# data[].attributes.body
- difference in idealogy
- USSR initial change in attitude (boosted stalins confidence that they have more bargaining power in CW rivalry)
-

# data[].attributes.body
Was a Cold War conflict, especially presented towards the end where involvement of local leaders and local actors kept to a bare minimum (developments mainly existed due to US/China/USSR involvement), even the end of the War was settled by the superpowers against the wishes of the Korean leaders and local Koreans (exhibited by their demonstrations against the armistice).

# data[].attributes.body
No. South Korean and North Korean leaders were motivated by nationalistic ambitions to unify Korea, not because of difference in ideologies. US and China who supported the respective countries were in turn motivated by legitimate security concerns.

# data[].attributes.body
Kim Il Sung was given the blessings by Stalin to start the Korean War due to Cold War considerations. Stalin felt that a communist Korea under Kim would counter US influence in East Asia and a possible springboard to Japan.
The Korean War transformed into a proxy conflict between the US and the communist bloc when the US and China/USSR intervened due to Cold War considerations. ( e.g. counter perceived influence of Moscow etc etc) According to the course book, the Korean leaders tend not to be able to have their say during the conflict?

# data[].attributes.body
US decided to step in albeit their initial reluctance to get involved in Korea because they were afraid of the domino effect which is out of their perceived threat of the USSR’s expansion of influence. This is due to the Cold War interest of the US in wanting to contain communism, which then pushed them to support South Korea against the communist- backed North Korea

# data[].attributes.body
YES. THEY WERE DRIVEN BY COLD WAR CONSIDERATIONS EG DEAN ACHERSON PERIMETER SPEECH. THE FACT THAT US WILL NOT PROTECT KOREA IF IT WAS INVADED MADE STALIN CHANGE HIS MIND AND START SUPPORTING THE IDEA OF INVADING SK TO NOT ONLY FULFILL KIM IL SUNGS AMBITIONS BUT ALSO AT THE SAME TIME SPREAD HIS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AS HE WOULD NOT BE IN CONFLICT WITH US. THIS SUGGESTS THAT A MAJOR PART OF STALIN’S CONSIDERATIONS WAS US INVOLVEMENT, SUGGESTING THAT COLD WAR CONSIDERATIONS ARE A BIG PART OF THE KOREAN WAR AND ITS ORIGINS. THE RESOURCES THE NORTH KOREANS USED TO FIGHT THE WAR WAS MAINLY PROVIDED BY THE USSR, SHOWING THE SUPERPOWERS’ MAJOR ROLES IN THE KOREAN WAR AS AN ENABLER TO FULFILL THE KOREAN LEADERS’  NATIONALISTIC AMBITIONS AS WELL AS THE UNDERLYING COLD WAR CONSIDERATIONS. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE KOREAN LEADERS WERE MERELY INSTIGATORS TO THE CONFLICT, THEY HAD NO REAL MEANS OF FIGHTING THE KOREAN WAR ON THEIR OWN IF NOT FOR THE SUPERPOWERS

# data[].attributes.headline
cathussy glenussy yixuanussy and chernussy

# data[].attributes.subject
cathussy glenussy yixuanussy and chernussy

# data[].attributes.body
we feel that the korean war was partly a cold war conflict. the korean leaders technically started the conflict due to ideological differences but north korea involved USSR which in turned caused the USA to be involved (?) furthermore USA and USSR handled the conflict using methods against the wishes of the korean leaders so it was partly a cold war conflict because there was still involvement from the two super powers who were having cold war conflicts

# data[].attributes.body
No, the Korean War was largely a Civil War.
The driving force of the war from the very beginning came from the Korean Leaders to unite Korea under their own rule. While they asked for the aid of the major superpowers, it is their nationalistic ideals that drove them in the first place. Furthermore, the reluctance in armistice signing from both Korean leaders as well as the protests from citizens of both side for a united Korea enforces the idea that the Korean War conflict was one of civil conflict.
Prior to the outbreak of the war, there were already border skirmishes along the 38th parallel between the North and South Korean leaders.

# data[].attributes.body
- Pre-existing tensions between US and USSR (atomic bomb, CCP etc.) caused by Cold War developments gave Stalin the confidence to agree to invade SK.
Only after Stalin provided NK with equipment and stuff then did Kim II Sung invade SK -> shows how support of superpowers was the driving force that instigated the Korean War?

- Armistice was signed against Koreans (both sides) will; shows how superpowers were the ones that had the ultimate authority to control the war to suit their interests (Cold-War wise).

# data[].attributes.body
USSR refused to lend assistance to Kim il-sung initially, but after atomic bomb, victory of Ccp, and dean Acheson —> agreed. Had newfound confidence in the invasion and reunification
Showed he had fears/apprehension:concerns abt US and Cold War

# data[].attributes.body
It is when USSR send weapons and arms to North Korea to assist them in conquering South Korea for Korea unification. Since USSR intention is to gain another communist ally in SEA.

# data[].attributes.body
The main actors are Syngman Rhee and Kim Il Sung, who both wanted to unite Korean in their own terms.

Kim Il Sung was the one who kept seeking approval from USSR to invade South Korea, instead of USSR themselves who invaded SK. Furthermore, USSR only provided NK with advisors and military weapons.

In this sense, Syngman Rhee and Kim were the main agents that pushed for the Korean war, and hence the K war is mainly a civil conflict

# data[].attributes.headline
cuban michelle crisis, mao ze rong n twin bao ze dong n hitlersin

# data[].attributes.subject
cuban michelle crisis, mao ze rong n twin bao ze dong n hitlersin

# data[].attributes.body
1. we can see from how the superpowers from cold war (US and USSR) involved themselves in the korean war, bringing in their own ideological conflicts into the dispute going on in korea.

2. changing soviet stance due to CW:
- communist victory in china also played a part in showing that communist threat is imminent, hence US intervention
- successful testing of atomic bomb -> more bargaining chip from USSR against the US -> gave green light to Kim
- dean acheson’s speech -> US will not be interfering -> stalin 放心 give resources to Kim (means he is like worried about US at the start due to CW consideration)

# data[].attributes.body
- Traces of CW can be seen in the start of KW, where USSR only agreed to help NK under the basis that US would not interfere
- Without the US interfering, ussr have more confidence and would have more bargaining chips in the Cold War should they successfully win the Korean War
- Truman used UN to send troops to cross 38th parallel -> afraid that South Korea would lose the battle
- Armistice was signed against wishes of Korean leaders -> US USSR had a say in the conflict

# data[].attributes.body
Western powers had the power to end the Korean war while Koreans had no say (they wanted to continue); shows that ultimate authority to navigate the war was by the superpowers who were driven by Cold War considerations and Korean leaders had no say.
US intervention in Korea was motivated by their fear of spread of communism (as seen from how they gave the green light after ccp victory in China)
Both sides were unwilling to support the conflict initially to prevent coming into direct conflict

# data[].attributes.body
Communism influences in North Korea from Soviet Union VS Capitalist Democracy in South Korea from the US

US perceived the spread of Communism in the Korean Peninsula as a threat against them, while China&Soviet Union perceived stationed US in Korea as a sign that US would launch an attack against them

# data[].attributes.body
In it's intentions, it influenced Stalin's eventual change in stance (he went from not helping to helping) that enabled Kim to invade the South