# data[].attributes.body
Below is a chart representing the trade gap between the United States and China. China is importing around $550-600 billion worth of goods to the U.S., while the U.S. is exporting around $200 billion worth of goods to China. Another way this can be analyzed, is how the U.S. has the advantage in the trade war with China. Because of how much less it exports to China, the U.S. is less vulnerable to tariffs.

# data[].attributes.body
Political cartoon illustrating the China–U.S.trade war from a more comical and literal view. President Trump is holding a giant mallet labeled 'TARIFFS' and getting ready to whack China with it. Under the giant mallet, is Uncle Sam, saying that Trump is hurting American consumers.

# data[].attributes.body
President Trump at the G7 summit on August 25th, 2019. These meetings discuss global economic governance. The next meeting is in September, and leaders of different countries will discuss trade and trade policy.

# data[].attributes.body
Trade is the buying and selling of goods between two parties, in this case, it's China and the United States. We are currently in the midst of a Trade War with China. When countries go back and forth trying to damage each others trade and economy, it is considered a trade war. Countries do this with the use of tariffs, taxes on imported goods from foreign countries. Tariffs have large impacts on countries' economies and its consumers. We are consumers, and we consume imports from other foreign countries. The U.S. imports approximately $550-600 billion worth of goods from China. But when tariffs are put on imports, prices increase. This especially damages the lower class; when prices increase on basic needs, the remainder of money that's spent on other essentials is lower. Typically, the country that receives more imports from foreign countries has the advantage because they have more opportunities to make the other country economically suffer with tariffs. So in the current trade war with China, the U.S. has more leverage and China is in a more vulnerable spot. As the articles said, Pres. Trump recently imposed tariffs on imported goods from China worth $300 billion or more. This lead to tariff increases on exported goods from the U.S. to China, and counters to that from the U.S.

# data[].attributes.body
On Monday, at the G7 summit in France, President Trump claimed that China had expressed its willingness to negotiate in the ongoing trade war during phone calls over the weekend. Beijing has repeatedly denied that any phone calls occurred.
“I have not heard of this situation regarding the two calls that the U.S. mentioned in the weekend,” -Geng Shuang, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
One day later, China is still insisting no phone calls took place over the weekend that President Donald Trump claimed showed its willingness to talk again.

"I have not heard of this situation regarding the two calls that the U.S. mentioned in the weekend," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at press conference on Tuesday. He had denied on Monday that the calls had taken place.

"Regretfully, the U.S. has further increased the tax rate on China's exports to the U.S. This extreme pressure is purely harmful to both sides and not constructive at all," Geng said, according to a CNBC translation.

On Monday, Trump said at the G-7 summit in France that China expressed its desire for a deal in recent phone conversations. His comment renewed hopes for a resolution between the world's two largest economies, pushing the market higher as the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained more than 250 points Monday.

Trump abruptly ended the cease-fire earlier this month by slapping more tariffs on Chinese goods, and China retaliated with imposing duties on $75 billion more of U.S. goods and resumed auto tariffs. Trump also said he's ordering U.S. companies to immediately start looking for an alternative to China.

"We hope that the U.S. can maintain calm, return to rationality, stop wrong practices, and create conditions for the two sides to conduct consultations on the basis of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefit," Geng said Tuesday.

Chinese state-run media Xinhua is also sticking to its tough stance on the trade war.

"China did not and will not surrender," Xinhua said in a commentary on Tuesday. "Playing the old tricks of bullying and maximum pressure, the U.S. administration has escalated the trade tensions repeatedly and tried to coerce China into accepting its irrational demands."

Xinhua had called Trump's move to order companies to leave China "ridiculous at best."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
China insists it is unaware of calls to Trump and says tariffs are 'extreme pressure' and 'not constructive at all'

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
One day later, China is still insisting no phone calls took place over the weekend that President Donald Trump claimed showed its willingness to talk again. "I have not heard of this situation regarding the two calls that the U.S. mentioned in the weekend," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at press conference on Tuesday.

# data[].attributes.body
When the White House recently increased tariffs on imported goods from China, U.S. and Chinese leaders became divided on the subject. Some Chinese leaders believe that they should be pushing back against the U.S. and never compromise. China and the U.S. continue to go back in forth in the trade war, and with the 13th round of trade talks upcoming in September, neither side knows what they want.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
When the White House decided to levy tariffs on goods from China, U.S. leaders were divided on whether a prolonged trade dispute was a wise course of action.

Now, so is Beijing.

China's leadership is being confronted by government factions offering contradictory approaches to resolving the ongoing trade war with the U.S. Some argue for cutting a deal as quickly as possible to save China's economy; a vocal and growing group of hawks argues China should push back against the United States and avoid an agreement at all costs.

As U.S. and Chinese negotiators head into their 13th round of trade talks in September, both sides have been given unclear signsabout what they hope to achieve from a dispute that has outlasted all expectations.

On Monday, the two governments appeared to be seeking to lower tensions. China's Vice Premier Liu He said, its lead trade negotiator, "China is willing to resolve its trade dispute with the United States through calm negotiations and resolutely opposes the escalation of the conflict." Trump said he agreed, telling reporters after a Group of Seven meeting in France that he thought the vice premier's comment was "a good thing."

That followed a slew of tit-for-tat tariffs.

On Aug. 1, President Trump walked back a tentative truce discussed on the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, by tweeting his decision to impose an additional 10% tariff on $300 billion worth of Chinese goods on Sept.1. Some of those import duties have now been delayed until Dec.15, but many in China saw the reversal as a betrayal.

Since then, trade relations have only worsened. Last week, China announced new, matching tariffs on $75 billion of U.S. goods and said it would resume duties on U.S.-made automobiles and car components. The U.S. immediately countered by raising the rates of existing tariffs on more than $400 billion of Chinese goods.

"Once the two presidents reached an agreement in Osaka, conditions should remain at the status quo so both sides can start negotiations for a good solution," says He Weiwen, a former commercial attaché at Chinese consulates and a trade expert. He wonders now if the Trump administration is negotiating in earnest or simply buying time. "It seems that the U.S. side is closing a door on talks," he says."That's very dangerous."

Frustration among China's leadership is running high, even at the Foreign Ministry, which has been the most vocal in publicly calling for a U.S. trade deal.

"There is no bottom line. And any time you set up a bottom line, it all can be very easily be broken," says Ruan Zongze, vice president at the China Institute of International Studies, a think tank run by the Foreign Ministry.

Continued U.S. escalation has cast doubts in China about whether the U.S. would even honor the terms of a trade deal, according to Ruan. "Many in China will say, 'if we make a deal, could this deal really work, or work for how long?' Trust is disappearing," he says.

A cohort of hawks, many from China's powerful military-industrial complex, is rising to the fore on the issue. They argue a trade deal is unnecessary, in stark contrast to China's diplomatic and commercial ministries that publicly welcome an agreement.

"Today, China is fighting two wars on one battlefield with the U.S. - a composite of economic and military conflicts," Dai Xu, a senior colonel in China's air force and an outspoken current affairs commentator, wrote in an online article in May. "Trump will first take China's money and then take our lives," Dai wrote in a commentary in January.

Dai says Beijing's trade frictions with Washington mark the beginning of a "protracted war," a concept popularized by Chairman Mao Zedong during China's war against Japan and now increasingly used in state media commentaries to describe China's trade negotiation strategy. "Much as in the original 'protracted war,' in this case we can also send the seemingly invincible invaders to a hell for failures," Dai wrote in May.

Dai and his supporters are calling for a war of attrition, in which China outlasts its rivals, even at the cost of global trade. The idea is attractive among those who believe the country's one-party system and control over its most significant monetary and financial levers would allow it to beatthe U.S. in a game of chicken.

"The result of the trade war between China and the United States is not determined by calculating how many chips the two countries have to play, but by their ability to bear the damage. You may have more chips but your damage tolerance is lower than mine," Shen Yi, an international relations professor at Fudan University in Shanghai, wrote on a state-run news site in June.

But significant dissenters believe China has overplayed its hand.

"Between China and the United States, the U.S. is still the strong one and China is the weak one. Therefore, China attaches more importance to good Sino-U.S. relations," Jin Canrong, associate dean of international studies at Renmin University and one of China's most prominent foreign policy commentators, stated in comments that went viral in July.

Speaking at a Shanghai corporate event, Jin went on to boldly predict a trade deal would be reached no later than November as pressure from tariffs diminish the country's economic prospects: "If the trade war has been fought for a long time and the mid-to-high-end supply chains leave China, that would greatly damage the potential of China's future development," he said.

China has reported weak economic figures this summer; Germany's economy contracted from April through June. Economists say uncertainty over trade policies have contributed to a global slowdown.

Moderate Chinese economists now hope that the trade war will at least lend policymakers cover to shepherd through market reforms to expand foreign investment rules and open China's financial system to foreign players - reforms critics say have come too late.

"The party line and also the general consensus is that China should open up more," Wang Huiyao, president of the Center for China and Globalization, a Beijing-based think tank that advises the government on trade and economic issues, tells NPR.

Wang says the two countries should strike a trade deal quickly so that China can focus its energy on policies like accelerating state-owned enterprise reforms.

"You can't look for a perfect deal," says Wang. "It's up to President Trump to call a victory any time."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
China's Vice Premier Calls For 'Calm' In U.S. Talks; Hawks Want A War Of Attrition

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When the White House decided to levy tariffs on goods from China, U.S. leaders were divided on whether a prolonged trade dispute was a wise course of action. Now, so is Beijing. China's leadership is being confronted by government factions offering contradictory approaches to resolving the ongoing trade war with the U.S.