# data[].attributes.body
Focus on what felt effective — especially regarding content, format, and city engagement.

Surface challenges with flow, tools, exercises, timing, or anything else that got in the way.

# data[].attributes.body
Share observations, patterns, or city-specific reflections that might inform future calls.

# data[].attributes.body
Workshops, Peer Sessions, Masterclasses, Mayoral Touchpoints?

# data[].attributes.body
Think of content, deadlines, facilitation, strategizing, etc

# data[].attributes.body
Time for coaches to review material is super helpful, and is an opportunity to adapt/pivot given where the city is

# data[].attributes.headline
Having pre-designed content for each session is a huge help

# data[].attributes.subject
Having pre-designed content for each session is a huge help

# data[].attributes.body
Some cities are advancing quicker than the coaching calls content - how do we adjust, or do we need to account for extra sessions?

# data[].attributes.body
I can see how Mayoral touchpoints are beneficial to BHCLI but not sure they're needed for this track

# data[].attributes.body
Engaging cities with potentials areas of AI intervention to support their use case has proved helpful

# data[].attributes.body
I think it'd be helpful to be more explicit about the motivation for prototyping - that we're trying to push for bigger and better ideas - and be up front that a high resident-impact scalable solution is not guaranteed

# data[].attributes.body
Peer-to-Peer sessions should have longer times to engage with their peers

# data[].attributes.body
Bloomberg programs are really high production value and have a high bar for participants' experience. It can be tough to deliver that if the tech partner hasn't worked with Bloomberg before and isn't ready to hit the ground running.

# data[].attributes.body
Intentional of what is the type of support that will be provided by IF with cities, referencing to past supports and how they operationalized them

# data[].attributes.headline
Identification of guardrails or sensitive topics

# data[].attributes.subject
Identification of guardrails or sensitive topics

# data[].attributes.body
I don't know the exact right timing for review and prep in advance of any given coaching session or workshop, but there has been a time or two when I've gotten confused at what is being covered when because some things we were able to review 3 weeks out and others have been much closer. Plus 3 weeks is a long time before the session and a lot can happen! Wish I had a solution here, or maybe I'm just easily confused.