# data[].attributes.body
Because the situation is one that is inherently stressful and individuals who witnessed it might not have taken in the same information based on how they process stress. There are also people with emotional stakes in the outcome (friends of the students involved) as well as general conceptions of people who fight, don't fight, etc. based on the culture at the school

# data[].attributes.body
speculation varies between each individual, no 2 people can necessarily see the exact some thing

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone watching the fight would have different perspectives of the fight. Some students may have seen the buildup to the fight while other students may have only seen the fight itself causing a difference in perception towards the potential initiator.

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone posses a different perspective or bias on the subject 

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone posses a different perspective or bias on the subject 

# data[].attributes.body
If no one is lying, and the stories of the event are still different, it means that sources who witnessed this fight are making up stories that could be trying to protect the people involved in the fight. This could be a reason why there are different stories of the same event.

# data[].attributes.body
everyone has their own different perspective of an event, and the impact the incident had on them as well as their own influence upon the incident

# data[].attributes.headline
One person knows more, has more detail or had a clearer view of the fight. They might also be better at communicating or are less intimidated by figures of authority. 

# data[].attributes.subject
One person knows more, has more detail or had a clearer view of the fight. They might also be better at communicating or are less intimidated by figures of authority. 

# data[].attributes.body
Even if no one is lying, there are always 2 sides to a story as it’s always about perspective. It’s the clashing of perspectives that likely instigated the fight in the first place which may be oblivious to the other

# data[].attributes.body
friends, teachers, supervisors, witnesses

# data[].attributes.body
First hand witnesses,

# data[].attributes.body
The different positions that they are in (eg; their friend was involved in the fight), the various places they were in when the fight occurred and/or their role in the situation (eg; they're a teacher or a student) would change their story because of their perspective of the event.

# data[].attributes.body
each student would have different view and interpretation of the fight from where they are standing and how much they know about the incident.

# data[].attributes.body
The different types of people who might have been a witness to this fight are friends of people involved, teachers or supervisors, people who are unfamiliar with any of the participants, and then those who are involved. This small group of people shows different perspectives on the fight. For example: people who know the fighters may have a deeper understanding of why the fight took place, whereas, those who are unfamiliar might be completely new to the fight and its reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
In this case, the primary source of plausibility would be the accounts of other students implicating one student as the initiator more than the other.

# data[].attributes.body
If the recount is not bias then that would make the story more believable and trustworthy as they are not particularly siding with one person.

# data[].attributes.body
And if it is an outside lunch room, it could be some of public that had seen the fight as well.

# data[].attributes.body
there could be different stories of the event as everyone has their own point of view, as everyone can have a different experience from the same event from others.

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone may have different perspectives or memory of the fight as it is a stressfull situation and the situation has passed. So some people may remember it differently due to the stress they felt during the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
all of the above. any student, teacher, member of staff there to witness the fight would have seen the fight.

# data[].attributes.body
one person could be more reliable or trustworthy and liked by many figures of authority
more detailed recalls of the story would sound more believable
if the story does not come from a bias perspective
recounting for accurate times

# data[].attributes.body
people who could have witnessed the fight could include; the friend group of the two involved parties, any on duty teacher during the time of the fight, and any fellow classmates who were nearby

# data[].attributes.body
whether or not the person retelling the story involves emotion or if they try to stay factual and try to avoid embellishing the story.

# data[].attributes.body
There were many students so there are different perspectives, there are different recounts because the students were standing in different positions that may have hindered their recount of the events.

# data[].attributes.body
Usually when there is no emotive language involved, and that the description (of what happened) is concise and to the point.

# data[].attributes.body
one person may have more insight into the fight, may have watched it begin. more detail and lines up with other peoples stories.

# data[].attributes.body
- The ability to recall details with the support of other witness statements
- concrete and plausible evidence, i.e first hand footage
-If their relationship with those involved doesn't influence the person's story

# data[].attributes.body
Their personal reputations are at stake, as well as their relationships with other students and teachers. They may also want to make one person's actions look better or worse than they were.

# data[].attributes.body
Because there were multiple people around the fight or who have heard of the fight so there are multiple perspectives with varing levels of relibality.

# data[].attributes.body
Friends of the involved, the perpetrator(s), the victim(s), bystanders, authority figures, potentially surveillance devices.

# data[].attributes.body
Anyone could have seen the fight whether it was a friend of the people involved, an acquaintance or a stranger.

# data[].attributes.body
The fighters, friends, random student bystanders and teachers

# data[].attributes.body
If there is footage from surveillance devices that supports a certain story (impartial evidence). The ammount of impartial onlookers who have little or nothing to gain from lying, corroborating a particular story could also be a good way to deduce most of the truth surrounding the event - particularly if these stories also line up with the stories that the majority of teachers (employed figures of authority) are providing you with. If there are clear injuries, then they should serve to at least determine who were participants in the fight, thereby narrowing the ammount of potential participants.

# data[].attributes.body
The reasons why the fight happened could make the story more believable. However, some evidence or proof would be required to make the story more believable.

# data[].attributes.body
People who are biased in one way or another; friends of the people involved, enemies of the people involved, people removed from the situation and people who are involving themselves to speculate

# data[].attributes.body
Some kids may have different interpretations of what happend or possibly forget some parts. Also they could have witnessed the fight at different parts

# data[].attributes.body
friends, other students, teachers, the people involved

# data[].attributes.body
one person's story could be seen as more believable and plausible could depend on the insight they have on the fight, as one may know /have more backstory than the other.

# data[].attributes.body
A person's story might be more plausible if they were less explicitly biased in favour of a specific person, and could be corroborated by similarly trusted sources, like a teacher or security footage. Specific details that are easy to prove like marks in conjunction with times and explanations, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Someone who has no relation to the people involved will have an non bias story. Someone who is not known for making up stories. Anyone who's story is similar or the same to the majority of stories.

# data[].attributes.body
their history, maybe you wouldn't trust the student who is known to cause problems

# data[].attributes.body
What makes one persons accout more reliable than the other is based on how close they were to the fight as they would have seen more than others and some background knowledge on the fighters would help in unerstanding why te fight occured

# data[].attributes.body
everyone would have different perspectives and points of view of the fight whether that be their position in the fight e.g. friend in the fight or having no idea who they are and are just a witness or whether they could actually see all of the fight could possibly change each persons story

# data[].attributes.body
- the kids involved

- the by standers/ witnesses

- teachers (authority)

- the best friends of those fighting

- the people that dont like the people fighting

# data[].attributes.body
those who may have the most clear and precise story may be from those who have no friendship or relationship with the kids involved therefor having no bias. it could also may be not just one story, adding a few peices of each story to create the timeline