# data[].attributes.body
The controversy was clearly linked to the facts, there were very detailed Points supporting your points + you explored the controversy on Vietnam’s part as well so that was very good!!

# data[].attributes.body
One thing that needs further explaining

What is the significance of da nang, phu cat, bien hoa? what was their role in the vietnam war such that they were bombed?

# data[].attributes.body
One suggestion for improvement

-“whether xx should have been involved”->the way it is phrased, i think it’s a bit of a speculation...? Maybe can discuss more about what led to their involvement/whats so controversial about their involvement

# data[].attributes.body
One thing positive about the work

-I think the background of Vietnam war was very clear.

-i like the little controversy question at the bottom of the slide for ‘what were the effects on Laos and Cambodia?’

-i think the slide about the Geneva protocol and the Geneva convention article 4 slide gave more clarity about the controversy.

# data[].attributes.body
i think this was a very well-researched and informative presentation! the elaborations provided were clear and detailed so good job!

# data[].attributes.body
i think it would have been nice if there was more elaboration/exploration on the geneva protocol/convention bc i think that's quite a valid point!

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps don't put everything you want to say in the slides, just put the key points (very wordy and difficult to process haha) (the rest can be in speaker notes)

More use of sources! Lots of elaboration but lack of evidence

but still good job overall!!

# data[].attributes.body
I think the controversies were all very clearly brought out, and there were many sources available!

# data[].attributes.body
I think at the start of the presentation there were four main controveries mentioned, but then it was broken down into two, so I was quite confused I thought you were going to cover more, like there was one Cold War controversy i think

# data[].attributes.body
I think the slides were a little wordy and it was abit messy to read but overall the points were quite clear so that’s good!

# data[].attributes.body
I think this group considered a lot of different aspects of controversy and the analysis was very thorough with suitable sources to support their argument!

# data[].attributes.body
In the concluding slide, there was a point about who knows best, the people or the government? I thought this was very valid and interesting, but it was not thoroughly explored and instead the government and people’s perspective were only explained separately.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the clear points which linked to the inquiry question, and that some of the key phrases were drawn out!

# data[].attributes.body
I think there was a bit too much information on the slides to process all at one go, and this is slightly unrelated but the background was nice but a bit too complicated for a wordy slide

# data[].attributes.body
I think there were many meaningful points, but because of the messy structure, there were many unexplained or overlapping points of controversy and ultimately I wasn’t able to get a clear picture of what exactly was controversial about the war. Perhaps the main argument could be made clearer at the beginning and end!

# data[].attributes.body
overall it was a very good presentation! However, to improve it, you can make the slides less wordy and make them into clear and succint points, while your elaboration can be in your speaker notes. I also feel like you can have clearer “big points”!! I remember at the start you introduced 4, but as the presentation progressed i think there became 2 main ones? But overall  well done!!

# data[].attributes.body
i like that your interpretation of the question and organisation of points and arguments are clear

# data[].attributes.body
i think instead of talking about the controversy at the end you could have linked it back after every argument (but this is just my personal preference i’m not sure)

# data[].attributes.body
Did the war only become controversial when the objectives changed to protect self interest and prevent humiliation?
"their reason for escalating and continuing the war
soon became their ego" from slides

# data[].attributes.body
-Type of war : independence struggle or cold war conflict
-The true victor of the war.
Only cause and methods were covered. How were the above 2 controversial? not addressed in the slides?

# data[].attributes.body
Key controversies?
Who knows best?
-People vs government
-The sovereign nation or the global superpower
Elaborate? especially the second one as it odes not seem to be discussed at all in the presentation?

# data[].attributes.body
Geneva convention? Ethics of war?

# data[].attributes.body
the arguments were strong and linked to the inquiry question

# data[].attributes.body
your slides have a bit too much information

# data[].attributes.body
overall your presentation was clear and well-elaborated so there wasn't much that needs more explanation