# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, in February directed the Minister of Justice to instruct The operative words are health and choice. The inference is that this review is all about protecting and promoting women's health. Right to Life challenges this assertion and asks how is women's health going to be promoted by decriminalising abortion? the Law Commission to make changes to "ensure our abortion laws are consistent with treating abortion as a health issue that is a reproductive choice for women, rather than as a criminal issue."
It certainly is not health care for the unborn who are violently torn limb from limb in what should be the sanctuary of their mother's womb and it is not health care for women who are physically, psychologically and emotionally wounded and left with lifelong grief, remorse and sorrow at the loss of their precious child. Why then does the Prime Minister call this callous violence against women and the murder of the innocent health care? [Read more...]

Filed Under: Abortion, Arguments, ASC, Certifying Consultants, Child Abuse, Conscience, Crimes Act, Decriminalisation, Jacinda Ardern, Labour and Greens, Law Commission, Media Releases, RTL Activities, The CS & A Act

Media Release Sunday May 13th 2018 On this day that we celebrate motherhood let us remember those mothers who have tragically lost a child through abortion or miscarriage. For many, Mother's day can be a day of great sadness. Mothers never ever forget their child lost in abortion and often experience a lifetime of regret, grief and sorrow. We should acknowledge their pain and share their grief. We should mourn with those who weep.
Since 1978 there have been more than 500,000 New Zealand children killed in the womb. There are in our community, tens of thousands of women who have been deeply wounded by the loss of their child in abortion. Many grieve in silence, because unlike for those who lose a child stillborn, society does not recognise the right to grieve over children lost to abortion. There are few who realise their pain. Many of these women, perhaps the majority have been coerced into having an abortion, that they did not want. Many too have been abandoned by the father of their child. Those who promote abortion, like Family Planning, tell women that they are imagining grief and that there are no adverse psychological consequences.

Today motherhood is under attack as never before with our Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, proposing to decriminalise abortion. [Read more...]

Filed Under: Abortion, Abortion Grief, Decriminalisation, Family Planning, Jacinda Ardern, Media Bias, Post Abortion

This report was prepared by Grant Gillett for the NZMA. Gillett practiced medicine until 2006 and was a fellow in philosophy at Magdalen College, Oxford. He is now a Professor of Medical Ethics at the Bioethics Centre of the Otago University Medical School and a fellow of the Royal Society. He is the author of over 350 aticles and books on medical ethics, philosophy, bio-ethics, the philosophy of psychiatry and neuroscience. An abiding area of his writing and research has been end-of-life care and euthanasia and he worked closely with the euthanasia report group of the BMA in 1988 and 1989. He continues to teach and write extensively on ethical issues and medical law in New Zealand and Australia, and the philosophical basis of contemporary clinical ethics.
The full report is accessible on the NZMA website

Filed Under: Belgium, Euthanasia, Netherlands, New Zealand, NZMA, Other Countries, RTL Activities

The following is a re-post of an Op Ed piece by Simon O'Connor published by the Wanganui Chronicle today May 7th 2018
A few weeks ago David Seymour dismissed tens of thousands of New Zealanders who wrote to Parliament with their concerns about his End of Life Choice bill.

Submissions on his bill, which allows for euthanasia or assisted dying, have barely closed and he has already stated he doesn't care what people have to say.

Armed with a handful of polls that assure him of just how right he thinks he is on this issue, he has decided Parliament no longer needs to think for itself.

The problem with relying on public polling to decide serious, complex social issues is that it inherently reduces the issue to a simple yes or no question. This is a dangerous way to address difficult subjects, especially when lives are at stake.

Polling questions are not only simple, they are entirely dependent on the imagination of those polled. It is very easy to support just about any proposition if you are asked only about the idealised version in your own mind.

While polls may indicate broad public support for the concept of "assisted dying", the public has never been asked about the specifics. Supporting an abstract principle is very different from writing a law that will shape the real world.

Assisted suicide, and this bill in particular, is a serious risk to many people in our society.
Though Seymour is at great pains to remind everyone this bill advocates only voluntary euthanasia, we also know that many people are vulnerable to abuse, bullying and exploitation.

Seymour must be convinced that no one will ever be coerced into dying for the convenience or financial gain of another. [Read more...]

Filed Under: Assisted Suicide, David Seymour, Decriminalisation, End of Life Choice Bill, Euthanasia, New Zealand, Re-posts, Submissions

Media Release Saturday 5th May 2018
Right to Life asks when is the government going to recognise the right of taxpayers to choose not to fund the murder of the innocent and defenceless unborn? It is arrogant for the state to assume that we all support the state funded abortion industry: We do not.

It is a massive injustice for the government to force all who pay tax to fund the murder of our own children in the womb. The government is tyranical in forcing us to be complicit in the murder of the innocent and to have their blood on our hands. The government has placed us in chains and compels us to pay with the threat of imprisonment for up to five years for those who dare to refuse.

Again we cannot state enough that It is utterly objectionable that taxpayers' money is being used to end the lives of thousands of unborn children despite the conscientious objection to this practice by a significant number of New Zealanders.

The Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and supporters of this culture of death claim that it is a woman's right to choose to kill her child as a "reproductive choice for women". She claims that this must be a right without regulation or interference from anyone else including the father of the child and at the same time she denies the taxpayer the right to choose to not to be complicit in this killing.

We ask Jacinda Ardern when is she going to allow the community the right to choose not to pay taxes to fund her government's abortion industry. [Read more...]

Filed Under: Abortion, Arguments, ASC, Certifying Consultants, Decriminalisation, Jacinda Ardern, Labour and Greens, Media Releases, The CS & A Act

1 May

Hon Nanaia Mahuta,

Minister of Maori Development,

Dear Minister,

I believe that the government's proposal to decriminalise abortion would violate Article three of the Treaty of Waitangi. When the treaty was signed in 1840, the Crown gave an assurance that Maori would have the Queen's protection. I believe that that protection was to include protection of the right to life of Maori from conception to natural death.

The Crimes Act section 182. "Killing Unborn Child" provides protection for the life of Maori in the womb. It is a serious crime to kill an unborn child and on conviction a person may be imprisoned for a term up to 14 years. Section 183. "Procuring abortion by any means" prohibits unlawful abortion, this is also a serious crime and every one on conviction, is liable tto imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years. This legal protection for the lives of unborn children has been in the Crimes Act since 1856.

It is the government's intention to make it no longer a crime to kill an unborn child in an abortion and to remove the child from the protection of the Crimes Act and to make the killing of an unwanted child a matter of "reproductive choice for women". These children will effectively lose the protection of the Crown. The children who are wanted will retain the protection of the Crimes Act and the protection of the Crown.

It is my contention that when the treaty was signed in 1840, the Crown was giving an assurance that it was giving protection for the lives of Maori during their first nine months of life which is currently provided in sections 182 and 183.

I believe that it is important to recall that the current abortion laws were recommended by the Royal Commission on Contraception Sterilisation and Abortion in its report to Parliament in 1977. This respected Commission was appointed by the distinguished Right Hon Bill Rowling, the leader of the third Labour government.

The Commission in its report to Parliament stated, with regard to the status of the unborn child; "The unborn child as one of the weakest, the most vulnerable and most defenceless forms of humanity, should receive protection. From a biological point of view there is no argument as to when life begins. Evidence was given to us by eminent scientists from all over the world, none of them suggested that human life begins at any other time than at conception". [Read more...]

Filed Under: Abortion, Arguments, Crimes Act, Decriminalisation, Letters, The CS & A Act

Dear Friends of Life,

You are no doubt aware that our Prime Minister has made it her agenda to decriminalise abortion. She has directed the Minister of Justice, Andrew Little to require the Law Commission to determine how abortion can best be removed from the Crimes Act and made a health issue.

The Law Commission is the organisation which reviews, reforms and develops New Zealand law.

Little has directed the Commission to put other work aside to concentrate on this matter.

The Law Commission will now consult health professionals and is now accepting submissions from the public on this issue.

In October the Commission will report back to Little with its recommendations.

If the Labour Green Cabinet opt for a change in the law, a government bill will be drafted. Cabinet will discuss the report. If they decide to change the law, a Government Bill will be drafted and sent to the Cabinet for consideration and approval. Cabinet consists of Labour and New Zealand First MPs. If that bill passes it's first reading then just like David Seymours End of Life Choice bill, it would then go before a Parliamentary Select Committee and be open to public submissions before going up for a second reading and thence into law if it passes it's third reading.

It is imperative for a great many reasons that we do not see the law changed and abortion removed from the Crimes Act.

If we don't want to see the last legal protections for our unborn children removed then it is crucial that as many people as possible speak out by making a submission to the Law Commission giving reasons why abortion must remain on our Crime statues.

Unlike in submissions made to the Parliamentary Health Select Committee on the issue of David Seymours "End of Life Choice" bill, submissions to the Law Commission need not provide name address or phone number.

Right to Life encourages you to make a submission as soon as possible. Following the links below will guide you in this process.

Submissions may be made to the Law Commission at,

Email address: alr@lawcom.govt.nz

Website: abortionlaw.lawcom.govt.nz

For more information about this issue please visit the Right to Life website. We have made a number or recent posts on our homepage relating to this issue.

Filed Under: Submission to NZ Law Commission

Media Release Anzac Day 25th April 2018 In celebrating ANZAC Day we mourn those who have given their lives in war in order that we may be free. There were more than 18,000 New Zealanders who lost their lives in World War 1 and 11,625 New Zealanders killed in World War II, a total of more than 29,000. We must never forget the sacrifice that they made in order that future generations may live in freedom and enjoy our inalienable right to life. Throughout our nation there are monuments commemorating their sacrifice.
It is an illusion though that we are now living in peace and in a world free from war. Today we are engaged in another bloody war, not with a foreign aggressor but in a war against a new enemy; our own children. Why do we feel threatened by our own children in the womb? They are the weakest and most defenceless members of the human family? Why then has the womb become a battleground more violent than Gallipoli?

Since the passing of the Contraception Sterilisation and Abortion Act in 1977, there have been more than 500,000 children killed in the womb in New Zealand. These children were deemed to be of little worth and their presence a threat to society. They are unnamed, worthy only of being a number in our abortion statistics. No tombstone marks their last resting place and their mortal remains deemed to be medical waste to be incinerated; in the same callous manner as the disposal of the Jews after slaughter at Nazi extermination camps during the Second World War.

The Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, is now passionately committed to accelerating this war against our own children. She is committed to an agenda of changing our laws that will in fact, coerce women into killing their children under the guise that abortion is not a crime but a simple health matter between a woman and her doctor. [Read more...]

Filed Under: Abortion, Abortion Grief, Arguments, Child Abuse, Crimes Act, Decriminalisation, Impact on Men, Jacinda Ardern, Labour and Greens, Media Releases, Statistics, The CS & A Act

Media Release Friday 20th April 2018 Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern has the opportunity to support a change to the Crimes Act to give legal recognition to the scientific reality that an unborn child in the womb is a human being. A human being endowed at conception with human rights, the foundation right being an inalienable right to life. The Prime Minister has the unprecedented opportunity to say "let's do this" and be the champion of women, mothers and the unborn. She has the opportunity to correct a great injustice. But will she? New Zealand led the world in giving women the vote. Jacinda Ardern now has the opportunity to again lead the world in recognising the dignity of motherhood and the humanity of the unborn. The child in the womb of Jacinda Ardern is a unique and unrepeatable miracle of the Creator's loving creation, it is not a potential human being, but a human being with great potential. As the weakest and most defenceless member of the human family her unborn child deserves love, respect and effective legal protection for its right to life.
Never before in the history of mankind have we ever known so much about the miracle of creation and the development of the unborn child. Today we have 3D scans which provide a window into the womb. Today increasingly the child in the womb is seen as a patient that can receive surgery to correct disabilities. [Read more...]

Filed Under: Abortion, Crimes Act, Decriminalisation, Jacinda Ardern, Labour and Greens, Media Releases, Personhood, The CS & A Act

Media Release 18 April 2018 The Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern rightly deplores the Syrian civil war and the recent chemical gas attack in Damascus where an estimated 80 civilians including 20 children were killed. The prime minister has expressed "the strongest condemnation" of the chemical attack in eastern Ghouta, Syria, while the foreign minister has labelled it a war crime. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Foreign Minister Winston Peters condemned the attack, and said those behind it needed to be held to account. "This is an appalling use of a weapon against a population who are innocent; a civilian population. We should be condemning it, and are." However while these sentiments may be admirable the fact is the New Zealand government is conducting its own chemical warfare programme against our own children, which is a crime against humanity.
.It is totally inconsistent for the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister to denounce the Syrian crimes against humanity while at the same time giving approval for the use of weapons of mass destruction by chemical warfare in New Zealand. We are conducting our own bloody civil war against our own children. The Abortion Supervisory Committee reported to Parliament in 2017 that 1,970 pre-born children were killed in their mother's womb with the lethal chemical poison Mifegyne RU 486. This chemical was approved for the killing of children by the Minister of Health Annette King, in August 2001. The Minister in her media release on 30 August 2001 stated that,

"Mifegyne RU486 meets the international standards of safety and effectiveness required for medicines".

Mifegyne RU 486, is not a medicine and pregnancy is not a disease. The lethal drug is not safe for the unborn child, nor is it safe for women. It is however, as the Minister claims, highly effective in killing the unborn. Since the introduction of this new chemical warfare against the unborn there have been nearly 20,000 unborn killed in New Zealand by this drug. This chemical war is also violence against women who are the second victims of this war.

Mifegyne acts by depriving the endometrium of a hormone that the human embryo requires to flourish, the embryo thus dies of starvation. This highly effective chemical warfare is approved and funded as a core health service by the government and is used in a number of Public Hospitals. The Family Planning Association is also an ardent supporter of chemical warfare against the unborn with Mifegyne and in April 2013 commenced killing unborn children at its Tauranga clinic.

It is hypocritical for our government to condemn crimes against humanity in other countries while actively waging a war against our own children, which is approved and funded by the government.

Right to Life asks when is the government going to stop this insane civil war against our own children? There will be no peace in New Zealand until this devastating war against our nation's children in the womb is stopped.

Ken Orr

Spokesperson,

Right to Life

Filed Under: Abortifacients, Abortion, Arguments, Family Planning, Jacinda Ardern, Labour and Greens, Media Releases, RU 486

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, in February directed the Minister of Justice to instruct The operative words are health and choice. The inference is that this review is all about protecting and promoting women's health. Right to Life challenges this assertion and asks how is women's health going to be promoted by decriminalising abortion?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pro-Life vs Pro-Choice: Should Abortion be Legal?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Whether or not abortion should be legal and accessible continues to be a controversial subject, split between those who believe women should have the right to...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
How abortion effects women, men, children and society

This section of the site explores how abortion effects society as a whole and how it effects people in particular

Check out abortion from the child's perspective

Read personal stories from women who have had an abortion

Find out how you can help a post-abortive friend

FAQ's on the effects of Abortion
Q1. What is post-abortion syndrome
Post-Abortion Syndrome (PAS) is at present understood to be a type of post-traumatic stress disorder. Its outward manifestations such as postnatal depression, suicidal behaviour, drug and alcohol abuse, eating disorders, marriage and family breakdown, child neglect and abuse, domestic violence, depression, anxiety attacks, compulsive disorders and other mental health problems are increasingly evident in our communities today.

Melbourne psychiatrist Dr Eric Seal, who defined PAS as "a delayed or slow developing, prolonged and sometimes chronic grief syndrome" stated: "The post-abortion syndrome is not like a more severe form of postnatal blues. It is far more serious, more delayed in onset, more lasting and more fundamentally involved in subsequent personality development."

He also said that "If the syndrome persists and is not treated adequately, personality changes will gradually emerge and affect one's family life, one's working capacity, and one's social and recreational potentials to say the least."
Symptoms of PAS can include

frequent weeping

depression

loss of concentration

feelings of grief and anxiety, guilt and remorse, sadness

isolation, alienation, victimisation

sense of hopelessness

self-destructive behaviour - suicidal

alcohol and / or drug abuse, eating disorders

abusive relationships and repeat abortions

extreme or chronic anger

sleep disorders and nightmares

loss of self-esteem

sexual dysfunction

relationship problems with spouse, children and / or peers

withdrawn / inappropriate emotional responses

compulsive disorders

increased tendency towards violence

dramatic personality changes or value disorientation

memory loss, hallucinations

flashbacks and anxiety attacks

an atonement child - the deliberate pregnancy trying to 'make up' for the aborted baby

anniversary reactions (around the time of the abortion date / and or the due date of the birth), which may not start until many years post event, can include major depression, anxiety, headaches, abdominal pain, eating irregularities, sleeping difficulties, abusing children, gastrointestinal symptoms or complaints relating to the reproductive system.

Q2. How can abortion ultimately cause breast cancer?
Almost all of the risk factors which are known to increase the risk of breast cancer are associated with some kind of excess exposure to the main female sex steroid hormone, oestrogen. The theory on how this works in an abortion is quite simple. The biggest surge of oestrogen occurs in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Oestrogen goes sky high. That's okay because although it stimulates the growth of the breasts, toward the end of the pregnancy other hormones kick in that make the breast tissue mature, which also kills off cells that are not needed. Once the mature cells are (ready) to produce milk, they are not in a growing mode.

Consequently they are much less likely to be subject to the mutogenic or initiating effects of carcinogens, (the substances that produce cancer). The carcinogens will affect cells which basically can grow.

Q3. What is femicide?
It is no secret that many societies place a much higher value on male children than on female children. In China, baby boys are greeted as a "big happiness;" baby girls are a "small happiness." A traditional Hindu bridal blessing says "May you be the mother of a hundred sons." Indian parents blow horns, have big parties, and give the midwife a large tip if she delivers a boy. If she delivers a girl, she guiltily slinks out the back door. In China, India, and many other Eastern countries, there is far more emphasis on the extended family than there is in the West.

It is natural for children to care for their parents when they are no longer able to care for themselves. Therefore, boys are seen as an asset because they guarantee that the parents will not become destitute or be abandoned in their old age. Boys are also able to labor in the fields if they stay with the family.

On the other hand, girls are considered liabilities because they require a dowry and then leave the family to care for their husbands and children. The prejudice against women in these societies is pervasive and extreme in many instances. Women must endure conditions unheard of in the West. The result of this attitude is quite predictable.

In China, Korea, and India, the abortion of girls has exploded. In 1985, the world sex-ratio average for newborns was 102.5 boys per 100 girls; in Korea it was 117 to 100. The situation in Korea became so intolerable that it is now illegal for doctors to reveal the gender of preborn babies to parents in that country.

Q4. Should we advocate abortion for babies at risk from HIV?
It has been said that an unborn baby contacting HIV whilst in utero should be aborted to prevent the "child suffering terribly later." Common sense should tell you that this is a ludicrous idea as nothing can compare to the horrific suffering a child goes through during an abortion. However, such questions do merit serious contemplation in order that we can develop a truly compassionate pro-life stance on the issue.

Firstly, let us look at the evidence. The risk of an unborn child contacting HIV virus from a positive mother is only 25% (Centre for Disease Control, USA, March 1987). However, all babies born to HIV positive mothers will test positive at birth, not because they themselves have the virus, but because they are passive recipients of their mothers' antibodies.

(Remember a diagnosis of HIV status is made on the presence of antibodies produced by the baby to fight the virus, not on the basis of the virus itself). In time, as the infant's own immune system develops, 75% of them will no longer need their mother's antibodies as they do not have the virus.

This is why it is especially important for women to be tested for HIV early in pregnancy. Research for the National Institutes of Health (1996) report that the HIV anti-viral drug AZT could keep a mother from passing HIV onto her unborn child. (Gorman, Time) In this study, three times as many HIV-infected babies were born to untreated mothers as were born to mothers given the AZT medication.

Preventing HIV in unborn babies is important because their immune systems are very immature when they are born. HIV makes them sicker than adults at a fast rate.

Read more on the effects of abortion below

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This section of the site explores how abortion effects society as a whole and how it effects people in particular Check out abortion from the child's perspective Read personal stories from women who have had an abortion Find out how you can help a post-abortive friend FAQ's on the effects of Abortion Q1.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
BBC - Ethics - Abortion: Reasons for abortion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This article sets out the possible circumstances in which society might permit abortion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Can an abortion affect one's parenting skills?

Obviously, if women and men are having emotional problems because of their past abortions, this is going to have an impact on their families. For example, women who have had an abortion are more likely to report subsequent substance abuse. Clearly, alcoholism and drug abuse have a negative impact on families.

Women who have had abortions are also more likely to become depressed for long periods of time. This, like other prolonged reactions to abortion, can affect children's emotional development, which is modeled on their parents'.

A past abortion can also have a direct impact on one's parenting "style." For example, in one study of women who had post-abortion problems, nearly half reported that they feared they would be "punished" for their abortions by some harm coming to their other children.

In many cases, these women choke back their love and are afraid to bond with their children. They fear that if they love their children "too much," they'll be punished by losing them.

Conversely, nearly half of the women in this study reported a "compulsion to be a perfect mother." These tendencies have led many women to report that they have become overly protective and "smothering" of their subsequent children. They too may be motivated by a fear of harm coming to their children, so they are deathly afraid of letting them out of their sight.

Unfortunately, some parents with unresolved grief want their born children to serve as "replacements" for the one who was aborted. This can result in the born children constantly being judged against the unattainable standard of "what might have been."

But aren't these problems offset by the fact that abortion has reduced child abuse by reducing the number of unwanted children?

This "fact" isn't a fact at all. Indeed, after decades of study, researchers haven't found a single shred of evidence to support the conclusion that abortion reduces the risk of child abuse. Instead, numerous studies have shown the opposite: a history of abortion is statistically associated with higher rates of child abuse.(1)

These findings are supported by clinical experience. A substantial number of women and men seeking post-abortion therapy have described a link between their unresolved post-abortion feelings and patterns of emotional or physical abuse of their subsequent children. One woman described feelings of intense rage whenever her newborn baby cried: "I did not understand why her crying would make me so angry. She was the most beautiful baby, and had such a placid personality. What I didn't realize then was that I hated my daughter for being able to do all these things that my lost [aborted] baby would never be able to do."(2)

Are you saying abortion can cause child abuse?

Yes. The reasons for child abuse are complex, and can't be fully dealt with here. But let me make a couple of quick points.

Difficulty bonding with subsequent children because of fear, shame, or guilt is commonly reported by post-abortion parents. Lack of adequate bonding is also one of the most significant risk factors for child abuse. When inadequate bonding is combined with feelings of anger and rage, which are common aftereffects of abortion, a dangerous mix can result.

In some rare instances, abortion can also lead to complete emotional breakdown with tragic results. Renee Nicely of New Jersey experienced a "psychotic episode" the day after her abortion which resulted in the beating death of her three-year-old son, Shawn. She told the court psychiatrist that she "knew that abortion was wrong" and that she "should be punished for the abortion." Unfortunately, Shawn became the victim of her pain and guilt.(3)

Sadly, in years to come it may be shown that post-abortion trauma was a major cause of the dramatic rise in child abuse cases in the last two decades.

Can abortion have an impact on siblings who were already born?

Yes. Some children experience "survivor guilt" over the abortion of a sibling. They feel guilty that they were the ones "chosen" by their parents to live. Some may even feel that they are responsible for the abortion of their sibling; if they had not been "so much trouble," perhaps their parents would not have felt it necessary to abort "another burdensome child."

One expert in the treatment of child abuse, Dr. Philip Ney, has noted that children who know they were "wanted" may not feel they were simply "welcomed" for who they are. This subtle shift, from being unconditionally "welcomed" into a family toward being "wanted" to satisfy their parents' expectations, may have a lasting impact on the child's self-perception.

Dr. Martha Shuping, M.D., is a psychiatrist with over ten years of experience in helping women with post-abortion issues.

Notes:1. Ney, P., Fung, T., Wickett, A.R., "Relationship Between Induced Abortion and Child Abuse and Neglect: Four Studies," Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal 8(1):43-63 Fall 1993; Benedict, M., White, R., and Cornely, P., "Maternal Perinatal Risk Factors and Child Abuse" Child Abuse and Neglect 9:217-224 (1985); Lewis, E., "Two Hidden Predisposing Factors in Child Abuse," Child Abuse and Neglect 3:327-330 (1979); Ney, P., "Relationship Between Abortion and Child Abuse," Canadian J. Psychiatry 24:610-620(1979).

2. See Reardon, Aborted Women, op cit., 130.

3. See Reardon, Aborted Women, op cit., 129-130.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Are Later Children Affected by Abortion?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Can an abortion affect one's parenting skills? Obviously, if women and men are having emotional problems because of their past abortions, this is going to have an impact on their families. For example, women who have had an abortion are more likely to report subsequent substance abuse.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Šį tinklapį ir mūsų pagalbos centrą kūrėme Tau ir visoms, kurios išgyvena neplanuoto nėštumo sumaištį, abejones, baimes, vienišumą ir neviltį. Norime padėti eidamos kartu su Tavimi šį sunkų gyvenimo laikotarpį - priimti ir suprasti Tave ir Tavo situaciją tokią, kokia ji yra, suteikti būtiną informaciją ir konkrečią pagalbą konsultuojant individualiai.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Since the 1973 Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court ruling legalized abortion, there have been roughly 55 million abortions in the United States, an average of 1.2 million abortions per year.

The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Guttmacher Institute figures put that at 312 abortions for every 1,000 live births.

Do those numbers shock you? Are you dismayed by them? If not, you need to ask yourself how you have become so complacent and seemingly unfazed by the deaths of that many babies in utero.

My intent is not a political harangue. There continue to be enough of that!

Abortion is not and should not be primarily a political issue, although it has been part of every presidential campaign since 1973 and every president, including Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, has campaigned for office citing the need to decrease the number of abortions, to make abortion more rare.

Yet, government efforts in this regard have failed to accomplish those goals in any appreciable measure.

Abortion really is a moral and ethical issue, reflective of the standards, values and beliefs of individuals and, by extension, our society.

So, my purpose here is to appeal to the heart.

Whether you believe humans have evolved to be the highest form of life on Earth or you believe, as I do, that we are designed and created in the image of our Creator God, surely we can all agree that we are not simply animals controlled by our instincts, drives and impulses, that we are thinking, feeling beings capable of compassion, love, connection, having the capacity to recognize the worth, rights and intrinsic value of human life.

Sex-education classes have been a part of the public school curriculum since the AIDS epidemic of the mid-1980s, so the American public is without excuse when it comes to the mechanics of how pregnancy occurs.

Are we not retaining the information? Are we in denial? Are we just lazy? Where is the disconnect when it comes to safe sex and pregnancy prevention?

Every single time unprotected sex takes place, there is the potential for pregnancy (not to mention sexually transmitted diseases, many incurable).

Women seeking abortions refer to "unplanned" or "unintended" pregnancies. But every person engaging in sexual intercourse must know that, if you do not want an "unplanned pregnancy," then you need to plan ahead to prevent conception.

And every person involved with sexual intimacy who does not want an "unintended" pregnancy needs to take intentional steps to avoid pregnancy.

Once conception takes place, a human life has been created. Growth takes place, hour by hour, day by day. A baby has been conceived and, if no one intervenes to strip that little life from the mother's womb, a child will be born in nine months.

The abortion industry dehumanizes that little life by referring to it as "the products of conception," a "clump of cells" or by the technically correct scientific terms of zygote, embryo or fetus, reducing the miracle of life to cold, clinical terminology.

It is somehow easier to rationalize or justify ending the life of a human baby growing within a woman's body if we speak of "terminating a fetus" or "ending a pregnancy."

Less than one-half of 1 percent of abortions are performed due to rape or incest. Mother's health accounts for 4 percent, and potential health problems of the baby account for 3 percent.

That means that 92 percent of all abortions are performed, according to women surveyed, because they felt unready for a child, can't afford a child, a child would interfere with education/career/personal plans, or due to relationship problems, the fact that they are single moms or their partner didn't want a child and was pressuring them.

But I have to wonder if any of those reasons are good enough to justify taking the life of the innocent child, if we could simply grasp the fact that, once conceived, what would be disposed of is a living human being in progress.

Mother Teresa once said, "It is poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live just as you wish."

I couldn't agree more.
Carol Petersen is a freelance writer, artist and photographer from Lancaster Township. Her email address is cpetersencolumn@gmail.com.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Since the 1973 Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court ruling legalized abortion, there have been roughly 55 million abortions in the United States, an average of 1.2 million abortions per year. The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Guttmacher Institute figures put that at 312 abortions for every 1,000 live births.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Abortion impacts everyone, whether they know it or not. It is a choice that influences not only the woman but also everyone related to them. If someone you know changes their behavior overnight - and seems to become someone else - suspect they may have chosen abortion.

When I decided to abort, I captured the false promise that afterwards I could go on as if nothing happened. The choice seemed the best for everyone involved - particularly my family. I believed this choice would afford both myself, my present and future family several advantages:

My parents would never be disappointed in discovering my loss of virginity

Finishing college and having a fulfilling career would make my mother proud of me and support my future family

Children would arrive on my own timetable when I was married to the man of my dreams

Leaving the clinic, I was overwhelmed with unexpected emotions like guilt, shame and anger. My body was also in deep physical shock from enduring the procedure because I couldn't afford anesthesia.

Many disturbing thoughts and fears overwhelmed me quickly, particularly that the abortion could impact my future fertility. I took control of those thoughts by telling myself - "I can't think about this now. I'll go crazy if I do." Drugs and alcohol helped me ignore these fears for a while.

I often drew upon anger to steel my heart against any emotional fallout. As the days passed, my heart turned to stone. The fun-loving person I had been was replaced by a secretive and pained young woman. This new person impacted everyone I loved in many ways.

Abortion impacts the "family" at many levels. These include:

Confusion - When I went home from college after my abortion, my parents noticed my personality change. Believing something was wrong, they pushed me for answers I refused to give. Never suspecting an abortion, they sadly adjusted to their obviously troubled daughter who bore no resemblance to the sweet girl who graduated high school the year before.

Anger - While she never knew I was pregnant, I blamed my mother for my abortion choice. I reasoned if she had been emotionally available, I may have been able to trust her with my unexpected pregnancy truth. My anger was directed at her for many years despite the fact she was innocent of all involvement in my choice. That was unfair and wrong.

Infertility - When I attempted to get pregnant with my amazing husband's child, infertility hit my marriage. I never expected that I could have aborted my only child. The idea that I could have done something as a teen that would mean my husband may never hold his own child was overwhelming. While my barrenness was medically remedied, many women may not be able to have children for a variety of reasons after abortion.

Bonding - Looking into the face of my newborn son, I experienced "motherhood wonderment" and immediately fell in love. That love transitioned quickly into a horrific understanding, reminding me of the child I had lost to abortion. My aborted child then began to haunt my heart, impacting my ability to bond with my new son.

Guilt - Watching a woman change after a procedure you encouraged can be horrifying for parents and family. While abortion may have appeared the best solution for the unexpected pregnancy, the potential emotional fallout is rarely discussed. Those involved in influencing this decision often carry guilt over their responsibility in the emotional, spiritual, psychological and physical consequences that may result.

Grief - While I don't how she discovered my abortion secret, my mother confronted me about my abortion five years later. After some angry words, she collapsed in grief for her lost grandchild. Her grief ushered a new guilt into my heart.

Thankfully, God healed all related family pain after my abortion recovery process. During the days before her death, my mother and I spoke often about heaven and those who would welcome her home. There was peace between us as God had allowed many healing conversations about the pain my abortion brought to our family.

While my abortion clearly impacted my mothering ability until God restored my wounded soul, He set everything right when I asked for His help. My lost child was named and welcomed into my heart so he no longer haunted me. My husband adopted this child in heaven as his own and our children know about their brother, Jesse, in heaven.

If a family member has been negatively impacted by abortion, understand their pain can impact your heart too. Family members often experience Abortion PTSD at a secondary level. Thankfully, God's healing is available for everyone impacted by abortion. As Psalm 130:6-8 outlines - My soul waits for the Lord, more than those who watch for the morning-yes, more than those who watch for the morning.O Israel, hope in the LORD; for with the LORD there is mercy, and with Him is abundant redemption.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Abortion impacts everyone, whether they know it or not. It is a choice that influences not only the woman but also everyone related to them. If someone you know changes their behavior overnight - and seems to become someone else - suspect they may have chosen abortion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Stephanie Gray wrote this week about how family members of aborted children work through the abortion issue. Or don't.

This excerpt talks about survivor guilt:

That does something to you psychologically. Consider the words of child and family psychiatrist Dr. Philip Ney who has done extensive research on the effects of abortion on siblings, something he calls post-abortion survivor syndrome:

"[Siblings of aborted children] have in common many of the conflicts that were found in those people who survived the Holocaust. For instance they have survivor guilt. They feel it is not right for them to be alive. And they wonder why they should be selected when their little siblings were selected to die ... which is precisely what happened to the people from the Holocaust. Why were they selected to live and some of their friends, relatives, and family were selected to die? And it leaves this deep sense of guilt. And that is a difficult, difficult thing to treat, because it is so deeply embedded. And of course with that is how can you trust your parents? Are they capable of killing you too?"

This one isn't about abortion, but about IVF and how it affected one woman's determination of when life begins:

If that weren't bad enough, it gets worse. While speaking to a young female college student, my colleague was having a difficult time convincing her of the scientific fact that our human lives began at fertilization. My colleague invited me into the conversation, hoping I could convince the young lady.

In our conversation I learned that the student was conceived through in-vitro fertilization (IVF). And in that moment, I realized I had a nearly insurmountable task ahead of me. It was no longer easy to explain that life begins at fertilization-not because it doesn't, but because of what it means.

In directly making the case that life began at fertilization, I'd be indirectly making the case that siblings she'd always longed for actually existed...

Abortion affects not only the woman who is making "her choice." It affects the family, the community, and society. It affects our understanding of who we are, what life is and when it begins. It affects our understanding of love, sacrifice, freedom and independence. It can affect our understanding of so many fundamental and foundational realities. It can change everything.

by

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Stephanie Gray wrote this week about how family members of aborted children work through the abortion issue. Or don't. This excerpt talks about survivor guilt: That does something to you psychologically.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It certainly comes as no surprise and it is definitely not new news that the abortion industry and the media and individuals who support it try and deny the truth about abortion and the reality of abortion survivors, but I've been thinking a lot lately about how this denial of our lives and abortion's often devastating effects doesn't just affect us, but affects our families, truly, it affects all families, who have been touched by abortion.

About this time last year, I wrote a post in reference to the Washington Post's attempt in 2012 to discredit my life and life story in their support of President Obama, (http://www.melissaohden.com/?p=1315), and in it, I started to process out some of my thoughts about how responses like this by those that are pro-abortion not only affect me, but affect my family, who have been forever changed by the abortion that was meant to end my life. In the course of the last year, though, I've been thinking about how not only such responses deny the reality of my family members, including my birthmother, who was forced to have the abortion and was greatly pained by this for decades, but denies the realities of tens of millions of families who have been forever changed by abortion. And I'll be honest. It saddens and frustrates me that we live in a world that wants to deny the truth about abortion so badly that it will not only turn a blind eye to its' everyday injustice against children, but then further denies the ramifications of this injustice on the children's families.

Abortion affects everyone, and I hear from and meet grandparents, siblings, aunts and uncles, mothers and fathers who have experienced abortion and its' long-lasting effects, day in and day out. They have a story. One that they don't often share because of their own guilt, shame, grief, or fear about how others will respond in a culture that has embraced abortion as a way of life (or lack thereof). Yet, no matter the feelings welled up inside these family members, what I have discovered is that when they finally hear from someone else that they, too, have experienced that pain, that they, too, understand what they've gone through, the floodgates open, and those feelings, those words that have remained locked up within them come pouring out.

We may not be able to change the response that the abortion industry and its' supporters, including the media, have in regards to abortion, abortion survivors, and the truth about how abortion affects all of us, but we can do something. We can be courageous enough to share our experiences with others, whether it is face to face, or something we share anonymously on the Internet.

We can educate others about the impact that abortion has across generations, not only on children and women, but on men, grandparents, siblings, aunts and uncles, cousins, and ultimately outside of the microcosm of family to our communities and nation. We can share our stories and encourage others to find hope and healing in the midst of what they have experienced. If we've lost 57 million children to abortion in the last 41 ½ years in the U.S. alone, we should recognize that we are not alone in our experience, and use our grief to bring about a difference, not only in our lives, but the lives of others.

I know that it's not easy to talk about, and it's hard to know where to start, but I would like to just encourage you, the reader, if you've been affected by abortion in your family, to take the first step and simply acknowledge this to yourself. The next steps of sharing it will come in their due time.

I would like to leave you with the story of a friend of mine, who is a grandparent who has experienced the loss of her grandchild. May her boldness (and the courage of other family members who share likewise on the site you will see listed below) in sharing her story enable you to someday find your own voice:

"On 4th April, 2014, the life of my 4th grandchild, my son's first child was ended in an abortion clinic. This child's parents had dated for 2 years, become engaged, bought baby clothes and furniture, and named their child, Cole James for a boy, Lyra Grace for a girl.

Nothing we did to reassure this young mother of our support, even after she and my son had planned for their baby and were excitedly welcoming him or her, could overcome the fears and insecurities that others close to her magnify in her mind... She wouldn't be able to manage a baby and complete her education... She would lose her entire youth... She would never be supported in the way we had promised... all lies.

She was cut off from those most trying to help her, by those who did not want to support her in her decision to have her baby, but instead were determined to ensure she rode the conveyor belt of doubt and fear all the way to abortion.

My son learned of the circumstances of his child's death 2 days later when he woke to find the mother crying on his doorstep about the terrible mistake she had made.

He was broken.

We all are.

Abortion does not just hurt women and their children. It hurts the fathers of the children. It leaves a gap in a family where a child should be, a child who was wanted, and already loved. It is a pathway of destruction that no woman deserves"- http://iregretmyabortion.org.au/debbie-loss-of-a-grandchild/

To access a large collection of resources and support after abortion, please visit: http://www.priestsforlife.org/afterabortion/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It certainly comes as no surprise and it is definitely not new news that the abortion industry and the media and individuals who support it try and deny the truth about abortion and the reality of abortion survivors, but I've been thinking a lot lately about how this denial of our lives and abortion's often devastating effects doesn't just affect us, but affects our families, truly, it affects all families, who have been touched by abortion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The economic cost of abortion

Before abortion law reform, abortion advocates argued that legalising abortion would have a positive effect on society. After several decades most of these predictions have proven false.

Rather than giving women more freedom, abortion has led to expoiltation by men who no longer want the responsibility of providing for their children.

Some men feel they have been disenfranchised and powerless as they have no legal rights when it comes to abortion.

Abortion has not decreased the crime rate as advocates claimed would happen, the opposite is true.

Abortion of unwanted babies has not led to fewer victims of child abuse as claimed, numbers are in fact on the increase.

Opponents said legalising abortion would be the slippery slope to the acceptance of infanticide and euthanasia, this has happened.

Advocates of abortion and early activists seeking abortion law reform, used arguments designed to persuade people that abortion would be beneficial for women in particular, and society as a whole.

Abortion was supposed to empower women, free them from the rigours of childbearing and the drudgery of housework, and enable them to achieve an equal place with men in the workforce.

Several decades later many women are wondering when this freedom, empowerment and equality is going to have a positive impact on their lives.

Women appear to be the losers when it comes to abortion.

In the 1960s the birth control pill was promoted as a way in which women could be equal with men, having all the pleasure of sex whenever they wanted, without the fear of consequences. One unexpected early side-effect of 'The Pill' was that some women died. Researchers found that lowering the dose of oestrogen and progesterone reduced the risk of deep-vein blood clots that gave rise to pulmonary-embolisms. Read more about birth control and abortion here.

A woman's problem
The lower-dose pill, however, meant that there were a number of 'break-through' ovulations each year, and despite the Pill working to alter the lining of the womb some of the embryos attached and thrived. Men who wanted sex without any obligations put pressure on women to have an abortion - it was, after all, safe and legal.

For many girls and women, this was the final death of romance for them - Prince Charming had turned out to be a toad who only wanted to use them, or rather, their bodies. Women who chose not to have an abortion often found themselves abandoned by the man and faced the hard life of a single parent.

Single parenthood has been said to be the single most indicator of poverty for a woman. New Zealand has the developed world's second highest percentage of single parent families. Lack of support, especially of adequate day care, has been one of the toughest barriers a single working mother has had to face, although there are signs that this is changing. Read more here.

Having to come to terms an increasing lack of romance and with reduced prospects of marriage with men who preferred sex without strings, women retaliated. Women, finally buying the 'equality' message began to indulge in uncommitted relationships while putting their energies into building a career and enjoying the 'party life.'

Freely available abortion as a back-up to birth control has meant a woman can - and has - chosen to delay childbearing and/or marriage until her mid-30s. A consequence of this delayed childbearing has seen many infertile women/couples having to resort to Fertility Clinics for help. Read more about abortion and infertility here.

In a study of 100 women carried out by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in the US (75 of whom were married or in committed relationships), 46% agreed that the abortion provoked a major crisis in their lives which was frequently followed by an unstable marital or social relationship.4

Other studies put the figure of relationship breakdowns as high as 70% in the first 12 months following abortion. This is particularly found with unmarried relationships, or when the husband either did not know in advance or objected to the abortion.

Abortion and men
Abortion has also had a negative effect on men.

Except in China, a man, married or otherwise, has no legal right to force a woman either to have an abortion or to bear his child. This has led to many men complaining that not only has this left them disenfranchised (deprived of a legal right), it has caused many to experience a feeling of powerlessness, especially when the father has offered to raise the child himself. Read more about men and abortion here.

The traditional role of men has been to provide and protect. Abortion has fractured that role for many men, leaving them confused as to what their role now is. With the advent of in vitro fertilisation and many single women choosing motherhood but not marriage, many men see themselves as no more than 'sperm donors.' Some men are quite happy to accept this role but others are resentful.

Men who pressure the mother of their child to submit to an abortion often later feel as though they have violated an important and fundamental part of a man's nature - i.e. to defend and protect his child. This can become apparent later in life as maturity causes him to look back at his actions.

Another effect of this breaking down the barriers is that, having already violated his nature by asking or allowing a woman to have an act of violence kill his child, he feels less restraint at inflicting violence on her or others. Rates of domestic violence and child abuse have risen since the legalisation or decriminalisation of abortion.

Abortion and children
One of the main arguments abortion advocates used was that unwanted children were victims of child abuse, and were more likely to grow up to be criminals. In America the National Abortion Rights Action League, now NARAL Pro-Choice America, stated:

"A policy that makes contraception and abortion freely available will greatly reduce the number of unwanted children, and thereby curb the tragic rise of child abuse in our country ... Legal abortion will decrease the number of unwanted children, battered children, child abuse cases, and possibly subsequent delinquency, drug addiction, and a host of social ills believed to be associated with neglectful parenthood."1

Larry Lader, a co-founder of NARAL and an early abortion activist, said, "The impact of the abortion revolution may be too vast to assess immediately. It should usher in an era when every child will be wanted, loved, and properly cared for; when the incidence of infanticides and battered children should be sharply reduced."2

Opponent have pointed out that history has shown the opposite to have occured. Children, they say, are now viewed as property, a product and a 'right', not a unique human being or a 'blessing.'. They believe that the widespread practice of infanticide of born children in hospitals, and parental abuse, are an inevitable flow-on from what they call the wholesale abuse of unborn children.

Dr. Philip G. Ney, head of the Department of Psychiatry at Royal Jubilee Hospital in Canada, has outlined some psychological mechanisms showing how abortion leads directly to child abuse.

1. Abortion decreases an individual's instinctual restraint against the occasional rage felt toward those dependent on his or her care.

2. Permissive abortion diminishes the taboo against aggressing [against] the defenseless.

3. Abortion increases the hostility between the generations.

4. Abortion has devalued children, thus diminishing the value of caring for children.

5. Abortion increases guilt and self-hatred, which the parent takes out on the child.

6. Abortion increases hostile frustration, intensifying the battle of the sexes, for which children are scapegoated.

7. Abortion cuts the developing mother-infant bond, thereby diminishing her future mothering capability. 3

The US National Center of Child Abuse and Neglect, has reported that child abuse increased more than 1,000 percent since the legalisation of abortion in 1973.
In New Zealand in 2004, figures from Child Youth and Family showed that the Department received ten thousand calls more than the year before, and were concerned that there was a rise in the number of suspected critical cases.

A September 2003 UNICEF report said that New Zealand's rate of child deaths from maltreatment is now 1.2 per 100,000. This is more than four times the first world average.

Abortion's effect on 'Generation Y'
Abortion is an accepted part of the culture for what is known as the millennial generation or 'Generation Y' (those born in 1978 or later). This generation has grown up with legal abortion and in many case have, in some way or another, been affected by it.

There is hardly anyone today who has not been touched by abortion, even those who have not had an abortion themselves usually know of a family member or friend who has ahd one. Many teenagers have seen the sometimes devastating effect abortion has had on a friend whose behaviour has changed, who avoids former friends, is very emotional and who may have become suicidal.

An even greater way teenagers have been affected by abortion is when they find out that their mother has had an abortion. It occurs to them that the aborted sibling could just as easily have been them. It is estimated that between one in three and one in five of this generation have been aborted. Many of these teens have come to regard them selves as 'abortion survivors' and feel a burden of expectation that is hard to live up to.

Abortion can impede mother-child bonding in subsequent pregnancies. This can distort the relationship through many years and contribute to many of the problems seen in this generation which has described itself as lost, empty, and no good.

The breakdown in a relationship following an abortion usually has a harmful effect on a woman's future relationships. One affect abortion has on women is that they become increasingly hostile towards men. The mother may vent this hostility toward a son as he grows older.

A relationship breakdown leads to many children growing up in homes where the adult male is not their biological father and who may not have a strong interest in their welfare. This can confuse the process of male identification in young men. When men have experienced the absence of their father when growing up, they fear intimacy.

Girls are also seriously affected by the loss of their biological father. If the father leaves they grow up in a home where they are poorly protected from other "sexually opportunistic males in the surrounding community." Read A Wounded Generation.

The effects of fatherlessness

71% of teenage pregnancies are to children of single parents

63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes

90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes

71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes 5

Falling birth rates
New Zealand's birth rate is declining and, like most developed countries, is below the level that is required for replacement. With gains from immigration, this has not yet had a significant impact on the economy of the country, but economists are beginning to show some concern.
It has been estimated that New Zealand will need between 30-40,000 immigrants each year to maintain the status quo. Australian economist Wolfgang Kasper wrote a paper "Populate or Languish," which was distributed by the New Zealand Business Round Table. He claimed:
People who now save for their old age implicitly hope that sufficient workers and customers will be around to make their investments pay in 30 years' time. With a declining population, many will be disappointed.

Should the population decline, they will discover that their savings capital, if invested in New Zealand, has a low productivity and a poor return. And they make this discovery only when they are old and can no longer cope well with such disappointments.

Read New Zealand's Demographic Decline and Economic Growth

As birthrates in Europe, Asia and Latin America have also fallen, countries on those continents are also looking to immigration to boost population numbers. These countries will all be competing for the same pool of suitable immigrants.

Population growth is a major source of economic growth. More people create more demand for products and services and supply labour that is need by industry and commerce.

There is evidence to suggest that an aging or greying population works to depress the rate of technological innovation and entrepreneurship. Older populations are seen to reflect the normal characteristics of older people. They become more security conscious, less progressive and dynamic, more rigid in their ways.

Many countries facing a 'birth dearth' have begun offering generous incentives for couples to have more children. Read more about the "Global consequences of the falling birth rate" here.

Abortion and economic growth

Since 1978, there have been 280-300,000 abortions in New Zealand. As the cumulative numbers of abortion rise, the yearly impact on the economy will increase.

In the 22 years up to 1999 there were an estimated 200,000 abortions. These missing consumers have meant fewer sales of many products and services over the years, such as disposable nappies, toys, shoes, clothes, school books, weetbix and Happy Meals. It has meant a reduced need for such things as teachers, cars and houses. While immigration levels have kept figures up, this will not always be the case.

In 1999 there were 15,501 abortions. In 2005 this means:

574 classes (of 27 children per class) that will not need teachers

15,501 x $? new uniforms and school clothes won't be bought

15,501 x $? casual clothes won't be needed

62,000 pairs of shoes or sandals won't be needed (school shoes, sandals & 2 pair of sneakers)

19,035,228 weetbix (396,567 x 750g packets) that won't be eaten (2 per child per day)

$620,000 worth of school stationery (@$40 per child) won't be bought

$1,000,000 - $1,550,000 in fees, schools will miss out on

186,012 Happy Meals (1 per child per month) won't be sold

$1,000,000 + worth of toys won't be bought

That is some of the loss to New Zealand's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from the children that weren't born in 1999 alone. Although economists may be able to construct models of how economies could grow amid a shrinking population, in the real world, it has never happened. A nation's GDP is literally the sum of its labour force times average output per worker.
Thus a decline in the number of workers implies a decline in an economy's growth potential. When the size of the work force falls, economic growth can occur only if productivity increases enough to compensate. And these increases would have to be substantial to offset the impact of aging.

An aging society

By the middle of the 21st century, one in four New Zealanders will be aged 65 or older, compared with one in eight at 2001. While some people may choose to continue working into old age it is just as likely that some people will choose to care for elderly relatives. The New Zealand government has been looking at ways to encourage people to remain economically active later in life.

There will be a greater reliance on mid- and late-career workers to meet skill demands. Although advances in medical science mean that people are healthier in later years than previous generations, a large proportion of New Zealanders lack qualifications, having acquired skills on the job. This potentially constrains the ability of older workers to adapt to changes in the labour market and technology. Thus, not all skills, and therefore the workers who possess them, will be sought after equally.

The ageing population also raises the concern that the growing number of retirees will increase the burden on the working population that supports them.

Australia is predicted to be facing severe labour shortages in many industries by as early as 2010. How that will impact on New Zealand is yet to be seen. One possibility is that more New Zealanders will be recruited to cross the Tasman. This would leave New Zealand industry in a precarious position.

Abortion and euthanasia

In the early days of abortion activism opponents were riduculed for suggesting that abortion was the thin end of the wedge, the slippery slope that would lead to euthanasia.

Many of the early abortion advocates were also involved with organisations promoting euthanasia. An argument used by euthanasia advocates is that if we may kill unborn babies, we may kill other human beings.

Being elderly and ill in Holland, where euthanasia is legal is a frightening experience, because the elderly know that they are officially "expendable." Such people are expendable because the primary motivation for Dutch health 'care' is cost containment rather than 'care.' They have been examined by 'healers' using a benefit-cost equation and they have been found wanting.

The same has been found in Oregon where many treatments are not covered by Medicaid, but euthanasia is.

Healthcare funding allocations, shortages of beds and nursing staff, as well as an increasing elderly population in the future, will undoubtedly influence policy makers and doctors to look at euthanasia as a means of cost containment.

Long-term political consequences
The 2004 American presidential election result left abortion advocates stunned. Despite having pulled out all stops in an effort to defeat President George W. Bush's re-election, he won convincingly.

According to an article in Newsday, James Pinkerton contended that "the left has birth-controlled, aborted and maybe also gay-libbed itself into a smaller role in American society."

Abortion has much to do with the fertility rates amongst liberals. It is estimated that of the 40 million or more abortions since legalisation, over 18 million would have been eligible to vote in the 2004 election, many of whom would have been influenced by their parents and voted for the Democratic candidate. This demographic shift is referred to in the US as "The Roe Effect."

James Taranto, a writer for the Wall Street Journal, wrote that: "Abortion is making America more conservative than it otherwise would be". First, "liberal and Democratic women are more likely to have abortions." Second, "children's political views tend to reflect those of their parents - not exactly, of course, and not in every case, but on average. Thus abortion depletes the next generation of liberals and eventually makes the population more conservative."

People with strong religious and moral views that oppose abortion are having more children than those who advocate abortion and have one, two or no children. As these children grow up they are likely to be influenced by their parents' views and also oppose abortion. As they reach maturity, they will gradually outnumber the liberals and will be likely to vote for politicians who respect traditional family values.

It is predicted by opponents to abortion, as well as demographers, that there will be a culture shift back toward limiting abortion. According to a Population Review Institute poll conducted in 2003, those opposed to abortion are outbreeding abortion advocates three to one. This was reflected in a 2003 Gallup Poll which showed that 72% of teenagers are of the opinion that abortion is morally wrong.

References:

1. National Abortion Rights Action League. A Speaker's and Debater's Notebook, June 1978, pages 7 and 8

2. Larry Lader. "The Abortion Revolution." The Humanist, May/June 1973, page 4

3. Philip G. Ney, M.D., "Abortion and Child Abuse: Which is Cause, Which is Effect?" Paper presented at a conference entitled "Psychological Aspects of Abortion." 1978

4. "The Abortion Experience in Private Practice", David H. Sherman, et al., in "Women and Loss: Psychobiological Perspectives", ed. William F. Finn, et al., The Foundation of Thanatology Series, Volume 3, New York: Praeger Publications (1985), pp. 98-107

5. Effects of Fatherlessness (US Data) http://www.massey.ac.nz/~kbirks/gender/econ/nodad.htm

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The economic cost of abortion Before abortion law reform, abortion advocates argued that legalising abortion would have a positive effect on society. After several decades most of these predictions have proven false. Rather than giving women more freedom, abortion has led to expoiltation by men who no longer want the responsibility of providing for their children.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Disclaimer: Throughout this article, we will be using the term "woman" to describe biological females who can become pregnant. We understand that and are separate, but for the sake of simplicity and consistency, these are the terms we will be using. If you would like to learn more about gender identity, visit our Sexual Orientation Gender Identity article.

General Information on Abortion

When performed by a trained medical practitioner in the appropriate conditions and settings, an abortion can be a safe way to end a pregnancy. There are two different types of abortion, with the first being the medical abortion and the second being the surgical abortion. The type of abortion procedure that will be performed depends on how many weeks pregnant the woman is. Women who have an abortion during the earliest weeks of their experience fewer health risks during and after the procedure, and also benefit from a faster recovery. Most women recover fully from an abortion within a few days of taking the required medication or undergoing the surgical procedure.¹

Choosing to have an abortion can be an extremely challenging decision and it is completely normal to feel a range of emotions and thoughts. It is therefore very important to surround oneself with positive support from loved ones and support groups. Surrounding oneself with loving and caring people while avoiding negativity as much as possible is a crucial factor in how a woman feels about her abortion. If you have had an abortion and are not receiving the support you need, try to reach out to support groups or online forums to help you through this delicate time.

Unsafe Abortion

We understand that not all women have access to safe, legal abortion. Unsafe abortions carry many risks including infection, hemorrhage, incomplete abortion, and organ damage. If you believe that you or someone you know are suffering from any of these symptoms following an unsafe abortion, contact a healthcare provider as soon as possible.

Your Health Care and Abortion Provider
Your healthcare provider should go over all the exact details of your abortion with you, leaving you with the knowledge of what to expect and what to watch out for following the doses of medication or the procedure. Keep in mind that your abortion provider is there to help you with your decision to have an abortion and inform you of the risks, but they should never shame or judge you. In addition, your abortion provider should be happy to answer questions you may have about any aspect of the procedure. The more knowledgeable a patient becomes about their procedure, the more comfortable and secure the patient will feel.

You should feel comfortable bringing up any questions or concerns you have with your health provider. A good strategy can include preparing and writing questions you have in advance, so that no questions go unanswered and so you can then feel completely comfortable and confident with your decision. Your provider should also make you aware of all of your options and provide you with their medical opinion about what the best and safest option for you is. However, if you feel an abortion provider is directing you away from the possibility of abortion, or seems disapproving of your final decision to abort, remember that you are entitled to seek medical care from another provider with whom you feel more comfortable with at any time.²

After your abortion, your provider should be equally as accommodating to answer any questions you have, and should be supportive and encouraging of your quick recovery. Your healthcare provider should provide you with all the knowledge of what to expect and what to be cautious of as well as proper self-care following the procedure. Additionally, your provider should provide you important contact information as well as a list of for any support you may need, including financial, emotional, and social support telephone numbers.

Immediately Following a Surgical Abortion

You can read about what a surgical abortion is by reading our surgical abortion article. If you undergo a surgical abortion from a reputable clinic, your provider should follow these steps:⁶

Your clinician will provide you with written after-care instructions and a 24-hour telephone number you can call if you have any questions or concerns about your recovery.

Depending on the clinic, you may be able to have an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted during the abortion procedure. The IUD is a method of birth control that can prevent pregnancy for 3 to 10 years (the duration of protection depends on the type of iud). If you would like an IUD inserted during the procedure, ask the clinic when scheduling your abortion if this is an option for you.

You may be asked to schedule a follow-up appointment 2 to 4 weeks after the abortion takes place.

If you are sedated for the procedure, you must arrange for someone to drive you home or find an alternate form of transportation, as it is unsafe to operate a vehicle under sedatives.

You can usually return to work and your normal routine by the next day. However, recovery after d ilation and evacuation (D&E) abortions may take longer.⁷

You may shower immediately following the procedure, but you should not sit in water (e.g., take a bath), douche, or use any medication in or for your vagina.

For two weeks after a surgical abortion, you should also avoid vaginal sex (including usage of sex toys) and using tampons (use pads instead)

Consult with a physician about the appropriate times to resume these activities.

Common Side Effects of a Surgical Abortion
Immediately after the procedure and during the recovery period, you may experience some side effects. Common side effects of surgical abortions include:

Most women experience vaginal bleeding and cramping similar to a menstrual cycle for two to four days.⁸ Although these are commonly reported side effects, you can always contact your healthcare provider for more information if have any questions or concerns about any of these side effects.
Serious and Dangerous Side Effects of a Surgical Abortion
While there are many common side effects following a surgical abortion, some side effects may be symptoms of potentially emergent conditions.⁹ These dangerous side effects may include the following:

Passing blood clots that are larger than a lemon for more than two hours

Bleeding that is heavy enough that you have to change your pad twice in one hour

Foul smelling vaginal discharge

Pain or cramping that gets worse, especially after 48 hours

Continuing symptoms of pregnancy

You should call your clinic or seek immediate attention if you experience any of these listed symptoms.

Immediately Following a Medical Abortion

If you receive a medical abortion from a reputable clinic, you will take the first of two pills while inside the clinic with your physician. This first pill blocks the hormone progesterone, and breaks down the uterine lining. This leaves the uterus unable to continue supporting the pregnancy.⁶

The healthcare professional will then give you antibiotics to take in addition to the second pill. The second pill is taken after your departure from the clinic. Under the guidance of your clinician, you will schedule a time (up to three days after taking the progesterone pill) and place to take the second pill.

The second pill contains Misoprostol and causes the uterus to empty itself.⁶ Many women compare this experience to an early miscarriage. You will experience cramps and heavy bleeding for several hours. Some women even begin bleeding before the second pill, but heavy bleeding or the discharge of blood clots and tissue typically occur after the dose of Misoprostol. Over 50% of women who receive a medical abortion abort within 4 to 5 hours of taking the second pill; however, it can take longer for some women. Additionally, this type of abortion is successful over 90% of the time. In the week following your abortion, it is recommended that you only use sanitary pads and refrain from vaginal sex or penetration of any kind.

The final step to a medical abortion is the follow-up appointment, which should take place within 2 weeks of your procedure.⁷ The purpose of this check-up is to administer a blood test or an ultrasound to confirm that the pregnancy was terminated and that there are no complications. In the unlikely event that your abortion was incomplete, you will need to discuss your options with your healthcare provider. For most women, this means scheduling an aspiration abortion (a type of surgical abortion) to end the pregnancy.

Fertility After an Abortion

Any kind of abortion effectively 'restarts' your menstrual cycle. This means that you should start your next menstrual period 4 to 6 weeks after your procedure. can occur as soon as two weeks after an abortion, which means that pregnancy can occur as soon as two weeks after the procedure which makes it essential for you and your partner to immediately start the use of contraception when you and your partner decide you are ready to resume sexual intercourse again.² Additionally, there are no indications that either surgical or medical abortions affect a woman's long term ability to have a baby when she is ready.⁶'
Common Side Effects of a Medical Abortion
It is common for women to bleed, cramp, or spot for up to 4 weeks after an abortion. Other common side effects may include the following:⁸

According to Planned Parenthood, acetaminophen (like Tylenol®) or ibuprofen (like Advil®) can be used to reduce the severity of these side effects.
Serious and Dangerous Side Effects of a Medical Abortion
Although there are many common side effects that are no cause for major concern, there exists numerous side effects that should act as warning signs if they occur. If you experience any of the following symptoms, contact a health provider as soon as possible.⁵

Severe abdominal and back pain that renders you unable to stand up

Bleeding that is heavier than a normal menstrual period

Foul-smelling discharge

Fever above a 100.4 F that does not respond to medication or is present for more than 48 hours

After completing the procedure, there are various activities that you must refrain from in order to heal properly and avoid infections. For up to two weeks after the procedure, you should avoid the following:¹

Engaging in vaginal sex or penetration of any kind (including usage of sex toys and fingers)

Using tampons (use pads instead)

Swimming in pools

Bathing in hot tubs or jacuzzis

Excessive exercising

Although the majority of women who have abortions recover without any problems, the risk of complications only highlights the importance of making sure that you have a checkup within the time frame prescribed by your health provider. During checkups, the clinician ensures that there is no infection in the uterus, that the cervix has closed completely, and that the patient is healing properly.² If you do not wish to have the checkup with your abortion provider, you reserve the right to go to your usual health provider.² However, it is important to tell them that you had an abortion and explain exactly what happened and what symptoms you experienced.

Emotional Health and Well-Being After an Abortion

In the days and weeks that follow the abortion, it is crucial to remember that there is no right or wrong way to feel. You may experience a range of feelings like sadness, anger, guilt, or relief. The intensity and duration of the feelings vary from woman to woman and can be affected by numerous factors including hormonal changes and adjustments in her personal life.³ You may experience very strong feelings, or you may not, and both are normal. If the feelings are overwhelming or persist for an extended amount of time, do not hesitate to seek out a mental health care provider or support groups.

It can be very beneficial to have someone that loves and supports you present during the abortion process. It can help you feel more relaxed, safe, and confident about your decision, and you will be able to talk through your emotions and concerns with this trusted supporter. Your partner, family member, friend, or anyone who is comfortable with and supportive of your decision can help you through this time. It is common for women to feel more emotional after an abortion because of the sudden hormone shift caused by the medication in addition to remaining pregnancy hormones.² Making this decision can also be difficult emotionally, so feeling a bit sensitive or fragile in the following days and weeks is normal.

Although many women are fearful of the negative emotional consequences that are often said to occur following an abortion (such as guilt, shame, or remorse), the majority of women who have had abortions do not report any long lasting emotional trauma. In reality, it has been shown in a wealth of studies that, in addition to having a quick bodily recovery, a majority of women also have a smooth psychological recovery after an abortion. In fact, only about 1% of all women who have abortions experience lasting depression or stress following their abortion. Moreover, the 1% of women who suffer from clinical depression following an abortion are largely women who were depressed before the abortion.⁴

Experiencing mood swings and strong emotions is common. These feelings are often caused by lingering pregnancy hormones. As these pregnancy hormones continue to decline, so too will the moods swings and intense emotional states. Making the decision to have an abortion can be very difficult and emotionally draining. The after effects of the decision may continue to influence you after the procedure, contributing to your mood swings or strong emotions. However, the most reliable indicator of whether a woman will experience feelings of distress after an abortion is her emotional stability before the abortion.⁴ Regardless, the majority of clinics provide a plethora of resources for patients if they require counseling or any other services.

There are numerous coping strategies that can help women throughout their own individual healing process. However, it is equally as important to address the existence of harmful coping strategies. Some harmful coping strategies include:³

By identifying harmful coping strategies, we are then able to shift our focus to better coping strategies.³ Good coping strategies do not necessarily have to involve making large changes to your daily lifestyle. These changes can be as small as going for a walk, eating a healthy meal, practicing deep breathing, listening to music, or engaging any behavior that can help us feel better in the moment as well as in the long run is recommended. Other positive coping strategies can include:³

When you are cultivating self-compassion it is important to remember that you are a good person in a difficult situation and are doing the best that you can. Speak to yourself the same way you would to someone you deeply care for and extend that same kindness and care to yourself. Practicing self-care involves engaging in any activity or behavior that can help you feel better during difficult times whether it be exercise, writing, gardening, hiking, or making time to be with loved ones. Reflecting, remembering, and writing down your reasons for having an abortion can provide a great sense of affirmation to yourself so that later on you can say "I made the best choice I could." The healing process varies from individual to individual but choosing forgiveness for yourself can go a long way as you choose to move on the best way that you can.

Life After an Abortion
On many measures, such as educational achievement, future income, dependence on public assistance, and domestic abuse, women younger than twenty-one who have abortions generally fare better than young pregnant women who decide to carry their pregnancy to term. Thus, the circumstances that often develop around early, unintended pregnancy and parenthood may be deterred by having an abortion. For women who are firm in their decision to have an abortion and who are comfortable with the procedure, an abortion can even have psychological benefits, including increased self-esteem.⁴

Although some women and their male partners may feel stress or sadness immediately following an abortion, long-lasting psychological harm is rare among the majority of women and couples who have an abortion. Women who are uncomfortable with the idea of having an abortion or who feel guilty or anxious about the procedure are more likely to experience negative feelings following an abortion. The psychological effects of abortion largely depend on a woman's beliefs and values, as well as the degree of care with which she made her decision. Having a good support system from a partner, family, and friends can significantly improve one's feelings about abortion. If you feel that you are lacking support regarding your abortion, there are resources available outside of your currently existing network to help you throughout the entire process.

References
1, "Caring for Yourself after an Abortion." Teen Health Source. Planned Parenthood Toronto, n.d. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.

2. Jilly. "Physical Recovery After an Abortion." AfterAbortion. PASS, n.d. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.

3. "After the Abortion." Everywoman's Health Centre. EveryWoman's Health Centre, 2014. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.

4. Bazelon, Emily. "Is There a Post-Abortion Syndrome?" The New York Times Magazine. The New York Times, 21 Jan. 2007. Web. 22 Jan. 2017.

5. "What Should I Expect After the Abortion?" ProChoice.org. National Abortion Federation, n.d. Web. 22 Jan. 2017.

6. "Aftercare Instructions: Medication Abortion." CWHCColorado. Comprehensive Women's Health Center, 2012. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.

7. "What to Expect After a First Trimester Surgical Abortion." Postgraduate Obstetrics & Gynecology 31.9 (2011): 8. UWMedicine. University of Washington Medical Center, Jan. 2010. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.

8. "Possible Physical Side Effects After Abortion." American Pregnancy Association. American Pregnancy Association, 3 Sept. 2016. Web. 22 Jan. 2017.

9. Gotter, Ana. "Surgical Abortion." Healthline. Healthline Media, 30 Aug. 2016. Web. 05 Feb. 2017

Last Updated: 22 March 2017.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Disclaimer: Throughout this article, we will be using the term "woman" to describe biological females who can become pregnant. We understand that and are separate, but for the sake of simplicity and consistency, these are the terms we will be using. If you would like to learn more about gender identity, visit our Sexual Orientation Gender Identity article.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.life.org.nz/abortion/abortionorganisations/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Organisations - Abortion | The Life Resources Charitable Trust

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Women's Global Network for Reproductive Health The Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights is an autonomous network of groups and individuals in every continent who aim to achieve and support reproductive rights for women.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The After Effects of Abortion - AbortionFacts.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
National abortion policy is built upon this judicial "fact" that abortion is a "safe" procedure. If this "fact" is found to be false, then national policy toward abortion must be re-evaluated. Indeed, if it is found that abortion may actually be dangerous to health of women, there is just cause for governments to regulate or prohibit abortion in order to protect their citizens.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It's official. This government is out of step with New Zealanders on abortion. Bill English has made his views clear.

As a devout Catholic, he opposes decriminalising abortion. But the people he hopes will vote for him later this year think differently.* The Abortion Law Reform Association of New Zealand (ALRANZ) recently commissioned a poll on attitudes to abortion to find out two things:

· do New Zealanders have an accurate sense of how common terminations of pregnancy are?

· under what circumstances do New Zealanders believe abortion should be legal?

First, most Kiwis don't realise how common abortion is. About one in four New Zealand women have an abortion at some point in their lifetime. Nearly two out of five people underestimated that, with only 14% getting it right. This result may be rooted in the stigma that still surrounds abortion. People who have had abortions may not feel safe talking about it. Some survey respondents may think they don't know anyone who has had an abortion when in fact they know several who just don't feel they can talk about it with the respondent.

Stigma is not self-created. It comes from our culture, where it is socially acceptable for elderly men to confront women trying to access abortion with gory signs and disapproving stares. Where it is legally and socially acceptable for a doctor to refuse to prescribe contraception, or refer a patient for a termination. Where abortion is still a crime listed in the Crimes Act.

Second, New Zealanders support greater availability of abortion than the current law allows. The survey presented people with a range of circumstances in which someone might terminate a pregnancy, from medical grounds ("Pregnant woman is likely to die without an abortion") to choice ("Pregnant woman doesn't want to be a mother"). In every case, a majority said abortion should be legal.

These numbers demonstrate New Zealanders overwhelmingly support abortion on request. It's not even close.

So why can't we change the system? Since we know we want abortion on request, why can't we have a system that is cost effective instead of wasting money on certifying consultants? Why can't we have a system that doesn't force patients to waste time running around getting approvals, necessitating more complicated and expensive procedures? Why can't we have a system that puts the patients' welfare first, instead of prioritising a box-ticking exercise to satisfy a 40-year old abortion bureaucracy?

Don't ask the Ministry of Health. The abortion bureaucracy comes under the Ministry of Justice. Because abortion is still a crime. The current system serves everyone poorly. It's not good enough. We need to decriminalise abortion, and reform our antiquated abortion laws, whether Bill English wants to admit it or not.

Editor's Note : These articles published previously on Werewolf/Scoop are suggested for further reading :
http://werewolf.co.nz/2012/09/abortion-in-the-dock/
http://werewolf.co.nz/2012/05/return-of-the-diy-abortion/

* Editor's further note : Since being elected PM, Bill English has said he will not use the office to influence public opinion on divisive issues such as abortion, euthanasia and same sex marriage.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It's official. This government is out of step with New Zealanders on abortion. Bill English has made his views clear. As a devout Catholic, he opposes decriminalising abortion.

# data[].attributes.body
http://alranz.org/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The physical side effects after an abortion can vary from woman to woman and there are potential side effects and risks that you should be aware of.

It is important to talk to a health professional as well as the doctor who will perform your abortion about possible side effects.

Your period should return about 4-6 weeks after the abortion, and you can get pregnant again soon after the abortion.

If your doctor has prescribed antibiotics, it is important to take them as directed in order to help prevent infection.

For information about abortion, you may call the APA toll-free helpline at 1-800-672-2296, or search locally by zip code below.

Anticipated physical side effects following an abortion

The following is a list of side effects that are frequently experienced after an abortion. It is possible to experience these side effects for as long as 2 to 4 weeks following the procedure.

Potential and more serious complications following an abortion

Although serious complications occur in fewer than 1 out of 100 first trimester abortions and approximately 1 out of every 50 late term abortions, it is important to be aware of the following risks:

Heavy or persistent bleeding

Infection or sepsis

Damage to the cervix

Scarring of the uterine lining

Perforation of the uterus

Damage to other organs

Death

It is important to understand that these risks are rare and that some of these risks are associated with child birth. What matters is that you are aware that these risks exist as you strive to make an informed decision about your pregnancy.

Severe abortion physical side effects
If you have had an abortion, call your doctor and seek medical attention if your side effects become severe or if you experience any of the following:

Severe abdominal and back pain that prohibits you from standing up

Bleeding that is heavier than a normal menstrual period

Foul-smelling discharge

Fever above 100.4 F

Continuing symptoms of pregnancy

Compiled using information from the following sources:

1. MedlinePlus [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); [updated 2006 Feb 24]. Abortion; [updated 2006 Feb 21; reviewed 2006 Feb 21; cited 2006 Feb 24].
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/abortion.html
2.Current Obstetric & Gynecologic Diagnosis & Treatment-Ninth Ed. DeCherney, Alan H., et al, Ch. 33.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Possible Physical Side Effects After Abortion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The physical side effects after an abortion can vary from woman to woman and there are potential side effects and risks that you should be aware of. It is important to talk to a health professional as well as the doctor who will perform your abortion about possible side effects.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
IMFC 12 May 2014
Executive Summary
This paper examines research that is typically ignored about abortion's effect on the family. The impact of abortion on marriage, sexuality, mental health and finally, family life in greater society are all considered. The paper reflects on the research through the story of Lee, one pro-choice woman for whom abortion had an unexpected effect as told in the book Giving Sorrow Words.

The effects of abortion on the family and society are secondary effects. Yet there are indeed consequences that remain substantially underpublicized-to our great detriment. These include an increased likelihood of divorce or separation, marrying late or not at all, increased acceptance of rape and increased risks of poor mental health, among others. A meta-analysis published in the prestigious British Journal of Psychiatry showed an overall 81% greater risk of mental health problems for women who had an abortion compared with those who did not.

It is not helpful to overstate negative ramifications of abortion. However, by far the bigger concern Canadians face today is the problem of pretending there are none.

This paper aims to challenge the notion that abortion is an individual event, as presented in political mantras like "my body, my choice." Abortion is hard on the woman, yes. However, an abortion is the result of relationship, regardless of how poor or short-lived. Therefore, examining the effects of abortion on family, relationships and our communities is important.
Download PDF:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How abortion impacts mothers, families and our society - Study

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
IMFC 12 May 2014 Executive Summary This paper examines research that is typically ignored about abortion's effect on the family. The impact of abortion on marriage, sexuality, mental health and finally, family life in greater society are all considered.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The emotional side effects many women experience after an abortion

Abortion can emotionally affect each woman differently. Some women report a sense of relief after having an abortion. The reasons for relief also vary from woman to woman.

Emotional and psychological effects following abortion are more common than physical side effects and can range from mild regret to more serious complications such as depression. It is important to discuss these risks with a trained professional who can address your questions and concerns. The emotional side effects of having an abortion are just as real as physical side effects.

For information about abortion you may call the APA toll-free helpline at 1-800-672-2296, or search locally by zip code below.

One important factor related to the vulnerability of negative emotional or psychological effects has to do with your belief about the baby inside of you. Those who believe it is not a baby until it is born have less of a chance of experiencing negative emotional consequences. However, those who believe it is a baby are more likely to experience negative emotional side effects.

What are the types of potential emotional and psychological sides effects following an abortion?

The following is a list of potential emotional and psychological risks of having an abortion. The intensity or duration of these effects will vary from one person to another.
Potential side effects include:

Regret

Anger

Guilt

Shame

Sense of loneliness or isolation

Loss of self confidence

Insomnia or nightmares

Relationship issues

Suicidal thoughts and feelings

Eating disorders

Depression

Anxiety

Who's more prone to experience emotional side effects?

It is possible for anyone to experience an unexpected emotional or psychological side effect following an abortion. Women commonly report that the abortion procedure affected them more than they expected. However, some individuals are more susceptible to experiencing some type of emotional or psychological struggle.
Women with a higher probability of having a negative emotional or psychological side effect include:

Individuals with previous emotional or psychological concerns

Individuals who have been coerced, forced or persuaded to get an abortion

Individuals with religious beliefs that conflict with abortion

Individuals with moral or ethical views that conflict with abortion

Individuals who obtain an abortion in the later stages of pregnancy

Individuals without support from significant others or their partner

Women obtaining an abortion for genetic or fetal abnormalities

Recommendations for someone considering an abortion

Get Help - Probably the most important thing you can do when facing an unplanned pregnancy is to communicate with trained professionals who can answer your questions and discuss your individual circumstances with you.

Avoid Isolation - If you are experiencing an unplanned pregnancy, you might have the tendency to withdraw from others to keep the matter a secret and/or to face the issue alone. Although it can be difficult, try to stay connected with family and friends who can support you. Too much isolation under these circumstances can lead to depression.

Evaluate Your Circumstances - See the situations listed previously regarding individuals who are more likely to experience one or more side effects. Discuss your situation with someone who can help you give you perspective and understanding.

Avoid Pressure - Avoid people who are pressuring you you to do what they think is best. Whether you opt to parent, choose adoption, or have an abortion, you are the one who is going to have to live with your choice.

Talk to Others - See if you can find someone who has gone through an unplanned pregnancy or had an abortion to find out what it was like for them.

Compiled using information from the following sources:

1. Adler, Nancy, et al. (2003). "Abortion Among Adolescents." American Psychologist, 59(3), 211-7. Adler, Nancy. (1989) University of California at San Francisco, Statement on Behalf of the American Psychological Association Before the Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee of the Committee on Governmental Operations, U.S. House of Representatives: 130-140.

2. Adler, Nancy., et al (1990). "Psychological Responses after Abortion." Science, 248(4951), 41-4.

3. Dagg, Paul. (1991) "The Psychological Sequelae of Therapeutic Abortion - Denied and Completed." American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(5), 578-85.

4. Gilchrist, A., et al. (1995). "Termination of Pregnancy and Psychiatric Morbidity." British Journal of Psychiatry, 167(2), 243-8.

5. Kishida, Yakuko. (2001). "Anxiety in Japanese Women After Elective Abortion." Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 30, 490-5.

6. Major, Brenda, et al. (1992). "Male Partners' Appraisals of Undesired Pregnancy and Abortion." Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(9), 777-84.

7. Russo, Nancy & Denious, Jean. (2001) "Violence in the Lives of Women Having Abortions: Implications for Practice and Public Policy." Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(2), 142-50.

8. Zabin, Laurie, et al. (1989). "When Urban Adolescents Chose Abortion: Effects on Education, Psychological Status, and Subsequent Pregnancy" Family Planning Perspectives, 21(6), 248-55.

9. Zolese, G. & Blacker, C. (1992). "The Psychological Complications of Therapeutic Abortion." British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 742-9.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Emotional Side Effects After an Abortion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Abortion can emotionally affect each woman differently. Some women report a sense of relief after having an abortion. The reasons for relief also vary from woman to woman. Emotional and psychological effects following abortion are more common than physical side effects and can range from mild regret to more serious complications such as depression.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We have all heard the saying: " Abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor." This line of thinking is used in an attempt to keep other people from influencing a mother's choice regarding the life or death decision she will make for her unborn child. For some women, the uncertainty that an unplanned pregnancy brings is a heavy burden. Abortion, for many, feels like the only choice that seems feasible.

An only choice, however, is not a real option; instead it feels like a last resort.

Women are not the only ones who feel the pain and suffering brought about by this last resort. Studies show that abortion leaves families heartbroken. Fathers, grandparents, aunts, uncles and siblings also feel the residual undesirable impact of abortion.

To think that an abortion only impacts a mother and her child preparing to be born removes the genuine pain family members experience when abortion touches their lives. For some family members, the pain comes more acutely because they promoted the abortion or chose not to speak up for the child. For other family members, the pain comes after hearing for the first time that a loved one had an abortion. Feelings of not being there to help can be difficult to overcome.

Studies have shown that following an abortion women have reported having relationship problems (1,2), vulnerability to abuse alcohol and use illegal drugs (3), and women who have abortions have a higher death rate from suicide, homicide and accidents higher than women who gave birth (4). While the statistics point to a documented concern, a better understanding may come from the testimony of those who have been brave enough to express how abortion has left their families heartbroken.

Robert Burke explains how abortion impacted him and his response to others. Robert said,

"I lost a child to abortion. I was one of those men who did not see the need to defend the innocent life I helped to create. Needless to say I have made many mistakes in my life. I have hurt others emotionally, psychologically, and spiritually, both intentionally and unintentionally. I supported the physical destruction of a human life. I never found true and lasting peace and acceptance no matter how hard I looked for them. I was restless and deeply unaccepting of myself."

Karen Cross shares how abortion impacted her relationship with her mother and extended family. Karen shared,

" Initially I was bitter toward my mother who took me to the first abortion. I wanted-or should I say needed-to blame her. For years I didn't realize her pain. Sometimes she cried for me and the pain I endured, and sometimes for the grandchildren she'll never hold. Later I accepted responsibility for what happened and we forgave each other. Even after all these years, it's still not over. As I held my new grandson, I realized I didn't abort two children, I aborted generations of children."

Georgette Forney remembers a difficult discussion with her young daughter. Georgette said,

" Trying to explain to an 8-year-old what abortion is and why I had one was extremely difficult. After some discussion, I said it was bedtime, and she said, 'Okay, but let me make sure I understand. You were pregnant when you were 16, and you killed your baby?' I had to look her in the eye and answer, 'Yes.' The look of fear and disappointment in her eyes is something I will never forget."

In the book Changed: Making Sense of Your Own or a Loved One's Abortion Experience by Michaelene Fredenburg, the raw emotion of those who contributed is evident. Their honesty shows that abortion leaves families heartbroken.

" I've spent a lot of time thinking about what it would have been like to have two siblings. I'm angry with my mother that she would abort them--that she would take them away from me. I feel like my life as an only child is a lie." - Amber, Changed, 46

" Ann has never stopped grieving the loss of our grandchild. Every year on the anniversary of the baby's due date, Ann mourns and struggles with depression. Yet she won't talk about it with [our daughter] because she doesn't want to cause our daughter additional pain." - William, Changed, 56

" I could have saved my grandchild. I could have saved my son from this grief and pain. Ryan told me how he'd tried to help Vicki when her parents were pressuring her to have an abortion. He said he was thinking about asking me again if Vicki could live with us, when her parents suddenly-and secretly-took her to the clinic." - Mary, Changed, 61

Works Cited:

1- Lauzon, Pierre, et al. "Emotional Distress Among Couples Involved in First Trimester Induced Abortions." Canadian Family Physician 46 (2000): 2033-2040.

2- Rue, V.M., et al. "Induced Abortion and Traumatic Stress: A Preliminary Comparison of American and Russian Women." Medical Science Monitor 10 (2004): SR5-16.

3- Reardon, David C., et al. "Substance Use Associated With Unintended Pregnancy Outcomes in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth." American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 26 (2004): 369-383.

4- Gissler, Mika, et al. "Injury Deaths, Suicides and Homicides Associated With Pregnancy, Finland 1987-2000." European Journal of Public Health 15.5 (2005): 459-463.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We have all heard the saying: " Abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor." This line of thinking is used in an attempt to keep other people from influencing a mother's choice regarding the life or death decision she will make for her unborn child.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Leading creative pro-life activism throughout the nation. Founded in 1980 with the aim of saving unborn children through non-violent direct action.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Year Science Took Over the Pro-Life Movement

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Even the technology touted at 2018's March for Life can divide the cause when it comes to abortion policy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Get Involved! Send a message
Abortion

All human beings possess an equal and inherent worth simply by virtue of their humanity, and not on condition of their possessing other qualifications such as size or mental capacity. The Eighth Amendment saves lives. Without the right to life, all other rights are meaningless.

Euthanasia

Many of us face challenges at the end of our lives. To create an ethos of equal respect, we must encourage in our lives, and that of our family, community and in government a society that supports and cares for the weakest and most vulnerable among us.

Gendercide

100 million baby girls are missing. The mission of the Stop Gendercide Now Campaign is to highlight the fact that so many baby girls have disappeared through abortion, infanticide, or neglect and to work for political change to remedy this.

Grass Roots

The passing of abortion legislation in 2013 was a terrible disappointment. The Grassroots Campaign is about taking the first step towards repealing this unjust law, enabling and motivating pro-life people all over Ireland to grow and mobilise the pro-life movement.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pro Life Campaign Ireland - The Eighth Amendment has saved 100,000 lives

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get Involved! Send a message All human beings possess an equal and inherent worth simply by virtue of their humanity, and not on condition of their possessing other qualifications such as size or mental capacity. The Eighth Amendment saves lives. Without the right to life, all other rights are meaningless.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" refer to the dominant ideologies concerning abortion rights. Those who are pro-life, a term that some argue is biased because it suggests that the opposition does not value human life, believe that abortion should be banned. Those who are pro-choice support keeping abortion legal and accessible.

In reality, the controversies related to reproductive rights are much more complex. Some people back abortions in certain circumstances and not in others or believe such procedures should be " safe, rare, and legal." Complicating matters is that there's no consensus on when exactly life begins. The shades of gray in the abortion debate are why the reproductive rights discussion is far from simple.

The Pro-Life Perspective

Someone who is "pro-life" believes that the government has an obligation to preserve all human life, regardless of intent, viability, or quality-of-life concerns. A comprehensive pro-life ethic, such as that proposed by the Roman Catholic Church, prohibits:

In cases where the pro-life ethic conflicts with personal autonomy, as in abortion and assisted suicide, it's considered conservative. In cases where the pro-life ethic conflicts with government policy, as in the death penalty and war, it's said to be liberal.

Pro-Choice Perspective

People who are " pro-choice" believe that individuals have unlimited autonomy with respect to their own reproductive systems, as long as they don't breach the autonomy of others. A comprehensive pro-choice position asserts that the following must remain legal:

Celibacy and abstinence

Contraception use

Emergency contraception use

Abortion

Childbirth

Under the Partial Birth Abortion Ban passed by Congress and signed into law in 2003, abortion became illegal under most circumstances in the second trimester of pregnancy, even if the mother's health is in danger. Individual states have their own laws, some banning abortion after 20 weeks and most restricting late-term abortions.

The pro-choice position is perceived as "pro-abortion" to some in the U.S., but this is inaccurate. The purpose of the pro-choice movement is to ensure that all choices remain legal.

Point of Conflict

The pro-life and pro-choice movements primarily come into conflict on the issue of abortion. The pro-life movement argues that even a nonviable, undeveloped human life is sacred and must be protected by the government. Abortion should be prohibited, according to this model, and not practiced on an illegal basis either.

The pro-choice movement argues that the government should not prevent an individual from terminating a pregnancy before the point of viability (when the fetus can't live outside the womb). The pro-life and pro-choice movements overlap to an extent in that they share the goal of reducing the number of abortions. However, they differ with respect to degree and methodology.

Religion and the Sanctity of Life

Politicians on both sides of the abortion debate only sometimes reference the religious nature of the conflict. If one believes that an immortal soul is created at the moment of conception and that "personhood" is determined by the presence of that soul, then there is effectively no difference between terminating a week-old pregnancy or killing a living, breathing person. Some members of the anti-abortion movement have acknowledged (while maintaining that all life is sacred) that a difference exists between a fetus and a fully-formed human being.

Religious Pluralism and the Obligation of Government

The U.S. government can't acknowledge the existence of an immortal soul that begins at conception without taking on a specific, theological definition of human life. Some theological traditions teach that the soul is implanted at quickening (when the fetus begins to move) rather than at conception. Other theological traditions teach that the soul is born at birth, while some assert that the soul doesn't exist until well after birth. Still, other theological traditions teach that there is no immortal soul whatsoever.

Can Science Tell Us Anything?

Although there is no scientific basis for the existence of a soul, there is no such basis for the existence of subjectivity, either. This can make it difficult to ascertain concepts such as "sanctity." Science alone can't tell us whether a human life is worth more or less than a rock. We value each other for social and emotional reasons. Science doesn't tell us to do it.

To the extent that we have anything approaching a scientific definition of personhood, it would most likely rest in our understanding of the brain. Scientists believe that neocortical development makes emotion and cognition possible and that it doesn't begin until the late second or early third trimester of pregnancy.

Alternative Standards for Personhood

Some pro-life advocates argue that the presence of life alone, or of unique DNA, defines personhood. Many things that we don't consider to be living persons might meet this criterion. Our tonsils and appendices are certainly both human and alive, but we don't consider their removal as anything close to the killing of a person.

The unique DNA argument is more compelling. Sperm and egg cells contain genetic material that will later form the zygote. The question of whether certain forms of gene therapy also create new persons could be raised by this definition of personhood.

Not a Choice

The pro-life vs. pro-choice debate tends to overlook the fact that the vast majority of women who have abortions don't do so by choice, at least not entirely. Circumstances put them in a position where abortion is the least self-destructive option available. According to a study conducted by the Guttmacher Institute, 73 percent of women who had abortions in the United States in 2004 said that they couldn't afford to have children.

The Future of Abortion

The most effective forms of birth control -even if used correctly-were only 90 percent effective in the late 20th century. Today, contraceptive options have improved and even should they fail for some reason, individuals may take emergency contraception to prevent pregnancy.

Advancements in birth control may help to further reduce the risk of unplanned pregnancies. Someday abortion may grow increasingly rare in the United States. But for this to happen, individuals from all socioeconomic backgrounds and regions would need to have access to cost-effective and reliable forms of contraception.

DeSanctis, Alexandra. "How Democrats Purged 'Safe, Legal, Rare' From the Party", November, 15, 2019.

﻿Finer, Lawrence B. "Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives." Lori F. Frohwirth, Lindsay A. Dauphinee, Susheela Singh, Ann M. Moore, Volume 37, Issue 3, Guttmacher Institute, September 1, 2005.

Santorum, Sen. Rick. "S.3 - Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003." 108th Congress, H. Rept. 108-288 (Conference Report), Congress, February 14, 2003.

"State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy." State Laws and Policies, Guttmacher Institute, April 1, 2019.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A Look at What Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Supporters Believe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The pro-life vs. pro-choice debate is central to American social policy, religion, and culture. What does each side believe?