# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model is essentially a planning tool that helps to design better learning activities for students.  The framework provides pedagogical insight into how technology can and should be used in the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR framework is sometimes thought of as a mountain to the summit, but it’s really more like a toolbox. The goal isn’t to use the most sophisticated tool, but to find the right one for the job.
Always consider whether or not the technology improves the learning process.   If the learning process is enhanced through the use of technology, then it’s appropriate to use – if not, more traditional (analogue) methods can work just as well (if not better).
Collaboration is extremely important, particularly if you’re looking at learning from a social constructivist perspective.  Consider how you can use technology to facilitate collaboration.
Ensure that you use technology to expose students to the outside world.  This not only helps to improve their cultural understanding and international-mindedness, but it can also be great for building key literacy skills.

# data[].attributes.body
I see that SAMR model tool does increases interactions and communications between students. Having encouraging and supportive environment, where students can be active in interpersonal relationships with one another, helps to make learning meaningful and engaging.

# data[].attributes.body
Originally I thought that redefining was a very crucial step, but after studying I found it to be a difficult process but not necessary. The enhancement and modification stage is what enables students to be more mature in their learning and technological integration.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model does effectively helped students in learning not alone. Students are socially present in the course, building connections between one another, to enhance learning.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think all electronic formats guarantee excellent learning, as I feel that sometimes using handwriting enhances memory. On the other hand, I feel that involving students in the learning and design of the course can enhance their engagement and understanding of the course

# data[].attributes.body
This SMAR framework structure is geared towards a technology and learning approach and I would like to know why the higher the level of SMAR, the more transformative it is, and how exactly is it transformative?

# data[].attributes.body
It is an educational tool that combines technology and pedagogy and is divided into two parts so that it is more suitable for students in different learning steps. With the increasing complexity，students are inclined to cooperate with each other，making the process more practical.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model has four layers. The first 2 layers focus on enhancing the learning tasks while the next two layers focus on actual transformation. It makes learners to have better communication and cooperation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the SAMR model does help learners connect with each other during the e-learning process. It is useful and the redefinition layer can make students learn globally.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model is tightly integrated with technology. And I wonder that some new technologies such as AR technology can be combined with it to help students achieve better learning results.

# data[].attributes.body
The carefully designed structure of the SAMR Model immediately catches my attention. This model indicates how teaching with technology may be improved step by step, which may be very helpful in guiding teachers to design better lessons using technological tools.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that as a teacher, I should always ask myself what me and my students can gain from the technology before implementing it. Because if technology doesn't change the learning process or outcome, but increases the time and effort required, it's probably better to stick to the old ways.

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to further explore how a teacher can assess students' learning and determine if students' learning need some redefining with technology.

# data[].attributes.body
XU XU 27th July

I‘ve notice SAMR was willing to create a huge community not only between students and teachers, and also for scholars around the world.

The model help us to realize there much more essential function in technology. If we can discover all about them. It will make a good collaboration and communication.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm agree with that point, it will provide a great platform to students and teachers to communicate with each other, and allow people can post some idea randomly, people can comment author post, it will advance interpersonal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Well, I notice that this community not only provides a platform for students and teachers, by the way, it also offers one for professions from the whole world.

# data[].attributes.subject
Well, I notice that this community not only provides a platform for students and teachers, by the way, it also offers one for professions from the whole world.

# data[].attributes.headline
I do think students could have a better learning experience in this community of inquiry, which could help them to develop their efficiency of study.

# data[].attributes.subject
I do think students could have a better learning experience in this community of inquiry, which could help them to develop their efficiency of study.

# data[].attributes.headline
The way of building a common-owned platform, how to build one? And how to manage it?

# data[].attributes.subject
The way of building a common-owned platform, how to build one? And how to manage it?

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR framework was a new concept to me. As I learned about it, I saw it as relying on technology to change the way students learn, so that they can better complete their learning tasks, further enhance their learning process and have more process gains. This is an approach that could not be met without the maturity of technology. When we use SAMR in the classroom, it makes it easier to extract students' own ideas and communicate them to the world.

# data[].attributes.body
There are more demanding requirements on technology for education in this SAMR framework as the layer goes deeper. Technology is no longer a provision for studying online, but a multimedia tool to extend people's different sensations such as hearing and observing. Technological advancement would do good to reforming the way people receive knowledge and communicate.

# data[].attributes.body
SAMR not only creates connections between teachers and students, but also integrates teaching resources from all over the world, which can help teachers and students gain better knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
SAMR not only creates connections between teachers and students, but also integrates teaching resources from all over the world, which can help teachers and students gain better knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
| Substitution  | Technology acts as a direct substitute,with no functional change.
| Augmentation  | Technology acts as a direct substitute,with  functional improvement.
| Modification  | Technology allows for significant task redesign.
| Redefinition  | Technology allows for the creation of new tasks,previously inconceivable.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model does effectively helped students in learning not alone.The technology can change the learning process or outcome, and increase the efficiency.

# data[].attributes.body
The S means substitution——Technology acts as a direct substitute, with no functional change.The A means Augmentation—— Technology acts as a direct substitute,with  functional improvement.The M means modification—— Technology allows for significant task redesign. The R means Technology allows for the creation of new tasks, previously inconceivable. This SMAR framework structure is geared towards a technology and learning approach and I would like to know how can we do better?

# data[].attributes.body
I recognize SAMR's ability to empower students with strong technical soft skills such as digital collaboration, communication, technical literacy, and the ability to adapt to new systems and processes. In addition, since the active participation of students is very important for learning, I agree that SAMR in the enhancement stage allows students to form a student-centered learning mode by using technology as a source of information, which promotes the initiative and enthusiasm of students in learning.

# data[].attributes.body
I gain a clearer perception of SAMR: substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition.  This Framework serves for the cognition process of students, and simultaneously can help educator to integrate technology into their teaching process to achieve a more enhanced learning effects for students.

# data[].attributes.body
This framework is align with cognition process of students. By applying this framework, students are enabled to participate in their learning with multiple ways, and in general it helps them to link their knowledge with daily practice.
Instead of referring it as disagreements, I'd rather state them as concerns: In the example the material gave us, students are eventually able to collaborate globally and attend some video conferences. Due to the income inequality and the unbalanced resources distribution around the world, this kind of profound effects cannot be achieved by most of learners. That's why I think in reality redefinition is hard to realize.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd like to still look deeper into the accessibility of redefinition in real life.

# data[].attributes.body
When using technology, how can we ensure that every student has the same access to electronic products and online platforms? In other words, when using technology to teach, I hope to explore some specific indicators to evaluate the use of technology.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model tackles issues where technology and pedagogy meet. This model has four different layers.The first 2 layers focus on enhancing the learning tasks while the next two layers focus on actual transformation.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagreed with the idea that the electronic formats can definitely promote excellent learning,as I think sometimes using handwriting enhances memory.Meanwhile,I feel that involving students in the learning and design of the course can enhance their engagement ana understanding of the course.

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder the reason why the higher the level of SMAR,the more transformative it is,and how exactly is it transformative?

# data[].attributes.body
I used to mistakenly think that technology was used in the classroom for the sake of using it. In fact, it is not. Technology has become a substitute for pen and paper for easy communication and cooperation. In addition, the proper use of technology in the classroom can not only enhance the communication between teachers and students, but also enable the network platform to communicate with thousands of people or scholars in their own field.

# data[].attributes.body
The topic of this Padlet is inconsistent by the way, it should be about SAMR model rather than the community of inquiry. But it's not a big problem.
Back to the topic, what is new to me about this model is there are actually so many levels (four) to measure to what extent the technology integrated into daily learning is helping to reach the study goals. Thus, the whole framework accompanied by many pragmatic pedagogy practices is new and quite informative to me.

# data[].attributes.body
What I totally agree with is the fact that introducing technology into the classroom delivers a clear message to your students that, on the one hand, you, as their educator, are not afraid to face up and adapt to a new challenge in a new era or in an educational revolution; on the other hand, you are trying to connect them with the rapidly changing world outside the classroom, which is beneficial for them to acclimatize themselves into the new world.

# data[].attributes.body
As we all agree, sometimes, using technology in the classroom is just for the sake of using technology that might not be advantageous to students' learning. Therefore, the question of whether to use a certain kind of technology or not in learning and teaching is really worth consideration. Plus, if you do, please consider how and when you plan to use it. What do you want to achieve with it? Are your students and yourself ready and sufficiently equipped to accept this form of pedagogy? And the question list goes on.

# data[].attributes.body
What is true educational equity? Can educational equity be achieved if all candidates use the same set of papers? In my opinion, this is too superficial and superficial. Only when all students receive the same educational level and model, can they basically achieve a part of educational equity.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR structure is a gradual process with stages, and I also believe that the use of technology should gradually penetrate into the teaching and learning activities, and this is how it has developed

# data[].attributes.body
This framework introduces a new concept to me. It is progressive and can help us design and evaluate a teaching activity design supported by educational technology according to needs.

# data[].attributes.body
I very much agree with the content of this framework, which has given me a lot of inspiration.

# data[].attributes.body
To be honest, I don't fully understand the boundaries and differences between the latter two dimensions. I think redesign can also be innovation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is meaningful.The teacher replaces the old technology with a new technology, but the function of the curriculum or activity has not changed. This is the new vitality of classroom activities given by the times

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with it.Relying on this SAMR framework to help teachers learn in class is direct and can improve teaching level more scientifically.

# data[].attributes.body
I think such a structure is reasonable, but it can not avoid harmony in the process of application.

# data[].attributes.body
As a technology integration model, SAMR can help teachers to use information technology, apply technology to all aspects of teaching properly, realize the deep integration of information technology and teaching, and form a new knowledge framework by integrating three knowledge factors: subject content, teaching method and technology.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model has 4 stages. In each stage of it, the use of EdTech becomes increasingly sophisticated. In substitution and augmentation, strategies use EdTech to enhance learning and add value. Modification and redefinition stages harness EdTech to transform learning and make new things possible.

# data[].attributes.body
The SAMR model tells where we are and how can we improve ourselves, and we can motivate the positive attitude of students by using EdTech.  I agree with description of these 4 stages.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution and augmentation are easy for teachers to reach. However, I'm wondering how I can reach the other 2 stages. I think modification and redefinition also need the positivity of students.

# data[].attributes.body
substitution, argumentation, modification, and redefinition