# data[].attributes.headline
Common pitfalls when applying visible thinking routines

# data[].attributes.subject
Common pitfalls when applying visible thinking routines

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Common pitfalls when applying visible thinking routines

# data[].attributes.body
I have been using See, Think, Wonder, but I call it something different. I have continued to use Claim, Evidence, Analysis, then I have also added space for open ended essential questions. I am trying to keep the tools/structures as simple and practical as possible

# data[].attributes.body
I have used "step in" (is that what it's called) and "word/phrase/sentence."  Both enabled some really great collaborative thinking and I saw some really deep connections being made.

I love how something so simple can lead to depth.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim Evidence Reasoning routine language seeing some crossover between Soc Stud and

# data[].attributes.body
I have been using Nearpod a lot.  They have a great technology interface that allows students to show their thinking with short responses, quick quizzes, a good drawing feature, and a post it note board.  Most of their lessons go back and forth between delivering info for several minutes and then collecting some visible thinking from all students.  I display it on the projector and often show exemplars while providing opportunities to dialogue.

# data[].attributes.body
My grapple is that the routines I've used have worked really well for the students who are already engaged.  My disengaged students chose not to participate, as usual.  This includes for when I have required both written and verbal responses.  For example, I did a "chat blast" for the "Step in" and many did not share.  We did discussion for "word/phrase/sentence" and those who are disengaged said they just picked the same word as was last said, and wouldn't say anything further or give more explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
Still so hard to establish any routine when we change every 2 weeks and get so many new kids.

# data[].attributes.body
struggle with time. High level thinking,reading, and writing takes time.

# data[].attributes.headline
I worry a lot about screen time in this day and age, and Nearpod is highly tech and screen dependent.

# data[].attributes.subject
I worry a lot about screen time in this day and age, and Nearpod is highly tech and screen dependent.

# data[].attributes.body
Mark

# data[].attributes.body
Since I have only done them a few times and the literature Matt has given has indicated that they need to be repeated, I need to try them more again.

I would like to incorporate small group stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
allow more time to discuss the "wonder"

# data[].attributes.body
I want to start adding more of my own content to the Nearpod's. I have been using content designed by other teachers, but I want to start modifying and adding stuff that will better suit the needs of my kids.

# data[].attributes.body
maybe start looking back (reflecting) upon the year's work and anticipate how incorp of Vis Think Rout might

# data[].attributes.headline
Leigh cont...be better used with this same content next year?

# data[].attributes.subject
Leigh cont...be better used with this same content next year?