# data[].attributes.headline
 HH  - Valid - Unsure what the task was - course criteria

# data[].attributes.subject
 HH  - Valid - Unsure what the task was - course criteria

# data[].attributes.body
Reliable - Did not see the persons face therefore unsure if it was the student.
Current - Not sure when the video was taken
Sufficient - Not aware of what was expected of the student - criteria?
Authentic - No indication of who the person was, and what was expected of them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Valid - can't see who is doing it and they don't introduce themselves. C&S

# data[].attributes.subject
Valid - can't see who is doing it and they don't introduce themselves. C&S

# data[].attributes.headline
Authentic - unsure as we can't see the learner and there's no ID. C & S

# data[].attributes.subject
Authentic - unsure as we can't see the learner and there's no ID. C & S

# data[].attributes.headline
Reliable - yes because it's the same person throughout but it could have been copied from another video. C & S

# data[].attributes.subject
Reliable - yes because it's the same person throughout but it could have been copied from another video. C & S

# data[].attributes.headline
Current - no because there is no date. C&S

# data[].attributes.subject
Current - no because there is no date. C&S

# data[].attributes.headline
Specific - yes because instructions were clear, in detail and in one session, not separate. C&S

# data[].attributes.subject
Specific - yes because instructions were clear, in detail and in one session, not separate. C&S

# data[].attributes.body
No specified criteria to to assess against nor is it clear what to assess or who I am assessing. Assessment will not be consistent over time as it is not clear.
Any assessment will not be fair as I cannot assess against any criteria. Therefore, the assessment was not valid, reliable or fair for the above reasons.

# data[].attributes.headline
Annette    Not Valid - Task is unclear, so not clear what to assess

# data[].attributes.subject
Annette    Not Valid - Task is unclear, so not clear what to assess

# data[].attributes.body
Not Authentic - do not know who made the cup of tea on the video, unsure if it is the Learner
Not Current - No date on the video, and unclear if it was real time ie. was the video edited?
Not Sufficient - does not show competency

# data[].attributes.headline
Sufficient - no - there were no further options offered such as tea preferences.  C&S

# data[].attributes.subject
Sufficient - no - there were no further options offered such as tea preferences.  C&S

# data[].attributes.headline
Criteria not met (on the basis there is no criteria).  Learner needs to identify themselves and show their face on camera and show the date/time of assessment.  Needs to watermark the video footage for authenticity.  The assessment is not valid for these reasons.  More detail required for tea preferences (diversity).    I consider our decision to be fair as the learner has the opportunity to re-submit their video or similar evidence in order to meet the criteria. C&S

# data[].attributes.subject
Criteria not met (on the basis there is no criteria).  Learner needs to identify themselves and show their face on camera and show the date/time of assessment.  Needs to watermark the video footage for authenticity.  The assessment is not valid for these reasons.  More detail required for tea preferences (diversity).    I consider our decision to be fair as the learner has the opportunity to re-submit their video or similar evidence in order to meet the criteria. C&S

# data[].attributes.headline
HH - Ensure - Task could not be counted towards the course criteria because I could not identify the student or the course specification to mark it against.   The assessment was not reliable, valid or fair for the reason given above.

# data[].attributes.subject
HH - Ensure - Task could not be counted towards the course criteria because I could not identify the student or the course specification to mark it against.   The assessment was not reliable, valid or fair for the reason given above.

# data[].attributes.body
Valid - Unsure. No Dates, writing is too small to read. Evidence is insufficient to assessor.
Authentic -  Photographs are clear but there are no dates or names attached to them.
Current - No dates on the photographs. No names on them. The photographs could have been taken 10 years ago, there would be no way of knowing.
Sufficient - There is no criteria to match the photographs. Therefore it us not sufficient.

# data[].attributes.body
Made against specific criteria - No, there is no evidence of criteria present.
Valid - No dates on or near photographs. No names with the photo's. Evidence is not backed up by supporting evidence.
Authentic - No dates, no names and no authenticity proof.
Reliable - Not reliable due to the fact of them having no evidence of work from before or evidence of previous photos.
Fair - Assessors decision is fair. All supporting evidence is absent eg dates, names, times or criteria.

# data[].attributes.headline
Annette  City and Guilds Level 3 Support Teach and Learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Annette  City and Guilds Level 3 Support Teach and Learning

# data[].attributes.headline
HH - Reliable/authentic - as the testimony and the signature was typed, I could not ensure that the form was completed by the teacher named at the bottom of the form therefore I would need to validate the information.

# data[].attributes.subject
HH - Reliable/authentic - as the testimony and the signature was typed, I could not ensure that the form was completed by the teacher named at the bottom of the form therefore I would need to validate the information.

# data[].attributes.body
Current - The paperwork was dated, so as long as it falls within the assessment dates it can be used.
Sufficient - I believe that the information is sufficient as it answers the questions asked.

# data[].attributes.headline
Annette   Is the assessment valid and reliable due to the fact that the comments are typed. How can it be authenticated that they are comments from staff when staff signature is typed. Perhaps, a conversation with the member of staff to confirm would make it valid and reliable?

# data[].attributes.subject
Annette   Is the assessment valid and reliable due to the fact that the comments are typed. How can it be authenticated that they are comments from staff when staff signature is typed. Perhaps, a conversation with the member of staff to confirm would make it valid and reliable?

# data[].attributes.body
The assessment is dated which could mean it is current as long as it falls within the parameters of timescale.
The assessment shows what the learner has learnt so can be deemed as sufficient to meet the criteria (if the criteria specifies this of course!)

# data[].attributes.headline
HH - Appraisal - I would not pass this assessment until I can validate that the information has been completed by the person named on the form.

# data[].attributes.subject
HH - Appraisal - I would not pass this assessment until I can validate that the information has been completed by the person named on the form.