# data[].attributes.body
i think its because their actions that affect the story and the events.

# data[].attributes.body
always think before you do something, otherwise you'll mess up.

# data[].attributes.body
I think humans should care for animals but should be given responsibility.

# data[].attributes.body
they are being whipped and starved ad this shows they are mean and not responsible

# data[].attributes.body
since the characters thought they knew what ey were doing, but they exactly didn't know what to do due to them being stubborn.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was described by the author because he wanted to know that the characters thought more of something would help and ta having experience is necassary.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, because the days are a lot smarter than the men because the dogs followed their instinct.

# data[].attributes.body
The people acted so weird, the men would whip the dogs and the woman would act like a child

# data[].attributes.body
The dogs get punished because of the humans ignorance.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it is: People will do whatever they can to achieve what they want.

# data[].attributes.body
The dogs know that all they things that the humans are doing are bad but they do not know that it is bad and it puts a characteristic on the characters which leads to the main idea or them of the book .

# data[].attributes.body
The dog's treatment shows that the people do not know how to care for sled dogs, and that they don't care about the dog's well being.

# data[].attributes.body
The lesson in chapter 5 is never lose your humanity over something that cannot buy happiness.

# data[].attributes.body
Animals have filling just like humans so treat them well .

# data[].attributes.body
I think London is trying to convey that there is more important things in the world to be worried about rather than a yellow metal.

# data[].attributes.body
i think it shows an ignorance of animals.

# data[].attributes.body
The incidents should show that you should try or put forth effort. You should also take the important advice people give you because it could save your life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that people are responsible for their pets and animals that get harmed from pollution. I do not think that people should have to help animals that are being harmed in natural causes.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think all dogs act different of how there treated.If there treated good they will be happy but if not they will be gloomy .

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is making the theme of not all humans are made to live in the wild

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because humans feed and command the dogs.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I think if you get an animal you should take care of it and if you see a animal in need you should help it

# data[].attributes.body
You should trust your first instincts and to never mistreat others.

# data[].attributes.body
The man in to build a fire did not take wise advice just like Hal, Mercedes, and Charles, but the man in to build a fire was traveling with one companion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think yes, because humans are responsible to take care of their animal but I don't think that we should have to take care of every animal, just their own.

# data[].attributes.body
London's description of the dogs reveal that many people who head for the Klondike lose all sense of humanity.

# data[].attributes.body
As the main characters treat the dogs it puts a personality on them which lead to the main idea.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it reveals the ideal that man well go and lean on there egos then there nature instincts

# data[].attributes.body
They are being whipped and starved and this shows that they are mean to the dogs and how they mistreat them.

# data[].attributes.body
The man in "To Build a Fire" is compared to the family in chapter 5 of "Call of the Wild", because they both think they are smarter than the people who have lived in Alaska. Also they can be contrasted because the man in "To Build a Fire" is more cautious than the family in "Call of the Wild".

# data[].attributes.body
They all have no experience they both did not take advice from people and they will do every thing they can to put there eye on riches. They where different by one came per paired in supply's and in " To Build a Fire"he was not.

# data[].attributes.body
The man is like them because the man in To build a fire was mean to the dog like the two men were in Call of the Wild. He is like the woman because they are both stubborn. They are different because the three people traveled together and they brought food for the dogs and their self and they traveled by the dogs and the sled they pulled. The man traveled by foot with little human food and no dog food and he was to stubborn to realize what he did wrong after his fire went out many times.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author described them like he did because they were stubborn and didn't take anyone's advice.

# data[].attributes.body
They all had no clue to what they where doing but the man in to build a fire had not a many material where the other had to much.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author described the family as an inexperienced group, so the reader would understand that some people have too much confidence.

# data[].attributes.body
No because real dogs can have a thought process as well as the dogs in London's book.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is because they had no expense at all.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they described them like that because soon they will be important the the them of the book .

# data[].attributes.body
No, although he has given the dogs the abbelaty to think he has also showen of the dogs have wild animal like fechers.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he described them that way because he wanted people to know how they really are and that they are new and don't know any thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because he gave Buck more of a human persona and he gave the dog In to build a Fire, a normal persona.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like he should not be considered one because he claims that he scientific facts and I think that animals have filling just like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because the dogs are a lot smarter then the men because the dogs tried to follow their instincts.

# data[].attributes.body
Buck uses his primal instincts when he starts to feel an impending doom before he reaches the soon to break river. Kaleb Brodnax

# data[].attributes.body
I think the dogs used primal instincts because they stop before going on the bad ice this shows that they knew that it was not safe.

# data[].attributes.body
Mersadis save Buck from being beaten bad and she knows that they need him to do well and keep running instead of being hurt .

# data[].attributes.body
The people acted so weird, the men would whip the dogs and the woman would act like a child.