# data[].attributes.body
Hi can i clarify the role of "contextual factors"? it seems that under the concept of "equity", actions taken should be the same across cultural and everyone is seen thru the same lens. But would that mean that we are also not considering how culture and beliefs (the context in which the family exist) have an impact on the clients? the fact that we are seeing it thru the same lens also implies that we dont consider the culture?

# data[].attributes.body
Today is the first time I am seeing CAP. A lot of definition to digest. It will be a good tool to start using back at my workplace.
Definitely needs a lot of practice.

# data[].attributes.body
Breakout groups are helpful

# data[].attributes.headline
Mentimeter is fun and helpful to change the energy and focus!

# data[].attributes.subject
Mentimeter is fun and helpful to change the energy and focus!

# data[].attributes.body
learning as a group, working through the work together to improve together

# data[].attributes.body
Indepth notes and examples to help understand concepts.

# data[].attributes.body
it is helpful when samples/examples are provided eg. example of various statements

# data[].attributes.body
I like that we have time to work on the tool individually, and with sample work, it cleared a lot of doubts

# data[].attributes.body
I enjoyed the individual coaching

# data[].attributes.body
quizzes are also fun, give us prizes :)

# data[].attributes.body
examples of the cases and how the frameworks were being used

# data[].attributes.body
practice sessions allows time for processing

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you for your hard work! I am learning a lot. Good that you gave us Model/sample answers to give us a clearer idea of what was taught.

Group discussions were a great help! My group members helped me alot! :D

# data[].attributes.body
Helpful were the smaller group discussions and 'debating' with each other about our differing opinions

# data[].attributes.body
Hands-on practice was helpful

# data[].attributes.body
do goal statements look like SMART goals?

# data[].attributes.headline
how to prevent from one breakdown to another?

# data[].attributes.subject
how to prevent from one breakdown to another?

# data[].attributes.body
how can i help clients to build reflexivity? sometimes when i use SFQ or interventive interviewing, clients are quite stuck and cant seem to explore possibility and solutions, or even exception. especially in families where basic needs are not met. i think i struggle with meeting their basic needs, fire fighting vs building reflexivity to promote change

# data[].attributes.body
How do we address if a client rates safety as 10/10 when we do a scaling question with them, but there are legit safety concerns that parents are denying?

# data[].attributes.body
what are some helpful guidelines to facilitate this w a child who has ADHD and has difficulties sitting still for long? How can we make this activity more hands on?

# data[].attributes.body
Understand that it is important to engage informal network like neighbours. But i was wondering what would be the effect on family when non professionals (like neighbours) are involved? as in asian context, there a strong belief of not airing dirty laundry outside (keep internal business to internal members). how much should we share with these non professionals and how can we get family's buy in? How to ensure boundaries for these network because i do foresee overinvolvement in these informal network but further perpetuate blaming and feelings of not good enough

# data[].attributes.body
So we have covered various framework/tools on our first two days, and it is getting clearer now which tool falls under which category (SDM or PFS).

However, I am still a little confused as to a few of the tools/tables/framework we have learned. I think it would be helpful to have a one-page snapshot of all the tools/tables/framework parked under their individual categories.

For example, under SDM (we have safety assessment and LFH tools), under PFS (we have COSS, Network Table, Three Houses etc.). Where does CAP, SFQ, Safe Access Tool, Access Safety Planning falls under? Are they stand-alone and fall under an "others" category, related to either SDM or PFS or is/are one of the tools under either SDM or PFS. It would be helpful to also include the tools/framework/table that will be covered on Day 3, 4 and 5.

Having a big picture like this would help give a clearer picture of what SDM and PFS are about and how they come together as we can then imagine in our heads how the tools are used at different processes of the SDM model.

Otherwise, the course has been very helpful as I am now better able to see what SDM and PFS entails in our OHC work with CPOs. Thank you!

-Poh Eng

# data[].attributes.body
in the CAPF report it said "Ms Li told MSF that she wants to stop drinking but that she does not know what will help her stop."

would this be influencing the cognitive abilities rating in the FSNA as it may show some difficulties in problem solving? ><

# data[].attributes.body
Can I ask why the Other Adult Household Relationships was rated a C even though there is no evidence of violence or coercive control? The definitions seem to emphasise the violence aspect

# data[].attributes.body
When rating the FSNA, do we take into consideration and balance between the harm that was caused vs actions of protections/strengths? For example for Parenting Skills, we acknowledge that NM left the children unattended for long periods. But the CAPF also states that there are some strengths where NM feeds Xiu Ying properly when she is present. Do we need to factor this part in when rating?

# data[].attributes.body
How does a CW present a safety plan to parents who are illiterate?

# data[].attributes.headline
What if the picture that the parents describe as their ideal picture during the initial process (in stage 2 of the process) is one of abuse?

# data[].attributes.subject
What if the picture that the parents describe as their ideal picture during the initial process (in stage 2 of the process) is one of abuse?

# data[].attributes.body
More frequent short breaks (3-5 mins)

# data[].attributes.body
quite a lot of content, so some breaks along the way can help to process

# data[].attributes.body
Longer breaks maybe :P

# data[].attributes.body
I was a little lost during the tool assessment (safety & LFH), but caught up after a while. Perhaps, can explain the tool and how its utilised first. Otherwise, all's good :)

# data[].attributes.body
talking slower for more complex/detailed concepts :)

# data[].attributes.body
Assessment tools are very new to me. Needs more time to understand. Hope the explanation is clearer and slower in pace.

# data[].attributes.body
maybe can show one or two more completed CAPF/other assessment tools so that we know how to complete it as a whole!

# data[].attributes.body
still lost on certain things especially when it feels so fast, but practice makes perfect

# data[].attributes.body
For forgetful people like me, it would be great if you can from time to time remind us how one document relates to another...eg from Cap framework to ....) ie.where to extract information (eg. FSNA grading) from one document and where they go in the next document (eg. access safety plan)

# data[].attributes.headline
Part 22 - Completed LFHR and Safety Assessment

# data[].attributes.subject
Part 22 - Completed LFHR and Safety Assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Typo for CYP Name in Safety Assessment (Yao Ming)

# data[].attributes.body
Parenting Skills - d but not related to danger? Worry Statement 1 does not mention alcohol use nor anger or frustration but Substance Use and Coping Skills are related while Worry Statement 2 mentions both but is related to Parenting Skills. Should consider swapping Worry, Goal Statements and Related Items?

# data[].attributes.body
Danger Item 3 still marked in SDMR but unmarked for Safety Assessment

# data[].attributes.body
3 houses too

# data[].attributes.headline
Collaborative nature of the tools, since sometimes it can be easy to prescribe things for the cyp/parents

# data[].attributes.subject
Collaborative nature of the tools, since sometimes it can be easy to prescribe things for the cyp/parents

# data[].attributes.headline
collaboration with others is important in ensuring the safety of CYP

# data[].attributes.subject
collaboration with others is important in ensuring the safety of CYP

# data[].attributes.body
the need to take a collaborative, and to include the views of all parties whenever possible

# data[].attributes.headline
To be aware of CYP/Parents' experience as they are going through the tools with us. To constantly check in if it's too overwhelming and to do it at their pace/take breaks. 

# data[].attributes.subject
To be aware of CYP/Parents' experience as they are going through the tools with us. To constantly check in if it's too overwhelming and to do it at their pace/take breaks. 

# data[].attributes.headline
being collaborative with clients in access safety planning (even in worry statements), instead of "i say u do" 

# data[].attributes.subject
being collaborative with clients in access safety planning (even in worry statements), instead of "i say u do" 

# data[].attributes.body
7 - good opportunity to practice,some parts pacing was good. the end was a bit rushed

# data[].attributes.body
7, sample answers for FSNA and why the answers fall into the respective categories

# data[].attributes.body
7- similar to what was said FSNA was heavy, would benefit more info on the slides regarding the explanation

# data[].attributes.body
7 - FSNA was heavy! Maybe it would have been something that needed a bit more time to think about?

# data[].attributes.body
6 - could help if the important sections were separated for training purposes] and some step by step guides / answers with explanation to why if possible.

# data[].attributes.body
7. FSNA was abit heavy to digest. having sample answers would help for referencing.

# data[].attributes.body
7, slides can have more information to support what is being said

# data[].attributes.body
7, consistent pace of class 😅 (some parts were longer, some faster)

# data[].attributes.body
7! Thought if we can pace it out a little like ytd as I found today too heavy towards the end... the FSNA and running through everything was quite intense

# data[].attributes.body
6. good if we can have sample of answers after every activity.