# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because they never had and still don't have any solid evidence proving he murdered Hae. This is all based off Jay's testimonies, which have recently been proving not so credible, having several discrepancies in his stories. The biggest one being him changing where Adnan showed him Hae's body on two interviews from a strip mall to a best buy parking lot.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that Adnan is innocnet because first of all Jays not even reliable and his story is wild and unbelievable. Also there's proof that he was at the librray and there was no time for him to make it all the way to best buy kill her and put her in the trunk

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Adnan is innocent because Jay isn't a reliable source since his story isn't clear and it keeps changing from time to time. Also, you must tkae Jay's words into consideration when he says that he hasn't had too many altercations with the police in his life but he has been held gun point and forced to do things and not communicate with the police. I feel like maybe someone was threatening Jay to blame Adnan for the murder and Jay must do this or else he gets killed.

# data[].attributes.body
i feel as though Adnan is innocent because the only evidence that the court has against him is Jay's and jays story has so many holes and inconsistencies in it that its hard to believe that even the court thought he was telling the truth. Yes Adnan memory is shaky but that's justified by the fact that the police took so long to actually question him on the killing.

# data[].attributes.body
Though there are a lot of people that will say he is guilty based off eyewitness testimony and cell records, I don’t believe this to be true. Neither Cell records or memory are to be completely trusted. This is a proven scientific FACT. Adnan has an Alibi for the 30 minute time period in which they say Hae died. Even if he didn’t I find it hard to believe he could get to her, kill her and get back all without a car (his car was loaned to Jay)

# data[].attributes.body
I feel as though adnan is innocent. A lot of the evidence wasn't even thoroughly looked at because the police already had their minds set on adnan being guilty so they didn't look for any evidence that would contradict that. A lot of the used evidence in the trial has no way to prove adnan did it. They are all saying guilty based off f jay's testimony which doesn't add up itself. The timestamps of everything like the cell phone records and the story jay tells doesn't add up. A lot of jay's story was taken as evidence against adnan but wasn't thoroughly fact checked.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Adnan is innocent because there was no way Adnan could make it to Best Buy after school and kill Hae with all of the after school traffic. There was also a witness that said they were in the library together at the time Hae was murdered. Jay is also telling multiple stories that don't add up. He always adds new info or takes away some.

# data[].attributes.body
Although there isn't a whole bunch of evidence containing Adnan's guilt, there is a few things that make him guilty. The cell records/Call log is an important one, because this shows how he was near where Hae's body was found!! I think that Adnan helped out with the murder, I don't think he did it all by himself. The court case is basically going off of the cell records and Jay's testimony. Although Jay's testimony changes many times, or he doesn't fully tell the truth, he developed a well enough testimony to prove to the state Adnan's guilt.

# data[].attributes.body
i feel like adnan is innocent. the lack of motive and the fact that there's not any evidence to actually prove thats he is guilty . to me it seems like jay is the more guilty than anything. because of all the details he's able to provide
amiah h

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Adnan Syed is innocent and he did not murder Hae Min Lee. Not only is their no physical evidence (such as DNA, fingerprints,fibers,etc) linking Adnan to the crime, The only main thing that supported his conviction is Jays interviews as well as his testimonys in court and none of those can actually be seen as reliable or accurate because he changes his story several times. Not only can several details of jays story be disproved, but there are several phone calls that Adnan made that do not ping to a cell tower where Jay tells the cops they were driving that afternoon. Jay made up several events that occurred during the day which created major changes to his initial story and statements. Although Adnan had minor slip ups in his story, I believe that many people including prosecutors were looking at the fact that Adnan was Haes ex and that was also used to give Adnan a motive. Also, initially Asia McClain served as a possible Alibi for Adnan but it was overlooked.

# data[].attributes.body
Since Adnan's conviction was almost entirely based on Jay's fabricated testimony, it's a little difficult supporting his conviction. Although Adnan may have some cell phone records that point to his guilt, Jay blatantly admitted to lying about some parts of his story. Some of his so-called evidence doesn't correlate with the timeline Hae was killed. Jay has more evidence pointing to him being the killer than Adnan does.

# data[].attributes.body
Up to this point, I think Adnan is innocent. The main source of his conviction is Jay's testimony. His stories keep changing and all the inconsistencies prove him unreliable. Other than Jay's testimony, there really isn't much evidence linking Adnan to Hae's murder.

# data[].attributes.body
With the current information I believe Adnan is innocent, because the main testimony against him comes from Jay, who continuously is caught lying about his story. At one point Jay makes up an entire, detailed trip to Patapsco Park, which he later denies ever happened. He admits to lying on multiple occasions. Other than Jay's story, there is little else to condemn Adnan, for instance the lack of physical evidence and his alibi which is seemingly confirmed by Asia McClain.

# data[].attributes.body
i believe that Adnan is innocent because there is not solid evidence against him. The lack of physical evidence and a trust-worthy witness, the courts case against Adnan is just not beliveable or stong.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan may be innocent he if really went to the Woodlawn Public Library after school. According to the state, Hae was killed sometime between 2:15-2:36 but Adnan claims around that same time he went to the library and there he had a conversation with Asia.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because of the lack of evidence. Most of the evidence is coming from Jay, a close friend to Adnan. Jay's evidence is very uncertain and everytime he gets interviewed his evidence seems to change everytime. Also the evidence Jay has doesn't even make sense.

# data[].attributes.headline
i think that he is not guilty with the provided evidence but doesnt have enough to be counted innocent with only jays story he shouldnt be in jail with little evidence and proof that memories can be distorted this is unconvincing

# data[].attributes.subject
i think that he is not guilty with the provided evidence but doesnt have enough to be counted innocent with only jays story he shouldnt be in jail with little evidence and proof that memories can be distorted this is unconvincing

# data[].attributes.body
I truly believe Adnan did not murder Hae Min Lee for multiple reasons. 1) The entire time frame of the scene isnt reasonably not to mention how many times Jay changed his story. Even in our smaller school it takes at least 5- 10 min to get out of the parking lot therefore how would Adnan even have the time seeing as her death took place in a span of 15 min after their last bell. I understand Koenig plotted out the route but that was with what a minute to spare at most. 2) The cell towers dont match Jays story , that is until he altered it. 3) A woman who was meant to speak out on Jays behalf even went against him saying its unlikely hed help Adnan with this murder yet he still cant explain the coorelation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because he seems to have a lack of a concise storyline in relation to the murder. The evidence used against him doesn’t add up to the timeline in which he could have killed her.

# data[].attributes.body
With the evidence provided so far through the podcast I am not entirely convinced that Adnan did it. Jay's story seems to be the only evidence they have against Adnan besides cell records. However, Jay's story has never been consistent. Everytime he's been interrogated something changes and something is added. It's hard to believe that he is telling the entire truth about the situation when it keeps changing and he went from saying he didn't help Adnan to he did. I also feel that the lack of physical evidence makes it hard to believe that he is guilty, and I believe that his attorney did a bad job at addressing the jury when it came to the evidence provided.

# data[].attributes.body
At the current point in the story I am convinced that Adnan did not kill Hae. The strongest evidence against him, Jay's testimony, is filled with inconsistencies, such as changing the details of where Adnan asked to be picked up after killing Hae. Coupled with the fact that memories are oftentimes unreliable, I believe that Jay lied to the police in his eyewitness account. I do not know why he would have lied, but I think that he may be covering up for the person who actually did kill Hae by blaming it on Adnan. The lack of solid evidence against Adnan also strongly convinces me that he is innocent because if he did kill her there would be some kind of DNA evidence found incriminating him.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adan syed is guilty due to the incriminating cellphone pings which clearly state he was near or was there when hae was killed even tho his friend jay testimony has had changes in time it Disney change the fact that he was there like it wouldn’t make sense to get his phone near or at the crime scene without any involvement

# data[].attributes.body
As the podcast continues, there is more and more evidence proving the possibility of Adnan's innocence, the differences in Jay's story, the timeframe of the murder, etc. The biggest and most compelling piece of evidence against Adnan is Jay. Jay's interviews are the only real evidence being used against Adnan. Personally, I don't trust Jay, making his story completely untrustworthy, therefore Adnan is innocent.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Adnan is innocent because the proof that they detectives are receiving are not even real evidence that Adnan was the killer of Hae lee. And also every time it's time for jay to speak the story continues to change numerous times to the point is he lying to the detectives to make Adnan guilty or whatever he's trying to do, but whatever it is it's not working and not making sense.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like he should not have been convicted because there is so much doubt that is involved in the case. The most convincing evidence for me is the lack of evidence, I feel that with all the case resting on Jay and Cell phone records, both things that the Jigsaw articles disproved, there is not enough evidence. I feel that there is enough doubt that the jury should have found Adnan innocent.

# data[].attributes.body
Though there are some compelling details within Jay's testimony, investigators are slowly starting to see inconsistencies in the testimony leading it to become unreliable. Following this, there has been no other strong source of evidence. This case is solely based on he said she said without any sort of physical evidence. This really hit me when Adnan said, "But no one could ever come with any type of proof or anecdote or anything to ever say that I was ever mad at her, that I was ever angry with her, that I ever threatened her." He isn't wrong when he said that no one could come up with any sort of proof. But the lack of proof also does not count him out of being guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Adnan is innocent because first of all jays story changes everytime they interview him and you cant say that its only little detail the big details change to and also because there was no DNA evidence that he was even there so you cant say he did it because he was there

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because they don't have any evidence that proves he committed this crime. He was convicted because of Jay, who's story had many inconsistencies and constantly changed between interviews and trials. "Best Buy. Just like Jenn had originally told them. This is a problem for the cops- this change. Because it's not something you forget-". This is the biggest inconsistency in Jay's story because how do you forget where you first saw the dead body of your classmate. Jay is more of a mystery than Adnan in this case and I feel that the cops are just using confirmation bias that aligns with their belief that Adnan did it.

# data[].attributes.headline
I personally don’t feel the Adnan is guilty because there is a lot of lack of evidence proving he murdered hae the only reliable evidence that he possibly did a bad crime is his call log but also we do not know what was said on those 30 second or less phone calls also during each interview with Sarah adnan did not seem like he had anything to hide his voice was never shaky or he never was on edge he gave all his responses very through only a couple times do he had to sit back and think like if what he said was accurate or not but he was very open to discussing whatever he had to say also there was no physical evidence to prove that he didn’t murder her only memorable evidence I guess you could say 

# data[].attributes.subject
I personally don’t feel the Adnan is guilty because there is a lot of lack of evidence proving he murdered hae the only reliable evidence that he possibly did a bad crime is his call log but also we do not know what was said on those 30 second or less phone calls also during each interview with Sarah adnan did not seem like he had anything to hide his voice was never shaky or he never was on edge he gave all his responses very through only a couple times do he had to sit back and think like if what he said was accurate or not but he was very open to discussing whatever he had to say also there was no physical evidence to prove that he didn’t murder her only memorable evidence I guess you could say 

# data[].attributes.body
i think Adnan is innocent because the evidence against him is not strong enough. Jay's police statement and testimony at trial is the only reason he was convicted but jay has been proven a lie multiple times.  His story lining up with the cell tower pings do not even fully corroborate his story because their location after the murder does not align with the phone log evidence. Also character wise everyone who knew Adnan very well or not at all said that this just didn't seem like something he could or would do. i genuinely do not believe that he committed this crime based on the lack of any solid or physical evidence.

# data[].attributes.headline
i think that adnan is innocent because the evidence against him doesnt logically make any sense or add up. Its only jay's testimony they have to prove adnan's guilt and there are many inconsistences in jay's story which makes me believe adnan is innocent.

# data[].attributes.subject
i think that adnan is innocent because the evidence against him doesnt logically make any sense or add up. Its only jay's testimony they have to prove adnan's guilt and there are many inconsistences in jay's story which makes me believe adnan is innocent.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because the main time line they use against him is shaky and all they have on him is that timeline and what Jay says. A lot of the timeline changes or gets completely changed like the trip that Jay and Adnan had where they went to another park and got high. Or the timeline doesn’t always line up with the cell tower data they used. Another thing the cell tower data could have been used to help Adnan because a lot of it doesn’t support the timeline.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because Jay's story is very inconsistent. Although the base of the story is consistent, the details are very inconsistent and it doesn't match up with the supposed evidence (cell records). Koenig retraced this path and it didn't match up.

# data[].attributes.body
i think Adnan is innocent as its pretty likely to strangle someone in a window of 3 minutes. jays statement became unreliable the minute he kept changing the story and inconsistent. the only evidence they had to convict him was his call logs , which jay had for the day of the supposedly crime done and jays testimonies both unreliable. in the Hayes car there was no physical evidence of a struggle or soil no evidence at all

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Adnan Syed is innocent because they have no real proof (DNA) that he is guilty, only what other people have said. He was mainly convicted because of what Jay said but I believe Jay’s story had many inconsistencies and is not a reliable source. In the podcast the detectives literally started taking notes of all the inconsistencies in his story. He was caught lying multiple times and provided really dumb excuses for it. All of that is important but to me the most compelling piece of evidence was when Jay could have came forward about it but instead he kept it in secret.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Adnan is innocent because of the lack of physical proof. All of the evidence against Adnan has been based off of a timeline established by an untrustworthy Jay and witness statements. Sarah Koenig herself notes that, ”As for physical evidence, there was none-- nothing. Apart from some fingerprints in Hae's car, which Adnan had been in many times, there was nothing linking him to the crime-- no DNA, no fibers, no hairs, no matching soil from the bottom of his boots.” This means that all of the evidence used to convict Adnan was circumstantial and I don't trust that.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Adnan is innocent due to the holes in Jays story. The whole trial riding on jays faulty testimony is a big reason for my beliefs. One of the biggest plot holes is how the cell records don’t line up. “It doesn’t match the cell tower in the call record. It’s pinging a tower back near the Best Buy, west of where we are. And that is true of all these calls from the middle of the afternoon.” Jays accusations being faulty while Adnan has a alibi is good evidence for his innocence.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Adnan is innocent because Jay's testimony is not backed up by evidence, it seems as if Jay is trying to pin the crime on Adnan for whatever reason because Adnan wasn't even close to Jay. That's another reason Jay and Adnan aren't even close enough for Jay to help in the hiding of the body. The timeline isn't very solid either due to the lack of wiggle room for the time of the actual murder (10-15 min to strangle someone to death) this alone would call off the case. Another reason is the  lack of physical evidence and the case riding on the backs of he said she said testiomonies. (Victoria Wilson)

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Adnan is innocent because Jay's testimony is not backed up by evidence, it seems as if Jay is trying to pin the crime on Adnan for whatever reason because Adnan wasn't even close to Jay. That's another reason Jay and Adnan aren't even close enough for Jay to help in the hiding of the body. The timeline isn't very solid either due to the lack of wiggle room for the time of the actual murder (10-15 min to strangle someone to death) this alone would call off the case. Another reason is the  lack of physical evidence and the case riding on the backs of he said she said testiomonies. (Victoria Wilson)

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Adnan is innocent because when Sarah Koenig retraced the path Adnan took from school to killing Hae, the timeline was close to impossible. Koenig made it from the school to best buy with only about 2 minutes to spare. Therefore, it is close to impossible that Adnan would've had time to strangle and kill Hae

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Adnan is innocent because when Sarah Koenig retraced the path Adnan took from school to killing Hae, the timeline was close to impossible. Koenig made it from the school to best buy with only about 2 minutes to spare. Therefore, it is close to impossible that Adnan would've had time to strangle and kill Hae

# data[].attributes.body
Danielle Cormier

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Adnan is innocent. Some crucial evidence that we’ve learned thus far is that Jay’s story is not consistent. It changes from telling to telling and it doesn’t make sense within the story. Also Jay retelling the story with such vivid detail is a bit suspicious. I understand that if you were to experience such a traumatic and formidable thing, it wouldn’t be necessarily hard to remember, but the extent to which Jay remembers these conversations don’t make sense. Another thing we learned from the timeline episode, the “supposed” trips that Adnan and Jay took after the murder didn’t fit the timeline that Jay provided the state. Not to mention that their relationship was not well developed enough for such events. Like why travel all afternoon with a guy that you just smoke weed with after you killed someone? I would think that if Adnan was guilty, he would spend as much time trying to cover his tracks and make sure that Hae was buried and had no connection to the murder. But Jay says that they spent the afternoon driving around and smoking weed? Doesn’t add up. And that’s just a couple of the inconsistencies and questionable things within Jay’s story. Also, it’s a story. How can you base an entire murder off of what Jay says when there’s no evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Adnan is innocent because Jay gives too many details of the murder that Adnan couldn’t. He was so descriptive that you would be believe her committed it . Also his use of language makes it seem like he’s more guilty. “To the effect, yes. Don't tell anyone. He said that he couldn't believe he killed somebody with his bare hands, that all the other mother [BLEEP] referring to hoods and thugs and stuff think they're hard core. But he just killed a person with his bare hands.”

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Adnan is innocent because of the major inconsistencies in Jay's story. From the cell tower records to the bizarre changes that he has made in the interviews. He has also admitted to have lied which in my opinion makes his testimony not reliable. I wont say that Jay is the murderer but he definitely knows something and is trying to cover it up.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Adnan Syed is innocent because Jay's story is to inconsitant and keeps change everytime he gets interviewed. Also when the murder took place Jay never thought to make an anonymous phone call or do somthing. And when the detective confronted him about that he asked him to stop.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Adnan Syed is innocent because Jay's story is to inconsitant and keeps change everytime he gets interviewed. Also when the murder took place Jay never thought to make an anonymous phone call or do somthing. And when the detective confronted him about that he asked him to stop.

# data[].attributes.body
Click the plus sign to create a post. Give it a subject (this can be your name, "guilty" or "innocent", or whatever you'd like). Then click "Publish" to post it.