# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
See all the wonderful things Bonavian Hasiholan has made

# data[].attributes.body
tnavigator is much simpler to understand the behavior of the reservoir than eclipse.Because tnavigator has run time where we can analyse the process and tnavigator does not require any pre processor.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigator  requires dealing with only a single interface as compared to dealing with more than one that is seen in Eclipse simulator. In addition, complicated geological structure cannot proceed without the use of pre-processor in Eclipse.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigator provide reservoir simulation services using only one software . Where as eclipse has more than one software they include prepossecor and modelers . Tnavigator is more user friendly than eclipse

# data[].attributes.body
The Navigator gives more of a raw workspace view of the resource structure, while the navigator shows more of a logical view provided by contributions from various projects to show logical structure.

# data[].attributes.body
T nav is better as it is more advance compared to Eclipse. Every function found from eclipse, office and petrel can be found on the screen of Tnav and it is user friendly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think tNavigator is  easier to use. it simpler and more convenient than Eclipse, because it doesn't need other software to help it, and it also runs faster.

# data[].attributes.body
T navigator does not require the usage of a pre processor such as petrel , however unlike eclipse Tnav can run regardless of error with the data file .

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion tnavigator is way better than eclipse because it has got many features that are not available in eclipse such as that you can see the results while processing for example while the tnavigator is still processing for the next 10 years and has done five years you can see the graphs and results for the processed years.

# data[].attributes.body
TNavigator is more easy to use than eclipse because of its tendency to have vast options in one window, and whereas eclipse and petrel in the other hand are slow in their simulation but i prefer using eclipse as it is more convenient.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnav doesn't require preprocesser unlike eclipse.
Tnav has a simpler user interface compared to eclipse though eclipse is more common due to its long existance in the oil industry,
Tnav is usually faster than eclipse

# data[].attributes.headline
For tanvi can give clear view than eclipes and also it one window software compare to eclipes you need run the files in different simulation softwar

# data[].attributes.subject
For tanvi can give clear view than eclipes and also it one window software compare to eclipes you need run the files in different simulation softwar

# data[].attributes.body
For the tnavigator, its easier to operate than the Eclipse. It is because we can monitor every step of the reservoir simulation at runtime, but also, we can directly interrupt and change the simulation’s configurations with just a mouse click

# data[].attributes.body
TNav is more easier to operate with conpare to eclipse.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnav offer easier use of simulation than eclipse, although some of the codes in eclipse could not be read by tnav. Also, Tnav could not read errors in the codes, so when there is an error, Tnav will automatically skip i and continue with the modelling.

# data[].attributes.body
tNavigator is very user friendly and does not require any other software to view the model since it is integrated with geology, model and network designers. Eclipse requires other softwares like Petrel in order to be able to view the model

# data[].attributes.body
T navigator is easier to use and simulate black oil models than eclipse as it is more simple and got all the functions in a single software which can consume less time compare it with eclipse 100

# data[].attributes.body
For tiNav; it’s user friendly. Easier to work with. All the platforms at one place(no need to open graphs from office, model from petrel, etc) therefore it’s more convenient to the user. On the other hand, ECLIPSE is easier to write the code with it. However, it’s more complicated compared to tiNav to work with

# data[].attributes.body
1001439257

1-tnav is the first parallel simulator supporting 3d monitoring and user interactivity at runtime.

# data[].attributes.body
In my perspective, Tnav is far more better in many aspects compared to eclipse. For instance, eclipse needs petrel which is a pre processor to run a model. Whereas, Tnav does not required any kind of pre processor and will help to save many time.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigater
Is way easier to be used than Eclips and petrel and it doesn’t suddenly stuck.
It has everything in one.
However eclipse
Is old but  we got used to it during the semester.
To make it shorter Tnav is new and a better simulation software to be used in universities.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigater
Is way easier to used than Eclips and petrel and it doesn’t

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigater
Is way eas

# data[].attributes.body
1001437765

* TNav is more convenient to use.
* Both Eclipse and TNav precise and accurate in calculation.

*TNav is more easier and simpler to use and Faster
* Eclipse more complicated.

*TNav new compared to Eclipse thats why not been accepted that much
*While Eclipse been used for longer time easier for the existing experts, since they got used to it

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigator has a better GUI( compared to eclipse, it has an unlimited core processor which leads to higher speeds, it is faster/quicker compared to eclipse.
Tnavigator unlike Eclipse, has no need for preprocessor

# data[].attributes.body
Tnavigator support more input data format(eclipse 100/300,IMEX) compare to eclipse and tnavigator is a single executable program which allow to run variety module in one program (black oil/compositional)

# data[].attributes.body
tNavigator supports black oil, compositional and thermal compositional simulations for workstations and High-Performance Computing clusters.

ECLIPSE 100 solves the black oil equations (a fluid model) on corner-point grids. ECLIPSE 300 solves the reservoir flow equations for compositional hydrocarbon descriptions and thermal simulation.

# data[].attributes.body
Eclipse can run a lot of tools such as Office and Petrel at the same time, while tNavigator is simpler to use and can show the well activities more detailed compared to Petrel.

# data[].attributes.body
T navigator easy to lean compared to eclipse. Eclipse is not very user friendly. T navigator has a better advanced feature like geology model design, PVT and etc in one simple system. The most importantly the simulation speed is very high compared to eclipse.

# data[].attributes.body
-tnavigator, unlike eclipse takes a shorter time to run.
- tNavigator can run on any workstation ,that is it can run on even an i pad.
-the two are unique in their own ways

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages (difference) of tNavigator over ECLIPSE are;

·         Running of different input syntaxes from different simulators (ECLIPSE (SCHLUMBERGER), IMEX (CMG), & TEMPEST (ROXAR))

·         Supports 3D monitoring and user’s interactivity at runtime

# data[].attributes.body
tNavigator has a simpler user interface and lower learning curve than Eclipse. However, Eclipse has better tools and apps due to its long-standing history as the standard in the industry.

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion, both tnav and eclipse are important in oil and gas industries, both are good software to give reservoir engineer description of the model. tnav has better interface, and easier to use compare to eclipse, it's because tnav has tried to introduce new way of working to reservoir engineer, compare to eclipse as mother of reservoir simulation simulation that i think still applied old-school mode. in the end both will be used as reference, the more the reference the better the result.

# data[].attributes.body
In Eclipse we have to run the data first then show the model in petrel so we have two software, while tNavigator is more simple; all work can be run in one software.

# data[].attributes.body
tNavigator is more easier and comfortable than eclipse in which tNavigator have only one window to work on but, eclipse you have to open more than two windows.

# data[].attributes.body
In my Opinion TNav is much easier than eclipse. It fasten the dynamic reservoir stimulation on laptop compare to others. What mostly important i think is the interface of the Tnav is much more simple and easy to read.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnav is much more better than eclipse. It provides better visual and clear instructions. Also , History matching in Tnav is clear and easer than that in eclipse. Tnav is faster compared with eclipse .However, eclipse is more accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
For eclipse, we need to acquire high knowledge and training as it is quite complex. Contrary, tnavigator dont need necessary training as long as we have basic simulation background.

# data[].attributes.body
T-NAV can show reservoir characteristic,  reverse in time showing previous data easier in drilling horizontal wells and can show a lot of graphs option with no need for petrel.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnav GUI is better, and for large simulation data its faster because you can use the model as it processes. but eclipse feels more reliable and accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
Tnav is better than Eclipse in the sense of interface and settings. Eclipse however has better accuracy and simplicity in input data and codings.

# data[].attributes.body
tNavigator is much more handy and has easy access to all of its features compared to Eclipse though Eclipse is more widely used in the industry for its long term exposure, when it comes to tNavigator, the user should be able to understand it easily with few training lessons and the manual. Tnav could definitely optimize the project duration and its contemporary features helps to solidify the resulting models in a faster and optimized way.

# data[].attributes.body
- tNav give better visual in 2D and 3D
- coding in tNav is not as precise as eclipse which is sometimes there is error in eclipse but not in tNav
-tNav is user friendly

# data[].attributes.body
Dear students,

Please make comments on the above question (Not more than 30 words): 1. Click on the 'add' icon on the bottom right corner to post your answer. Write your name in the title.
2. Place the post anywhere you like.
3. Please answer latest by Monday, 9 April 2018, 12.00 pm. Thank you

# data[].attributes.body
tNavigator has a better GUI than Eclipse. It provides real time results viewing and supports live discussion which Eclipse cannot do. It also saves simulation time compared to Eclipse.