# data[].attributes.headline
Inside the Program of Inquiry - Opportunities

# data[].attributes.subject
Inside the Program of Inquiry - Opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
This is my first year not only as a 5th grade teacher, but also putting an Exhibition into practice, so I certainly have many questions about these two options. Based on my experience this year, having the exhibition inside the program of inquiry would be an opportunity to work deeper on a particular theme. I also think it would be easier for specialists to be involved because of their schedule.

# data[].attributes.headline
Outside the Program of Inquiry - Challenges

# data[].attributes.subject
Outside the Program of Inquiry - Challenges

# data[].attributes.body
Students this age still need a lot of guidance. For instance, our students are still adapting to this new way of learning and thinking. I agree that having multiple themes is overwhelming. I think it is harder to maintain their motivation and interest.

# data[].attributes.headline
Outside the Program of Inquiry - Opportunities

# data[].attributes.subject
Outside the Program of Inquiry - Opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
Here, students have more opportunities to synergize academic and tacit knowledge. They also have more time to develop the skills necessary to demonstrate independence and responsibility for their own learning.

# data[].attributes.headline
Inside the Program of Inquiry - Challenges

# data[].attributes.subject
Inside the Program of Inquiry - Challenges

# data[].attributes.body
Students have fewer opportunities to explore multiple perspectives. They would be limited to one theme. Therefore, less time to explore their interests. Learning wouldn't be as authentic and personalized.

# data[].attributes.headline
Inside the Program of Inquiry - Opportunities

# data[].attributes.subject
Inside the Program of Inquiry - Opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
This is my first year not only as a 5th grade teacher, but also putting an Exhibition into practice, so I certainly have many questions about these two options. Based on my experience this year, having the exhibition inside the program of inquiry would be an opportunity to work deeper on a particular theme. I also think it would be easier for specialists to be involved because of their schedule.

# data[].attributes.body
The mentor can also be selected outside the learning community to help guide content that can allow authentic learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Mentors will have to formularise themselves with the content of the year and what the students understand to have a better reference point.

# data[].attributes.body
Learning excursions can be arranged to accommodate many groups and other students might feel inspired to extend their learning.

# data[].attributes.body
The resources and cost of the material need to be a student’s expense as students could choose expensive material or excursions.

# data[].attributes.body
A more focused time frame may mean that students have the prior knowledge of the PYP essential elements.

# data[].attributes.body
A year long focus would give more time to revisit the different PYP elements. Time could be set aside each week.

# data[].attributes.body
If outside as a 7th unit that is year long. It may be difficult to keep students motivated.

# data[].attributes.body
More genuinely student-led if there is a broader choice of Transdisciplary Themes to select.

# data[].attributes.body
If a Transdisciplinary theme is decided prior to exhibition students may not be free to pursue their desired issue.

# data[].attributes.body
As there is a set timeframe if the Exhibition is a one of the required units.

# data[].attributes.headline
Exhibition inside the Programme of Inquiry

# data[].attributes.subject
Exhibition inside the Programme of Inquiry

# data[].attributes.headline
Exhibition outside the Programme of Inquiry

# data[].attributes.subject
Exhibition outside the Programme of Inquiry