, S. "A Damnable Defense." Sports Illustrated (February 24, 1992): 92.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
mike tyson trial: 1992
defendant: michael gerard tysoncrimes charged: rape

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
and confinementchief defense lawyers: kathleen i. beggs

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
and f. lane heardchief prosecutors: david dreyer

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
and barbara j. trathenjudge: patricia j.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Mike Tyson Trial: 1992 Defendant: Michael Gerard TysonCrimes Charged: Rape, criminal deviant conduct, and confinementChief Defense Lawyers: Kathleen I. Beggs, Vincent J. Fuller, and F. Lane HeardChief Prosecutors: David Dreyer, J. Gregory Garrison, and Barbara J. TrathenJudge: Patricia J. Source for information on Mike Tyson Trial: 1992: Great American Trials dictionary.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A woman has filed a lawsuit accusing former heavyweight boxing champion Mike Tyson of raping her sometime in the early 1990s after she met him at a nightclub in Albany, New York.

The legal action was filed under New York's Adult Survivors Act, which gives sexual assault victims a one-year window to file lawsuits over assaults that happened years or even decades ago.

The woman, who is suing for $5 million, said Tyson raped her in a limousine and that she has suffered from "physical, psychological and emotional injury" in the years since. The woman's affidavit does not provide a date for the attack but says only that it happened in the early 1990s. It is unclear whether she pursued criminal action at the time of the alleged assault.

Neither Tyson nor any of his representatives has responded to the allegation or commented on the lawsuit. A message from The Associated Press seeking comment from Tyson was sent to an agency that has represented him.

The woman, who asked to remain anonymous to protect her privacy and prevent her from suffering further mental harm and harassment, said in her affidavit that she got in Tyson's limousine and that the boxer immediately started touching her and trying to kiss her.

"I told him no several times and asked him to stop, but he continued to attack me," the woman said. "He then pulled my pants off and violently raped me."

The woman's attorney, Darren Seilback, said in a separate filing that his office investigated her allegations and determined that they are "highly credible." He said Tuesday he could not comment further on the case.

Tyson, 56, was convicted of raping beauty pageant contestant Desiree Washington on Feb. 10, 1992, and served three years in prison. His former wife, actor Robin Givens, also said in divorce papers that their late-1980s marriage was characterized by "unprovoked rages of violence and destruction."

The Brooklyn-born Tyson was boxing's undisputed world heavyweight champion from 1987 to 1990.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Woman sues Tyson, says he raped her in 1990s

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A woman is suing Mike Tyson for $5 million, saying he raped her in a limousine in New York in the early 1990s and that she has suffered from "physical, psychological and emotional injury" in the years since.

# data[].attributes.headline
once you get power you get addicted and you think you can get away with anything and doing bad stuff

# data[].attributes.subject
once you get power you get addicted and you think you can get away with anything and doing bad stuff

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
&#151; -- Mike Tyson hasn't lost his penchant for saying the outrageous.

In a television interview scheduled for broadcast Thursday, Tyson again denied he raped Desiree Washington in 1991 in an Indianapolis hotel room. But he said the burden of being labeled a convicted rapist makes him want to do it now.

"I just hate her guts. She put me in that state, where I don't know," Tyson said. "I really wish I did now. But now I really do want to rape her."

Tyson made the comments during a recent interview in Miami Beach with Greta Van Susteren, who was taking a look back at the circumstances of Tyson's 1992 trial that ended with him convicted of rape and sentenced to six years in prison.

He served three years of the sentence before being released on parole.

A call for comment to Tyson's adviser, Shelly Finkel, was not immediately returned.

The interview will be shown Thursday night on "The Pulse" on the Fox network.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tyson says he would 'really' rape victim now

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
151; -- Mike Tyson hasn't lost his penchant for saying the outrageous. In a television interview scheduled for broadcast Thursday, Tyson again denied he raped Desiree Washington in 1991 in an Indianapolis hotel room. But he said the burden of being labeled a convicted rapist makes him want to do it now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Woman files suit accusing Mike Tyson of rape in early '90s

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
NEW YORK (AP) - A woman has filed a lawsuit accusing former heavyweight boxing champion Mike Tyson of raping her sometime in the early 1990s after she met him at a nightclub in Albany, New York.

# data[].attributes.headline
final chapter of jekyll and hyde speaking about how potion doesnt make jekyll or hyde evil, its jekyll himself, just like how tyson could do good with how powerful he is but chooses not to.

# data[].attributes.subject
final chapter of jekyll and hyde speaking about how potion doesnt make jekyll or hyde evil, its jekyll himself, just like how tyson could do good with how powerful he is but chooses not to.