# data[].attributes.body
Main points of feedback:
- Lighting and sound were edited very well.
- Colour grading suited the music video.
- The artists performance was believable and well done.
-  Song suited the artist.
- Costume went well with the genre of music and colourful locations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is "9. Asha, Deenah, Jerome, Rahma" by 283goswellg on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.

# data[].attributes.body
When comparing the rough cuts I realised the improvements we made. In the first rough cut our main point of criticism was editing in terms of lip syncing and the speed of our video. Whereas with the rough cut 2 those previous errors were rectified in order to make the best version of the music video. With only needing to improve on fractions of the video such as lead up edits and implementing more synergy within the video.

# data[].attributes.body
When looking at the rough cut 2 feedback I realised most of the constructive criticism was aimed at the dancing scene which needed a lead up cut rather then rushing the edit. Additionally we received constructive news about the artist performance and the edits and cuts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is "Rough Cut 1" by jerome lance on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.

# data[].attributes.body
A very important process and part of making a video is creating and editing multiple drafts or versions of a video and presenting it to audiences for rough cut feedback. Myself and my group edited our music video and decided to have our class give feedback on the edits, timing and artist performance. With some feedback coming back as positive and also some strong constructive criticism. A main point of constructive criticism was the out of sync timing with the artist and the song and the opening scene being too quick in timing. While at the same time receiving positive feedback with the artist performance and the choice in song.