# data[].attributes.body
Could view the use of technology in the work force as technology should not take over blue collar workers as humans should be put first in front of technology because of ethics. Thus doctors would view the debate over technology being implemented in the workforce as it should not be used because humans should come first over technology and computers.

# data[].attributes.body
A philosopher would question whether the use of technology  is inhumane. This is because the use of this technology could leave blue collar workers jobless and ultimately result in worse living conditions becase of the loss of a job and income for a family. Thus a philosopher would say the implementation of technology should not happen because of the negative outcomes it brings.

# data[].attributes.body
The use of technology by the help of scientists would ultimately help business succeed and save money because of the AI's doing the work for them without having to pay money, and while doing so scientists can help these AI's advance to increase their performance and help better businesses. Thus Scientists would support the use of implementing technology because they can help businesses succeed

# data[].attributes.body
These businesses can see great potential and greatness with the use of technology in the workforce because they can save money by having this technology replace jobs that they had to replace workers for. Which would ultimately end in businesses wanting to implement technology into the workforce today,

# data[].attributes.body
These families that are negatively effected by the implementation of technology could forsee bankruptcy in the future because of their loss of a job because they may not have as much power and potential to find another job that doesn't replace them by technology. Thus they would not want to implement technology into workforces

# data[].attributes.body
They would potentially view the loss of jobs of these blue collar jobs as an offense to their culture. This could be because they could think this implementation of technology as a purposeful offense to their culture to try and eliminate those of their culture. Thus cultures would view the implementation of technology in the workforce as it shouldn't be implemented because of their view as they are targeted by these businesses.

# data[].attributes.body
Social Media will take over the debate over the implementation of technology in the work force because these people losing their jobs would bring up great conversation and debate over whether it was fair or not which ultiomately would end with social media, in majority saying that technology should not be implemented into today's work and it should not take over blue collar jobs of these hardworking people.

# data[].attributes.body
Environment Savers might view the use of the technology as harmful to the environment because of the use of energy and possibly gas which could end up with the overuse of these hazardous products to pour environment and ultimately make global warming worse than it already is. Thus the environment savers in our world would say technology should not be used in the workforce because of these negative outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
They would also admit to use of technology and how it can negatively effect the environment and also negatively influence global warming. Which would also make businessses possible consider technology should not be implemented into the workforce

# data[].attributes.body
Scientists within the field of health would view this issue as technology should not be implemented, leaving these people jobless, because it can effect these workers now seen jobless very negatively. These negative health affects can include most likely depresssion, the abuse of drugs and alcohol, and much more due to the stress over losing their job and having no source of income. And on top of that, if these workers have families, these families can go through even more stress and result in divorce because of these negative habits shown from the workers who have lost their jobs.

# data[].attributes.body
Democrats would view the debate over the implementation of technology into the workplace as it shouldn't be implemented because they would see that technology could backfire and argue that humans can do the jobs better than robots and computers because they can communicate with their other workers better than programming code into a software that could potentially fail. Thus Democrats would view this topic as it should not be implemented because humans can do these jobs more efficiently than robots.

# data[].attributes.body
Through a political/historical lens, republicans like Donald Trump would find the advance in the workplace with technology a great implementation because it advances businesses a lot and helps them grow as a company because they can simplify and clean up their work with the use of AI. And since our world today is changing with the strong use of technology, republicans as a whole would support the implementation of technology in the workplace.

# data[].attributes.body
Businesses would find the implementation as ethical to a certain standard because it simplifies work for their business and then they can save money which they spend on making their business even better. However, to another extent by implementing the technology, this will leave their past workers without work and in a tough situation which they should view as unethical. Thus, through the ethical lens, businesses should find the implementation as an in-between of ethical and unethical because although it can help their business, it does not benefit their workers

# data[].attributes.body
Families would say that the implementation of technology that would replace blue collar jonbs is unethical because it unrightfully takes away that persons job and leaves them without pay which is also unethical to the family because it puts them in large money trouble. Thus, through the ethical lens, the implementation of technology should not replace blue collar jobs in the workplace because it is unfair to the workers and their families.

# data[].attributes.body
Business can take an advantage to the automation of blue collar jobs because they won't have to pay workers to do jobs that could be done now by machines thus increasing the pay for other more important employees. Also the implementation of automation could be unpredictable when it comes to the quality of the jobs they are doing, which is because some jobs may not be done as efficiently by machines as the would by workers

# data[].attributes.body
Families could be effected by the automation of work negatively because the blue collar workers of these families could lose their jobs due to automation leaving the family with low money or even induce some of these families to poverty and bankruptcy. Thus the automation of jobs should not be implemented to the extent where these undeserving families are being brought into money issues.

# data[].attributes.body
To what extent will the implementation of technology affect blue collar jobs in the workplace?