# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people believe that it is of paramount importance to learn local history rather than world history. The key rationale is that their national past background is adequate for students, hence having better understanding of the past economy, culture and so on can help they to thrive in their career as well as making tremendous contribution to their nations' tradition and economy. Nevertheless. this thinking is flawed because interactions has been facilitated on a global scale, leading to the intergration of other traditions and history into other countries. Consequently, it is of utmost importance for students to learn history from other histories to broaden theri knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people believe that learning world history is not as important as learning local history. However, this notion is not suitable in this modern era, as globalization is of vital importance, so that knowing only the history of one area is not enough for students to catch up with the new curriculum which is applied in schools nowadays.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people believe that studying local history is more vital than learning world history. The key rationale is that the local historical values are enough for students. However, this thinking is flawed. This situation exemplifies starkedly in the situation of obtaining knowledge of a foreign nation's history since it will help them to co-operate with companies or people from foreign coutries.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why a sum of people tend to put a heavy emphasis on national history. The key rationale is that local history is already adequate for one to acquire. This thinking, however, is flawed since our world becomes globalized day after day. In light of this, learning about other histories is fundamental to have more comprehensive views about foreigners hence making it is easier to collaborate with them. For this reason, it seems to be unwise to underestimate the unshaken importance of world history

# data[].attributes.body
Certain people still believe that schoolchildren should study about local history rather than world ones. The key rationale is that it is likely to avoid incomprehensible and vague knowledge that world history has to offer, while on the other hand, local history is more concentrated and relatable to one’s lives. However, this thinking is flawed due to the fact that it overlooks the importance of world history in people’s life, way more vital than local ones. When studying world history, students will have a broader perspective of a historical scenario or event, therefore leading to a more objective judgement and knowledge of the scenario. This means students are likely to avoid the one-sidedness that happens in local history, which is based on the opinions and thinking of the country’s historians, that results in wrongful and inaccurate knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why people think that learning local history is adequate. The national history of a country is what its citizens take pride in. However, this thinking is flawed, as it gives a one-way view of the problem. This acts as a precursor to hatred towards other countries, especially countries that used to fight against others.

# data[].attributes.body
It is reasonable how people would believe that understanding local historical value intrinsically would be beneficial for the people's lives. These thoughts are only valid in the past, where most social interactions are between individuals of the same race. However, as it is more globalised, and countries has started to establish international relationships with eachother, this viewpoint is no longer correct in this day and age. Knowing foreign history would help with local people with establishing business and interpersonal relationships with foreigners, and further on strengthening the relationships mentioned.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people believe that it is better for children to only learn about local history. Learning local history can help children to develop their nation’s weakness. However, in the light of globalization, this thinking is out-dated. In this situation, a knowledge of a foreign nation's history will help them to co-operate with companies or people from foreign coutries.

# data[].attributes.body
First of all, among several advantages associated with learning local history, the most significant of which is to understand thoroughly the origin and meaning of the past events, customs and so on of their motherland. Therefore, the youngsters could maintain the valuable tradition for the next generation. Furthermore, the country past is a storehouse of information about how the ancestors had lived, had thought and had fought to protect their families, hometown, and the most important is the land. For example, by listening about the rebellion of the people against the enemies to liberate Vietnam, Vietnamese children could understand the value of freedom and respect the sacrifice of their forefathers. Accordingly, teaching local history is synonymous with educating about patriotism. However, we should not underestimate the importance of world history. In order to understand more thoroughly and more deeply the regional past, it is necessary to relate the local historical events with corresponding world conditions.

# data[].attributes.body
To commence with, some people adopt a view that the history of a nation is more valuable for the learners than the world history as such subject can enable schoolchildren to be aware of some frailties that their nations still need to develop. Nonetheless, this is such a fundamental flaw since learning international history can also help them to avoid countless urgent issues such as famine, civil wars, protests in other nations in the past that their country might tackle in the future. This merit manifests itself starkly in the truism of Japanese students who have learned world history have noticed that their countries are tackling some identical issues like some nations in the past. Hence, they strive for solving it in order to develop their nation in the foreseeable future. This is a testament to why people ought not to underestimate the vital determinant of world history.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable to advocates of the opposite viewpoint that having an understanding of the local historical values is sufficient to live. Their allegation could have been accurate a few decades ago, when most interpersonal interactions were limited to persons of the same race and ethnicity. However, as the globe has grown more globalized, and multinational commerce and migrant labor have turned any town into a global village, this viewpoint is no longer valid. In this context, a knowledge of a foreign nation's history will assist future local employees to strengthen their bonds with expatriates from that country.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people contend that students should learn local history rather than international history. It is predicated on the assumption that fixating on one's country history will widen their knowledge about their national identity.According to this theory, this proposal would boost patritoism. However, this line of reasoning is not sound because learners will look at merely one side of the historical setting, which potentially triggers hatred towards other nations. Therefore, studying international history will help people to have a general standpoint in any historical events.

# data[].attributes.body
It's understandable why some people think understanding local history is more important than learning world history. The key rationale is that studying local history could help youngsters recognize the sacrifices made by their forefathers and mothers. However, since the globe has gotten more international, this way of thinking is flawed and short-sighted. Students in this circumstance require a broad understanding of international history, which allows them to broaden their awareness of different cultures and traditions.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people believe that studying local history is more necessary than learning world history. The main argument is that the historical significance of the area is sufficient for pupils. However, since the globe has gotten more international, this way of thinking is out of date. In this environment, students must acquire a broad understanding of international history in order to effectively interact with foreigners.

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people think that it is better for children to only learn about their nation's history. Learning local history can help children to appreciate their ancestors sacrifices . However, this style of thinking is not only short-sighted but also harmful.By learning about the world history, one can learn to respect those with different skin colours, traditions and cultures

# data[].attributes.body
It is understandable why some people believe that studying local history is more vital than learning world history. The key rationale is that the local historical values are enough for students. However, this thinking is dated, as the world has become globalized. In this situation, students need to have a general insight into world history, which enables them to collaborate with foreigners better.