# data[].attributes.body
All in all, whilst a growing number of people are starting to suggest that governmental bodies should have responsibility on environmental preservation, it is my firm belief that ordinary people’s actions are stronger influencers.

# data[].attributes.body
In recent years, the argument whether protecting environment is government's responsibility or each person's has never failed to attract people's attention and sparkle controversy over the potential impacts of this trend on individuals. From my standpoint, it will be better if both state officials and individuals share the responsibility.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, from my perspective, environmental conservation is a colossal task that places a burden on both state officials and ordinary people. For that, it requires a close-knit community to tackle this mentioned problem.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, while the responsibility concerned with environment field is the main work for government, I am still convinced that their counterpart do not ignore the most important thing about living in entire ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, while this phenomenon is polarizing, I strongly believe that every individual should cooperate with the state officials to preserve the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, from my perspective, due to the large amount of work involved, mobilising all the possible forces is a more sensible approach. It is, therefore, likely that joint efforts of both the gorvernments and their citizens would result in the most effective way of preserving the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, although the authority’s responsibility for preserving the environment plays a pivotal role in every country, I personally argue that common people should also contribute in saving the ecosystems in several ways.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, although the government intervention should no doubt be given precedence in environmental protection, I still contend that it is crucial for everyone to take actions in the practice of conserving the ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
To recapitulate, environment preservation is a social problem that must be dealt with to remain social stability. Provided that the authority along with law-abiding citizens effectively supervise the ecosystem saving actions of the residents, the modern society will significantly benefit from this practical behaviours.

# data[].attributes.body
Turning now to the other side of the argument, I still subscribe firmly to the belief that inhabitants’s actions are of the essence. Firstly, changing daily lifestyle does tremendous wonders for environment. A good example of it would be using public transports in lieu of personal vehicles to minimize the carbon emissions. In addition, citizens must obey the environmental protection law as well as speak out to protest against the degradation. If the ecosystem are constantly devastated, it leads to the environmental catastrophe including widespread flooding, soil erosion, extinction of many species and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, the government may play a pivotal role in maintaining the balance of ecosystem and environmental conservation. It is neccessary that authorities should introduce the legislation  so as to mitigate the environmental problems such as air pollution which is cautious nowadays. Likewise, they should run campaign to propagandize the knowledge and the methods of protecting ecosystem for citizens. Besides, the investin on modern technologies which is used for waste disposal. For instance, domestic waswater must be treated throughout filtration system before releasing to drainage or lakes.

# data[].attributes.body
However, this preservation mission can be weakened if the people are left out as they can be a significant contribution to the common cause. Starting at their lifestyle, many things can be altered to improve the habitat. For instance, taking public transports can considerably minimize exhaust emissions. Another thing that can help the cause is that the public must obey the law and avoid littering. Many regulations are designed to keep the environment spotless, and they must be kept that way.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, I still subscribe to the belief that the ordinary people around the world should become a part in environment conservation. First, by switching to environmentally-friendly lifestyle might change the world on the positive impact. For instances, people do from small action like recycling stuffs to the tremendous one such as boycotting  industries that do not handle the waste from their own factory.
Second, people should become a member of consumerism. The main idea behind this is that make everyone act on instinct on every product they decide to buy, this work would help the factory use less resource to make products

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, despite the fact that the government may take responsibility for protecting the environment, I still subscribe to the belief that every resident is also responsible for it. It is proved that every person can strongly influence on the environment by changing their lifestyle to the more  environmentally friendly habits. Specifically, citizens should boycott the plastic bags which are degrade human’s environment standard or recycle things. Moreover, citizens should obey to the environmental laws to conserve the environment. Taking these solutions, citizens may improve the environment standard significantly.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, it is undeniable that every single inhabitant is accountable for any damage or injury of the environment. First, it is significant for every individual to obey the law carefully. Lack of awearness is considered to be a major source of environment's change, so the more people obey the law, the more effective we can protect the environment. Second, changing lifestyle can also change the neiborhood around every person. Using more friendly-environmental products, boycotting products using material from endangered animals can reduce bad effect on the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, I still subscribe to the belief that all ordinary people should embrace responsibility for the environment. By changing daily lifestyle to be more environmentally-friendly, such people can help alleviate alarming environmental issues. This means that citizens can reduce their own carbon footprint by various ways: limiting plastic bags, transporting by public vehicles rather than private ones, eating less meat and so on. In addition, these inhabitants can also take consumerism into their consideration. Without that practice, there will be a tendency of acting on instinct which can lead to a colossal amount of waste in the near future.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, I still subscribe to the belief that every inhabitants should participate in preserving the environment. Firstly, residents can preserve the environment by changing their daily lifestyles. For example, although plastic bags are cheap and available in every traditional market, citizens should seek to bring their own bags when they go shopping on a regular basis. Secondly, obeying the law is also an easy-to-do way for every inhabitant to protect the environment. For instance, if common people do not leave their litter outside garbage cans and do not break other environmental rules such as degrading wildlife and marine conservation,  they will gradually alleviate the pressure on the ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, I still subcribe to the belief that residents should be under an obligation to  save the flora and fauna. First of all, inhabitants must obey the environment law, if they do not abide by the law, they would be punished. Observing the law could take actions to adress the issues related to alleviate odinary people wreak havoc on the nature. One futher method of saving the elogical system would be changing people’s lifestyle. A better example of this can be best provided by giving careful consideration to buy in coal instead of acting on instinct, if it couldn’t be used regularly, you shouldn’t buy it to diminish the environment consumption.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, some people insist that the authorities should shoulder the responsibility of preserving the environment while their opponents maintain that all citizens need to contribute their effort to protect the environment. From my perspective, both viewpoint have their own considerable justification and therefore both opinions should be elaborated on

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a great variety of reasons to advocate for the idea that government must have responsible for conservation. Firstly, state officials has an abundant authorities to control the country. For example, government can enact environment law to prevent citizens or companies destroy the rivers with trash and wastewater. Secondly, government body, also reserve a mount of money to build on organizations serve for propaganda widely purpose. To be more clear, the internet will be the perfect place to start and president can hire people to work in that, when people use the internet, they will see that project the environment is very important.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a great variety of reasons to advocate for the idea that the authorities take the whole responsibity for protecting environment. Some people believe that investing the particular amount of the State Coffers in technology that helps human to prevent environmental deterioration. Moreover, the government can enact policy related to environmental preservation or run campaigns in order to raise ordinaries' awareness about protecting environment.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a vast array of reasons to advocate for the idea that environmental conservation is the responsibly of the government. First and foremost, environmentally-friendly techniques will emerge with advances in technology due to the government’s investment. For instance, dump water can be refined then put into domestic use.  What is more, state officials are influential enough to propagandize residents of taking actions for the environment. Put simply, people’s awareness about this issue can be raised, which leads to the better attitude to the surrounding nature.

# data[].attributes.body
To commence with, It is undeniable that government has great potential to conserve the ecosystem. Legislation is one of the most powerful contributing factors in solving this problem. To be more specific, authorities can promulgate some environmental rules and regulations, which will contribute to controlling poaching and illegal deforestation. In addition, it is obvious that state official has a great budget to run some propagate programs to raise citizen's awareness through social media or educational curriculum. The right awareness of environmental protection will lead to the right action of citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, it is undenieable that citizens can play an improtant role in protecting their environment in area. Actually, cars and motobikes are considered to be a major reasons lead to air pollution. Their exhausted gases contaminate the air, release the carbon dioxide and fume to the ozone which can lead to greenhouse effect, acid rain and so on. They can use some environmentally-friendly vehicles such as bikes, electric cars to avoid doing harm to environment. Another chance for each persons is recycling. As an evidence, using cloth bags instead of plastic bags will contribute to alleviate the serious level of water pollutiion which causes by plastic waste. Moreover, stopping using plastic which everyone can act will prevent soil from eroising. So that, individuals have their own misions for environmentl conversation.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a wide range of possibilities that the government can control. They have the power to impose laws and regulations that can regulate the amount of waste. For instance, policymakers can purposely reduce the use of conventional power plants and promote more renewable energies. Moreover, the state government is often known for its prosperity. Tax payer's money can be used to fund environmental conservation campaigns. In addition to that, state-of-the-art recycling technologies can have more resources from the state budget to develop, bring a greener life to residents.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a great diversity of reasons to advocate for the idea that the act of protecting ecosystem belongs to government. Initially, there will be a great influence on environment if the authorities use government coffers on the right way. To be more specific, planting colossal numbers of tree around industries and inside city in other to restore fresh atmosphere is a good example. Furthermore, state officials could take advantage from their position to raise people's awareness. In other words, they could pass some laws for condemning people throwing trash in not correct place or run a campaign every single year for students to understand how important the environment to humans.

# data[].attributes.body
It is unequivocal that authorities play an essential part on preserving the environment because of scores of reasons . One of the most prominent reasons is authorities’ power can have a strong impact on the environment. In other words, state officials can enact environmental law in order to alleviate environmental contamination. For instance, the state officials can not only encourage factories to move to the countryside rather than staying in cities but also put a ban on business who release toxic emission to the environment. Because of adequate power of government, they may raise people’s awareness on environmental preservation such as encourage them reduce using plastic bags or draw their attention on the Red Book. In addition , it is clear that the state officials can use money from coffers to invest technology so as to conserve the environment. It is proved that there are a variety of modern technology which can help people to prevent environmental pollution such as wastewater treatment systems.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a great variety of reasons to advocate for the idea that governmental bodies is demanded accountability for maintain the balanced environment. It is authorities that should enact law in order to decrease environmental problem such as air pollution, and more. For example, practical law and appropriate fine about cacbon dioxyde from industries may reduce greenhouse gasses. Another pivotal role the government could play would be running environmental campaign in order to raise residents's awareness. If there is more people who are fully informed about the seriousness of the environmet stituation, there will be more and more actions avoiding harming the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, environmental protection has become a topic of common interest. However, public opinion has polarized on this issue whether individual or government should pick up the pieces. From my perspective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications and therefore, this controversial issue should be thoroughly elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, There is a great variety of reasons to advocate for the idea that, inhabitants can be responsible for promoting green and environmentally friendly life style. If citizens keep acting on instinct with a colossal amount of merchandise, the environment will have a deterioration on its ecosystem. Furthermore, Obeying the law from authorises is the must for each residents to allevitate environment contamination. For instance, individuals should raise awareness of their actions in the routines every day by avoiding overpackaged goods and unnecessary plastic items.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there are a host of rationales to advocate the idea that authorities are responsible for saving the ecosystem. First, since governmental bodies have massive financial support from coffers, there will be more actions that can be done to protect the environment. For instance, the government can invest in alternative energy inventions such as solar panels or wind energy in order to reduce overexploitation in fossil fuels. Second, the authorities can also run many practical campaigns through media or education. As a result, people’s awareness may be raised as they have a sufficient amount of knowledge about environment protection.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a host of rationales to advocate for the idea that only the national authorities are involved in the act of conserving the environment. Initially, it is obvious that the state officials have a strong coffer and force. In other words, given that the government is financially viable and has a great power, they can allocate money and force for propagandizing environmentally-friendly campaigns as well as raising residents' awareness of preserving the environment. Furthermore, the governmental bodies can make some policies regarding environmental conservation in order to prevent ordinary people to wreak havoc on the environment. For instance, the government can promulgate the policy in which the act of hunting wild animals and cutting down forest trees will be fired severely to intervene law-breakers to deteriorate the ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a great variety of reasons to advocate for the idea that the governmental bodies should manage to keep control of preservating the environment. It seems appropriate that the authorities have the supreme jurisdiction to enact environmental law, for instance, introducing green taxes has been proposed as one of the main instruments for the mitigation of environmental problems. Moreover, the state officials should run a campaign to raise people’s awareness on maintaing the clean green world in general and saving the ecosystem in particular.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there is a great variety of reasons to advocate for the idea that the state officials may play a vital role to maintaining the environment safe and healthy. Initially, it is obvious that the governments have a power of coffers and  force. In other words, the authorities is financially viable, they can invest money in technology for water treatment factories and force for run environmentally-friendly campaigns as well as raising resident's awareness of conservation the environment. Moreover, the government bodies should introduce the legislation in order to mitigate environmental problems, such as air pollution and deforestation. For example, the government can strongly punish those who cut down forests or discharge wastewater into rivers.

# data[].attributes.headline
in this day and age,preserving the environment is the authorities's liability.Others believe that every citizen should be blame for it has been receiving a great deal of public attention. In my opinion ,I think both  governmental bodies and resident should take responsibility to take care the environment

# data[].attributes.subject
in this day and age,preserving the environment is the authorities's liability.Others believe that every citizen should be blame for it has been receiving a great deal of public attention. In my opinion ,I think both  governmental bodies and resident should take responsibility to take care the environment

# data[].attributes.body
Some people insist that environmental protection is government's mission while their opponents maintain that every citizen should be responsible for it. From my perspective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications and therefore, it should be elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, some people insist that environmental preservation is the state officials' respnsibility, while their opponents maintain that the responsibility for it belongs to every resident. From my perspective, both points of view have their own considerable justifications and therefore, the environmental conservation should be thoroughly elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
It is insisted that authority should take action to preserve environment, while their opponents maintain that it is citizens who should have duty on. To my way of thinking, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications and therefore, environmental protection should be elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, some people insist that protecting the environment is the responsibility of authorities, while their opponents maintain that individuals should also contribute to the protection of the planet we live on.   From my perspective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justification, I believe that there should be a combination of both factors.

# data[].attributes.body
To conclude, due to the serious pollution nowadays, we need the contribute from everyone. Therefore, efforts of both government and ordinary people would result in the most effective way of preserving environment and ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
Environmental issues are still an alarming problem and therefore, it need to be solved urgently. Despite that, people are still arguing whether the ordinary people or the governments be accountable for that. In this thesis, both viewpoints will be covered and given conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
Currently, some people insist that policy-makers should take responsibility for environmental problem while their opponents maintain that the act of environment protection belongs to each individuals' duty. From my perspective, both view points have their own considerable justifications and therefore, it should be elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, it is irrefutable that environment protection has become a topic common interest. Some believe that government should take responsibility for preserving the environment while their opponents subscribe to the belief that every citizen should be responsible for it . From my own perspective, both opinions have their own considerable justifications which should be carefully considered.

# data[].attributes.body
While some people believe that protecting the environment is the state's responsibility, their opponents believe that every citizen should take responsibility for it. From my pespective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications, and therefore they should be carefully elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, environment conservation has become a topic of common interest. Some people insist that authorities must play the main role on environmental preservation while their opponents maintain that each of the citizens should take responsibility for it. From my perspective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications and therefore, both opinions should be thoroughly elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
On the one hand, there are scores of reasons to advocate for the idea that authority should be in charge of preserving the environment. First, government play a pivotal role in introducing legislation to mitigate the environmental problem, such as air pollution. To illustrate, there should be some enacted laws on the reduction of carbon emissions released from vehicles. In addition, it is authorities who have massive financial support that should maintain the environment healthy. In other words, state officials should allocate the money from the nation's coffer to run campaigns that help raise people awareness or to invest in sustainable energy in lieu of fossil fuels.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, Some humans insist that governmental bodies must take responsibility for environment conservation, while their opponents maintain that citizens should be the ones for that. From my perspective, both view points have their own considerable justifications and therefore, both states should be thoroughly elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people assume that the state officials are in charge of conserving the environment while their opponents maintain that the citizens also need to take responsibility for it. From my perspective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications and therefore, both opinions should be elaborated on.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, some people insist that the government bodies should be the ones holding accountable for the ecosystem while their opponents maintain that all citizens need to contribute their effort to protect the environment. From my perspective, both viewpoints have their own considerable justifications, but I personally lean towards the latter.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people insist that environment conservation is the responsibility of the state officials while their opponents maintain that all citizens have to be accountable for it. From my perspective, both view points have their own considerable justifications and therefore, who need to fulfill this obligation should be thoroughly elaborated on.