# data[].attributes.body
刘恭榕

In modern society, more parents satisfy all their children’s requests or give them unlimited freedom to show love. Yet this overindulgent parenting harms children’s long-term development.

First, it robs children of learning key skills like self-control and responsibility. Never hearing “no”—whether for expensive toys or skipping homework to play games—kids lose the ability to manage desires. They may feel entitled, expecting priority for their needs, and grow impatient with basic rules. For example, employers note overindulged young staff often struggle with workplace rules like meeting deadlines, unaccustomed to restrictions.

Worse, this style brings severe long-term issues in adulthood. Lacking experience overcoming difficulties, they have poor resilience—easily discouraged by setbacks like job interview failures. They also face higher risks of financial trouble, as they never learned to budget and may overspend. Studies link permissive parenting to lower academic performance, since these kids lack motivation for long-term goals.

In conclusion, while fulfilling children’s wishes may temporarily boost parent-child bonds, overindulgence blocks their growth. Parents should balance love with guidance to raise responsible, resilient adults.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue of caring for children is an important thing of the society has become a subject of debate in recent years. In my opinion I fully agree about this idea, because this education can give a big help for children’s future.

First of all, many parents don’t know how to teach their children, which leads to them either spoiling their children neglecting them. To be more specific many parents are just 25 to 28 years old, they just adjust the society, don’t know how to taking care children. In this way, this class can make then more confident for future and more prepare for children. Therefore, education for parents is essential for them.

I fully agree that parenting courses should be mandatory. While love is natural, skills are not. Many young parents, still adjusting to adult life themselves, lack crucial knowledge in child development, health, and positive discipline. This can lead to unintended neglect or poor emotional support. Formal training would equip them with essential tools, boosting their confidence and ensuring children’s well-being. Ultimately, supporting parents through education invests in a healthier, more stable future generation, which benefits all of society.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

4.5

主要问题：

1. 开头和结尾段加 自己的观点

2. 字数不够，中间段加解释和例子。

People have different opinions about whether children should be allowed to make mistakes. Some people think that children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while others believe that adults should prevent them from making mistakes.

(What is your opinion? In my opinion, a balanced approach is the most effective.)

On one hand, children who make mistakes can learn important lessons from them.

(Add explanations: When children face the consequences of their actions, they often develop responsibility and independence.)

For example, a child who forgets to do homework will learn to be more responsible. Mistakes can also help children develop problem-solving skills, which are useful in their future life. (Add explanation or example: For instance, if a child spends all their pocket money too quickly, they may have to find creative ways to save or earn more in the future.These situations, though uncomfortable at the time, foster resilience and independence, qualities that are highly valuable in adulthood.)

On the other hand, some people believe that adults should stop children from making mistakes. They argue that some mistakes, such as those that are dangerous or harmful, can cause serious problems. (For example, .......) Adults who have more life experience can guide children and protect them from harm. (Explain how ....)

In conclusion, children should be allowed to make small mistakes, but adults should give them guidance when necessary. This way, children can learn from their own experiences while still being safe. （What is your opinion？ .....)

In conclusion, mistakes are essential for children’s personal growth, as they encourage responsibility and problem-solving. However, adults should intervene when mistakes could cause harm or long-term damage. In my view, children should be given the freedom to make minor errors, while parents and teachers should provide careful supervision to ensure their safety.

# data[].attributes.body
4.5-5

主要问题： 观点没有例子支持。

Nowadays, more and more people talk There is an ongoing debate about whether parents need to take mandatory childcare training. Some people think parenting is a natural thing that does not need formal learning, but others believe training can help parents do better. I agree that mandatory childcare training is a good idea because it helps parents learn useful skills, keeps children safe, and makes sure all children have a good start in life.

Firstly, mandatory training addresses parental knowledge gaps and reduces preventable harm to children . Many parents, especially first-timers, lack systematic childcare knowledge, leading to unintentional risks to children’s physical and mental health. (Add an example ： For example, some parents may feed infants solid food too early, which can cause choking or digestive problems. ) Mandatory training ensures that all parents have access to essential information such as age-appropriate nutrition, accident prevention, helping them raise children in safer and healthier ways.)

What's more, voluntary childcare resources ,such as private courses, parenting books and so on, these are often unaffordable for low-income  or less educated families, widening the gap in early childhood development outcomes.

(Add explanations: For instance, a middle-class parent might afford a series of professional parenting classes, while a single parent working multiple jobs may have neither the money nor the time to participate.)

Providing free mandatory training ensures that all parents, regardless of background, receive the same essential knowledge.

Mandatory childcare training is valuable for parents, protecting children, and promoting equity, provided it is implemented flexibly.

In conclusion, mandatory childcare training is helpful for parents and children. It gives parents necessary skills, keeps children safe, and makes child development fairer. Governments should support such training to help more families and build a better society for the future.

# data[].attributes.body
曹静如

6.5

The Dual Pillars of Progress: Investing in Both Adult and Youth Education

Education serves as the foundation upon which societies build their future. Within this realm, the education of youth and adults represents two complementary yet distinct priorities. While youth education prepares the next generation, adult education empowers the present one. Rather than viewing these as competing interests, we should recognize them as equally vital components of a comprehensive educational strategy.

Youth education undoubtedly deserves significant investment. Young minds are exceptionally receptive, making this the ideal time to cultivate knowledge, critical thinking, and innovation. By providing quality education to the young, we not only prevent future illiteracy but also develop the scientists, entrepreneurs, and leaders who will drive tomorrow's progress. This long-term investment ensures national competitiveness and sustainable development for decades to come.

Simultaneously, we cannot overlook the transformative power of adult education. Millions of adults worldwide lack basic literacy or job-ready skills, limiting their employment opportunities and perpetuating cycles of poverty. Adult education programs directly address these challenges by providing second-chance learning opportunities. When adults gain new skills, they become more employable, increase their earning potential, and can better support their children's education. This creates a positive ripple effect across families and communities. Furthermore, upskilling the current workforce enhances national productivity and economic resilience. （Add an example： Germany’s long-standing investment in vocational education is a good illustration: by equipping workers with updated technical skills, the country has maintained a highly skilled labor force that helps the economy recover quickly from downturns.）

The most effective approach integrates both youth and adult education into a continuous learning ecosystem. Governments should maintain strong support for formal education systems while developing flexible adult learning programs—including vocational training, night classes, and digital literacy courses. This dual investment recognizes that learning doesn't end with youth but continues throughout life.

In conclusion, education should not be an either-or proposition between young and old. Youth education plants the seeds for future harvests, while adult education nurtures the crops already growing. By investing in both, we create societies where everyone has the opportunity to learn, grow, and contribute—building stronger economies and more equitable communities for all.

# data[].attributes.body
杜弈捷

6.5

People often wonder if There is an ongoing debate about whether children should be protected from mistakes or given the chance to make them. Some believe mistakes can be dangerous, while others think they are an important part of learning. This essay argues that small mistakes can help children grow, but serious ones must be prevented.

One important reason why children should not always make mistakes is that it keeps them safe. Young children often do not understand danger, so one mistake could cause serious harm. For example, if a child runs into a busy street or plays with fire, the result could be very dangerous. Therefore, adults need to step in to stop mistakes that might cause accidents or injuries.

Another reason why mistakes are important is that they help children become more independent. When children are allowed to make small mistakes, they learn to solve problems and take responsibility. For instance, if a student forgets homework, they may lose points, but this teaches them to remember next time. Therefore, small mistakes are useful because they help children learn important life skills.

The best way is to find a balance between freedom and protection. Children should be allowed to make small mistakes so they can learn from them, but adults must prevent serious ones. For example, losing a game can teach children to deal with failure, but parents should stop teenagers from drunk driving. Therefore, a balanced approach lets children grow while staying safe.

In conclusion, children should be free to make small mistakes that help them learn. However, adults must protect them from dangerous mistakes. In this way, children can gain experience while still being safe.

Good development with explanations and examples ！

# data[].attributes.body
xuyingdong--0911.21.40

4.5-5

1. In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which do you think is appropriate in today’s world?

In contemporary world, the secondary education can be derived at two approach: general education which is included includes many different subjects, and the career-focused education which is training trains students the expertise and special specific skills for a given job. In my opinion, I think general education is more cater to most of country or area appropriate for most countries or areas.

Sometimes, career-focused education can be the best solution. The one of important reason is career-focused education can made a person became more cater to the standard of firms and get jobs faster than other. The main idea of Career-focused education is training specialists and operators for many industries such as manufacturing and services. Career-focused education can supply the largest number of labour into the labour market. Also, career-focused education can reduce the learning pressure on teenager. In most of country, teenager have large stress on academic study commonly, but career-focuesd education can avoid this problem, because students only need learn and practice one or few subjects that limit the spending of time and energy.

But in the most of time, the general education is better choice for common. The reason why the public choose the general education is this type of education model can maximize the potential of students and make sure every student fund their interest subjects or topics. Because every student have their own interest even they never knew it before. General education includes wide range of topics, so most of students can find their targets. Except this point, general education could make the abilities becoming flexible. As people know, the unemployment was becoming frequent and abrupt than older centries, so building wide expertise or skills are more important in future market.

However, even the career-focused education has many advantages, but I still believe general education is the better choice, because many countries improve this result by facts.

主要问题： 这篇文章应该重点讨论 general education的优点。 可以在让步段中 提到 career-focused education的优点， 但是应该明确指出 它的缺点或不足之处。 　　 参考以下范文：

In some countries, secondary schools emphasize general education across a broad range of subjects, while in others, students specialize early in areas connected to particular careers. In today’s fast-changing world, I believe that providing a general education is more appropriate, as it equips young people with flexibility, critical skills, and a wider perspective.

优点 1 One important reason for supporting general education is that it gives students the flexibility to adapt to a rapidly changing job market. Many of today’s careers did not exist a decade ago, and it is highly likely that future jobs will continue to evolve with advances in technology. For example, roles in artificial intelligence and digital marketing are relatively new, yet they require employees with a wide set of analytical, creative, and communication skills. A general education exposes students to mathematics, science, languages, and the arts, ensuring they have a broad toolkit to draw upon no matter which field they eventually enter.

优点2 Another advantage is that general education supports the development of critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. When students study a variety of disciplines, they learn to approach issues from different perspectives. For instance, a student who learns both history and science may develop the ability to evaluate evidence critically, whether that involves analyzing historical documents or interpreting experimental data. Such intellectual versatility is not only useful in academic settings but also in personal decision-making and civic participation.

让步段 强调缺点Admittedly, a career-focused curriculum has its strengths. Advocates argue that concentrating on specific subjects allows students to gain expertise earlier, which may give them a competitive edge when entering specialized professions. However, while this approach may benefit certain individuals, it risks limiting opportunities for students who later wish to change careers or discover new interests.

In conclusion, general education at the secondary level is the most appropriate approach in today’s world. It provides young people with flexibility in a changing job market, and strengthens their critical thinking skills. Although career-focused education has its advantages, the breadth and adaptability offered by general education make it a better long-term preparation for success.

# data[].attributes.body
4-4.5 分

主要问题

1. 开头段没写出个人观点。

2. 句子太短，需要加连词 合并句子。

3. 第三段支持youth education 的原因和例子不足）

There is an ongoing debate about whether should the governments increase Financial investment in illiterate adults.In my opinion, I agree it.（ 明确写出你的观点）

The main reason about why governments should increase cost budget in adults whose who can't read or white write is that it can help them reduce financial stress life strees. Nowadays, know how the ability to read or white is really important in workplace because many jobs require applicants to have basic writing skills such as sending and replying emails. Teaching adults to white words write can help them find a better-paid job so that they can make more money to feed support themselves and their families. For example, there is a adults make a low money in construction site. Then cause by the local government provides subsidies for illiteracy and offers free literacy classes. He find a job in supermarket. Made several times more money than before. So that,take more times and spend more money in illiterate is necessary. Pay attention to grammar ： For example, an adult who had been working at a construction site earned only a very low income due to his inability to read and write. Later, when the local government provided subsidies for illiteracy and offered free literacy classes, he attended and successfully improved his skills. As a result, he was able to find a job in a supermarket, where he earned several times more than before. This shows that investing time and resources in overcoming illiteracy can lead to significant long-term benefits for individuals.

Adult education is meaningful, but youth education is equally important. Teenagers are young, they learn things quickly. In school, they can exercise their problem-solving skills with teachers and classmates.This is beneficial for their growth. （add more reasons to support youth education： Adult education is meaningful, but youth education is equally important. If young people receive proper education early on, they are less likely to face difficulties such as unemployment or illiteracy later in life. For example, children who learn basic literacy and numeracy skills at school can adapt more easily to higher education and the demands of the modern workplace. Moreover, focusing on youth education reduces the need for costly remedial programs in adulthood. Therefore, ensuring equal access to quality education for the younger generation is not only beneficial for individuals but also more efficient for society as a whole.）

So, both adult education and youth education are important, and we cannot just focus on which is more important. We need to pay attention to and develop both, which is beneficial for the progress of the entire society.

# data[].attributes.body
5.5-6分

需要加一段 解释为什么觉得general education 比 career-focused education 更好。

# data[].attributes.body
The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries. However, educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important, and governments should spend more money on this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

6分

主要问题：

1. Why is the education of young people less important？

题目里面有比较关系， 文章里面也需要回答出来。

2. 注意逻辑词的使用

Caya

Adult education VS Children education

Introduction:

The government considering that whether to support adult education or not. （不正式改为 There is an ongoing debate about whether governments should prioritize adult education to promote literacy or youth education. ) I firmly agree with the idea that the government should focus on supporting adult education.

Body 1:

Providing Funding adult education would will significantly reduce the number of poverty in the local communities. Adults can gain more access to enhance their skills and working qualifications by taking professional training literacy courses. In today’s competitive job market , they can find much more job opportunities with higher pay and better working conditions, This which provides a sustainable source of income. Additionally, For example, factory workers can be retrained and be more familiar with the technical equipment. In this case, those workers could improve their productivity and reduce the risk of being unemployed.

Body 2:

In another angle, the adult education can empower parents them to support their children’s study. It has been a serious issue that a number of parents are confused with how to support their children’s education and the program of adult education can solve this issue in an effective way. The literate parents could learn a variety of subject knowledge of variety of subjects and then teach help their kids with their homework and tests. Also, the extracurricular cram school for children is expansive and the family could save money.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, supporting with adult education benefits

families and younger generations. The government should provide this support to the local residents.

# data[].attributes.body
4.5-5分

主要问题

1. 缺观点句

2. 缺结论段

Introduction

The question of whether parents should fulfill their children's every desire is a perennial dilemma in modern parenting. In an age of consumerism and with growing emphasis on children's happiness, many parents are tempted to provide their offspring with everything they ask for. This approach, while often well-intentioned, is a complex issue with significant implications. While granting every wish may offer short-term benefits, it ultimately poses considerable risks to a child's long-term emotional and character development.

开头段太长了， 需要简化一下。 写两句即可，第一句引出话题，第二句表达自己的观点。

这里没有自己的观点

The Advantages

On the surface, giving children everything they want appears to have certain advantages. Primarily, it is a powerful way to express love and create immediate joy. The happiness on a child’s face upon receiving a longed-for toy is undeniable, and for parents, this can feel like a direct measure of their success in making their child happy.

The Disadvantages

Despite these superficial benefits, the drawbacks of this indulgent parenting style are far more profound and lasting. The most critical disadvantage is the hindrance of essential character development. Children who never hear "no" fail to learn crucial life skills such as patience, perseverance, and the ability to delay gratification. They may grow into adults who expect instant satisfaction from the world, leading to frustration and disappointment when reality does not meet their expectations. Add another disadvantage

结论段呢？

参考范文： Essay (Expanded Version):

In recent years, some parents have adopted a permissive parenting style, granting their children everything they request and allowing them to act without boundaries. While this approach may stem from love or a desire to avoid conflict, it can have serious negative consequences for a child's development.

Allowing children unrestricted freedom can hinder their ability to develop discipline and a sense of responsibility. If children are never told 'no,' they may grow up expecting instant gratification and fail to appreciate the value of effort or patience. For example, a child who receives a new toy every time they ask may struggle to understand the concept of saving or working for rewards. This entitlement can carry into adulthood, making it difficult for them to function in environments where effort and compromise are necessary. Research also shows that children who lack boundaries often underperform academically because they have not learned how to manage time or persevere through challenges.

Moreover, children raised without limits often face difficulty respecting rules and authority. Schools, workplaces, and even friendships require individuals to follow norms and consider others’ perspectives. Children who are used to always getting their way may become self-centered, struggle with frustration, and find it hard to maintain healthy relationships. For instance, teachers frequently report that students from overly permissive households are more likely to argue with instructions or disregard deadlines, which damages their social integration and long-term prospects.

Admittedly, it is worth acknowledging that permissive parenting can sometimes nurture creativity and independence. When children are given freedom, they may explore their interests more openly and develop a strong sense of self-expression. However, without balance, such benefits are overshadowed by the risks of poor self-control and a lack of resilience. Therefore, parental love should be expressed through supportive guidance rather than the removal of all boundaries.

In conclusion, although fulfilling a child’s desires may bring short-term happiness, it is ultimately detrimental to their growth. Children need structure, limits, and the opportunity to face and overcome challenges in order to become responsible, resilient adults. A balanced parenting style—one that combines warmth with firm boundaries—is essential for raising well-adjusted individuals who can thrive in society.

# data[].attributes.body
Adult education vs. youth education

Introduction

· There is an ongoing debate about whether governments should prioritize youth education or invest more in adult education programs.

· This essay argues that while both are important, youth education should be given higher priority to ensure long-term societal development.

Body 1 – Benefits of prioritizing youth education

· Ensures a strong educational foundation, preventing future illiteracy and social issues.

· Maximizes learning potential during formative years, leading to better academic and career outcomes.

· Contributes to long-term national development by cultivating a skilled future workforce.

Body 2 – Limitations of focusing only on adult education

· While adult education can improve immediate literacy and employment, it often has limited impact due to older learners’ constraints (e.g., time, cognitive flexibility).

· Resources spent on adult education may yield slower returns compared to investing in youth.

· Risks perpetuating a cycle of dependency if younger generations are not adequately educated.

Body 3 – Why youth education should be prioritized

· Early education shapes critical thinking, creativity, and civic values.

· Reduces future costs related to poverty, crime, and welfare dependency.

· Enables adults to focus on supporting children’s education rather than remediating their own.

Conclusion

· Although adult education plays a vital role in empowering individuals and reducing inequality, youth education should be the primary focus for sustainable national progress.

# data[].attributes.body
children‘s freedom to make mistakes

Introduction

• Many parents and educators debate whether children should be allowed to make mistakes or be guided to avoid them.

• This essay argues that allowing children to make mistakes is more beneficial for their long-term development.

Body 1 – Benefits of allowing mistakes

• Helps develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills.

• Builds resilience and self-confidence through learning from errors.

• Example: A child who struggles with math problems and eventually solves them learns perseverance.

Body 2 – Problems of over-protection

• Can lead to fear of failure and low self-esteem.

• May hinder independence and decision-making abilities.

• Example: Children who have all decisions made for them often struggle with responsibility later in life.

Conclusion

While guidance is important, allowing children to make mistakes fosters independence, resilience, and adaptability essential for future success.

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction

Some people think that children are free to make mistakes, and some people think that parents should prevent children from making mistakes. I think I prefer that children are free to make mistakes.

The article will compare from two points and give corresponding explanations and views.

Body1–Benefits of allowing mistakes

Builds Resilience:
Children learn to cope with failure, develop grit, and keep trying after setbacks.

Fosters a Growth Mindset:
It teaches children that abilities and intelligence can be developed through dedication and hard work, rather than being fixed.

Promotes Independence:
Allowing children to make their own choices and learn from them encourages self-reliance and autonomy.

Develops Problem-Solving Skills:
Children who experience mistakes are more likely to think critically and find solutions to problems they encounter.

Increases Confidence:
Successfully navigating mistakes, even small ones, builds self-assurance and a sense of accomplishment.

Encourages Emotional Regulation:
They learn to manage their emotions, such as frustration or anger, when things don't go as planned.

Body2–When to prevent mistakes

Safety:
It is essential to step in and prevent mistakes that could lead to physical harm or danger for the child or others.

Well-being:
Some choices or situations may negatively impact a child's long-term physical or emotional well-being, requiring adult intervention.

A balanced approach

Create a Safe Space:
Allow mistakes in a controlled environment where the consequences are manageable and not harmful.

Guide Learning:
After a mistake, remain calm, avoid blame, and help the child analyze what happened and what they can do differently next time.

Teach, Don't Just Correct:
Frame mistakes as learning opportunities, using them to teach valuable lessons about consequences and decision-making.

Conclusion

It's normal to make mistakes. What we should do is to guide and encourage children correctly, while creating a good atmosphere for them.

# data[].attributes.body
Elaine

Freedom to make mistakes vs. prevention by adults

Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

Introduction

•There is debate over whether children should be protected from mistakes or allowed to experience them.

•This essay argues that small mistakes are valuable for learning, while serious mistakes must be prevented.

Body 1 – Preventing mistakes

•Protect children from serious harm.

•Save time and resources by avoiding major setbacks.

•Reduce emotional distress caused by severe consequences.

•Example: Parents stopping children from playing with fire to avoid danger.

Body 2 – Allowing mistakes

•Encourage independent thinking and decision-making.

•Build resilience and problem-solving skills.

•Teach responsibility through natural consequences.

•Example: Forgetting homework teaches responsibilitywithout long-term damage.

Body 3 – Balanced view

•Minor mistakes should be allowed as learning opportunities.

•Major mistakes with long-term harm must be prevented.

•Example: A child losing a game builds resilience, but adults must stop teenagers from drunk driving.

Conclusion

•Children should have the freedom to make small mistakes for growth.

•However, adults need to step in to prevent serious risks and long-term harm.

# data[].attributes.body
Stella

Introduction

- Some parents spoil their children and always satisfy their children’s every requirements,never teaching their children.

-Is this parenting model good for children?What will be the consequences when children grow up?

Body1 Why is it bad for children?

-Children’s vanity will grow.

-Children will not allow the rules.

-Children’s self-control will worse.

Body2 What will be the consequences when the children grow up?

-They will not be responsible for themselves.

-Because of their childhood, it is difficult for them to get along with others and be tolerated by others.

-It is difficult for them to face difficulties alone.

Conclusion

-Excessive spoiling of children is harmful, which affects children's psychology and ability to deal with things.

- Parents should meet their children's reasonable requirements to a limited extent and teach them in the right way.

# data[].attributes.body
Emily

Caring for children is an important thing of the society. It is suggested that all mothers and fathers should be required to take childcare training courses. Do you agree or disagree?

Outline (Disagree)

Introduction

Childcare is important for society.

However, requiring all parents to take childcare courses is not appropriate.

Body Paragraph 1

Such courses restrict parents’ personal freedom to decide how to raise their children.

They also create financial and time burdens, especially for busy or low-income families.

Body Paragraph 2

The policy assumes all parents need formal training, but many already have skills through experience or cultural traditions.

Real-life parenting and family support often teach more than standardized courses.

Conclusion

Mandatory training is unnecessary and impractical.

Governments should offer optional programs instead of forcing all parents.